substantially to the size of my default config. Any performance
hits or other worries I need to know about?
Bill Green
dfn Systems
505-622-7853
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], a
t all.
Can I set up a filter that would catch all mail to aol so I can COPYTO an
account I can monitor?
Bill Green
dfn Systems
505-622-7853
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "u
og on my part)
One item I want to make sure I'm clear on. Swapping Countries for Country
would only be done in the txt file, right?
Bill G
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You can find it in the knowledgebase at
http://support.declud
nd are too obscure.
I believe it is a custom filter with the word country or countries in the text
file? Am I way off base? I can't find it in the manual at all.
Can someone pitch me a link, or some other bone?
Declude 4.x (latest build)
Bill Green
dfn systems
---
This E-mail came from the D
Thanks Herb and Kevin!
I had missed 2 different ways of doing it. I guess I need to RTMA (Read the
Manual Again)
>Herb Wrote:
>That is not correct. Here is the info from the help in version 3.x.
>Smartermail will do what you want, require >those from non known ip addresses
>or ranges to have
marterMail seems to only
have 2 options. Authentication required, or totally Open Relay.
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives
The only downsides I see so far are user re-education, and that it seems to
lack SMTP Relay for specified IPs.
So, Would any SmarterMail Admins like to share from actual experience to
date?
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
a while. If it seems all
spam, then lower your Delete score, and review the next few points. When you
start seeing legit mail in your review range, double check the next one up.
Bill Green
dfn Systems
- Original Message -
From: Chris Patterson
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
FYI, from Steve Linford of spamhaus:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/2d050ab220faf931
http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
Bill
David Sullivan wrote the following on 11/15/2006 12:58 PM -0800:
> Does anyone have the proper setup in Declude to query
&g
h the
other domains? Or will I have to use HOPHIGH to catch them all?
Bill Green
dfn Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The
#x27;s job to artificially make an incompatible message
compatible with email clients.
Well said Andy. I completely agree.
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Decl
CATCHALLMAILS will actually Catch All Mail. It is
usefull only if you want an action to apply to ALL mail that hits your
server.
Bill Green
dfn Systems
- Original Message -
From:
Craig
Edmonds
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 10
Of course those of us who are small ISPs don't even
have the option.
Bill
dfn Systems
- Original Message -
From:
chris
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:15
AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] picture
spam
all, it is all
done with open source software, from the OS to all necessary e-mail
applications, including spam filtering and virus scanning. It's a really
nice setup and is very fast and efficient, as well. If you would like all
of the gory details, e-mail me off-list.
Bill
---
True, my choice of words was not fair to Declude. Thanks for the correction.
Bill Green
dfn Systems
- Original Message -
From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 5:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhitelist feature with
adding any
false positives to their Contacts list for whitelisting.
I remember reading on one of my email lists that the Declude Autowhitelist
feature is broken when used with Imail 2006. Was this really the case? Has
it been fixed in current release? Is anyone using it successfully?
Bill Green
d
David, I have not upgraded to any 4.x version of Declude yet, but I still do
not see a link for downloading anything but a 4.x version on my downloads
page. Please send me the link for the 3.1.1 "upgrade" download (I am
currently running 3.1.0).
Thanks,
Bill
- Origin
David, how does one go about finding and downloading v3.1.1 for Declude? I
don't see it available for download on my download page at the Declude web
site.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Sent: Friday, August 04,
Sure, just drop the ndb files into the same
directory where your daily.cvd and main.cvd files are located and then restart
your clamd service (if you have it running as a service).
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Craig
Edmonds
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
.
The new scam database is working great here, lots of catches so far and no
FPs yet. If you want to give it a run, please do heed Steve's request at
the end of this message about scripting the downloads for the new scam.ndb,
at least for now...
Thanks,
Bill
- Original Messa
.
The new scam database is working great here, lots of catches so far and no
FPs yet. If you want to give it a run, please do heed Steve's request at
the end of this message about scripting the downloads for the new scam.ndb,
at least for now...
Thanks,
Bill
- Original Messa
existing language (unless I had experts in both languages), I would simply
start with the existing specifications and develop original code (in my
programming language of choice) to those specs.
Anyway, this is my final 2 cents on this person's (mine) personal opinion...
Bill
- Original Me
David, it looks like Declude needs to update its SPF record as posts from
the list are failing both:
SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL
SPF_SOFTFAIL
DNSStuff is showing "softfail" for your mail delivery host IP address, as
well:
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/spf.ch?server=declude.com&ip=63.24
I thought this was due to a glitch in the transition from IMail to
SmarterMail at Declude.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Barker"
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:49 PM
Subject: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] Dec
ff and their capabilities
than I do, so I'll admit that I could be wrong...
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bill Landry"
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:47 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commto
different then Declude
looking at building in support to these various spam checksum services -
send the query in the correct format, and properly interpret the returned
response.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bill La
resort to
pricey and convoluted options like CommTouch. Had Declude queried its
customer base before getting in bed with CommTouch, they might have come up
with some better/cheaper/more acceptable solutions...
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL
Sound like Cloudmark (http://www.cloudmark.com/) and their free Razor
service (http://razor.sourceforge.net/), which I have already been using
successfully for a few years now.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, Ju
"cp" is the
UNIX/Linux "copy" command syntax and "chown" changes the file and directory
ownership - probably not necessary on Window servers).
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 15,
RulesDeJour is a script for pulling down the non-official SARE rules sets.
The sa-update script is used to pull down official SA rule updates (updating
the default rule sets that come with SA).
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
fully tag almost 100% of these image
spams, and Razor tags a majority of them, as well.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 7:39 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] image spam
fyi -
I just found these 2 plug
PONG
- Original Message -
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:21 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Testing the Boards
PING
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
ntation reacts to poisoning attempts.
So spammers keep using bayes poison because it works in some cases. It also
doesn't really hurt them much, and sometimes even helps them, against more
resistant implementations.
==
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Colbeck, Andrew&quo
.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 11:06 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files
I received a couple with the broken gif as late as yesterday. The Declude
headers end up at the botto
y are
quite awesome. Steve periodically updates the phish signatures, as well, so
check regularly for an updated file.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ban
scanning and thus
bypasses the virus scanners.
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail&
Queue Manager:
Disabled DNS Cache
Disabled Failed Domain Skipping
In SMTP Security Tab:
Disabled "Check Valid Sender"
Disabled "Auto-deny possible Hack
Attempts"
Bill Green
dfn Systems
- Original Message -
From:
Goran Jovanovic
Hi,
I have
Great! :-)
Only one feature to go!
I'm hoping the new SMTP Plus and POP Plus will enable Declude's Mailbox
Action to work.
Bill Green
dfn Systems
- Original Message -
Automatic Whitelisting per user from the recipient's Web Messaging
Address Book
->> As fa
matic Whitelisting per user from the recipient's Web Messaging Address
Book
Can any early adopters enlighten me?
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail cam
Didn't get any notification here either.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Changes @ Declude
Barry,
I didn't get the E-mail that you mentioned.
I'
I notice on the Declude web site that Declude 4.0.8 is available for
download. I don't recall seeing any announcement of a new version, so
what's new or changed in the 4.0 version?
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail cam
I haven't received anything from the Declude or Imail lists since early this
morning. I'm getting nervous. Is it just quiet?
Bill Greem
dfn Systems
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
T
ILENT -REPORT=report.txt
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 1:24 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Virus Scanning For Your Servers
1. You should be using fpcmd.exe which is the 32bit scanne
Don't know if you would want to use them, even if
they were available, as the writer was high on life and drunk with enthusiasm
most of the time while concocting them... ;-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Evans Martin
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Well, now that you put it that way, probably not... ;-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy
Does it make a difference who is supplying th
I think you've got it backwards, SBC acquired AT&T but is keeping the AT&T
name.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:23 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy
And since
ocal7.Debug 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3960069c00fe2cd1)
[65.223.9.133] MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2006-01-19 00:01:52 Local7.Debug 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3960069c00fe2cd1)
[65.223.9.133] RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not sure what to do at this point. Does anyone have any suggestions?
:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2006-01-19 00:01:52 Local7.Debug 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3960069c00fe2cd1)
[65.223.9.133] RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not sure what to do at this point. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
We are running Declude Version 3.0.5.23 with JunkMail and Virus Pro on two
dual-proc servers and are not seeing this. I often see the CPU at zero when
no mail is being processes.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "David Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt&qu
Marcus,
Are you running DNS on the Mail Server, or does it point to another
machine?
If running locally, you might want to try pointing DNSOVERRIDE to a
different dns server.
Bill Green
dfn Systems
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
You can. Simply add a line to your hosts file on your current mail server
like:
ip.of.gate.waycomcast.com
Then all mail destine for comcast.com will get sent directly to the gateway
server and all other mail will still get delivered as usual.
Bill
- Original Message -
From
directories are relatively new to my installation.
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [
now.
Are these just orphans to be deleted after 24-36 hrs. or is something I need
to look into?
I didn't think one of the file pair should be left here?
Bill
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
I doubt that the problems experienced by the
Declude licensing server had anything to do with your DNS tests failing. I
have been running version 3.0.5.22 since it was released and experienced no
problems over the weekend, including DNS based tests.
Bill
- Original Message
ource of
education.information on this and other email standards.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Chris Anton
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 7:55
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Not
supporting null originator Problem
H
What version of decludeproc are your running?
decludeproc -v
Sounds like an old issue that has been resolved in more recent releases.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Vanderzand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: [
Keep in mind that if you have a backlog, your processor may max until it
clears out. If it is still maxing after your que is cleared, adjust the
threads back down some.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December
Yes, 8.2 needs to be patched, as well. See:
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/imail/releases/imail_professional/im822.asp
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: [
I'm running on IMail 8.12
I've considered SmarterMail but the lack of a mailbox feature to route spam
to individual mailboxes was a dealbreaker. We have too many customers who
depend on it.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Evans Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
out 2 weeks ago, but I don't know if
it's related.
Looking at the logs, it appears the email is being treated as if
autowtitelist isn't on. I've double checked my global config to ensure it
is.
Has anyone encountered this before?
Bill G
---
[This E-mail scanned f
Thank You John and Bill :-),
During my adjustments, I was able to try it both ways. On my first
adjustment I stopped and restarted decludeproc, smtp, and Que Manager. I
immediately saw the change in proccessor utilization. For the second
adjustment, I only restarted the decludeproc service
n you
declude.cfg and processes whatever it finds there.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude.cfg threads procedure
Changes to the Declude.cfg file req
to stop/start any services to make the change effective, or just
change the number in declude.cfg?
Bill
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
Take a look at SpamAssassin or the SA plug-in for Declude.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cryptic URL in source
David,
Could I suggest that you
Mike, you cannot simply execute the Decludeproc30xxx.exe file to do the
decludeproc upgrade, you need to stop the decludeproc service, delete the
old decludeproc.exe file, then rename the Decludeproc30xxx.exe to
decludeproc.exe and then restart the service.
Bill
- Original Message
address like RouteTo for IMail?
Bill Green
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives
Really, whoda thunk it... ;-)
The file was actually updated while the service was stopped to change the
decludeproc.exe file. It appears that the version 3.0.5.14 does not like
something about winmail.dat attachments.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "John T (Lists)&quo
David, I made the suggested change to my declude.cfg and within 3 minutes
the orphaned .vir directories started showing up in the "work" sub-directory
and messages were being moved into the "review" directory. I will send you
and support the trace evidence off-line.
I sent info to Declude support yesterday about this, but have not received a
response yet. I also had to revert back to V3.0.5.12 yesterday because of
this issue.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 0
Shock on the IMail Annual Maintenance. I'm looking
at SmarterMail with renewed interest as, I'm sure, are others.
Have I missed news of a SmarterMail equivalent to the Mailbox Action, or is
one coming soon?
Bill
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail cam
k, to reprocess these emails move them back to the
\proc or \spool directory.
=
Above it talks about a "\review" directory, however, under
"imail\spool\proc" I only have two sub-directories: "\error" & "\work". Do
I need to create this "\revie
Ditto, since we run dual-proc IMail servers, as well. What are the current
declude.cfg entries and recommended settings. Are all of the documented
issues now resolved?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005
f function:
sed "s/original text/new text/g" old-file.txt > new-file.txt
Bill
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
vURIBL is still actually
run against every email since it is in global.cfg, so there is no reduction
in Processor utilization. (Actually, an increase due to the custom test).
Do I understand this correctly?
Is there a way to only run the invuribl.exe if a message has passed Sniffer?
Bill
only.
Correctly handle parsing the XML file for the email installation path.
SY, Bill Billman
Declude
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.7/112 - Release Date: 9/26/2005
Why would you want to do this and send the message through SA again if it's
already running on your gateway?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] d
0.0
I can see you guys are going to keep us busy.
We are as well looking forward to focusing developing on this new version
the features and functionality our customers are talking about. And maybe a
few we have come up with too. ;)
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
those
messages and hand them back.
I hope this answers your question.
Thanks,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 3:54 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and IMail 8.2
Sandy
testing is underway and there are plans to enter open beta soon.
Bill Billman
Director of Engineering
Declude - internet security software
978.499.2933 office
603.930.4886 mobile
978.477.8930 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
of the message,
which is only supported via ESMTP, then the receiving mail server must receive
the message up to the set limit before it can reject the delivery.
Bill
all forwarded mail and then
bounce mail sent to invalid accounts, then it will always respond positively to
verification queries, thus defeating the purpose of recipient address
verification.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Goran
Jovanovic
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 2:10
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
box
I have a question
about these boxes that go in front of Declude, be they IMGATE or ORF or
us to
remove it.
Chuck, for what it's worth, Postfix can strip these headers very easily, if
you are willing to setup a Linux server with Postfix and relay all outbound
mail through it.
Bill
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mai
We had the same problem last year. It was a "bug" in one of the
releases of Imail and was latter fixed. I am not sure what version had
the problem but the latest version (8.20 with hotfix 2) works correctly.
Thanks,
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
expectations.
Thanks,
Bill Billman
Declude
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 6:52
AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
[Declude.Virus] Brief Update
Hi Bill
believe it was time well spent and I thank all our customers for their
patients. So far we are very pleased with the results from our tests.
Bill Billman
Declude
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mailing Lists
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005
9:23 PM
To
but I’m very optimistic from a stability and
performance perspective.
Bill Billman
Declude
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hardrick
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:47
PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
give a high degree of confidence that the target
problem is the one that has been fixed. That confidence will grow as
testing without failure continues through beta.
Bill
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Nice
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005
3:51 PM
EMAIL PROTECTED] We do pay attention to every message and appreciate your
feedback. We will continue to improve our processes until we are offering the
best support possible.
All the best,
Bill Billman
Director of Engineering
Declude - internet
security software
--
No virus fou
o stop these emails from clogging up our server with the
email
> loop.
>
> Thoughts?
Blocking the localhost address could possibly cause you problems. Why not
simply blacklist the sending servers real IP address (the one that it
connects to you with) in IMail and be done with it?
Bill
---
T
well we will provide the solution in an interim release. I
apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused and thank you for your
patience.
This is my first post here but assure you that it will not
be my last.
All the best,
Bill
Bill Billman
Director of Engineering
Declude
able either, since the HF2 patches looks to be the same for both 8.15
and 8.2, with the exception of the SMTPD32 related fix, which probably was
not an issue with 8.15.
Bill
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
- Original Message -
From: "Spaminator" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bill, thanks-- this helps a lot.
The imail statistics test was one I wanted to capture with declude,
but mostly I'm looking for the phrase and URL tests (which we've
spent years tweaking extensivel
- Original Message -
From: "NIck Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bill Landry wrote:
Actually, some IMail spam tests run before being passed to Declude and
some after. The JunkMail archives will contain the gory details.
Bill
correct William - but the headers are after.
contain the gory details.
Bill
Spaminator wrote:
Hi all,
I have a need to use Declude to filter mail to a user's spambox based on
X-IMAIL-SPAM in the headers (we're still using an imail filter that we
don't want to give up).
I created a custom filter file with the following:
H
I have configure in IMail. I have added:
DNSOVERRIDE xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
as well, and now the response to "declude -diag" is much
quicker, and only one instance of "Using [im.decludekey.us]" shows
up.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Ralph
Krausse
Markus Wrote:
If someone is interested in, I've updated my sober-q filter files.
I'm interested! Thanks Markus!
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
Here's another one:
http://mailscanner.prolocation.net/german.cf
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 9:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] German political spam
The direct link for spamassassin
#x27;s not
email related.
Thanks,
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archi
s. The better thing
to do, as you said, is determine what test(s) is/are reducing the weight and
adjust it.
Bill
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The
1 - 100 of 1039 matches
Mail list logo
