RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Delog update

2002-02-19 Thread Tom
Definitely CPU intensive. I will look into this a bit further. I usually install utilities on a separate workstation with a task manager combined with batch files to handle odd jobs. Even an old Windows 98 machine with an Ethernet connection would do just fine. Feature to combine report

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console

2002-02-19 Thread John Tolmachoff
This was mentioned/asked by someone else as part of another topic, but I did not see a different answer. Is there a way to see the real time Declude console when logged on via terminal services? John Tolmachoff Network Engineer 211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106 Fullerton, CA  92835

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console

2002-02-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there a way to see the real time Declude console when logged on via terminal services? I do not believe there is a way to see it when logged on via terminal services. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] ---

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude console

2002-02-19 Thread Todd Holt
I've seen some posts about the Declude Console lately. What is that? Can anyone get it? How? Todd --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude console

2002-02-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've seen some posts about the Declude Console lately. What is that? Can anyone get it? How? It is a console that lets you see some basic information about the recent E-mails that IMail has received, as well as the log files. You can download it from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude console

2002-02-19 Thread Jim Jones, Jr.
I just tried to install it per the instructions below and i can't seem to get any info out of it... just a header and a bunch of 0's... Any ideas? Thanks, Jim - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:31 AM

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2002-02-19 Thread Matt Robertson
I have the following placed just after the advanced options and just before the tests in global.cfg WHITELIST FROM @moorcroft.co.uk Will this do the trick for all mail coming from the moorcroft.co.uk domain? Of all the mail I process these guys' mail servers are the only ones making declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2002-02-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have the following placed just after the advanced options and just before the tests in global.cfg WHITELIST FROM @moorcroft.co.uk Will this do the trick for all mail coming from the moorcroft.co.uk domain? Yes (unless someone sends mail with a return address different than their actual

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude console

2002-02-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Could it be that I was in a terminal server session? That could account for why you didn't see any information in it. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude console

2002-02-19 Thread Jeff Kratka
Did the same exact thing here. Jeff ** TymeWyse Internet P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417 tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** -

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2002-02-19 Thread Todd Holt
Has the issue about whitelisting higher order domains will whitelist lower order domains been resolved? Example: WHITELIST abc.com should whitelist xyz.abc.com, 123.abc.com, etc Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude console

2002-02-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Welp, i am on the console of the server and nothing happens... From what I understand, the program just starts by itself? since that didn't happen, I tried starting it manually and it still gave all 0's... Well, if it doesn't start by itself, starting it manually isn't going to do anything.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude console

2002-02-19 Thread Cris Porter
Just downloaded the console exe to my imail folder and changed my global.cfg file and it fired up immediately! It's a shame it doesn't work with terminal server. -Cris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude console

2002-02-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Yep, all three of those things are done... Actually, it turns out that you need to have the CONSOLE ON in all your config files (if you have CONSOLE OFF in any of them, it may override the CONSOLE ON setting in another). -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude console

2002-02-19 Thread Jim Jones, Jr.
Yup, that was it... Thanks! Jim - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude console : : Yep, all three of those things are done... : : Actually, it turns out that

[Declude.JunkMail] Header/Body

2002-02-19 Thread Tom Schwarz
Using Outlook Express I cannot find a way to setup a Message Rule that looks at the Header. Am I missing something? I'm told that you cannot setup a Message Rule in Netscape that looks at the Body of the message. Is this true? Once I have an answer for these questions I may have a follow-up.

[Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question...

2002-02-19 Thread Todd Ryan
Hi all, Just installed JunkMail Pro with the default settings. Did some tests using rsp set off and I'm getting the warning in the headers as expected. What an awesome product, Scott! Since I've received over 100 spam messages in the last 40 minutes (from the log info), I'm quickly realizing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console

2002-02-19 Thread John Tolmachoff
I'll raise my hand as a second vote! :) John Tolmachoff Network Engineer 211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106 Fullerton, CA  92835 714-578-7999, ext. 104 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.reliancesoft.com   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question...

2002-02-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
While testing...I'd like to do something similar to WARN and HOLD at the same time. That is, let the message go through but keep a copy for evaluation when I have time. This could be either in the \spool\spam folder or forwarded/copied to a dummy account and checked via email. This isn't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question...

2002-02-19 Thread Madscientist
What if you were to hold them, but then set up a scheduled job that runs once per hour or so. That job would: 1. copy all held messages back to the queue for delivery. 2. move all held messages into a review directory (to clear the hold area for next time. The result would be almost the same

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question...

2002-02-19 Thread Madscientist
Another possibility is the global cc... What if you set up the global cc to a review mailbox. Then set up that review mailbox with an IMail rule to delete any message not contianing a warning string? Just thinking outside the box. _M | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question...

2002-02-19 Thread Todd Ryan
Hey! Thanks for all the quick, helpful responses. In case anyone is interested, here's what I figured out... I set up a ]TEST]alert.eml for each test type. In the file, I put: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: postmaster@%LOCALHOST% Subject: [SPAM] Failed: