RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)









Alex, I have seen no issues with Hijack
and Imail V. 8.



Are you using DAISYCHAIN any where in
Declude?







John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA

Engineer/Consultant

eServices For You

www.eservicesforyou.com









-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Artigues
Sent: Wednesday, June
 25, 2003 7:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Another Hijack question





Scott,





Has anything changed in Imail 8 that changes the way hijack
clears hold 1?





I've had to raise the hold one to a high number to basically
disable hijack. If anything gets caught in 1 and 2 is not reached it just sits
in hold one, closing the console doesn't help. hasn't been much of an issue to
me but since John just brought up hijack it made me think of it. 





Thanks,





Alex


















[Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-26 Thread John Carter








How would I test in Declude for the presence of the X-Imail-Spam
header? (or does running order prevent this?) I want Declude to put a
Spam notation in the subject line when an email fails enough of either Imail or
Declude checking.



Thanks,

John








[Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Bridges, Samantha
I know I saw a bunch of strings last week regarding AOL so I hate to ask
again but here it goes.

I have users who were able to send to AOL accounts until recently.  What
needs to be done on either my end or the AOL end to send mail to them?

Thanks for any insight to this.

Samantha
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Mark Brody
I have noticed that AOL frequently rejects connect attempts so it requires
multiple retries to get mail to AOL users. Set you retries to a higher
number and see if that helps like it did for us.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bridges,
Samantha
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:54 AM
To: Junkmail 'Declude. (E-mail)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


I know I saw a bunch of strings last week regarding AOL so I hate to ask
again but here it goes.

I have users who were able to send to AOL accounts until recently.  What
needs to be done on either my end or the AOL end to send mail to them?

Thanks for any insight to this.

Samantha
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)








Create a filterfile test, then have it
check HEADERS for that string.







John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA

Engineer/Consultant

eServices For You

www.eservicesforyou.com









-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Thursday, June
 26, 2003 5:48 AM
To: Declude JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Test
on Imail X-header



How would I test in Declude for the presence of the
X-Imail-Spam header? (or does running order prevent this?)
I want Declude to put a Spam notation in the subject line when an email fails
enough of either Imail or Declude checking.



Thanks,

John










RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread David
Samantha,

You could start with this:

WARNING: One or more of your mailservers claims to be a host other than what
it really is (the SMTP greeting should be a 3-digit code, followed by a
space or a dash, then the host name). This probably won't cause any harm,
but is a technical violation of RFC821 4.3.

macombisd.org claims to be host



http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=macombisd.org+

David

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2003 16:54
To: Junkmail 'Declude. (E-mail)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


I know I saw a bunch of strings last week regarding AOL so I hate to ask
again but here it goes.

I have users who were able to send to AOL accounts until recently.  What
needs to be done on either my end or the AOL end to send mail to them?

Thanks for any insight to this.

Samantha
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Terry Parks
I'm getting that indication when I run the DNS report from dnsreport.com.
I'm running Imail 8.0 does anybody know how to fix this?

Terry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

Samantha,

You could start with this:

WARNING: One or more of your mailservers claims to be a host other than what
it really is (the SMTP greeting should be a 3-digit code, followed by a
space or a dash, then the host name). This probably won't cause any harm,
but is a technical violation of RFC821 4.3.

macombisd.org claims to be host



http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=macombisd.org+

David

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2003 16:54
To: Junkmail 'Declude. (E-mail)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


I know I saw a bunch of strings last week regarding AOL so I hate to ask
again but here it goes.

I have users who were able to send to AOL accounts until recently.  What
needs to be done on either my end or the AOL end to send mail to them?

Thanks for any insight to this.

Samantha
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] DECCON

2003-06-26 Thread Terry Parks
Anybody have documentation on how to interpret the displayed information
from DECCON?

Terry




---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
 macombisd.org claims to be host
 


I'm getting that indication when I run the DNS report from dnsreport.com.
I'm running Imail 8.0 does anybody know how to fix this?
It's actually not an IMail issue -- it's a firewall issue.  You've got a 
broken firewall that is preventing your mailserver from being RFC-compliant 
(a lot of Ciscos seem to do this).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread Charles Frolick
I thought Win2003 was supposed to have added console access to Terminal
Services (I have some recollection that you are running 2003, could be
wrong though)?  If you are not running 2003, just install VNC for the
occasions you need console access. That's what I had to do.

Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 6:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question


 If the console is not being used at all, how does Hijack keep track
of IP
 addresses?
 
 It does not.  Without the Declude console running, Declude Hijack will
not
 work.  However, if the \IMail\Deccon.exe file exists, then it will
 automatically get started by Declude Hijack as needed.

Thanks.

Along that same line then, as has been discussed before, any thought to
changing deccon.exe so as to be able to access from other than the
console,
and other than the lengthy work around we discussed last year but that I
have not had the time to try yet?

Not high priority. (Unless of course an IP gets listed ala hold 2 and
the
server has to be restarted.)

John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread Charles Frolick
I don't know what they did, and it is running as a service, but,
SimpleDNS Plus by jhsoftware.com had a similar issue with the need for
console access, however they found a way around it in their beta version
(not publicly released thought). I may have to poke at it a bit to see
if I can figure it out.

Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question



Along that same line then, as has been discussed before, any thought to
changing deccon.exe so as to be able to access from other than the
console,
and other than the lengthy work around we discussed last year but that
I
have not had the time to try yet?

The problem is that it must run when the system is first started, but it

seems that Terminal Services doesn't have any way to let you access the 
default window.  There may be a way to get around this in Declude, but
we 
haven't stumbled across anything yet.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Landry



Of all of the spam tests that IMail V8.0 now 
supports, all but the statistical content filtering test (which is the one that 
places the “X-Imail-Spam” entry into the header) run before being passed to 
Declude JunkMail. Unfortunately, the IMail statistical test does not run 
until JunkMail passes the message back to IMail for delivery.

I'm not sure what the rationale was for this, but 
maybe if we ask IPSwitch (wishlist) to change the process order and run this 
test before handing off to Declude, this could get changed in a future 
release. Also, maybe there is a registry entry that can be modified 
to change the process order? A good question for IPSwitch...

Bill

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  John 
  Carter 
  To: Declude JunkMail 
  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:48 
  AM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail 
  X-header
  
  
  How would I test in Declude for 
  the presence of the “X-Imail-Spam” header? (or does running order prevent 
  this?) I want Declude to put a Spam notation in the subject line when an 
  email fails enough of either Imail or Declude checking.
  
  Thanks,
  John


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Bridges, Samantha
I run an Exchange 5.5 server that IMail forward to.  The Exchange server
allows you to put in a Reply Address.  My Exchange server is macombisd.org
and the IMail server is misd.net.

Sorry for the confusion.

Samantha

-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


  macombisd.org claims to be host
  



I'm getting that indication when I run the DNS report from dnsreport.com.
I'm running Imail 8.0 does anybody know how to fix this?

It's actually not an IMail issue -- it's a firewall issue.  You've got a 
broken firewall that is preventing your mailserver from being RFC-compliant 
(a lot of Ciscos seem to do this).

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Joshua Levitsky

Yah.. Something is wack with your mail server...


telnet exmail.macombisd.org 25
Trying 64.88.82.249...
Connected to exmail.macombisd.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 

2*



 From: David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:31:14 +0300
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL
 
 Samantha,
 
 You could start with this:
 
 WARNING: One or more of your mailservers claims to be a host other than what
 it really is (the SMTP greeting should be a 3-digit code, followed by a
 space or a dash, then the host name). This probably won't cause any harm,
 but is a technical violation of RFC821 4.3.
 
 macombisd.org claims to be host
 
 
 
 http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=macombisd.org+
 
 David

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
 I thought Win2003 was supposed to have added console access to Terminal
 Services (I have some recollection that you are running 2003, could be
 wrong though)?  If you are not running 2003, just install VNC for the
 occasions you need console access. That's what I had to do.

I was using Windows Server 2003 on one server, but that server is no longer
in use.

Do to business startup and move, I have not had time to do the testing with
it on Windows Server 2003 in a lab.

I will not leave any production server logged on.

John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Patrick Childers
 
 Yah.. Something is wack with your mail server...
 
 
 telnet exmail.macombisd.org 25
 Trying 64.88.82.249...
 Connected to exmail.macombisd.org.
 Escape character is '^]'.
 220 
 **
 **
 2*
 

You need to turn off SMTP fixup protocol on your Cisco PIX firewall.

~Patrick

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Landry



Not possible with the current process order. 
IMail does not run this test until after Declude has finished and passed the 
message back to IMail for delivery.

Bill

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  John Tolmachoff (Lists) 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:14 
  AM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on 
  Imail X-header
  
  
  Create a filterfile 
  test, then have it check HEADERS for that string.
  
  
  
  John Tolmachoff MCSE 
  CSSA
  Engineer/Consultant
  eServices For You
  www.eservicesforyou.com
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John CarterSent: Thursday, June 26, 
  2003 5:48 
  AMTo: Declude JunkMailSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail 
  X-header
  
  How would I test in Declude for 
  the presence of the “X-Imail-Spam” header? (or does running order prevent 
  this?) I want Declude to put a Spam notation in the subject line when an 
  email fails enough of either Imail or Declude checking.
  
  Thanks,
  John


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread Charles Frolick
You don't have to leave it logged on, you can log in and out remotely
with VNC, you can even lock out the local inputs while in remote mode.

Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question


 I thought Win2003 was supposed to have added console access to
Terminal
 Services (I have some recollection that you are running 2003, could be
 wrong though)?  If you are not running 2003, just install VNC for the
 occasions you need console access. That's what I had to do.

I was using Windows Server 2003 on one server, but that server is no
longer
in use.

Do to business startup and move, I have not had time to do the testing
with
it on Windows Server 2003 in a lab.

I will not leave any production server logged on.

John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread Alex Artigues



John,
I'm not using daisychain.
Actually I just looked and it appears to only 
happen when hold one is reachedwhen people are sendingfrom 
killerwebmail.

Alex


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  John Tolmachoff (Lists) 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:27 
  AM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another 
  Hijack question
  
  
  Alex, I have seen 
  no issues with Hijack and Imail V. 8.
  
  Are you using 
  DAISYCHAIN any where in Declude?
  
  
  
  John Tolmachoff MCSE 
  CSSA
  Engineer/Consultant
  eServices For You
  www.eservicesforyou.com
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex ArtiguesSent: Wednesday, June 25, 
  2003 7:56 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Another 
  Hijack question
  
  
  Scott,
  
  Has anything changed in Imail 8 
  that changes the way hijack clears hold 1?
  
  I've had to raise the hold one to 
  a high number to basically disable hijack. If anything gets caught in 1 and 2 
  is not reached it just sits in hold one, closing the console doesn't help. 
  hasn't been much of an issue to me but since John just brought up hijack it 
  made me think of it. 
  
  Thanks,
  
  Alex
  
  


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)









Ah, the IP address of the server is
being caught.



In that case, you should use ALLOWIP and
the IP of the server.







John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA

Engineer/Consultant

eServices For You

www.eservicesforyou.com









-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Artigues
Sent: Thursday, June
 26, 2003 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Another Hijack question





John,





I'm not using daisychain.





Actually I just looked and it appears to only happen when
hold one is reachedwhen people are sendingfrom killerwebmail.











Alex













- Original Message - 





From: John
Tolmachoff (Lists) 





To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: Thursday, June
 26, 2003 2:27 AM





Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Another Hijack question









Alex, I have seen no issues with Hijack
and Imail V. 8.



Are you using DAISYCHAIN any where in
Declude?







John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA

Engineer/Consultant

eServices For You

www.eservicesforyou.com









-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alex Artigues
Sent: Wednesday, June
 25, 2003 7:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Another Hijack question





Scott,





Has anything changed in Imail 8 that changes the way hijack
clears hold 1?





I've had to raise the hold one to a high number to basically
disable hijack. If anything gets caught in 1 and 2 is not reached it just sits in
hold one, closing the console doesn't help. hasn't been much of an issue to me
but since John just brought up hijack it made me think of it. 





Thanks,





Alex






















Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread R. Scott Perry

I found archived messages about the order in which tests are run, but 
nothing which directly applies
to something I noticed in our logs. Whitelisting works, but many messages 
are getting tests run on
them before the whitelist. Seems like a waste of CPU. Is there a way to 
make Declude skip all tests
on a whitelisted address? Here are edited sample log entries ...
What you want is the PREWHITELIST ON option of the latst beta 
version.  That will automatically bypass scanning of E-mail that
gets whitelisted for certain reasons (not all, though).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread Keith Purtell
I found archived messages about the order in which tests are run, but nothing which 
directly applies
to something I noticed in our logs. Whitelisting works, but many messages are getting 
tests run on
them before the whitelist. Seems like a waste of CPU. Is there a way to make Declude 
skip all tests
on a whitelisted address? Here are edited sample log entries ...

00:08:20 Q2e41244d034235f2 SPAMDOMAINS:5 NOPOSTMASTER:6 .  Total weight = 11
00:08:20 Q2e41244d034235f2 E-mail whitelisted - automatically passing all spam tests 
[ListedText]
00:08:20 Q2e41244d034235f2 Subject: ListedText (192.168.1.1) Alerts
00:08:20 Q2e41244d034235f2 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

13:15:14 Qe68d132103581e07 WHITELISTFROM:-20 nNOLEGITCONTENT:-1 REVDNS:3 nIPNOTINMX:-2 
.  Total
weight = -20
13:15:14 Qe68d132103581e07 E-mail whitelisted - automatically passing all spam tests
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13:15:14 Qe68d132103581e07 Subject: RE: Fixed assets
13:15:14 Qe68d132103581e07 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole 
use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any 
unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please
contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Bridges, Samantha
According to you guys its not the mail server it is the Firewallright?

What needs to be changed on the Firewall and why is the current setup so
bad?  

Thanks

Samantha

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


 
 Yah.. Something is wack with your mail server...
 
 
 telnet exmail.macombisd.org 25
 Trying 64.88.82.249...
 Connected to exmail.macombisd.org.
 Escape character is '^]'.
 220 
 **
 **
 2*
 

You need to turn off SMTP fixup protocol on your Cisco PIX firewall.

~Patrick

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Domlist or other Log tool

2003-06-26 Thread Russ Uhte (Lists)
What I'm looking for is a way to monitor store and forward domains.  It 
appears that the domlist tool doesn't count messages for these domains.  Am 
I missing something with domlist, or does anybody know of a tool that will 
be able to give me stats like the following:  Total number of messages 
(smtpd) for example.com.  Total number of messages (smtp-) for 
example.com.  How many virus were stopped by Declude for example.com. And 
finally how many messages failed WEIGHT20 test for example.com.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!!

Thanks,
Russ
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread Mark Brody
You know, this brings up another point. We use a weighting method and
consider all 20 weights to be spam. Once that weight is reached, it
would make sense to stop testing to save proc time. Just food for
thought.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist



I found archived messages about the order in which tests are run, but
nothing which directly applies
to something I noticed in our logs. Whitelisting works, but many
messages 
are getting tests run on
them before the whitelist. Seems like a waste of CPU. Is there a way to

make Declude skip all tests
on a whitelisted address? Here are edited sample log entries ...

What you want is the PREWHITELIST ON option of the latst beta 
version.  That will automatically bypass scanning of E-mail that gets
whitelisted for certain reasons (not all, though).

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread R. Scott Perry

According to you guys its not the mail server it is the Firewallright?
Correct.

What needs to be changed on the Firewall
I believe someone said it is the SMTP Fixup Protocol that needs to be 
turned off.

and why is the current setup so bad?
Two reasons:

[1] It makes your server non-RFC-compliant
[2] The security feature is broken (specifically, it is leaking information 
it was designed to hide)

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread Jerod Bennett
That seems all well and good, but what if you next test has a large
negative weight?  If your email didn't get the chance to fail that test,
you may get many more false positives.

Perhaps if there was a way to order the tests so the admin could put all
the tests that have the potential of a negative weight first then you
could implement such an option.  But, I get the feeling that the bulk of
our tests are DNS based and there is more waiting for the results than
anything else.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Brody
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist


You know, this brings up another point. We use a weighting method and
consider all 20 weights to be spam. Once that weight is reached, it
would make sense to stop testing to save proc time. Just food for
thought.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist



I found archived messages about the order in which tests are run, but 
nothing which directly applies to something I noticed in our logs. 
Whitelisting works, but many
messages 
are getting tests run on
them before the whitelist. Seems like a waste of CPU. Is there a way to

make Declude skip all tests
on a whitelisted address? Here are edited sample log entries ...

What you want is the PREWHITELIST ON option of the latst beta 
version.  That will automatically bypass scanning of E-mail that gets
whitelisted for certain reasons (not all, though).

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Rick Davidson
Disabling the SMTP Fixup Protocol at the firewall disables ESMTP and allows
only SMTP

Anyone using Imail peering will not be able to disable ESMTP

Rick Davidson
Buckeye Internet Inc
www.buckeyeweb.com
440-953-1900 ext: 222

- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL



 According to you guys its not the mail server it is the
Firewallright?

 Correct.

 What needs to be changed on the Firewall

 I believe someone said it is the SMTP Fixup Protocol that needs to be
 turned off.

 and why is the current setup so bad?

 Two reasons:

 [1] It makes your server non-RFC-compliant
 [2] The security feature is broken (specifically, it is leaking
information
 it was designed to hide)

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Jason Newland
Isn't that backwards?

Firewall with Fixup -  ESMTP will not work, and mail defaults to
ordinary SMTP transaction

Firewall without Fixup -- ESMTP works fine


Jason


- Original Message -
From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


 Disabling the SMTP Fixup Protocol at the firewall disables ESMTP and
allows
 only SMTP

 Anyone using Imail peering will not be able to disable ESMTP

 Rick Davidson
 Buckeye Internet Inc
 www.buckeyeweb.com
 440-953-1900 ext: 222

 - Original Message -
 From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:48 PM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


 
  According to you guys its not the mail server it is the
 Firewallright?
 
  Correct.
 
  What needs to be changed on the Firewall
 
  I believe someone said it is the SMTP Fixup Protocol that needs to be
  turned off.
 
  and why is the current setup so bad?
 
  Two reasons:
 
  [1] It makes your server non-RFC-compliant
  [2] The security feature is broken (specifically, it is leaking
 information
  it was designed to hide)
 
  -Scott
  ---
  Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
  Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
  vulnerability detection.
  Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread R. Scott Perry

Disabling the SMTP Fixup Protocol at the firewall disables ESMTP and allows
only SMTP
Anyone using Imail peering will not be able to disable ESMTP
Does that mean that Cisco firewalls can't be set up not to interfere with 
SMTP transactions?

If enabling the fixup protocol breaks RFC-compliance and doesn't do all 
that it is supposed to, and disabling it disables SMTP AUTH, those 
firewalls need to be thrown out.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread Alex Artigues



good idea - thanks John.
I was just stumped as to why they never cleared out 
of hold 1 but that solution will work:)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  John Tolmachoff (Lists) 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:55 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another 
  Hijack question
  
  
  Ah, the IP address 
  of the server is being caught.
  
  In that case, you 
  should use ALLOWIP and the IP of the server.
  
  
  
  John Tolmachoff MCSE 
  CSSA
  Engineer/Consultant
  eServices For You
  www.eservicesforyou.com
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex ArtiguesSent: Thursday, June 26, 
  2003 9:37 
  AMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another 
  Hijack question
  
  
  John,
  
  I'm not using 
  daisychain.
  
  Actually I just looked and it 
  appears to only happen when hold one is reachedwhen people are 
  sendingfrom killerwebmail.
  
  
  
  Alex
  
  
  

- Original Message - 


From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) 


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Sent: 
Thursday, June 26, 
2003 2:27 
AM

Subject: RE: 
[Declude.JunkMail] Another Hijack question


Alex, I have seen 
no issues with Hijack and Imail V. 8.

Are you using 
DAISYCHAIN any where in Declude?



John Tolmachoff MCSE 
CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com


-Original 
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex ArtiguesSent: Wednesday, June 
25, 2003 7:56 
PMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Another 
Hijack question


Scott,

Has anything changed in Imail 8 
that changes the way hijack clears hold 1?

I've had to raise the hold one 
to a high number to basically disable hijack. If anything gets caught in 1 
and 2 is not reached it just sits in hold one, closing the console doesn't 
help. hasn't been much of an issue to me but since John just brought up 
hijack it made me think of it. 

Thanks,

Alex




RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread R. Scott Perry

You know, this brings up another point. We use a weighting method and
consider all 20 weights to be spam. Once that weight is reached, it
would make sense to stop testing to save proc time. Just food for
thought.
That's one we've given some thought to.  The catch, though, is negative 
weights -- for example, E-mail from @yahoo.com will fail the 
NOPOSTMASTER/NOABUSE tests, so lots of people give it a negative 
weight.  If the processing is stopped when a weight of 20 is reached, 
Declude JunkMail might miss a test that would have reduced the weight to 
less than 20.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
 Does that mean that Cisco firewalls can't be set up not to interfere
 with SMTP transactions?

Nah, PIXes are fine with no smtp fixup.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Kevin Bilbee
If it is a CISCO pix you need to add the line

no fixup protocol smtp 25

I just looked in our PIX and this is the exact line.


Kevin Bilbee



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason Newland
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:12 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


 Isn't that backwards?

 Firewall with Fixup -  ESMTP will not work, and mail defaults to
 ordinary SMTP transaction

 Firewall without Fixup -- ESMTP works fine


 Jason


 - Original Message -
 From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:02 PM
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


  Disabling the SMTP Fixup Protocol at the firewall disables ESMTP and
 allows
  only SMTP
 
  Anyone using Imail peering will not be able to disable ESMTP
 
  Rick Davidson
  Buckeye Internet Inc
  www.buckeyeweb.com
  440-953-1900 ext: 222
 
  - Original Message -
  From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:48 PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL
 
 
  
   According to you guys its not the mail server it is the
  Firewallright?
  
   Correct.
  
   What needs to be changed on the Firewall
  
   I believe someone said it is the SMTP Fixup Protocol that
 needs to be
   turned off.
  
   and why is the current setup so bad?
  
   Two reasons:
  
   [1] It makes your server non-RFC-compliant
   [2] The security feature is broken (specifically, it is leaking
  information
   it was designed to hide)
  
   -Scott
   ---
   Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
 mailservers.
   Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
   vulnerability detection.
   Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
  
   ---
   [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
  (http://www.declude.com)]
  
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
   type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
   at http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
  
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup

2003-06-26 Thread Rifat Levis

I have talked to cisco people in Cebit Hannover about the PIX problem

Rifat :   The Fix-up protocol does not support ESMTP , my clients need to
use SMTP Authentication.

Cisco Tech Guy :  Just use the Vpn client to get the client to local subnet.

Rifat : My clients PIX is a cheaper model it does not support VPN

Cisco Tech Guy : We just released a IPSEC pack just dowload it from the web
site.

Result : As a company which have the biggest sale volume in our country of
cisco routers,  we are using Netscreen firewall.

Fact : Pix router is not a real cisco product , it is a product added to the
list after the acquisition of a security company.

Regards

Rifat Levis



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
 I'm  not sure what the rationale was for this...

Simplicity  and  performance:  if  you  separated the all-in-one Queue
Manager  into a separate Content Scanner and a Queue Manager (with the
ability  to  interpolate  third-party  processors  at  any  point), an
all-IMail setup would be (relatively) handicapped.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Rifat Levis
Yes ,exactly
Remove the smtp fixup and everything works fine

Better , remove the PIX firewall from your system , and add a real firewall
,
You will have much less problems.

Rifat




- Original Message - 
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:26 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


 Does that mean that Cisco firewalls can't be set up not to interfere
 with SMTP transactions?

Nah, PIXes are fine with no smtp fixup.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup

2003-06-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
But just because your Cisco tech guy doesn't know anything about the
application-level  effects  of  the  Cisco fixup features doesn't mean
there's  anything  wrong  or  unreal about the PIX as a firewall, as
long  as  you eliminate the fixup problem. If neither you nor the tech
thought  or  wondered  about  turning  off  fixup,  which is very well
documented,  that's  no  fault  of  the  product  itself (though I can
understand  the  desire  for vengeance at a vendor rep who didn't know
his stuff).

The PIX is a highly resilient enterprise firewall. Like other products
that  dabble  in  application  proxying  (WatchGuard, etc.), its proxy
functions are not as well thought out.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup

2003-06-26 Thread Terry Parks
Terry here,
Now I am lost...should the fix-up protocol be used or not? If not, how is it
turned off?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rifat Levis
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup


I have talked to cisco people in Cebit Hannover about the PIX problem

Rifat :   The Fix-up protocol does not support ESMTP , my clients need to
use SMTP Authentication.

Cisco Tech Guy :  Just use the Vpn client to get the client to local subnet.

Rifat : My clients PIX is a cheaper model it does not support VPN

Cisco Tech Guy : We just released a IPSEC pack just dowload it from the web
site.

Result : As a company which have the biggest sale volume in our country of
cisco routers,  we are using Netscreen firewall.

Fact : Pix router is not a real cisco product , it is a product added to the
list after the acquisition of a security company.

Regards

Rifat Levis



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Kevin Bilbee
We run a PIX with no Issues. Like any thing else if it is configured
properly it will run great.


Kevin Bilbee

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rifat Levis
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:45 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


 Yes ,exactly
 Remove the smtp fixup and everything works fine

 Better , remove the PIX firewall from your system , and add a
 real firewall
 ,
 You will have much less problems.

 Rifat




 - Original Message -
 From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:26 PM
 Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


  Does that mean that Cisco firewalls can't be set up not to interfere
  with SMTP transactions?

 Nah, PIXes are fine with no smtp fixup.

 -Sandy


 
 Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
 Broadleaf Systems, a division of
 Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup

2003-06-26 Thread Rifat Levis
Terry , just disable the fixup protocol for smtp

And all your problems will be over .

Rifat



- Original Message - 
From: Terry Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup


Terry here,
Now I am lost...should the fix-up protocol be used or not? If not, how is it
turned off?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rifat Levis
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup


I have talked to cisco people in Cebit Hannover about the PIX problem

Rifat :   The Fix-up protocol does not support ESMTP , my clients need to
use SMTP Authentication.

Cisco Tech Guy :  Just use the Vpn client to get the client to local subnet.

Rifat : My clients PIX is a cheaper model it does not support VPN

Cisco Tech Guy : We just released a IPSEC pack just dowload it from the web
site.

Result : As a company which have the biggest sale volume in our country of
cisco routers,  we are using Netscreen firewall.

Fact : Pix router is not a real cisco product , it is a product added to the
list after the acquisition of a security company.

Regards

Rifat Levis



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Landry
All so much hokum.  This should be a configurable option to run all tests
either before or after third-party plug-ins, but not a hard-coded split in
the spam processing (again, at least not without a configuration option).

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:43 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header


  I'm  not sure what the rationale was for this...

 Simplicity  and  performance:  if  you  separated the all-in-one Queue
 Manager  into a separate Content Scanner and a Queue Manager (with the
 ability  to  interpolate  third-party  processors  at  any  point), an
 all-IMail setup would be (relatively) handicapped.

 -Sandy


 
 Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
 Broadleaf Systems, a division of
 Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup

2003-06-26 Thread Terry Parks
OK, What's the command to do this?

Terry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rifat Levis
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup

Terry , just disable the fixup protocol for smtp

And all your problems will be over .

Rifat



- Original Message -
From: Terry Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup


Terry here,
Now I am lost...should the fix-up protocol be used or not? If not, how is it
turned off?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rifat Levis
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup


I have talked to cisco people in Cebit Hannover about the PIX problem

Rifat :   The Fix-up protocol does not support ESMTP , my clients need to
use SMTP Authentication.

Cisco Tech Guy :  Just use the Vpn client to get the client to local subnet.

Rifat : My clients PIX is a cheaper model it does not support VPN

Cisco Tech Guy : We just released a IPSEC pack just dowload it from the web
site.

Result : As a company which have the biggest sale volume in our country of
cisco routers,  we are using Netscreen firewall.

Fact : Pix router is not a real cisco product , it is a product added to the
list after the acquisition of a security company.

Regards

Rifat Levis



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup

2003-06-26 Thread Kevin Bilbee
no fixup protocol smtp 25

I just looked in our PIX and this is the exact line.


Kevin Bilbee

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Parks
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:40 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup


 OK, What's the command to do this?

 Terry

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rifat Levis
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:12 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup

 Terry , just disable the fixup protocol for smtp

 And all your problems will be over .

 Rifat



 - Original Message -
 From: Terry Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:03 PM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup


 Terry here,
 Now I am lost...should the fix-up protocol be used or not? If
 not, how is it
 turned off?



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rifat Levis
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:41 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup


 I have talked to cisco people in Cebit Hannover about the PIX problem

 Rifat :   The Fix-up protocol does not support ESMTP , my clients need to
 use SMTP Authentication.

 Cisco Tech Guy :  Just use the Vpn client to get the client to
 local subnet.

 Rifat : My clients PIX is a cheaper model it does not support VPN

 Cisco Tech Guy : We just released a IPSEC pack just dowload it
 from the web
 site.

 Result : As a company which have the biggest sale volume in our country of
 cisco routers,  we are using Netscreen firewall.

 Fact : Pix router is not a real cisco product , it is a product
 added to the
 list after the acquisition of a security company.

 Regards

 Rifat Levis



 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDomains- Prodigy?

2003-06-26 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message



Hi;

Does anyone know 
of the Spamdomain entries for Prodigy?

This is what I saw 
in a spam..

X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, 
BASE64, FILTER-SUBJECT, FILTER-HEADER-XMAIL, COUNTRY, WEIGHT20s, WEIGHT20r, 
FREEEMAILSX-Weight: 49X-Mailfrom: ggreggoryspre.prodigy.netX-Note: 
Sent from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Note: 
Sent from Reverse DNS: dsl-200-67-73-3.prodigy.net.mx 
([200.67.73.3]).


Is this the 
correct revdns for this?

Regards,
Kami


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Rick Davidson
Correct. It will disable SMTP AUTH as well

The fixup was added to IOS to allow ESMTP

its quite a pickle

Rick Davidson
Buckeye Internet Inc
www.buckeyeweb.com
440-953-1900 ext: 222

- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL



 Disabling the SMTP Fixup Protocol at the firewall disables ESMTP and
allows
 only SMTP
 
 Anyone using Imail peering will not be able to disable ESMTP

 Does that mean that Cisco firewalls can't be set up not to interfere with
 SMTP transactions?

 If enabling the fixup protocol breaks RFC-compliance and doesn't do all
 that it is supposed to, and disabling it disables SMTP AUTH, those
 firewalls need to be thrown out.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Landry
I afraid you have got it backwards.  The fixup protocol disables ESMTP,
which would include SMTP Auth, because fixup or permits SMTP attributes, but
none of the extended atributes.  Disabling the fixup protocol allow for
ESMTP to pass through the PIX, including SMTP Auth.

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


 Correct. It will disable SMTP AUTH as well

 The fixup was added to IOS to allow ESMTP

 its quite a pickle

 Rick Davidson
 Buckeye Internet Inc
 www.buckeyeweb.com
 440-953-1900 ext: 222

 - Original Message - 
 From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:14 PM
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL


 
  Disabling the SMTP Fixup Protocol at the firewall disables ESMTP and
 allows
  only SMTP
  
  Anyone using Imail peering will not be able to disable ESMTP
 
  Does that mean that Cisco firewalls can't be set up not to interfere
with
  SMTP transactions?
 
  If enabling the fixup protocol breaks RFC-compliance and doesn't do
all
  that it is supposed to, and disabling it disables SMTP AUTH, those
  firewalls need to be thrown out.
 
  -Scott
  ---
  Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
  Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
  vulnerability detection.
  Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDomains- Prodigy?

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Landry
Title: Message



This looks to be most likely a dynamic DSL customer 
of Unity Telephone:

dig -x 200.67.73.3

;; ANSWER SECTION:3.73.67.200.in-addr.arpa. 
3380 IN PTR 
dsl-200-67-73-3.prodigy.net.mx.

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:73.67.200.in-addr.arpa. 
3380 IN 
NS 
nsgdl2.uninet.net.mx.73.67.200.in-addr.arpa. 3380 
IN NS 
nsmex2.uninet.net.mx.73.67.200.in-addr.arpa. 3380 
IN NS 
nsmex4.uninet.net.mx.73.67.200.in-addr.arpa. 3380 
IN NS 
nsmty2.uninet.net.mx.73.67.200.in-addr.arpa. 3380 
IN NS 
dnsadm-interno.uninet.net.mx.

;; ADDITIONAL 
SECTION:nsgdl2.uninet.net.mx. 680 
IN A 
200.23.242.201nsmex2.uninet.net.mx. 680 
IN A 
200.33.146.201nsmex4.uninet.net.mx. 680 
IN A 
200.33.146.217nsmty2.uninet.net.mx. 680 
IN A 
200.33.148.201dnsadm-interno.uninet.net.mx. 680 IN 
A 200.33.150.193=

whois -h whois.networksolutions.com 
uninet.net

Registrant:Unity Telephone 
(UNINET2-DOM) 25 Main St Unity, ME 
04988 US

 Domain Name: UNINET.NET

 Administrative Contact, Technical 
Contact: Unitel, Inc. 
(NA4701-ORG) 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
25 Main St Unity, ME 
04988 US 
207-948-3900

 Record expires on 
03-Dec-2008. Record created on 04-May-2002. 
Database last updated on 26-Jun-2003 19:25:32 EDT.

 Domain servers in listed 
order:

 
NS1.MEGALINK.NET 
205.243.60.3 
NS2.MEGALINK.NET 
63.164.60.7 
AUTH50.NS.UU.NET 
198.6.1.161
This one most certainly should have failed the 
spamdomains test, and would have if setup correctly.

Bill

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kami 
  Razvan 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:02 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDomains- 
  Prodigy?
  
  Hi;
  
  Does anyone know 
  of the Spamdomain entries for Prodigy?
  
  This is what I 
  saw in a spam..
  
  X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, 
  BASE64, FILTER-SUBJECT, FILTER-HEADER-XMAIL, COUNTRY, WEIGHT20s, WEIGHT20r, 
  FREEEMAILSX-Weight: 49X-Mailfrom: ggreggoryspre.prodigy.netX-Note: 
  Sent from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Note: 
  Sent from Reverse DNS: dsl-200-67-73-3.prodigy.net.mx 
  ([200.67.73.3]).
  
  
  Is this the 
  correct revdns for this?
  
  Regards,
  Kami


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDomains- Prodigy?

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Landry
Title: Message



Scott, after thinking some more about Kami's 
situation, would this scenario pass or fail the spamdomains test?:
==
SpamDomain.txt file entry:
prodigy.net

Message from (X-Declude Sender):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Connecting mail server (or one tested based on HOP 
and IPBYPASS settings) IP Address:
1.2.3.4

RDNS for 1.2.3.4:
abc.prodigy.net.biz
==

If the spamdomains test is setup as "CONTAINS", 
then I suspect it would pass the test. However, I don't think that is what 
we want, asin Kami's real-life example. This would most likely be a 
messages you would want to fail the spamdomains test.

Several people, including myself, have asked for a 
way to define an exact match, or a way to define a delimiter in the config file 
so that we could define, for example, the spamdomains tests like:

global.cfg:
DELIMITER ~

prodigy.net~
~mx1.abc.net~
~mx2.xyz.  
 ~mx5.cbs.com~
.nbc.net~.msnbc.com~

This could apply to the filter tests, as 
well. This would certainly remove a lot of the ambiguity and uncertainty 
surrounding these tests.

Bill

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Bill 
  Landry 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:32 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 
  SPAMDomains- Prodigy?
  
  This looks to be most likely a dynamic DSL 
  customer of Unity Telephone:
  


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDomains- Prodigy?

2003-06-26 Thread R. Scott Perry

Scott, after thinking some more about Kami's situation, would this 
scenario pass or fail the spamdomains test?:
==
SpamDomain.txt file entry:
prodigy.net

Message from (X-Declude Sender):
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting mail server (or one tested based on HOP and IPBYPASS settings) 
IP Address:
1.2.3.4

RDNS for 1.2.3.4:
abc.prodigy.net.biz
==
Yes, it would.

Several people, including myself, have asked for a way to define an exact 
match, or a way to define a delimiter in the config file so that we could 
define, for example, the spamdomains tests like:
The real question is whether or not this will really happen -- I'm not sure 
that spammers will go to the trouble (and legal risk!) of doing something 
like that.  If they have enough control over an IP that they can change the 
reverse DNS entry, they are very likely trackable, and if they use a 
Prodigy return address *and* use a reverse DNS entry with prodigy in it, 
they could very likely get sued for anything that they may have made from 
the spamming.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Fail two tests, get extra points

2003-06-26 Thread Robert Grosshandler
We run Sniffer, and we're testing Alligate (soon to be buying).

I'd like to set up a test that adds points if BOTH tests fail.  An
Accelerator test, I guess.

For instance, let's say failing Alligate adds 5 points, and failing Sniffer
adds 5 points.

If an e-mail fails both, I want the total added to be 12 (new math).

Conversely, a test that takes away points if both tests pass might also be
interesting.

I don't recall seeing anything like this.  Is it possible?

Rob

www.iGive.com

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Double RDNS

2003-06-26 Thread Mike Kruidhof
We just purchased and implemented Declude Junkmail here.
I am attempting to understand what should be changed to catch more messages.
We are using the default values.  Many messages are getting through with low values.
One thing came to me tonight, I turned on the XINHEADER option to show the RDNS value.

Is there a test that can do a DNS lookup with the hostname that is returned from the 
RDNS?
The IP address returned should match the IP address originally used for the RDNS.
I would like to see how often this is not the case on the messages that are getting 
through.

Thanks,

Mike K


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Political Spam

2003-06-26 Thread Dan Patnode
I preface this by saying that my techniques are based on studying and understanding 
spammers and the way they behave.  More Sun Ztu than Zen:

I've been noticing an increasing number of politically oriented spam, starting after 
the war with Iraq.  The most wanted playing card spam turned into getting those who 
opposed the war.  Since, I've seen anti Bush, pro Bush, and now anti Hillary and pro 
Hillary.

This begs the question, are spammers (as a group) more Republican or Democrat?  Maybe 
the 2010 US Census will have Spammer as an occupation...

Dan

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.