We've running W2k3 Server on a Dell PE1750 with 3GHz Dual-Xeon CPU and
SCSI-Raid system here.
Sometimes the proc folder is filling up with thousands of messages and
declude is processing it.
But it does process them way to slow.
While all 4 CPU-Usage graphs in the task manager has an average
I was wondering what the status is on the spam review tool for smartermail
users?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 12:22 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
Ummm... Did anybody else get a piece of spam this morning with subject
SPAMSPCE: that seems to have been relayed through Declude.com?
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
Something like this, which was received from
X-Note: Sent with HELO [declude.com] from Reverse DNS [mail.declude.com]
From: Mireille Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gteat holidays?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:43:27 +0700
Content-Type: text/html;
Yes, I did
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet Computer Services
519-741-1222
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 8:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
Ummm... Did anybody else get a piece of spam this morning with subject
SPAMSPCE: that seems to have been relayed through Declude.com?
Yes.
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
We are aware of this it was a forged email posting to our list, we have
disabled all posting on the customer list until we need to post.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006
Yep I did also.
Stu
At 08:47 AM 1/13/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Ummm... Did anybody else get a piece of spam this morning with subject
SPAMSPCE: that seems to have been relayed through Declude.com?
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA
Ummm... Did anybody else get a piece of spam this morning with subject
SPAMSPCE: that seems to have been relayed through Declude.com?
Yes, we did.
--
Kim W. Premuda
FastWave Internet Services
San Diego, CA
--
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This
I have worked with customers with similar Dual-Xeon CPU setup and have seen
processing of 1000+ emails per minute.
1. What is your THREADS in the Declude.cfg ?
2. Are you running many large filters ?
3. How many virus scanners are you running ?
4. Is hyperthreading turned ON or OFF ?
5. Are you
I have worked with customers with similar Dual-Xeon CPU setup
and have seen processing of 1000+ emails per minute.
We have two of this machines here. It has exactly the same config from the
screw who hold the server in the rack up to each dot in the junkmail config
file (except the license
Yes I recived it also.
Jeff Kratka
On 1/13/2006, Dave Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ummm... Did anybody else get a piece of spam this morning with subject
SPAMSPCE: that seems to have been relayed through Declude.com?
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
1. Set THREADS 200
2. Which virus scanner are you running ? and do you have PRESCAN ON in your
virus.cfg
3. Try turning hyperthreading off.
4. Set WAITFORMAIL 500
5. Have you had DNS issues with decludeproc running ? Disable WINSOCKCLEANUP
ON
6. Disable WAITFORTHREADS and WAITBETWEENTHREADS
Let
I have a similar machine, generally running well
My declude.cfg is:
threads 75
waitformail 0
waitforthreads 25
waitbetweenthreads 100
winsockcleanup off
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet Computer Services
519-741-1222
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Markus,
I would try the DNSOVERRIDE x.x.x.x switch in your declude.cfg file. There
is a post in the archive from Declude - Bill I beleive that explains more.
The scenario you are describing is exactly the same issue I seen a time
before and the DNSOVERRIDE fixed it.
Darrell
Markus
1. Set THREADS 200
Ok set to 200
2. Which virus scanner are you running ? and do you have
F-Prot and optionaly McAfee
PRESCAN ON in your virus.cfg
Yes it was already set to ON
3. Try turning hyperthreading off.
Hmm the server is around 40 km away. As I know HAT is enabled/disabled in
I would try the DNSOVERRIDE x.x.x.x switch in your
declude.cfg file. There is a post in the archive from
Declude - Bill I beleive that explains more.
Can't find any message from Bill
Added DNSOVERRIDE without any result
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA
1. How many messages currently in your \proc ?
2. On average how many threads has decludeproc and what is the highest
thread count over a 5 min period check this under your processors, also set
the update speed under the view to high
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From:
Quick comment about turning hyperthreading off. I posted a graph from
sometime in the last two weeks where I tested this with 2.0.6.16 and it
showed that this effectively doubled my CPU utilization. I understand
that 3.x is different, but it still launches a lot of processes such as
external
FYI Hyperthreading http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39237341,00.htm
Intel had sold hyperthreading as something that gave performance gains to
heavily threaded software. SQL Server is very thread-intensive, but it
suffers. In fact, I've never seen performance improvement on server software
with
Declude.cfg should be in your \Declude folder, is that where it is located ?
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 11:25 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE:
1. How many messages currently in your \proc ?
SRV1 is gone below 1000
SRV2 is still somewhere between 4000 and 6000 messages (going up and down
slowly)
2. On average how many threads has decludeproc and what is
the highest thread count over a 5 min period check this under
your
Markus,
Sorry it was Ralph -
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24658.html
Note it says 2.0.6, but I had to use it under 3.x as well.
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail,
That might even be the very article that made me decide to try testing
it off. There is no doubt that this more than doubled my CPU
utilization. This extreme is also why I have doubts about whether there
was something else going on that caused the issues that I saw. The part
that makes
But after Darells suggestion I noticed another difference
between both servers. SRV1 and SRV2 has configured two
different DNS servers for lookups (even without DNSOVERERIDE)
After disabling all DNS-based tests CPU usage seems going up
to an average of 90% but only for certain periods
Marcus,
Are you running DNS on the Mail Server, or does it point to another
machine?
If running locally, you might want to try pointing DNSOVERRIDE to a
different dns server.
Bill Green
dfn Systems
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Declude.cfg should be in your \Declude folder, is that where
it is located ?
Hmm strange.
It was there and also in the c:\program files\declude folder where it was
after the initial installation.
Now I've deleted and recreated the declude.cfg file in the declude folder
and restarted the
Hi,
Does anyone have a good list of all the
SNIFFER categories and different weights for them that they would like to
share?
Thanks
Goran Jovanovic
Omega Network
Solutions
25% utilization under NO load is very strange. Could you provide us with
Remote Access to see this ?
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 1:28 PM
To: Matt
Subject: Re[2]:
Hello Matt,
Friday, January 13, 2006, 12:29:25 PM, you wrote:
M I would throw both logs into Debug and restart just to see if
M there areany clues in there.
Did this and couldn't come up with anything out of ordinary.
M One other longshot that would be interesting would be to change
M
Matt wrote:
I'm sure that Nick will volunteer to have his server monitored by me
so that I can test this out on another box. I believe that he is also
on 2.0.6.16 as well.
sure and I am. Off list we need to discuss -
-Nick
Matt
David Barker wrote:
FYI Hyperthreading
We are running Declude Version 3.0.5.23 with JunkMail and Virus Pro on two
dual-proc servers and are not seeing this. I often see the CPU at zero when
no mail is being processes.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matt Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
David Sullivan wrote:
M One other longshot that would be interesting would be to change
M thedefault host in IMail to match the other box and use the keys on
M theproperly functioning server just to see if there is any
M difference.
Good idea, we'll give this a shot.
What about the 25%
SNIFFER-TRAVEL external
047 C:\Imail\Sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe yourverificationcode 15 0
SNIFFER-INSURANCE external
048 C:\Imail\Sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe yourverificationcode 15 0
SNIFFER-AV-PUSH external
049 C:\Imail\Sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe yourverificationcode 15 0
SNIFFER-TRAVELexternal047"C:\IMail\declude\sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe
yourverificationcode"850SNIFFER-INSURexternal048"C:\IMail\declude\sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe
yourverificationcode"850SNIFFER-AVexternal049"C:\IMail\declude\sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe
My conclusion for this
day:
At the mid of december I decided to switch to declude
v3.
After several tests we discovered that a simply comment
after the license code like
CODE abcdefg
#mail.domain.com
wouldn't work anymore with v3. This would result in a
"invalid license code" message
Markus Gufler wrote:
My
conclusion for this day:
Normaly I should stay in bed
today as I'm more ill then healthy.
Agreed! We need you Markus so get well!
-Nick
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, January
Hello Matt,
Friday, January 13, 2006, 2:04:00 PM, you wrote:
M Great news. Now Declude can look for a bug in how it handles
M certainlicense codes and maybe fix this for others. Maybe Markus
M could trythe same thing.
Ok, I'm not sure why the license code change worked at all. Been on
with
I suppose that it makes sense to not set WAITFORMAIL to 0, though Harry
posted this morning that his was set that way and working properly.
Personally I would be curious to see what happens if you set it back to
0 and restarted the service sine the other testing didn't seem to make
sense if
I have not yet tested out any changes to the threads. It seems that
people don't want to discuss it.
Oh, I'll discuss it. . . but I don't really don't know why the burden
of proof fell my way, rather than this stuff being investigated
_before_ declaring without real testing that MS
40 matches
Mail list logo
