Hi Kim,
Kim Premuda wrote:
I experienced the maxed out processor(s) - I only tried it for a few min
and then went back to 2.0.16. Haven't tried it since!
-Nick
Nick,
The beta version 3.0.3 does not automatically create the 'work' folder below the 'proc' folder (ie.
I am still holding off though on this Beta - I just do not see it as
trustworthy and Declude is not forthcoming with its bugs. For example I
just saw some posts about issues w/multiprocessor environments - which is
scary because that is what I have, you have just uncovered another bug,
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am still holding off though on this Beta - I just do not see it as
trustworthy and Declude is not forthcoming with its bugs. For
example I just saw some posts about issues w/multiprocessor
environments - which is scary because that is what I have, you
So, we can not really use this list to know whats going on with the beta
since they do not post it here?
We have to use the beta site?
No, I would not say that. I post each and every issue I have with the beta
to this list as well as to Declude. I would hope that others do they same
as
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So, we can not really use this list to know whats going on with the
beta since they do not post it here?
We have to use the beta site?
No, I would not say that. I post each and every issue I have with the
beta to this list as well as to Declude. I would
Hi Kim,
Kim Premuda wrote:
We installed the latest 3.0.3 beta tonight; the decludeproc service shot to 99% of CPU and stayed there for 15 minutes. During this time we accumulated over 1000 items in the proc folder; nothing was going out.
I experienced the maxed out
I experienced the maxed out processor(s) - I only tried it for a few min
and then went back to 2.0.16. Haven't tried it since!
-Nick
Nick,
The beta version 3.0.3 does not automatically create the 'work' folder below
the 'proc' folder (ie. 'proc\work'). If you create the folder manually,
We installed the latest 3.0.3 beta tonight; the decludeproc service shot to
99% of CPU and stayed there for 15 minutes. During this time we accumulated
over 1000 items in the proc folder; nothing was going out.
Anyone else experienced this?
We loaded JunkMail 3.0.3 last night and, this
on Declude Junkmail and Virus. Download
it today - http://www.invariantsystems.com
- Original Message -
From: Kim Premuda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update
We installed
Those were the same error messages that I seen when the work directory was
not created. Please see my earlier post - you need to make sure you have a
/spool/proc/work directory.
Darrell
Thanks, Darrell. I did read your previous post, but not until I had already
sent my posting to the list.
configuration. Download a copy today - http://www.invariantsystems.com
- Original Message -
From: Kim Premuda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update
Those were the same error
Now the other thing to make sure of is did you increase the amount
of threads that it will use in the declude.cfg file? By default it
appears to use only 5 threads. I bumped mine up to 25 and that seems to be
working very well. The other thing which is documented on the beta page is
if you
We installed the latest 3.0.3 beta tonight; the decludeproc service shot to 99%
of CPU and stayed there for 15 minutes. During this time we accumulated over
1000 items in the proc folder; nothing was going out.
Anyone else experienced this?
We stopped/re-started the decludeproc service, as
/URI
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: Webmaster - GlobalWeb.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 11:11 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update
We installed the latest 3.0.3 beta
14 matches
Mail list logo
