RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
, 2006 4:33 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it and it costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing the service? Last I checked business, are in business to make

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi We're not a service provider (but I love and value the fact that all of you are!) Rob What I find particularly amusing is the line Restrictions apply to service providers. If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. ---

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Darin Cox
be easily quantified. Darin. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:54 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 No they do not impose a revenue sharing model, but toilet paper is still a consumable

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Darin Cox
\ WCNet To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 You're saying that email and spam/virus scanning is a service aspect that specifically draws customers to an ISP. I'msaying it doesn't, that's all.I've not once heard

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Don Brown
to be removed so that the factors determining it can be DC easily quantified. DC Darin. DC - Original Message - DC From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] DC To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DC Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:54 PM DC Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 DC No they do

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Marc Catuogno
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 You're saying that email and spam/virus scanning is a service aspect that specifically draws customers to an ISP. I'm saying it doesn't, that's all. I've not once heard a customer state

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Title: Message This has been a great thread to follow and I just want to add my two cents worth. At the moment the whole issue of spam filtering is quite complex. Declude's configuration requires constant tweaking it seams. That translates into labour. If Declude can somehow manage to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Kevin Bilbee
] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 6:37 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Kevin, It would probably help for you to take a course or read a book on business accounting. There are cost centers, and revenue-generating centers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Darin Cox
in the way they do it. That's what makes this proposed revenue-sharing model completely impractical. Darin. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 1:00 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 A book

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread bill.maillists
. Other than the Commtouch add-on, are there any other features or reasons to upgrade to 4.3? Original Message From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:03 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Gary, 1

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread netsolution webmaster
pper limit of what we're willing to spend on a tool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:51 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Gary, 1. Server

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Robert E. Spivack
, July 18, 2006 2:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may seem commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi Gary, What I find particularly amusing is the line Restrictions apply to service providers. If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. Hand !!! We are a school. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?

2006-07-19 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
11:22 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Question to thoes that are saying thatspam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee---This E

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Don Brown
If we could get away with it, we wouldn't offer any e-mail service. There is more tech support overhead and other costs with e-mail than everything else combined. Unfortunately, not offering e-mail and Spam/Virus protection is not an option, from a competitive stand-point. Tuesday, July 18,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:21 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Basically you are telling me to ignore the Add Commtouch part of your web page that shows up when I log in to my

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Harry Vanderzand
, 2006 9:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Gary, 4.3 Release notes: Added CT and a Global variable being initialized more than once has been corrected. You are correct in your statement, if you do not want to join our Service Provide

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
and you. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:15 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 A friend of mine was one of the original founders

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Gary, 4.3 Release notes: Added CT and a Global variable being initialized more than once has been corrected. You are correct in your statement, if you do not want to join

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
are moved to the \review folder. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Zajicek Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:53 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Exactly. I'm still running

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Be reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, function, features of our software. If you have any questions or would David, I have asked as well as submitted a inquiry to support and others have asked Is their a CommTouch trial How does it work etc and none of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert E. Spivack Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:08 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Correction David B, Postini offers a great product, it's Declude with the product that is questionable. We switched most of our services over

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
Darrell, I am getting there :) David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:00 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Be reminded

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? Darrell

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Matt
David Barker wrote: I did not say that Postini offered a poor service it was a comment from Matt. Actually, that was a private comment from and old conversation with me, and I think the point was missed. Postini is the McDonalds of the spam blocking business. It's edible, it even tastes

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Dan Shadix
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:40 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Don, in this case tells its most active customers that they should effectively refrain from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Kevin Bilbee
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Kevin, Mainly because in order to get other types of business

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
19, 2006 1:11 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I agree with this. I was also once a hosting provider which was ancillary to a business that I used to operate which required me to offer hosting. I added E-mail because I was sick of dealing with my

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:26 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? David, Are components of the message hashed and some

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Matt
o things. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:11 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I agree with this. I was also once a hosting provider

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?

2006-07-19 Thread Bill Landry
: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:33 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Darrell, 1. Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to CommTouch for analysis? RPD extracts 2 types of patterns from the message, Distribution Patterns (from the header

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, It's the revenue share. Is that not a requirement of the gateway

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:41 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Is this how the AV part of the program works and will it run when the other AV scanners run or is it only run once

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Darin Cox
. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:23 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, 1. With regards to no new functionality, we have been over this I agreed and made a commitment to address this. I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?

2006-07-19 Thread Bill Landry
@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:19 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Sound like Cloudmark (http://www.cloudmark.com/) and their free Razor service (http://razor.sourceforge.net/), which I have already been using successfully for a few years now. Bill

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
their included mail service. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would be lost. The ISP users

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Oh and prices were increased from $132 to $295 before they were dropped back to $132 for legacy customers, so there was no price cut except in the sense of department stores raising prices to have a sale. FYI, from the time that Service Agreements first came out through December, 2004 the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Matt Robertson
On 7/14/06, Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another hand raised. End User (business) here. Apparantly I missed the Exchange memo. Put yourr hand down :-) According to the definition you are a service provider. Quoted with emphasis added: definition: a business which provides their

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
that provides email to it's own employees. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:41 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 On 7/14/06, Scott

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Matt Robertson
On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would be lost. Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first place I can expect a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Darin Cox
. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:16 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Oh and prices were increased from $132 to $295 before they were dropped back to $132 for legacy customers, so

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would be lost. Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it and it costs you money to provide then what is the business

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Matt Robertson
On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If revenue would not be lost without it and it costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing the service? In 2006, for any small operator, nothing insofar as the service itself is concerned. You only do it to provide

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Andy Schmidt
:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 05:01 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I think one thing that happened here

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread David Barker
(Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 05:01 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I think one thing that happened here

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:01 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I think one thing that happened here is that the announcement regarding ComTouch didn't make it *clear

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Kevin Bilbee
. Of course you will not be able to quantify the lost new business! Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:55 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Matt
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, It's the revenue share. Is that not a requirement of the gateway product? Are people like me not your target for the gateway product? It's also what one isn't getting for the product that exists now. I don't wish to see new functionality added

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Don Brown
Message- DB From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don DB Brown DB Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:15 PM DB To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 DB A friend of mine was one of the original founders of Bridge Data. They were DB

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?

2006-07-19 Thread Don Brown
, 2006 10:26 AM DB To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? DB David, DB Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to DB CommTouch for analysis? DB What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
it entices them to stay. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:01 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Then stop offering mail if it such a burden to the business. Explain to your customer that they can can go

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Well the definition says: As a service provider (definition: a business which provides their customers with delivery of their Email communications and/or users with access to their own Email) We are all businesses of one sort or another - Check We all provide our customers (internal or

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Goran Jovanovic
dows not apply to us. Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Nick Hayer
David - at Declude - Would you kindly comment on this? Also on what is Declude 4.3? -Nick John T (Lists) wrote: I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread David Barker
] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Andy Schmidt
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 03:24 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 John, That applies to the Version 4 product for the people who are renting it on an annual

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Matt
) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Gary Steiner
program was spelled out somewhere. Original Message From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Nick Hayer
Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. Excellent! Thanks for the reply - -Nick --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Goran Jovanovic
and RIGHT TO USE FOREVER interchangeably Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:44 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread John T \(Lists\)
, July 18, 2006 12:42 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread David Barker
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use Commtouch? Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, what

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, lets say for the sake of discussion I wanted to use/purchase/license the Declude Gateway product with CommTouch as a legacy customer. Who and how is the revenue projected or actual derived from use of the CommTouch software/feature

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread David Barker
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? For the majority of service

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread David Barker
David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
people. I have not had pay raise in four years. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:08 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread David Barker
Of Glenn \ WCNet Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:32 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 To give you guys over at Declude an idea of what is going on out here in the real world of small ISPs, there may be some small bit of revenue (meaning funds from paying

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Matt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Gary Steiner
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Gary, 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to Declude will be in violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection and additional spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Kevin Bilbee
My hand is raised. Kevin Bilbee Standard Abrasives -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:21 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Basically you

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Don Brown
-Original Message- DB From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David DB Barker DB Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:09 PM DB To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 DB Matt, DB Managed services is the fastest growing segment

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Scott Fisher
Another hand raised. End User (business) here. Apparantly I missed the Exchange memo. - Original Message - From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:20 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Basically you are telling

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?

2006-07-18 Thread Scott Fisher
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Mike N
If E-mail with spam and virus protection is offered to our customers as a loss leader for an unrelated business, does this mean that CommTouch would pay us to use their product? (Negative revenue). - Original Message - What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Title: Message Question to thoes that are saying thatspam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Question to thoes that are saying thatspam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Dave Beckstrom
we're willing to spend on a tool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:51 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Gary, 1. Server Providers who use

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Paul Navarre
*** Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder.   If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? *** Is this a serious question? If you don't offer spam and virus filtering, you won't have any

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Glenn Zajicek
1. Honestly, I don't know. 1b. The mail server would literally be overwhelmed and crash without it. 1c. Perhaps that's not a bad idea. That'd be one less target for the spammers to hit. 2. A significant number of our users don't use our mail. Many of those that don't aren't even aware

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Matt
I agree with this. I was also once a hosting provider which was ancillary to a business that I used to operate which required me to offer hosting. I added E-mail because I was sick of dealing with my customer's ISP's for their E-mail problems (lost passwords, poorly performing services, bad

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-18 Thread Dave Beckstrom
With that said, as an add-on in the same regard as things like Sniffer, CommTouch might be a good solution (if it performs well) for those that can pay the $195/year, however it still irks me that after two years and lots of promises, these things are being added at an extra expense and not