RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x

] Experience with 4.x In light of this reference to WINSOCKCLEANUP being an iMail only issue, do I even need to enable this on our SmarterMail servers? -Jay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 6:30 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x

I'll get lucky enough to need to the fix and may offer some further insight here. Andrew. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:30 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com >

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x

or does it imply that other IP communications will also fail, e.g. SMTP and (critically for me) RDP? Andrew. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:12 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Stranded header files

isn't the best solution. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:00 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New vers

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x

directive in declude.cfg? I would rather be able to detect this while it's happening than to react when I find that spam is leaking or that the proc folder is continually growing. Andrew. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New version - any hints

4 items .. Releasing tomorrow morning: 1. Increased performance for the AVG DB updates 2. AVG virus name reporting fixed 3. Configurable times for AVG updates 4. Buffer overflow fix caused by format of certain 'broken' emails David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x

: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 7:34 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x > The purpose of WINSOCKCLEANUPON is to reset the winsock, what > happens when using this setting is that when the \proc directory hi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x

The purpose of WINSOCKCLEANUPON is to reset the winsock, what happens when using this setting is that when the \proc directory hit 0 decludeproc will finish processing all the messages in the \work before checking the \proc again. As WINSOCKCLEANUP is to be used only by those who experience

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version control and announcements.

John, I understand your frustration and I am working on correcting this and creating a process for this to be effective. Just a FYI you can always check the release notes: http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma

[Declude.JunkMail] Testing the Boards

PING --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How would you create a filter for this?

I created a filter you can modify it or add as you need too David B www.declude.com BODYEND NOTCONTAINS MSHTML BODY1 CONTAINS>a< BODY1 CONTAINS>b< BODY1 CONTAINS>c< BODY1 CONTAINS>d< BODY1 CONTAINS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Backlogged Proc Folder

Will, There is a known issue with certain versions of Imail where the network stack gets confused and DNS no longer resolves. By stop/starting the decludeproc service this resets the winsock and therefore corrects the problem. If you had stop/start the Imail smtp services you would have had the sa

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

half Of David Barker Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:53 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1 1. Harry please contact support at declude regarding your issue of upgrading.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes

find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 8:32 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 R

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes

Thanks John. I will continue to do this in the future. Also just FYI we are currently re-writing the Declude manuals. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Doyle Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:51 AM To: Declude.J

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

1. Harry please contact support at declude regarding your issue of upgrading. 2. The GUI is independent of the install you do not need the full update.   David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry VanderzandSent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes

Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122 available. David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be fo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] This doesnt add up

12:56 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] This doesnt add up Thanks David, both of these tests are not hidden and show up in the headers. Todd - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, April 0

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] This doesnt add up

To reduce false positives NOLEGITCONTENT and IPNOTINMX are hidden tests, check your global.cfg you should see the -5 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 12:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMai

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

ere a comprehensive inventory or list anywhere? Thanks, Dan On Feb 24, 2006, at 5:56, David Barker wrote: > You can add the following to your global.cfg file under your headers > section: > > XINHEADER X-Declude-Code: %HEADERCODE% > > This will produce a code and you can ch

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP - outlook meeting invitations arell not coming through properly. Please See below - Iam using imail 8.15 - declude 2.0.6

Best to do both if you have the declude.cfg   David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott FisherSent: Friday, March 31, 2006 5:28 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP - outlook meeting invitations arell not

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP - outlook meeting invitations arell not coming through properly. Please See below - Iam using imail 8.15 - declude 2.0.6

Go into your virus.cfg and comment out the FOOTER lines.   David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.)Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 5:09 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] H

RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

some tests say WARN in the logs, while others say IGNORE, when they are all set to WARN in the $default$.junkmail? P.s. Darin, correct about the license code, big slip on my part. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Thursday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

IGNORE does not mean the points would not be applied. The points are always applied for all emails. IGNORE means do not take any action regarding that specific test. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Weise Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway

Harry, This is the actual sender of the email X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.251.135.75] Not From: Ken Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Release

you check the download link for the proc only download for 3.0.6.4? I received a page not found error. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 8:06 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Release > Declude Release

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Release

Declude Release 3.0.6.4 and 4.0.9.4 HI FIX Corrected logging issue and locked file problem trying to move .hdr files in SmarterMail SM ADD Support for MAILBOX action in Smartermail CON FIX Confirm for Imail now working correctly David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3 / Declude 4

The initial release of SM 3.x they changed the format of their domains file so everything that Declude checked was considered outgoing. This has since been resolved with the latest release in 4.0.9 and 3.0.6 in Declude and 3.x of SM. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAI

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3 / Declude 4

>>What impact does "unmark as spam" have, in relation to Declude? This should add the sender to SM trusted sender file which Declude checks against for whitelisting. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Sudowski -

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

You can add the following to your global.cfg file under your headers section: XINHEADER X-Declude-Code: %HEADERCODE% This will produce a code and you can check it on this web page which will explain to you what problem(s) exist with headers that cause E-mails to fail the BADHEADERS or SPAMH

RE: [Declude.Virus] [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 11:23 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0 Saturday, February 11, 2006, 9:47:07 AM, David Barker <[EM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

>> So henceforth, 3 will be license/SA and 4 will be subscription. No as customers prior to 8 Feb 06 can use version 4 if they have Declude EVA PRO, Junkmail PRO and Hijack licensed and remain with the purchase of service agreements. >> Will there be concurrent development for both versions or

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

get asked this a lot. Why not post the answer on this forum and save everyone a lot of time? Also, does upgrade mean a previous customer is on SAs, but using v4? Or does that customer stay on v3? Darin. ----- Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

] Declude 3.0 / 4.0 HI David, Re: 6. What is the price for the upgrade? And does the upgrade mean we are on an annual subscription, or continue with service agreements? Darin. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; Sent: Saturday, February 1

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

1. The definition of an Annual Subscription is a license to run Declude for a period of a year at which time the Annual Subscription has to be renewed to continue running Declude. Annual Subscription does NOT apply to customers of Declude prior 8 Feb 06. 2. Existing Customers prior to 8 Feb 06 CAN

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Recurring Quemgr Issues again

Randy,   The new release of SmarterMail 3.0 coming soon, will support WHITELIST AUTH   David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of randy armbrechtSent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 6:21 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Virus Scanning For Your Servers

1. You should be using fpcmd.exe which is the 32bit scanner of F-Prot not the f-prot.exe which is the 16 bit version. 2. Remove the /NOFLOPPY and /PACKED options from the switches 3. Ensure that the Real Time protector of F-Prot is not installed. David B www.declude.com -Original Message---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool Directory Backed Up

: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool Directory Backed Up David Barker wrote: >If there is not one create it using notepad. Or Check if you have a >copy in C:\Program Files\Declude > >What is the CPU of the server ? > > > Found it in Program Files. This is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DOSENDERACTIONS

DOSENDERACTIONS ON uses the $default$.sender actions for OUTBOUND email rather than the OUTBOUND actions in the global.cfg   David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of georgeSent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:24 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool Directory Backed Up

1:11 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool Directory Backed Up David Barker wrote: 1. Check for DNS problems by running your logs on DEBUG and then searching for didn't get response if you see multiple entries like this it could b

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool Directory Backed Up

1. Check for DNS problems by running your logs on DEBUG and then searching for didn't get response if you see multiple entries like this it could be DNS   2. How many threads are you running in your Declude.cfg and what is the CPU of the server ?   David From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc causing dns queries to fail

Will, When this happens again could you try start/stopping the queue manager and smtp services in Imail to see if it resolves the issue of not being able to connect to the DNS server. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc causing dns queries to fail

sh to make this issue known so it can be avoided or diagnosed in the future. I am currently running Win2003/sp1, Imail 8.12 with declude pro 3.0.5.22 running spam and antivirus with f-prot. Will -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc causing dns queries to fail

Will, If Decludeproc was usurping network resources we should be aware of this issue. However currently you are the only report of this incident. Please make sure you are running the latest version of declude 3.0.5.23 Declude has sent out DNS requests and did not recieve responses from the DNS s

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v3 CPU usage and processing speed

25% utilization under NO load is very strange. Could you provide us with Remote Access to see this ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 1:28 PM To: Matt Subject: Re[2]: [

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v3 CPU usage and processing speed

Declude.cfg should be in your \Declude folder, is that where it is located ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 11:25 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declu

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v3 CPU usage and processing speed

miss the possibility of an error on my system considering how large the difference was for the worse, but I haven't seen any claims that turning off hyperthreading produced an improvement yet, though on other applications I have definitely seen benchmarks that show measurable improvements in s

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v3 CPU usage and processing speed

1. How many messages currently in your \proc ? 2. On average how many threads has decludeproc and what is the highest thread count over a 5 min period check this under your processors, also set the update speed under the "view" to high David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [E

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v3 CPU usage and processing speed

1. Set THREADS 200 2. Which virus scanner are you running ? and do you have PRESCAN ON in your virus.cfg 3. Try turning hyperthreading off. 4. Set WAITFORMAIL 500 5. Have you had DNS issues with decludeproc running ? Disable WINSOCKCLEANUP ON 6. Disable WAITFORTHREADS and WAITBETWEENTHREADS Let me

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v3 CPU usage and processing speed

I have worked with customers with similar Dual-Xeon CPU setup and have seen processing of 1000+ emails per minute. 1. What is your THREADS in the Declude.cfg ? 2. Are you running many large filters ? 3. How many virus scanners are you running ? 4. Is hyperthreading turned ON or OFF ? 5. Are you us

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam leak?

We are aware of this it was a forged email posting to our list, we have disabled all posting on the customer list until we need to post. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc Directory

Check your Imail and Declude logs for the start and finish times of a single message, this will help you understand where the delay is occurring.   David Barker www.declude.com   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Fisher Sent: Wednesday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Aliases and per-domain configs

The domain name folder should be the same as that in your imail. If the domain name in Imail is scrubbed.domain.com the the folder name should be scrubbed.domain.com David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS/FAIL test format

>>Does 8.22 require 3.0 or can I run my 2.x version?   Imail 8.20+ requires Declude 3.0 or later.   David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John DoyleSent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 2:16 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Decl

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] D files in spool

Declude only processes D*.smd and Q*.smd files not T files. IMail does not delete the data file when a message is not deliverable, not returnable, and there is no postmaster alias (or there is a problem with the postmaster or root alias accounts). In certain instances, like if you happen to reboo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Autowhitelist not working

Should be available in the SmarterMail 3.0 release. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn Systems Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:08 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] weighting domains

Nick, It is an item for the development schedule, but not likely in a near future release, as currently the functionality is available using invURIBL. David B www.declude -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Thursday, Decembe

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.21 Posted

JM - INVITEFIXON Located in Declude.cfg. Some customers had issues related to Outlook meeting requests appearing as text only. The default for this directive is OFF. JM - Fixed skipping of certain DNSBL tests. JM - STOPALLTESTS is now working correctly EVA - Incorrect log entries regarding

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude and IMail 2006

We have had access to the Beta and have run all our standard tests successfully. The caveat that I will offer is that there is no way in which we can replicate every combination of tests and events in our simulated environments. But to the best of our knowledge Declude and IMail 2006 seem to be OK

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

I will have to ask the Developers and get some feedback. Will post when I have something. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyler Jensen Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:40 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subje

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg lines for SPF

This is the correct syntax. SPFFAIL spf failx 0 0 SPFPASS spf passx 0 0 SPFUNKNOWN spf unknown x 0 0 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

Travis, "My only wish is that we could setup the global.cfg file to fire the tests in the order we choose." This is on our development wishlist. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Sullivan Sent: Thursday, Nov

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though

Yes we are listening David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:55 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though hijack will

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] CMDSPACE Failures

Christian, Another way that you could deal with this specific Microsoft Office Outlook build is to create a filter that contains the following: HEADERS -8 CONTAINS Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.20 Posted

Declude 3.0.5.20 JM - Fixed un-initialized variable, causing CMDSPACE false positives. JM - Fixed un-initialized variable, causing SPF false positive JM - BITMASK test timeout error fixed JM - Mishandled Winmail.dat / TNEF fixed David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Jun

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ipfile

0 then we check 3 etc If you have a HOP 1 then we check 2 etc. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me either by email or call Toll free 1-866-332-5833 Regards, David Barker www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted

anks for you help, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 12:52 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Mike, Best thing to do if yo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent?

We have requested functionally in SM so we can use the MAILBOX action we hope they have it in their 3.0 release. In the mean time you can use information in the Header of the email and the rules in SM to move the message to a specific folder. David Barker www.declude.com -Original Message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.18 Posted

Declude.exe 3.0 is 32kb in size. David Barker www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 12:17 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.18

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted

Mike, Best thing to do if you not sure is run Declude_setup.exe David Barker www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 5:38 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.18 Posted

Declude 3.0.5.18 ALL - Fixed un-defined variables causing intermittent stop/start with the decludeproc service. JM - Fixed SmarterMail incoming email recipient domain aliases. AV - Fixed un-defined variables, causing incorrect Virus Names. David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted

ginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:14 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Yes under the Declude Upgrade Section on the My Account Home Page Da

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted

: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Is there a link we can just get the declude exe file instead of the complete install each time? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:09 PM To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 10:09 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue > The review directory has it's purpose, if there is email that causes > decludeproc to crash, messages that are currently being worked on go

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

The review directory has it's purpose, if there is email that causes decludeproc to crash, messages that are currently being worked on go into the review directory, if the messages continue to cause the same problem, then the messages will again end up in the review. What I would suggest is sendin

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted

Declude 3.0.5.14 ADDED - WINSOCKCLEANUPON Located in Declude.cfg. Some customers had issues related to their network stack causing loss of functionality for basic network operations. The default for this directive is OFF FIX - Memory leaked fixed by forcing windows to close handles once compl

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

Yes, use a renamer application http://www.snapfiles.com/freeware/system/fwfilerename.html   David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard FarrisSent: Monday, October 31, 2005 8:57 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMa

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail v8

At least they say you will look good and they guarantee it ;) David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Sullivan Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 12:37 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter broken in 3.05.05?

@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter broken in 3.05.05? Our service agreement expired but I still have broken product. That suck... Now im sad :) David Barker wrote: >The COUNTRY issue was corrected in 3.0.5.9 > >David B >www.declude.com > >-Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter broken in 3.05.05?

The COUNTRY issue was corrected in 3.0.5.9 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:05 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter broken

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

version this was. John T eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:45 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.J

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 9:02 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

Information when upgrading the decludeproc only. (Note xxx is the version of declude.) 1. download the new decludeprocxxx.exe to your \mailserver\ directory 2. Stop the decludeproc service 3. rename your current decludeproc.exe to decludeprocxxx.exe 4. rename the new decludeprocxxx.exe to declu

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

Did you stop the service when replacing the executable ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:06 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incor

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

Goto your smartermail directory at the command prompt and type Decludeproc -v Which version are you displaying ? David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:34 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.c

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverted to 2.6.11 - FWIW...

Mark, Thank you for this post it is very useful. I am taking this information to our developers to see what else we can find I will let you know as soon as we can possibly identify the problem. The only difference between you and all our other customers is that you have a load balancer doing a ro

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.12 Posted

] Declude 3.0.5.12 Posted Is it safe to install the latest ( 3.0.5.12 ) with no changes to the existing configuration files ? Avolve Support Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless ! http://www.avolvewireless.net -- Original Message -- From: "David Barker&quo

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.12 Posted

Declude 3.0.5.12 ADDED - When the \proc directory is empty winsock cleanup will be called after the shorter of either the number of worker threads going to 0 or 5 minutes. Any files found in the work directory will then be moved to the \review directory. David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail c

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Processing Order: 3.05.11

It is possible that the \work does not get empty if you have a continues flow of email, Declude will not WAITFORMAIL unless the \proc reaches 0   It may look like it is processing email 1 at a time but each thread is doing it's work, and so while one mail is waiting in DNS returns others ema

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

Matt, Nice peaks. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:19 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem Darin Cox wrote: >In picture form

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

eclude upgrade? Darin. - Original Message - From: "GlobalWeb.net Webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:32 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem Decludeproc and queuemgr Randy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

clude upgrade? Darin. - Original Message - From: "GlobalWeb.net Webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:32 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem Decludeproc and queuemgr Randy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Processing Order: 3.05.11

WAITFORMAIL works exactly as stated. If the \proc directory becomes empty the decludeproc service will sleep for the amount of time specified before it begins to process email again that is located in the \proc directory.   I am not sure that what you are seeing is in fact happening. If I am

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem Decludeproc and queuemgr Randy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:30 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

the time stamp of the new proc > install. There is nothing in it; just a blank folder. I deleted it. > > > Sincerely, > > Randy Armbrecht > Global Web Solutions, Inc. > 804-346-5300 x112 > 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112 > http://globalweb.net > > >

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

d with the time stamp of the new proc install. There is nothing in it; just a blank folder. I deleted it. Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions, Inc. 804-346-5300 x112 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112 http://globalweb.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

folder called "s" that appeared with the time stamp of the new proc install. There is nothing in it; just a blank folder. I deleted it. Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions, Inc. 804-346-5300 x112 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112 http://globalweb.net -Original Message---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:39 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem Randy try changing WAITFORMAIL 1500 To WAITFORMAIL 500 See if that changes the delay. David B www.declude.com -

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude.cfg defaults

John, Default Values: (But my opinion is to use the WAITFORMAIL and change it to 5000 for single or 500 for dual proc) WAITFORMAIL3 WAITFORTHREADS 1500 WAITBETWEENTHREADS 1 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

David Barker Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:39 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem Randy try changing WAITFORMAIL 1500 To WAITFORMAIL 500 See if that changes the delay. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >