on to stay with IMail easier for you?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declud
:
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and IMail 2006
Who ever said it is not compatible?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday, Decemb
Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
d as spam if it ever reached Declude. It's almost as
if the SMTP server hasn't even attempted delivering any of this e-mail even
once.
Does anyone know what could possibly be going on here? I'm aware of the
IMail forum but I thought I'd try here first.
Thanks
greatly if I didn't have to comb through the
250 MB log files to figure out when a small piece of text inadvertently
pushes legit e-mail over my HOLD threshold.
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail sca
Hello, All,
I realize that this might be better asked in the IMail Forum but this group
has a little better signal-to-noise ratio so I thought I'd try here first.
We are doing Store and Forward mail filtering for a customer. We use the
"hosts" file to define what IP to Forward mail to after w
Hello, All,
I think it's possible that my ALL_LIST.DAT needs to be updated because I'm
starting to receive legit e-mails from Yahoo IPs that come up as ARIN
Unlisted. My current ALL_LIST.DAT is dated 4/08/2005. Is there a newer
copy that we can download somewhere?
Thanks, Much!
to me and I was told to try AVAFTERJM
command and it made a world of difference...the only draw back I have seen
is more spam in spamreview...
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247. Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
"Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet"
- Original Messag
ed in knowing about it otherwise I'm just looking for ways to
decrease the CPU Usage.
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
---
This E-mail c
ext,
e.g...
=?iso-8859-1?B?SG9ybnkgcGlsbHMgLSA3NSUgT0ZG?=
so I can see exactly what the user would be seeing if the e-mail actually
made it all the way to the e-mail client?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
And here's the obligatory page from Snopes,
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/scams/credit.htm.
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Catuogno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:25 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: Anti- Identity theft advice
I have a great deal o
Sorry, everyone. I sent this question to the wrong list.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:41 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
Hello, All,
We are runnin
7;Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability".
Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the "Outlook 'Boundary
Space Gap' Vulnerability" on either a specific incoming e-mail address or a
specific incoming e-mail domain?
Thanks
Has anyone but me noticed that the "german spam" subjects appear to be
changing?
We just blocked on that has the subject "Armenian Genocide Plagues Ankara 90
Years On" but that's not on any of the lists that I have seen.
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PR
ht be good enough as they seem to think we should be able to
control it and are shirking our duties.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
---
This E-mail came
oes the version I am running have the
ability to count the number of recipients in an e-mail and "punish" the
e-mail based on a "number of recipients" threshold?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
I think it uses STP...The Racer's Edge.
- Original Message -
From: "Imail Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
> Just curious: does SmarterMail use SMTP or something similar?
>
> Ben
>
> - Origin
Hello, CPHZ?
Is there any word on this?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 10:01 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest ALL_LIST.DAT
> Hello, All,
> I think
I personally think it's b*llsh*t.
First of all to send a spam message back to the "spammers computer" you need
to properly identify all spam messages. No one has come up with a good way
of always identifing only spam as spam and only legit e-mail as legit
e-mail.
Also, what constitues the "spamm
Hello, All,
I think it's possible that my ALL_LIST.DAT needs to be updated because I'm
starting to receive legit e-mails from Yahoo IPs that come up as ARIN
Unlisted. My current ALL_LIST.DAT is dated 10/01/2004. Is there a newer
copy that we can download somewhere?
Thanks, Much!
Fred,
Are you looking for a Control Panel which allows customers to manage both
web sites and e-mail sites?
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Frederick Samarelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 11:24 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Off Topic.
> I am looking for reco
Joey,
If you go here http://declude.mydomain.com/ (where mydomain.com is the
domain I use in my from address) you can see the part of our Declude
JunkMail Config which we make public.
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Joey Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 04, 20
I can't reach their web site site from here. It's 11:39am EST right now.
- Original Message -
From: "Che Vilnonis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Declude Email List"
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:24 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Is declude.com down?
> anyone?
>
> Che Vilnonis
> Applica
om line in GLOBAL.CFG that adds this header is...
XINHEADER X-Note: Sent with HELO [%HELO%] from Reverse DNS [%REVDNS%]
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.co
. Is there any way to lengthen the amount of
time or number of retries that IMail will attempt to resend Store and
Forwarded e-mail?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus
of tests and a Domain
Summary Report so I can tell how spam filtering customers how much spam we
are blocking for them.
Do I need to have the LOG LEVEL set to HIGH to get accurate reports for
those?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
ers I know immediatelty that is spam. It would
be great if Declude could have a test built into it in which you could
punish e-mail if it had x number of multiple duplicate recipients. If this
functionality does not exist I would like to put in a development request
for it.
Thanks In Advance,
Echo!!!
- Original Message -
From: "Mark E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT-Microsoft Exchange Tools
> Before we moved to HP Openview (very pricy) we used a combination of Big
> Brother and IpSwitch What's Up
hold)
> 300 Delete (71.3% of all mail)
>
> As I have to draw a line somewhere, I drew the line at 200. Everything
held
> or deleted is considered spam.
> Everything under 200 is considered ham, I think this is fairly
conservative.
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
Scott,
How do you define Ham?
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 4:14 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months
I've compiled my spam test results over the last year to look at test
effectiveness tren
even a bulk mail message. It's
handwritten.
How can I tell what part of the message is failing the COMMENTS test?
Thanks, In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/m
ecause it too happens
to comply with RFCs?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:13 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
S
ables that Declude
creates but I don't know exactly what the syntax would be and I don't know
if Declude parses out the domain name into it's own variable. But if there
were such a variable I'm thinking something along the lines of...
FROMDOMAIN 50 IS %HELO%
Than
ated on 2005-01-26 13:37:43 EST
>
>Domain servers in listed order:
>
>DNS4.IMGFARM.COM 208.45.133.230
>DNS5.IMGFARM.COM 208.45.133.231
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello, All,
Does anyone know if MyWay.com and ExciteNetwork.com are owned by the same
entity?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
---
[This E-mail was
Scott,
I'm sorry. I didn't mean the MAILFROM test. I mean the MAILFROM entry that
you put in the filter file, e.g. MAILFROM 50 CONTAINS suspect.
All I need to know is if the MAILFROM I describe above looks at the whole
address in X-Declude-Sender, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], or if it just
looks
X-Declude-Sender address? Or does one search the whole address and the
other only look at stuff after the @ character?
BTW, I have searched the archives and I'm still seeking clarification.
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
uld enable this?
Does this idea even have any merit to it?
Thanks for your feedback!
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
ne, astronomy, etc., and
> we just don't know enough to see through the mistakes.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> Dan Geiser wrote:
>
> >I don't get this article at all. How is this any different then sending
> >e-mails with using domains that you have no intentio
I don't get this article at all. How is this any different then sending
e-mails with using domains that you have no intention of ever using? Why
would you want to register the domain name and then associated yourself with
a domain used in a spam mailing? And from a technical standpoint why would
Scott,
I was running 1.81.
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
>
> >I have upgraded to the new Declude.exe v1.82. Within a matter of minutes
of
e might be something in the new Declude code
which would cause the .EXE to not run as quickly or as efficiently as
before.
I'm not pointing fingers. I just wanted to know if there's been any
possible performance changes because of the bug fix. If not I'll look
somewhere else.
T
Hello, All,
I would like to take a look at the current default GLOBAL.CFG. It used to
be linked to from the manual but that link is gone. Can someone tell me
where I would go to find that now?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I've never heard of it.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 12:45 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on SortMonster/MessageSniffer
> Is anyone using this product as part of their filtering?
>
> http:/
TECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 3:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Declude Config Files...anyone in the
> holiday giving mood?
>
>
> Che,
> NOT the address that I typed in my e
PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 3:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Declude Config Files...anyone in the
> holiday giving mood?
>
>
> Che,
> You can see everything that I am
Che,
You can see everything that I am currently doing here...
http://declude./
Replace with the domain that I use to post to the list.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Che Vilnonis" <[EMAIL P
NS" be a viable alternative to the domain but still
block on everything else. Can I just put that string "No Reverse DNS" in
second column to pass through domains which only match "domain.com" and "No
Reverse DNS"?
I hope that makes sense.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
port 25 and then sending e-mail either from or to @domain.tld, where
domain.tld is the second-level domain found when you do a lookup on the
Reverse DNS for any IP addresses found to be responding on port 25, might be
a good way for spammers to get their messages through.
Thanks, Much!
Dan G
this direct delivery method
which basically ignores the current DNS system?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/m
Scott,
I can seem to reach www.dnsstuff.com or backup.dnsstuff.com. Are you
current having issues?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
http
anks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://
vance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declud
Title: Message
Or Snapple addresses...
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin Bilbee
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 4:13
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the information. I can now block smaphole address f
m. I know that part of
our parternship will probably give us access to feeds through them, although
I've been a little unimpressed by their AV feeds. I'm curious to know if
there are any other good ones out there.
Thanks, Much!
Dan Geiser
[
.
- Original Message -
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:33 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Determining a BCC Recipient
> > If it were me I would just use the CATCHA
If it were me I would just use the CATCHALLMAILS feature of Declude and COPY
them to an archival e-mail address and then just burn the inbox of that
address to disk once a month.
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Octobe
Mark,
I wasn't talking about "declude -ver" vs.
"declude.exe -ver". I was saying to Darin that "-ver" appears to work as
well as "-diag".
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
Mark E.
Smith
To: [EMAIL PR
"Declude.exe -ver" appears to work as
well.
- Original Message -
From:
Darin Cox
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 2:28
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How to
tell which version I have
Uh...shouldn't that be "decude -
diag"?
Dari
001154; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:13:04 -0400
==
Pagerover.com is another domain name on our IMail server but I can't figure
out why SMTP32-FWD is kicking in. Is there some place in the file system
or
registry where I can go to see why SMTP32-FWD is forwarding this message?
Thanks So Much!
D
Scott,
I'm a little suprised that this message didn't fail the MAILFROM test...
===
Received: from wrkst-120-188.trafficopen.com [69.42.120.188] by
mail.maildesk.net
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A197D95000B8; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:00:23 -0400
From: "Market Research" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e phishing URLs".
Less noise and more signal on this list means less meaningless (to me)
messages that I have to wade through to get to the real meat of the new
enhancements in Declude JunkMail. As it is I can't keep up with everything
which is discussed on here and I don't think
t; have almost no false positives. Just my thoughts on the matter.
> >
> > Chuck Schick
> > Warp 8, Inc.
> > (303)-421-5140
> > www.warp8.com
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D
Markus,
I would say that your list is more much complete than mine. Mine is correct
just not as complete. Mine is based on the messages that I have received
and if I haven't received phishes for some specific domains then they
wouldn't have ended up on my list.
Dan
- Original Message -
tter.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Citibank - phishing- still live
Whether I
n
whether I'm making too much of my Declude config known to the
public.
Any takers? If so, just e-mail me directly
and I'll send you the link.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
es for ClamAV
> support phishing e-mail detection.
>
> Bill
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Citibank -
Hi, Kami,
Well, my users never see them because I have
"citibank.com" on my "spam domains" list. I agree that it might be
important to disseminate currently active phishing URLs but I just don't know
that the DJM mailing list is the place.
Just An Idea,
Thanks!
Dan
- Original Mess
Can I ask why you guys post these to the Declude
JunkMail discussion list? It doesn't seem to have anything to do with the
subject matter of this list.
- Original Message -
From:
Kami Razvan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 6:56
AM
Subject:
John,
What is the IP range?
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "John Shacklett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:35 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IP block tool
> I use SamSpade for Windows as my Swiss Army Knife while I'm working, and
99
Does anyone know the best method for submitting
reports regarding the Declude Web Site and/or JunkMail Manual?
BTW, it's cool to finally put a face to our
esteemed junkmail saviour, Scott Perry, http://www.declude.com/aboutus.asp.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David,
I migrated our Declude JunkMail setup to a 100
point system awhile back. With our current setup as it is today we HOLD on
100 and DELETE on 300. When I first migrated over the way that I did it
was I set my HOLD weight to 100 and had no DELETE weight and then I assigned
arbitrary (w
ftp.xyz.com/imail where xyz.com is Kami's domain
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 3:19 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Online FTP site with Declude Files...
> I believe that it was Kami who had his \declu
L PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP:
207.8.198.43 ID: 09/17/2004 22:00:37 Q96b227a Tests failed [weight=199]:
NOABUSE=IGNORE IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE
WEIGHT-HOLD=HOLD AHBL-RHSBL-RELAY=IGNORE IPFILE-BAD-24=IGNORE 09/17/2004
22:00:37 Q96b227a Last action = "">
but still no mention of the FROMFILE-OTHER
test.
Does anyone have an idea what might be going on
here?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is intentional as I
would like to use that for lookups if possible.
Thanks, Much!
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you even read their sites?
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Farris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Help, I have been blacklisted
> I have been delisted from SPAMCOP...whew...but I still am
ularly send mail to..
>
> Richard Farris
> Ethixs Online
> 1.270.247. Office
> 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
> "Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet"
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMA
If you were on a blacklist people would not have problems sending to you.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Farris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 12:07 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] I HAVE BLACKLISTED ON SPAMCOP
> 65.240.164.10 has been
Not just Spamcop, http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=65.240.164.10.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Farris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 100% CPU
> I see I have been blacklisted in spamcop
What's up with the Declude.com web site? When
I go to http://www.declude.com/ I
get...
"Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error
'80040e37'
Invalid object name 'ConfigSetup'.
/incfiles/configsetup.asp, line 600"Thanks,Dan
. I
think they're pretty concise but I'm always looking for constructive
criticism.
Thanks,
Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Jun
ve that is causing this to occur.
Any ideas?
Thanks,Dan Geiser[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe,
I can send you the instructions on how to set it up if you like.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Cool! Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New ALL_LIST.DAT File?
>
> >Has the file been updated?
>
> It has just been updated, and is
> at http://www.declude
Hi, Scott,
Has the file been updated?
Thanks, Much!
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New ALL_LIST.DA
ted States, http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/cidr.ch?ip=66.248.151.107.
Also ARIN WHOIS appears to have it allocated to an ISP in Las
Vegas.
Could some your tools have one setup of IP
allocation tables different from ALL_LIST.DAT?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
be causing it? The only thing I've really done recently is
upgraded to Beta 1.79 (no interim). Could that have something to do with
it?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this guy serious when he says "The test is available for download". What do we
have to download? What version number includes this test? What is
the format of the test? Is it just an IP4R test? What host name do
we use?
- Original Message -
From:
Barry @ CPHZ
To
and that my
countries are heavily scaled towards the countries that our customers receive
e-mail from.
COUNTRY adds points for the last country in the
chain. COUNTRIES adds points for a country anywhere in the
chain.
Let me know if it makes sense or not.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL
Can someone tell me what DOW is?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "John Olden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:09 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DOW test
> Maybe someone can answer t
http://money.cnn.com/2004/05/20/technology/spam.reut/?cnn=yes
"Ron Scelson told the Senate Commerce Committee
that the 30 million messages he sends out each day from an underground
nuclear-fallout shelter contain his mailing address and a method for recipients
to opt out of future mailings,
I always though it would be much easier to track down spammers if the ISPs
would stop terminating the service of the known spammers that they have on
their networks and instead allow them to continue to keep the same IP
addresses. That way the list of IP addresses of known spammers would not be
ev
each line would be compared to the HELO string and if that string was
210.10.23.75, for example, it would add 100 points for "0.1" and "0.2" and
"3.7"?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
John,
Just use Froogle, http://froogle.google.com/. There are plenty of stores
listed on there which have the product in that price range.
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "John Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tues
http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php?code=420e
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 2:26 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] "SPAMHEADERS"?
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me why this one failed the SPAMHEADERS test
Thank you so much, Kami! I can definitely understand your concise
explanation and it sounds like a great way to handle what I am trying to do
or at least add another trick in the bag. I'll have to see how I can
incorporate this into my current setup.
Thanks, Again!
Dan
- Original Message --
# Added: 05/17/2004@attbi.com
@bellsouth.net@eudoramail.com@juno.com .untd.com@lycos.com@mindspring.com blount.mail.mindspring.net@msn.com .hotmail.com@netzero.net .untd.com
will those "# Added: 05/17/2004" comments mess up
the functioning of the file?
Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou are trying to do?
>
> Regards,
> -Kami
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 9:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS works as
f it can be done that would be great.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Kami Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 9:22 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS works as ENDSWITH or CONTA
REVDNS in the "edu" TLD. With
"edu" especially a large majority of the time it does match so points for
not matching would be great.
And that's just one example of how that would be very useful to me.
.Just another request to give consideration for the future.
Thank
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
