Joe,
Thank you so much for writing up this simple HOWTO. I've been trying to get
something like this described to me since July to no avail.
Thanks, Again,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: J Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March
Hi
I finally got spf set up for my domain. I'm running Imail + declude as a
gateway scanner, so it only relays mail to and from the two mailservers. So
now I see that mail from my mail-servers are tested with spf, and get an
result of unknown (I use v=spf1 mx ?all).
Should I set this up
Not a bad suggestion for some situations.
Matt
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
...but sooner or later I will find a customer that makes use of SMTP
AUTH and can't be firewalled or resolved with a filter following the
connection...
If the server is solely used for SMTP AUTH,
Mailpure's foreign-TLD and badcountrynorevdns are also good examples of country
filters that are prebuilt and may be easy to implement with few changes.
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/23/04 07:12PM
So how do we use this functionality? Per your
Have you tried WHITELISTing your internal IP range?
-Original Message-
From: Kaj Søndergaard Laursen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 March 2004 14:22
Hi
I finally got spf set up for my domain. I'm running Imail +
declude as a
gateway scanner, so it only relays mail to and
Can someone send me the link for the updates?
Thanks,
Chris Dufala, CCNA, MCP+I, MCSE
Efficiency Experts, LLC.
www.esquared.cc
727.939.8112
813.354.4467(fax)
Can someone send me the link for the updates?
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm has links to the latest released
version and latest beta.
http://www.declude.com/interim is used for interim releases, which should
normally only be used if there is a specific need for them.
Where I should put the LogLevel configuration
On Global.cfg or in the $default$.JUnkMail File ??
It is a global configuration option, which belongs in the
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam
Where I should put the LogLevel configuration
On Global.cfg or in the $default$.JUnkMail File ??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log File
if you
are looking for the interim versions:
http://www.declude.com/interim/
mfgi.a.gez. markus
guhl***lds nrwdez. 235tel.:
0211 9449 2578fax.: 0211 9449 8344mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]***
-Ursprüngliche
I have a filter in the default file called
SUBJECTFILTER filter E:\Imail\Declude\Filters\Subjectfilter.txt x
21 0
Does this filter only match the entire phrase, or part of the phrase or both?
That depends on the lines within the subjectfilter.txt file. If they use
CONTAINS, then
And this only works in the Pro version, correct?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject Line FIlter
Scott... Am I correct that
I'm trying to use the Unix Tools give me a count of how many e-mails I get
from specific domains. Then I can check that against my blacklist. I'm not
very versed in this so bear with me. Using the following (all one line)
egrep Msg failed WEIGHTHOLD|From: junk0301.log | grep -A 1 WEIGHTHOLD |
And this only works in the Pro version, correct?
Yes, filters are only available in Declude JunkMail Pro.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus
I'm starting an IPFILE test in which I will place IPs with I want to
block. For management reasons I would like to do this through JunkMail
(as opposed to Imail access control list). Problem: From looking at
the logs I have a NEAR consecutive range of IPs 12.129.205.42 to .89
(FLOW*GO) to put
And where do you get these?
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Countries List
Mailpure's foreign-TLD and badcountrynorevdns are also good examples of
country filters
That's super Joe -- I hope they look at your email when the finally write
the manual instructions for this. Would you be willing to share your list
of bad countries? It seems to me that would make a good starting point for
us.
Thanks again.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: J Porter
IMail Admin wrote:
And where do you get these?
Ben
I would recommend searching either the archives for MailPure, or maybe
even Google:
http://www.google.com/search?client=googletq=Mailpure%20foreign-TLD
Matt :)
--
=
MailPure custom
Change IS to CONTAINS is provides an exact match.
BODYFILTER 0 CONTAINS sex
BODYFILTER 0 CONTAINS sexy
BODYFILTER 0 CONTAINS badword
Be careful with approch especiall with short words like sex. It is in other
words like sextant. Sexy is also not a good word to match on. Especially
when people
I want a filter for body
Such as BODYFILTER filter E:\Imail\Declude\Filters\bodyfilter.txt x 0
And I want it to find exact words
Can I use this filter
BODYFILTER filter E:\Imail\Declude\Filters\bodyfilter.txt
with
BODYFILTER 0 IS sex
No. The problem is that the body of the E-mail is
1. the IS would require the body to exactly match your word. You may want to use
CONTAINS.
2. Watch out for those short words. With sex, you have hits on heterosexual or
sextuplets. I sometime check the subsets of section on
http://dictionary.langenberg.com/.
cialis burned me with specialist
Reccomendations
I have the oppertunity to add some spindles to our mail server and want to
know what people are using and reccomend I have been looking at LSI and my
boss wants me to look at Adaptec.
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
I have the oppertunity to add some spindles to our mail server and
want to know what people are using and reccomend I have been looking
at LSI and my boss wants me to look at Adaptec.
LSI is _loved_ around these parts. We dropped Adaptec and started
using the LSI 320-2X recently.
If you are using raid then the Adaptec 2120S is a good unit. We
have used Adaptec for years and they are solid controllers. We have had
some small problems where 2120S cards are finicky with certain drives
and bios revisions. Particularly the Seagate drives so be careful. They
also have
I am using a SATA with 2 80GB drives in RAID1 on my workstation, and it runs
great.
Next server I build, I will incorporate SATA.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
We are using serial ATA on other servers. I am combining two existing
servers with mylex raid controllers to creat a new imail server.
Our current server is a single processor and our filters are killing the
performance of the server. We will end up with a dual processon pIII800 and
3 sets of
IDE/SATA or SCSI ?
From my experience it seems that the lifespan of IDE/SATA hard drives in
Servers that run 24h/day is between 2 to 5 years, SCSI runs for 3-12years.
So if you plan to do a HD server refresh every 2-3 years, you should be fine
with IDE/SATA drives.
I am personally a big fan of
There are a lot of SATA RAID (0/1/5) options. Example:
http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata.asp
SATA is good for high performance, low-end servers, but you would never
want to attempt a big RAID-10 rack with SATA. Actual throughput speeds
of SCSI/160 drives (10K or 12K RPM) are still
Has anyone thought about serial ATA? I don't see any reason why
someone can't build a high quality RAID controller to use these
drives, and it appears that they are building high quality drives
for serial ATA. A friend told me there was at least one such card on
the market
Sandy,
The card that Keith pointed out comes with a default 128 MB and goes up
to 1 GB.
http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata9000.asp
Matt
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Has anyone thought about serial ATA? I don't see any reason why
someone can't build a high quality RAID
That's the company that I was told about before. I think you might be
selling serial ATA short though.
First, these cards have a separate bus for each drive, so a 4 port
serial ATA RAID card can handle much more than any single drive can
push. No issue there.
Secondly, I've been reading
The card that Keith pointed out comes with a default 128 MB and goes
up to 1 GB.
Pretty cool, might be worth a demo...:)...but the price of the
9500S-8, their closest SATA offering, doesn't beat our preferred LSI
card. (IM0, the savings on the drives themselves is matched by the
Sounds like a potential convert :)
Here's something else that people should consider...
The outer edge of a platter offers the best throughput by far. If you
have say a 80 GB SATA drive, you can partition just 20 GB per drive in
order to capture the best performance (considering that no
33 matches
Mail list logo
