[Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi, With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching consistant levels of over 90%... I can of course get an even faster mailserver but I think I would be better of with an extra smtp server in front of my mailserver which filters the most blatant spam mail purly based on

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Ing. Andrés E. Gallo
Try IMgate ( postfix like MTA ). Len's page is a good 'starting point' Andres.- -- Ing. Andrs E. Gallo Cotel Ltda. ((02255)-46-1600 2 (02255)-46-0014 + aga...@cotel.com.ar B7165 - Villa Gesell Bs. As. - Argentina http://www.gesell.com.ar

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Harry Vanderzand
. From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: February-10-10 6:29 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT] Hi, With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching consistant levels

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Scott Fisher
: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT] I use Alligate Thank you Harry Vanderzand Intown Internet 117 Ruskview Road Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1 519-741-1222 DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Pete McNeil
Bonno Bloksma wrote: Hi, With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching consistant levels of over 90%... I can of course get an even faster mailserver but I think I would be better of with an extra smtp server in front of my mailserver which filters the most blatant spam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Ncl Admin
Alligate Alligate Alligate At 12:28 PM 2/10/2010 +0100, you wrote: Hi, With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching consistant levels of over 90%... I can of course get an even faster mailserver but I think I would be better of with an extra smtp server in front of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Ing. Andrés E. Gallo
And, besides, Postfix is FREE. I'm running 2.6 version, with Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Postgrey, together with BindDNS, and SQUID on a cheap machine -P4, 2 Gb RAM, 80 Gb HDD- under FreeBSD. In fact, 2 of them sharing loads. Just my 2 cents. Andres.- Pete McNeil escribió: Bonno Bloksma wrote:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
[mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 3:29 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT] Hi, With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching consistant levels of over 90%... I can of course

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Matt
It's definitely Alligate for this purpose. Instead of using something like Postfix or IMgate which will mostly replicate functionality found in Declude, Alligate will end up blocking things using unique functionality and it runs on Windows and uses very little CPU. The two main features of