debian-u...@howorth.org.uk writes:
> gene heskett wrote:
>> On 12/4/23 05:22, Anssi Saari wrote:
>> > debian-u...@howorth.org.uk writes:
>> >
>> >>> I concur, and would add that even on an isolated network one
>> >>> should prefer ssh. First, to be in the right habit. Second
>> >>> because it
to...@tuxteam.de (12023-12-05):
> It does have a line mode with local echo (meaning you can type without
> anything
> being sent until you hit ENTER, with limited line editing capabilities
> (backspace
> and things). No readline's full power, though: that was more like a
> Christmas's
> wish
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 08:29:04PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de (12023-12-04):
> > Back then (TM) (must have been 1990ies or so) I knew. And I sometimes still
> > miss the "easy interactivity". I haven't investigated whether there is an
> > equivalent socat mode (say line-mode
to...@tuxteam.de (12023-12-04):
> Back then (TM) (must have been 1990ies or so) I knew. And I sometimes still
> miss the "easy interactivity". I haven't investigated whether there is an
> equivalent socat mode (say line-mode with readline editing or something). That
> would be a market niche,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 08:04:40PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de (12023-12-04):
> > Which, in the case of interaction with HTTP (and most others) actually
> > comes in handy. Those explicit \r\n get old pretty fast...
>
> Just hope you will not need to emit a LATIN SMALL LETTER
to...@tuxteam.de (12023-12-04):
> Which, in the case of interaction with HTTP (and most others) actually
> comes in handy. Those explicit \r\n get old pretty fast...
Just hope you will not need to emit a LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH
DIAERESIS in ISO-8859-1.
Anyway, the treatment done by telnet is
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:32:20PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Curt (12023-12-04):
> > Telnet doesn't alter the actual data being transmitted
>
> Yes it does, read the doc before posting wrong information here.
Which, in the case of interaction with HTTP (and most others) actually
comes in
Curt (12023-12-04):
> I think you're buggering yet another fly here.
I think you should read the docs and shut up. I know what I am saying.
--
Nicolas George
On 2023-12-04, Nicolas George wrote:
> Curt (12023-12-04):
>> Telnet doesn't alter the actual data being transmitted
>
> Yes it does, read the doc before posting wrong information here.
>
I think you're buggering yet another fly here.
Curt (12023-12-04):
> Telnet doesn't alter the actual data being transmitted
Yes it does, read the doc before posting wrong information here.
--
Nicolas George
Marco Moock (12023-12-04):
> Is that really the case?
Yes.
> Other applications like telnet or vi don't care about it, so I
> assume(d), it is up to the application to handle it.
Applications can decide to change the mode of the tty or catch SIGINT.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
Am 04.12.2023 um 09:28:30 Uhr schrieb Nicolas George:
> Marco Moock (12023-12-04):
> > ncat also uses ^C to kill the process.
>
> No, this effect of ^C is part of the operating system.
Is that really the case?
Other applications like telnet or vi don't care about it, so I
assume(d), it is up
On 2023-12-04, Marco Moock wrote:
> Am 04.12.2023 um 09:23:16 Uhr schrieb Nicolas George:
>
>> If you want to test a network protocol, you should use a really
>> transparent client. Traditionally people use netcat (nc), but it
>> handles EOF approximatively.
>
> ncat also uses ^C to kill the
gene heskett wrote:
> On 12/4/23 05:22, Anssi Saari wrote:
> > debian-u...@howorth.org.uk writes:
> >
> >>> I concur, and would add that even on an isolated network one
> >>> should prefer ssh. First, to be in the right habit. Second
> >>> because it will do things that telnet won't, like
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, 2:23 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Charles Curley (12023-12-03):
> > True. None the less, there is at least one perfectly good use for
> > telnet: testing connections to servers.
>
> Wrong. The telnet client is not entirely transparent, as the telnet
> protocol defines an
On 04/12/2023 11:30, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/4/23 05:22, Anssi Saari wrote:
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk writes:
I concur, and would add that even on an isolated network one should
prefer ssh. First, to be in the right habit. Second because it will do
things that telnet won't, like tunnel X.
On 12/4/23 05:22, Anssi Saari wrote:
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk writes:
I concur, and would add that even on an isolated network one should
prefer ssh. First, to be in the right habit. Second because it will do
things that telnet won't, like tunnel X.
Ah but will it tunnel wayland??
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 11:52:51AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
True. None the less, there is at least one perfectly good use for
telnet: testing connections to servers.
charles@hawk:~$ telnet hawk
Trying 127.0.1.1...
telnet: Unable to connect to
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk writes:
>> I concur, and would add that even on an isolated network one should
>> prefer ssh. First, to be in the right habit. Second because it will do
>> things that telnet won't, like tunnel X.
>
> Ah but will it tunnel wayland?? Enquiring minds want to know :)
Yes.
Marco Moock (12023-12-04):
> ncat also uses ^C to kill the process.
No, this effect of ^C is part of the operating system.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
Am 04.12.2023 um 09:23:16 Uhr schrieb Nicolas George:
> If you want to test a network protocol, you should use a really
> transparent client. Traditionally people use netcat (nc), but it
> handles EOF approximatively.
ncat also uses ^C to kill the process.
Charles Curley (12023-12-03):
> True. None the less, there is at least one perfectly good use for
> telnet: testing connections to servers.
Wrong. The telnet client is not entirely transparent, as the telnet
protocol defines an escape octet to introduce commands.
If you want to test a network
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 14:01:38 -0500
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > The question is whether anyone should be running a telnetd *server*.
> > On an isolated network, it might be acceptable. But it's really a
> > bad habit that should be stomped out aggressively, as machines
>
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 14:01:38 -0500
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> The question is whether anyone should be running a telnetd *server*.
> On an isolated network, it might be acceptable. But it's really a bad
> habit that should be stomped out aggressively, as machines which are
> currently on an isolated
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 11:52:51AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:00:44 +0100
> Marco Moock wrote:
>
> > >
> > > How do you find 1994? It seems to be a mail from yesterday:
> >
> > For me it sounded like a joke.
> >
> > Telnet is unencrypted (although it is possible to
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:00:44 +0100
Marco Moock wrote:
> >
> > How do you find 1994? It seems to be a mail from yesterday:
>
> For me it sounded like a joke.
>
> Telnet is unencrypted (although it is possible to run it over TLS to
> encrypt it) and SSH exists more than 20 years.
True. None
Am 03.12.2023 um 12:06:40 Uhr schrieb Michel Verdier:
> On 2023-12-02, Andy Smith wrote:
>
> > Can someone examine the list's configuration? This email from 1994
> > seems to have only just been delivered.
>
> How do you find 1994? It seems to be a mail from yesterday:
For me it sounded like
On 2023-12-02, Andy Smith wrote:
> Can someone examine the list's configuration? This email from 1994
> seems to have only just been delivered.
How do you find 1994? It seems to be a mail from yesterday:
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 09:50:00AM -0600, William Torrez Corea wrote:
> My telnet not operate, try connect my laptop by means of telnet:
Can someone examine the list's configuration? This email from 1994
seems to have only just been delivered.
Thanks,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ --
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Marco Moock wrote:
> Am 02.12.2023 um 09:50:00 Uhr schrieb William Torrez Corea:
>
> > sudo telnet 192.168.1.1
Also, just for the record, there is *no* need to use sudo here.
Am 02.12.2023 um 09:50:00 Uhr schrieb William Torrez Corea:
> sudo telnet 192.168.1.1
> > Trying 192.168.1.1...
> > Connected to 192.168.1.1.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
That means that the telnet connection was successful
> > Telnet connection from 192.168.1.5:55670 refused.
That means that
Todos nos ja utilizamos o ssh porem o telnet era muito utilizado principalmente
para acesso a roteadores, ainda existem muitos telnet por ai, e coisas
incríveis como assistir o filme Star Wars pelo telnet, eu pensei se algo como
Stunnel tornaria o telnet tão seguro quanto o ssh?
Em 28/05/2019
Ola,
Se somente necessita acessar a shell de um outro Linux (ou outro OS,
incluindo o windows) de forma segura, basta utilizar o ssh.
O servidor e o cliente ssh costumam já estar instalados no sistemas.
No debian basta instalar os pacotes openssh-client e openssh-server.
Para acessar, a partir de
Fiquei curioso... cada vez mais vejo perguntas criativas... qual o contexto?
Observo o uso de telnet para troubleshooting... e alguns dispositivos
antigos que só tem ele como opção de acesso... mas vc chegou dar uma
olhada no man? Fala à respeito disso... provavelmente terá que
compilar com
Le 25/05/2017 à 17:03, bernard.schoenac...@free.fr a écrit :
> bonjour,
>
> je fait quelques essais avec telnet pour envoyer un courriel contenant des
> accents et le résultat escompté est déplorable comme si tout était en 7bits
>
> comment faire pour corriger le tir ?
>
>
> slt
> bernard
Ton
Le Thu, 25 May 2017 17:03:06 +0200 (CEST),
bernard.schoenac...@free.fr a écrit :
> bonjour,
>
> je fait quelques essais avec telnet pour envoyer un courriel
> contenant des accents et le résultat escompté est déplorable comme si
> tout était en 7bits
>
> comment faire pour corriger le tir ?
si
El Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:38:17 -0400, cosme escribió:
> Como seria la forma correcta de denegar el telnet en Debian 7
Pues dependerá del sistema de filtrado/cortafuegos que uses.
> Por ejemplo que cuando vaya hacer un telnet x.x.x.x 25 desde cual pc lo
> deniegue
A ver, si tienes un servicio
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:38:17PM -0400, co...@crearq.co.cu wrote:
> Como seria la forma correcta de denegar el telnet en Debian 7
En Debian la forma correcta de denegar el telnet es *no* instalando
telnetd.
> Por ejemplo que cuando vaya hacer un telnet x.x.x.x 25 desde cual pc lo
> deniegue
El mié, 02-09-2015 a las 13:38 -0400, co...@crearq.co.cu escribió:
> Hola
>
> Como seria la forma correcta de denegar el telnet en Debian 7
>
> Por ejemplo que cuando vaya hacer un telnet x.x.x.x 25 desde cual pc
> lo
> deniegue
>
> Salu2
>
>
iptables -t filter -A -s ip-denegada -p tcp
El 02/09/2015 a las 2:58, Santiago Vila escribió:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:38:17PM -0400, co...@crearq.co.cu wrote:
Como seria la forma correcta de denegar el telnet en Debian 7
En Debian la forma correcta de denegar el telnet es *no* instalando
telnetd.
Por ejemplo que cuando vaya hacer
El Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:41:37 -0200, adriancito escribió:
Camaleón va entre tus líneas:
(...)
La cuestión es que cuando llego a dispositivo2 no me aparece el
cursor.
Demasiado misterio para poder sugerirte algo. A ver, ¿de qué
dispositivos estamos hablando exactamente?
El
El Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:34:38 -0200, adriancito escribió:
Buenos días.
Les consulto por si a alguien le pasó:
Vale, pero márcalo como OT y así te curas en salud ;-)
Tengo un equipo con Debian Lenny desde el cual me conecto por telnet (ya
se que no es seguro, pero es el único protocolo que
Camaleón va entre tus líneas:
Camaleón wrote:
El Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:34:38 -0200, adriancito escribió:
Tengo un equipo con Debian Lenny desde el cual me conecto por telnet (ya
se que no es seguro, pero es el único protocolo que soporta el
dispositivo destino), a un dispositivo destino
Try:
# aptitude why-not telnet
On 09/29/2012 06:46 PM, lina wrote:
Hi,
I have the harden-clients installed.
when I tried to install the telnet,
it showed me conflict.
# aptitude why telnet
Unable to find a reason to install telnet.
I am just curious how telnet work. Is it not so
I think that is because everything in telnet is sent in plaintext...
password included. It is also vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks.
See : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telnet#Security
2012/9/29 lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have the harden-clients installed.
when I tried to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ciracusa wrote:
Buenas Lista.
Un usuario se tiene que conectar remotamente -via ssh- a un server
linux con presencia en internet y luego hacer telnet a un host unix
(dentro de la red).
Pregunta:
Alguien conoce alguna modificación de telnet
Buenas tardes,
sustituye el ejecutable de telnet para los usuarios que quieras controlar
con un script que ejecute lo siguiente en lugar de telnet:
script -c telnet myhost.domain.com /tmp/output.log
Espero que te sirva de algo.
On Mon, June 23, 2008 01:18, ciracusa wrote:
Buenas Lista.
On Mon, June 23, 2008 15:14, ciracusa wrote:
Diego Fdez. Durán wrote:
Buenas tardes,
sustituye el ejecutable de telnet para los usuarios que quieras
controlar
con un script que ejecute lo siguiente en lugar de telnet:
script -c telnet myhost.domain.com /tmp/output.log
El script sería
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:06PM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
or mc it does not show any lines just funky characters for the lines.
Just a shot in the dark, but I've occasionally run into weird problems
where one system has UTF-8 support installed while the other doesn't.
Make sure both
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:06PM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
or mc it does not show any lines just funky characters for the lines.
Just a shot in the dark, but I've occasionally run into weird problems
where one system has UTF-8 support installed while the
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 07:24:27PM -0800, Jeff Grossman wrote:
s. keeling wrote:
Your problem isn't related to locale. I suspect it's your terminal
emulation that's buggered. Are you using xterm, rxvt, or one of the
clueless children
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 07:24:27PM -0800, Jeff Grossman wrote:
s. keeling wrote:
Your problem isn't related to locale. I suspect it's your terminal
emulation that's buggered. Are you using xterm, rxvt, or one of the
clueless children (kterm/gnome-terminal)?
I am using TERM=linux. Before
Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
s. keeling wrote:
Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
If I do an 'export LC_ALL=C' then term=linux and term=screen appear to
act the same. The
s. keeling wrote:
Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
s. keeling wrote:
Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
If I do an 'export LC_ALL=C' then
Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
If I do an 'export LC_ALL=C' then term=linux and term=screen appear to
act the same. The display is much better but still not perfect. I
have
updated a new
s. keeling wrote:
Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
If I do an 'export LC_ALL=C' then term=linux and term=screen appear to
act the same. The display is much better but still not perfect.
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Oct 28, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I do all of my administration on my Debian system using either Telnet
or SSH from a remote computer. But, when I run programs like aptitude
or mc it does not show any lines just funky characters for the lines.
I did a
Tim Gruene wrote:
It might help to use a standard language setting, like
export LC_ALL=C
before you start the command.
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I do all of my administration on my Debian system using either Telnet
or SSH from a remote computer. But, when I run programs like
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 05:43:54AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
On Oct 28, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I do all of my administration on my Debian system using either Telnet
or SSH from a remote computer. But, when I run programs like aptitude
or mc it does not show any lines
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 05:43:54AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
On Oct 28, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I do all of my administration on my Debian system using either Telnet
or SSH from a remote computer. But, when I run programs like aptitude
or
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
If I do an 'export LC_ALL=C' then term=linux and term=screen appear to
act the same. The display is much better but still not perfect. I have
updated a new picture at http://www.stikman.com/mcdisplay1.jpg.
What about
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
If I do an 'export LC_ALL=C' then term=linux and term=screen appear to
act the same. The display is much better but still not perfect. I have
updated a new picture at
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
If I do an 'export LC_ALL=C' then term=linux and term=screen appear to
act the same. The display is much better but still not perfect. I
have
updated a new picture at
On Oct 28, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I do all of my administration on my Debian system using either
Telnet or SSH from a remote computer. But, when I run programs like
aptitude or mc it does not show any lines just funky characters for
the lines. I did a screen shot and put
It might help to use a standard language setting, like
export LC_ALL=C
before you start the command.
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I do all of my administration on my Debian system using either Telnet or SSH
from a remote computer. But, when I run programs like aptitude or mc it
El 17/11/06, Luis E. Salas C.[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Espero que en su experiencia hayan resuelto un problema similar al
siguiente, tengo que conectarme a unos dispositivos via Telnet y ejecutar
algunos comando de mantenimiento, y los resultados de dichos comandos
copiarlos a un archivo de
El vie, 17-11-2006 a las 11:11 -0500, Luis E. Salas C. escribió:
Espero que en su experiencia hayan resuelto un problema similar al
siguiente, tengo que conectarme a unos dispositivos via Telnet y ejecutar
algunos comando de mantenimiento, y los resultados de dichos comandos
copiarlos a un
Dear Pol,I am interest is to configure POP3 client.Thanks I can telnet to my server normally, BUT I can't
telnet mailserver 110.
ok :-)
what do u do 4 connect?
Check where your mailserver listening (loopback only? or in which interface)
Which mailserver do u use?
which error message appear?
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 05:58:20 +0200, JB MORLA wrote:
Hi,
I've installed sshd and putty, I'd like to stop telnet permanently without
removing it.
Here is a Fedora command:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# chkconfig telnet off
Is there a similar one under Debian?
The generic Debian command
El mié, 24-05-2006 a las 10:27 -0300, crstn mtchll escribió:
si ahora entiendo
yo tengo algo parecidoen un cliente con un servidor unix medio viejito
y terminales linux.
en tehoria no tendria que tener mayormente problema.
contame cual es el error que te manda exactamente.
por que perdio
El 25/05/06, Antonio Trujillo Carmona[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El mié, 24-05-2006 a las 10:27 -0300, crstn mtchll escribió:
si ahora entiendo
yo tengo algo parecidoen un cliente con un servidor unix medio viejito
y terminales linux.
en tehoria no tendria que tener mayormente problema.
El 23/05/06, Antonio Trujillo Carmona[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El lun, 22-05-2006 a las 19:40 -0300, crstn mtchll escribió:
El 22/05/06, Antonio Trujillo Carmona[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
¿Alguien sabe a que se debe este error que me ha aparecido en un
servidor casi estable pero con algo
El lun, 22-05-2006 a las 19:40 -0300, crstn mtchll escribió:
El 22/05/06, Antonio Trujillo Carmona[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
¿Alguien sabe a que se debe este error que me ha aparecido en un
servidor casi estable pero con algo de etch cuando he intentado
hacer un telnet desde el a
El 22/05/06, Antonio Trujillo Carmona[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
¿Alguien sabe a que se debe este error que me ha aparecido en un
servidor casi estable pero con algo de etch cuando he intentado
hacer un telnet desde el a cualquiera de las otras maquinas?
Ya lo he purgado, he reinstalado, he
I can telnet to my server normally, BUT I can't
telnet mailserver 110.
ok :-)
what do u do 4 connect?
Check where your mailserver listening (loopback only? or in which interface)
Which mailserver do u use?
which error message appear?
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Friday 10 March 2006 10:07, Jonathan P. Mwakijele wrote:
Dear Brian,
I am Redhat Linux user.
I can telnet to my server normally, BUT I can't
telnet mailserver 110.
What might be a problem.
Anything. Ask a smarter question?
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
Paul
Hallo Andreas,
Am 2006-01-19 14:12:42, schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Vodafone TalkWeb Box, ein UMTS-Modem. Geraeteinfo: Merlin U630 (HW
REV [0:55]), Revision 12.0
Was kostet das Tei eigentlich und wie ist die Leistung,
Geschwindigkeit, wie wird es angeschlossen, ...
In Frankreich kann ich relativ
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
sagt mal, kennt jemand hier sich mit dem telnet-Dienst aus? Ich hab da
so ne Router-Box auf der ein telnetd laeuft. Ich hab natuerlich keine
Zugangsdaten dazu (die hat ja dafuer ein Webinterface), aber mich wuerde
trotzdem interessieren ob es da Moeglichkeiten gibt
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:55:25
+0100):
Hi,
Hi Andreas,
sagt mal, kennt jemand hier sich mit dem telnet-Dienst aus? Ich hab da
so ne Router-Box auf der ein telnetd laeuft. Ich hab natuerlich keine
Um was handelt sich's (Model/Marke)?
Zugangsdaten
On 19.01.06 13:18:30, Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:55:25
+0100):
sagt mal, kennt jemand hier sich mit dem telnet-Dienst aus? Ich hab da
so ne Router-Box auf der ein telnetd laeuft. Ich hab natuerlich keine
Um was handelt
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:18:30 +0100
Richard Mittendorfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:55:25
+0100):
Hi,
Hi Andreas,
sagt mal, kennt jemand hier sich mit dem telnet-Dienst aus? Ich hab
da so ne Router-Box auf der ein
Andreas Pakulat:
On 19.01.06 13:15:12, Werner Detter wrote:
Du hast die Zugangsdaten für das Webinterface, jedoch
nicht für die Verbindung über Telnet? Im Regelfall sind die Passörter,
mit denen du dich über das Webinterface anmelden kannst meist die gleichen
wie die über Telnet.
On 19.01.06 14:45:30, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Andreas Pakulat:
On 19.01.06 13:15:12, Werner Detter wrote:
Du hast die Zugangsdaten für das Webinterface, jedoch
nicht für die Verbindung über Telnet? Im Regelfall sind die Passörter,
mit denen du dich über das Webinterface anmelden kannst
On 19.01.06 14:12:09, Gerhard Wolfstieg wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:18:30 +0100
Richard Mittendorfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:55:25
+0100):
Hi,
Hi Andreas,
sagt mal, kennt jemand hier sich mit dem
Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
[...]
Alternative2: BruteForce Attacke!! ;)
Hmm, gibts fuer Passwortattacken Tools?
Versuchs mal mit Hydra von THC ( www.thc.org )
Andreas
Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:12:42
+0100):
On 19.01.06 13:18:30, Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006
12:55:25 +0100):
sagt mal, kennt jemand hier sich mit dem telnet-Dienst aus? Ich
hab da so
Also sprach Gerhard Wolfstieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006
14:12:09 +0100):
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:18:30 +0100
Richard Mittendorfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zugangsdaten dazu (die hat ja dafuer ein Webinterface), aber mich
wuerde trotzdem interessieren ob es da Moeglichkeiten gibt
On 19.01.06 16:09:58, Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:12:42
+0100):
On 19.01.06 13:18:30, Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
Alternative: Nach einer Custom-Firmware fuer das Geraet suchen (z.B.
openwrt). Damit hat Mensch dann volle
Hi.
Vielleicht hab ich die Lösung für dich. Ich habe grade mit meinem Router
experimentiert und habe über nmap entdeckt, dass dort ebenfalls ein
telnetd läuft, port 23 wie üblich. Anmelden konnte ich mich nicht, weil
ich im Webinterface keinen Benutzernamen eingeben muss um Zugriff zu
bekommen,
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:47:39
+0100):
On 19.01.06 16:09:58, Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu, 19 Jan 2006
14:12:42 +0100):
On 19.01.06 13:18:30, Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
Alternative: Nach einer
Benjamin A'Lee wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 08:56 -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
Is it possible to change a user's login shell to an instance of telnet
to a user-unique port? When a user logs into my server, I'd like them
to be immediately dropped into a telnet session on a specific port
running
On 10/16/05, Aurelien Ricard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen, try to put a telnet session in their ~/.bashrc
I've never tried but it should work.
While this works, it is insecure. A user can easily run a command like
'ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] rm .bashrc' to delete the .bashrc file and get full
Stephen Le wrote:
On 10/16/05, Aurelien Ricard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen, try to put a telnet session in their ~/.bashrc
I've never tried but it should work.
While this works, it is insecure. A user can easily run a command like
'ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] rm .bashrc' to delete the
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 08:56 -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
Is it possible to change a user's login shell to an instance of telnet
to a user-unique port? When a user logs into my server, I'd like them
to be immediately dropped into a telnet session on a specific port
running on the server and to be
Olá.
- Gostaria de saber como devo fazer para imprimir em modo texto de
dentro de uma aplicação Telnet ( tenho um servidor Telnet que executa
uma determinada aplicação e a impressão é direcionada para a estação
cliente numa fila chamada lp; detalhe o servidor de telnet usa o LPD;
e a impressora
nc
software AGJörg EckhardtUntere Königsstraße 86D 34117
Kassel( Tel.: +49
(0)561 / 70161 0
?Fax: +49 (0)561 / 70 161
55+ Mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan Kesten wrote:
Hallo, zusammen :-)
Habe ein kleineres Problem - ich versuche gerade per telnet mich auf
einem SCO OpenServer 5 einzuloggen, klappt auch wunderbar. Aber die
Terminalemulation oder die Keymap passen nicht zusammen - nun hab ich
schon etwas gesucht und auch eine termcap und
Thomas Amm wrote:
Frage doch auf der SCO-Box mal die Umgebungsvariablen ab, und sieh in
der /usr/share/terminfo nach, ob du etwas passendes findest.
Schon getan - das ist vt220_xp (wofür auch immer das _xp stehen mag).
Immerhin ist ein vt220 vorhanden (in einigen Versionen).
Jan Kesten wrote:
Thomas Amm wrote:
Frage doch auf der SCO-Box mal die Umgebungsvariablen ab, und sieh in
der /usr/share/terminfo nach, ob du etwas passendes findest.
Schon getan - das ist vt220_xp (wofür auch immer das _xp stehen mag).
Immerhin ist ein vt220 vorhanden (in einigen
* Konnichiwa Carlucio Lopes-sama:
Boa tarde,
ao instalar o debian-cdd-br com window maker, nao configurou opcao shell
bash, alguem sabe qual pacote devo instalar.
O Debian instala pelo menos um shell. Vc queria dizer que não
tem um terminal console, não ? Se for isso, vc pode
1 - 100 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
