Hi Gergely,
On 17-03-13 02:02, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Arno Töll a...@debian.org writes:
In fact, even the wiki says Becoming a Debian Developer: You should be
a Debian Maintainer for six months before applying to the Debian New
Member Process [1]. That's somewhat different to the original idea
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:37:35AM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
Thus, the sheer number of DMs is not a really a resilient number per se,
although I agree that the DM status itself is a good procedure.
FWIW, a more relevant number is the number of packages in the archive
maintained by DMs, see [1]
Op zaterdag 16 maart 2013 17:39:56 schreef Moray Allan:
On 2013-03-16 12:13, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The current NMU guidelines[1] discourage fixing cosmetic issues or
changing the packaging style in an NMU. The reason for that is that
such changes are often a matter of taste (though there
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
Would becoming DPL increase the chance that you would work on any of
these ideas?
Would not becoming DPL increase the chance that you would work on any of
these ideas?
Well, not becoming DPL means I'd have less time to spend on Debian
things than if
Hi,
On 17/03/13 at 12:19 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Candidates,
What do you plan to work on if you are not elected?
Will not being elected de-motivate you?
Will you work on the things in your platform even if you are not
elected? Most of the things mentioned there are not DPL specific
Hi,
On 17/03/13 at 12:00 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Candidates,
I maintain a wishlist[1] of ideas of various levels of craziness I would
like to see implemented and directions I would like Debian to go in.
Some of these should be moved to bugs, but at least they are somewhere
more public than
On 2013-03-17 00:13, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
while reviewing the vote that introduced the Debian Maintainer status
in 2007 (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003_tally.txt) I
noticed
that Lucas voted in favor and that Moray voted against it.
Moray, why did you vote against?
I'll follow up
On 2013-03-17 07:00, Paul Wise wrote:
Would becoming DPL increase the chance that you would work on any of
these ideas?
Would not becoming DPL increase the chance that you would work on any
of
these ideas?
Becoming DPL would certainly make work on this myself:
better communication on
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes:
On 17-03-13 02:02, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Arno Töll a...@debian.org writes:
In fact, even the wiki says Becoming a Debian Developer: You should be
a Debian Maintainer for six months before applying to the Debian New
Member Process [1]. That's somewhat
On 17/03/13 at 15:03 +0300, Moray Allan wrote:
Implementing dh(1) or source format 3, notwithstanding their
advantages for
DD's, is successful if the generated binary packages are the same
as before.
Should we really focus more effort on increasing the existing
convergence?
No, I don't
On 2013-03-17 16:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Actually, I disagree that we should not focus more effort on
increasing
the existing convergence.
I was replying as part of a discussion of using NMUs to increase
convergence, not on whether convergence is good in general.
So despite your I
On 17/03/13 at 16:34 +0300, Moray Allan wrote:
On 2013-03-17 16:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Actually, I disagree that we should not focus more effort on
increasing
the existing convergence.
I was replying as part of a discussion of using NMUs to increase
convergence, not on whether
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 04:28:03PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote [edited]:
On 16/03/13 at 15:31 +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
have
you considered assignments for the preparation of patches for wishlist bugs
in
native and pseudo-packages (eg. infra-related sw projects)?
Have others
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org writes:
If you refer to university students in some software-related discipline:
have
you considered assignments for the preparation of patches for wishlist bugs
in
native and
On 17/03/13 at 14:54 +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 04:28:03PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote [edited]:
On 16/03/13 at 15:31 +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
have
you considered assignments for the preparation of patches for wishlist
bugs in
native and
On 2013-03-17 07:19, Paul Wise wrote:
What do you plan to work on if you are not elected?
If I am not elected, then by default almost all my Debian time would
continue to be taken up by DebConf work.
However, after setting out my my ideas about Debian teams more clearly
for my platform, I
On 2013-03-17 14:50, Moray Allan wrote:
On 2013-03-17 00:13, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
while reviewing the vote that introduced the Debian Maintainer
status
in 2007 (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003_tally.txt) I
noticed
that Lucas voted in favor and that Moray voted against it.
Moray,
On 2013-03-17 14:50, Moray Allan wrote:
On 2013-03-17 00:13, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
while reviewing the vote that introduced the Debian Maintainer
status
in 2007 (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003_tally.txt) I
noticed
that Lucas voted in favor and that Moray voted against it.
Moray,
18 matches
Mail list logo
