[Declude.JunkMail] Major Declude/SPF problem... any ideas?

2004-12-01 Thread Joe Wolf
I've been receiving reports of non-delivery of messages between users on our mail server. For example if I host abc.com and users between abc.com send to each other inside the building on the private IP range. I tracked down the problem and all the messages have SPF FAIL in the headers and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New ALL_LIST.DAT File?

2004-07-30 Thread Joe Wolf
Maybe I'm way behind here, but what is the all_list.dat file? What does it do and how do you implement it? I have no such file in my system. Thanks, Joe - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 8:36 AM Subject: Re:

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude reporting wrong IP... why?

2004-07-22 Thread Joe Wolf
I've had a couple of reports that my messages were failing SPF. I sent a message to myself via a loop and am totally confused at the message header. The message was actually sent from my computer on private IP 192.168.1.177 to my IMail server at 216.229.87.4. For some reason Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude reporting wrong IP... why?

2004-07-22 Thread Joe Wolf
Scott... HOP is 0, no HOPHIGH. IPBYPASS 192.168.1.50 which is my backup spooler. Complete Received: headers below: Received: from smtp.fidnet.com [216.229.64.74] by mail.csimo.com (SMTPD32-8.12) id AD2B20D0070; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:10:03 -0500 Received: (qmail 13061 invoked by uid 20954); 22

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLD test -- Relationship between Viruses and Spam

2004-07-10 Thread Joe Wolf
Jeff, I for one agree with you. This test seems worse than useless to me. To somehow think that an IP address that was previously infected by a virus has anything to do with SPAM is beyond me. Seems like a dangerous test that I want no part of. -Joe - Original Message - From: Jeff

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLD test -- Relationship between Viruses and Spam

2004-07-10 Thread Joe Wolf
Most reports are that more than 50% of all spam is now coming from zombies, which typically are home computers that were infected by a virus that installs a trojan horse that the spammer has control over. -Scott --- I don't know if that's an

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup Database test for Declude JunkMail

2004-07-10 Thread Joe Wolf
Seems that Computerized Horizons should read their own press releases before sending them to Business Wire. If a current Service Agreement is required then the following paragraph from the Computerized Horizons pr is a lie: Although immediately available at no charge to current Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-18 Thread Joe Wolf
Sure looks like a freebie to me. http://vil.nai.com/vil/virus-4d.asp Is scan.exe a 32 bit app? How do you update the pattern files? Thanks! - Original Message - From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 4:26 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange MONKEYFORMMAIL problems

2004-03-23 Thread Joe Wolf
I try to look at the config files on a regular basis, but I have to print both of them out and compare them side by side to see if Declude has made any changes. It would be of great help to me if they would just put a comment at the top of the file giving the revision date. I think many others

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-27 Thread Joe Wolf
Why don't you just create a rule for that user that says something like... if the header contains date delete the message? You could put any phrase in there that is in every email message. -Joe - Original Message - From: Bennie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Joe Wolf
I've never tried it, but couldn't you just have the nobody ailias resolve to NUL? It's an interesting concept that would present at least one solution to the dictionary attacks. I might give that a try on one of my stable domains (no deleted users in years) just to see what it does to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Joe Wolf
OK, I'm convinced. Whoever posted it made me think it might be a method to try. I yield to those with superior knowledge. -Joe - Original Message - From: Matt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 2:39 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Joe Wolf
Sandy, I'm not going to claim to be an email server expert, but here's what I see... I could be wrong. When you're hit with a dictionary attack we all know they send to thousands of addresses at the domain. If the final delivery address is invalid the server creates an Unknown User (or whatever

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do they do it?

2004-02-06 Thread Joe Wolf
I'm glad that I'm not the only one with these problems! Not that I like having the problem, but I thought there must be some kind of undetectable Trojan on my system letting the spammers know when I add a domain or user. Misery like company I guess. I did happen to talk to DigiHost yesterday and

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] How do they do it?

2004-02-06 Thread Joe Wolf
on the firewall and intrusion detection features. We run pretty good firewalls and lock down the servers pretty well so I see no reason for a software firewall. -Joe - Original Message - From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joe Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 6

[Declude.JunkMail] How do they do it?

2004-02-05 Thread Joe Wolf
Perhaps someone here might be able to shed some light on my problem. I've had two cases recently where I had hosting customers move their email services to my Imail/Declude box. Both moved from a national hosting company and had no spam protection of any kind on their services. Both complained

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do they do it?

2004-02-05 Thread Joe Wolf
Thanks for the reply. No dictionary attacks that I can see in the logs for these domains, but it's possible that it happened. The previous host was DigiHost. There was no sign of spam filtering and it's not on their list of features or options. Will ask one of the customers for permission to

[Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail config files...

2003-12-16 Thread Joe Wolf
I have been using JunkMail Pro for about a year. I only make minor changes to the standard config files because I've never had the time to learn about all the ever changing spam tests, etc. The only action I take on spam is to prefix the subject with SPAM: and send it on to the user for their

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail config files...

2003-12-16 Thread Joe Wolf
Scott, I have installed the latest files... I try and keep up with them. I think the only changes I make are on the Weight 10 and 20 and I change the subject. I look at the headers on a bunch of the spam messages that come thru and most fail SORBS-DUHL, but then I see that many legit messages

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail config files...

2003-12-16 Thread Joe Wolf
Scott, I'm not looking at the file right now, but all I do is change the Weight 10 and 20 from Warn to Subject Sapm: or whaterver the correct syntax is. The result is that the message is sent on with the subject prefix of SPAM: added. That's all I want to do. Then it's up to the user if they

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail config files...

2003-12-16 Thread Joe Wolf
[64.251.138.48] by brothersmaytag.com (SMTPD32-7.15) id A47B5700112; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 07:11:23 -0600 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jim Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joe Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Enola Gay Exhibit Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 07:10:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Two JunkMail questions please...

2002-11-04 Thread Joe Wolf / CompuService
Everyone thanks for the replies. I did take a look at the overflow directory and it was empty. I cleaned out the spool directory and offloaded all outbound to our production servers. We'll see how this works out before digging in too far. This server has a dedicated T1 and is saturated some of