Ok, I'll break the ice :)
I was wondering what people would recommend as far as a managed switch
goes that I can use to either limit bandwidth or at least guarantee
bandwidth going out to the router. It might even be nice to do this on
a per-IP basis instead of a per-port basis, though that's
Echo!!!
- Original Message -
From: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT-Microsoft Exchange Tools
Before we moved to HP Openview (very pricy) we used a combination of Big
Brother
Matt,
I would recommend Cisco for this than again I seem to recommend Cisco for
everything. You can get rate limiting in the EMI images of the 2950 series
or the SMI images of the 3550 series. What type of other options do you
need with this? Straight L2 or L3? Gig uplinks etc?
Darrell
Reposting
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 12:01 AM
To: 'Declude.JunkMail@declude.com'
Subject: Is there a variable for this
Hi,
Is there a variable for:
Received: from cc-2 [216.132.135.170] by
HELOBOGUS already does this by taking the HELO/EHLO and checking to see if
it has a valid A or MX record matching it. Of course, if there is no . it
will fail.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, that's the HELO variable.
Your configuration should already be triggering HELOBOGUS on the sample
you provided; if you want to be particular about the problem you
specified
HELO 1 NOTCONTAINS .
would do the trick. You will probably penalize as much spam as ham this
way, though. Lots of
is there a
possibility to hold a mail and alert the recipient?
our problem is that
german law may force us to do this.
bernd
goebbels
ldsnrw
Hi,
If a subject line is encoded like (all on one line):
Subject:
=?utf-8?B?RndkOiBbYmV0dGVybWVudF0gODYlIG9mZiBWaWNvZGluLiAgY291cmFnZW91c2
x5IHNhdmFnZXJz?=
What it really says is:
Fwd: [betterment] 86% off Vicodin. courageously savagers
And I have a filter that looks for vicodin
ANYWHERE
Matt,
This might be a little more than what you need, but we use a product
called a NetEnforcer for bandwidth limiting at our shop. There are a
lot of other monitoring and accounting features as well. You can find
information about them at www.allot.com. This will allow you to rate
limit based
And I have a filter that looks for vicodin
ANYWHERE 2 CONTAINS VICODIN
The filter does not find it. I think it is because the subject line is
encoded. Is there any way to check it with the filters?
Actually, I believe the issue is that ANYWHERE just looks at the subject
and body
Hi Andrew,
If I do:
HELO 1 NOTCONTAINS .
cc-2.example.local
Then the example will pass my HELO filter test since it has a . in it.
It will fail HELOBOGUS though.
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Declude will decode declude the subject tests
Declude 1.82 found these:
I've had hits in
=?utf-8?B?Y2hlYXAgb2VtIHNvZnR3YXJlIHNoaXBwaW5nIHdvcmxkd2lkZS4gIHBvdW5jZWQgQ2
hhbmc=?=
for SUBJECT 40 CONTAINS OEM Software
I wonder if it doesn't decode the subject with an ANYWHERE test?
- Original
Hello, all.
Aside from the usual Internet Explorer and Office patches, this patch
cycle also includes an update to the October update MS04-035 which
affects a DNS query vulnerability in the SMTP handling in Windows
2000/2003 as well as Exchange 2003.
Great - Fixed.
Thanx
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:57 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
Scott:
If ANYWHERE only gets subject and body, then to fully cover everything in
the message would we then need
ANYWHERE# CONTAINS
HEADERS # CONTAINS
Thanks
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
If ANYWHERE only gets subject and body...
Sorry, I meant that it covers the headers and body (but not any decoded
parts).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra
Hi,
Is there a variable for:
Received: from cc-2 [216.132.135.170] by .
The cc-2 in this case. This is the mail server that last touched it.
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to query the cc-2 and assign
it points if it did not have a . in it. It is supposed to be a proper
I don't know if this will work the way you want it to, but I saw this
company at Networld + Interop last year. It does have manual rate shaping
available but it's biggest benefit is that it will automatically rate
control connections to ensure no service can run away with too much
bandwidth.
Hi Matt,
There may be other options, but we settled on Cisco 3350 switches for this.
Their rate-limiting is much more granular than most others we looked at
(most would only limit to 1Mbps per port, not below), however they are both
pricey (~$3500) for 48 10/100 Mbps ports and 2 Gbps ports. You
Title: Message
Hi,
haven't heard
anything since the updated 2.xversion was posted online. Has anyone
dared to install? Any luck this time around? Does it appear stable
enough? Or is everyone still waiting for everyone
else?
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtHM Systems Software,
Inc.600 East
Title: Message
There are currently more than 120 installed
updates, a mixture of SmarterMail and Imail.
Barry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005
6:24 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
Title: Message
Barry,
It would be nice to know what the previous issues were related to so
that we can keep an eye out for them. E-mail is vitally important to
most of our customers and we have become very cautious about making
changes in light of recent events. At the same time, there are
Title: Message
The 2 issues I had seen with the first
2.0 released version have been resolved.
2.0.3 has been in use on the 2 servers I
actively maintain since Monday night with no issues that I know of.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
Does declude decode messages before using filters? I have a domain in a body
filter that keeps getting through?
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
Does declude decode messages before using filters?
It does a lot of decoding, yes.
I have a domain in a body filter that keeps getting through?
Have you checked the raw source to see how it is encoded?
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced
Title: Message
Excellent points, Matt.
I would love to see a customer-only viewable page
that lists known issues with a given release, along with estimated patch/upgrade
release dates. That way we can judge when to upgrade with less fear of
known issues, that we are unaware of, causing
Title: Message
John,
Was the install a manual process like we are used to install or an
automated installer.
Darrell
---Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring,
SURBL/URI
Title: Message
It's
either. You download one InstallShield-style installer, which asks if you
want the automated method, or whether you just want to extract the files to a
folder you specify. I chose the latter; the application then looked like
it was installing, but as promised, all it did
X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent
with spam [210f].
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.32.34.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D465d077100c4763a.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for
spam.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed:
Title: Message
Well - I
tried...
Minutes after
install my mail server became unresponsive - after a few minutes, I saw Dr.
Watson in the task list - and then found these in the root.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
DECLUDE.GP1
Title: Message
We are working on a page where we will list
known issues, bugs and fixes. In the recent past or focus has been stabilizing the
release and ensuring that we tested fixes we were working on.
In the near future we are looking to ad a number
of features to the web site
Title: Message
Wonderful! Thanks, Barry!
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Barry Simpson
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:33 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 2.0 - Safe to
Install
We are working on a
page where we will list known
Hi Marc-
I saw NOABUSE, ROUTING, and SPAMHEADERS today with my personal statement
from AMEX, which came from the same sender.
SPAMHEADERS reports that the sender was bad.
-d
- Original Message -
From: Marc Catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday,
We are in the process of moving from Imail
to SmarterMail including our Declude
setup.
We have setup SmarterMail on a new
box and have it running in production now.
The servers with our Imail 7.15
setup where we are moving the mail domains from will stay in operation as they
currently
Hi Matt-
We do this on our Fortigate antivirus firewall, which allows us bandwidth
limits and guarantees, both inbound and outbound, on a service and IP basis.
-Dave
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005
The headers say base64
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 4:56 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Base 64 Encoded messages
Does declude decode
Sending message again as the first one did not post.
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:02 PM
To: 'Declude.JunkMail@declude.com'
Subject: Filters and encoded subject lines
Hi,
If a subject line is
YOU may want to chang your config to use weightrange instean of weight. It
will difinitivly choose the actio that will happen and avoid confusion.
Why was this message held anyway. Based on the failed tests I would not hold
this message on our server.
I do not know what filter does. But I would
Hi,
You should be able to find the domain by opening the log file with a
text editor and using the search/find function. I just use notepad.
Thanks,
Andrew Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 2:50:03 PM, you wrote:
We have some users
39 matches
Mail list logo
