Please review the posts I made on 3.0.5.3 earlier this week.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:07 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
My understanding is Deccon is no longer used. A new GUI is in the works.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lyndon Eaton
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 6:41 AM
To:
similar to the 3 files you posted, and I thought you might want to
take a look at
it (out of curiosity).
Kim
-- Original Message --
From: John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13
In a few minutes, I am going to drop the
known bad files into the proc folder and watch what happens.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
Sent: Monday,
September 26, 2005
Current release is 3.0.5.3
Reactions/observations so far:
1. Dropping known bad d and q files, decludeproc
moves them to a new folder \proc\review. The Decludeproc did crash and stop,
but it was restarted. I am not sure if the files were moved upon restart or at
the time of the
Stop the Imail SMTP service
Stop the Imail Queue Manager service.
Perform the upgrade.
Make sure the DecludeProc service is
started.
Restart the Imail SMTP and Queue Manager
service.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Per Bill at Declude, number 3
is fixed and number 4 is being fixed.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Monday,
September 26, 2005 12:44 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
Did you create the file declude.cfg in
the imail\declude folder per instructions on the down load site?
Look at the Windows Event log, any Decludeproc
stops noted?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Robert, may I make a suggestion?
Put all the logs into debug mode. Allow
it to run until you know this issue has occurred. Put the logs back the way you
had them.
Extract from the JM log all the lines
for a message in question. Send those along with the d and q file to Declude
have addressed the stability thing.
There's nothing worse than having a customer call up and ask you why you are
passing multiple spams or even viruses. I don't however know that this
causes leakage, but it is a bug and bugs aren't always predictable.
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Per Bill
Does any one know what the SpamDomains entries should be for @gmail.com?
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at
Through a time consuming process, I have apparently identified the trigger
for the problem with the decludeproc stopping and messages backing up.
Attached are text files which are D files for messages that caused this. The
2 times in the last 4 days that the decludeproc has stopped. Each time,
Looks like it might end with .turner.com.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Sullivan
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 2:05 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
I've seen all show [a letter]proxy.gmail.com, so a
second entry shouldn't be needed but .google.com couldn't hurt. If
you need to use @, make it
@gmail.com.gmail.com
Dan
On Sep 24, 2005, at 12:16, John Tolmachoff ((Lists)) wrote:
Does any one know what the SpamDomains
-recoverable. I would imagine
that if decludeproc.exe is called and it isn't running as a service, it should
be able to start itself.
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Through a time consuming process, I have apparently identified the triggerfor the problem with the decludeproc stopping
detect every issue, or share every known
issue. I personally have a list that I am not bothering to share with
Declude because they are busy dealing with much greater issues at the moment
(supporting IMail 8.2+ users).
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Matt, I have the Decludeproc set
David, too clarify, is that THREAD or THREADS? Originally it was THREAD.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 9:00 AM
To:
I would ask that you go back to 3.0.4.4 and keep running. If you have this
problem again, please do the same think and isolate the files, then send
them to Declude along with the log files.
This was seen before and was hopefully fixed, but if you are seeing it
please continue to run 3.0.4.4 and
Responding to 3 responses:
Thanks, I had a feeling it was the ALLRECIPS, but it appears there is no
other variable to use for the recipient. I guess I could use NOTCONTAINS
instead of NOTENDSWITH.
I was hoping for an exact match as possible.
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from
FYI, it appears the Beta may be wrapping up soon. So if you can, maybe wait
a week or two for version 3.x.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday,
Sunpentown units are very good, and are supposed to be efficient on water
collection, meaning there is not supposed to be as much drainage. They do
have a tank and a drain.
www.spt-usa.com
You can usually get them at a discounted price on eBay from a reseller, but
they are all shipped directly
Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but participating in a Beta requires
active participation, meaning if you notice a problem, you need to take
steps to gather information surrounding that problem.
Did you read my posts about the beta, and did you take any steps that I did?
The point of a
: John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem appears to be caused/centered/triggered/co-incidental to 4
spam
messages. Also, a large Dr Watson log file and dmp were created when this
happened. After isolating these messages, stopping the Imail SMTP,
QueueManager services
I am sure you did, but let's check.
Did you stop the Imail SMTP service, stop the Imail Queue Manager service,
wait for both the proc and work folders to be empty, stop the DecludeProc
service, copy in the new decludeproc.exe file, start the DecludeProc
service, start the Imail Queue Manager
And yes, as of midnight my time, I am running 3.0.4 and it is working as
expected so far.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:56 PM
]
Is this another sign that the 'decludeproc.exe' was not doing anything?
Also, please
remember, we are using the older IMail 8.05 HF3, and that our results can
definitely
be different from yours.
With regards,
Kim
-- Original Message --
From: John Tolmachoff
Ya know, I thought about asking about that, but said nah, no one could do
some thing dumb like I did.
;)
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Premuda
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 11:36
I have been running the latest beta for about 9 hours now.
The previously reported problem by me with false triggers on External tests
appears to be resolved.
Currently, Hijack is not working reporting can not find Declude Console.
Declude is aware of this and working on it.
Windows Server 2000
1. The only Beta that should currently be running is 3.0.3.7 you should
not
be reverting to a previous version of the Beta at this point.
I said to a pre 3.x version which is what that means. Pre means before.
4. Your concern of the external tests working incorrectly is currently
being
FYI to all running the Beta, I have reviewed and verified a problem brought
to my attention by Kami.
It appears that some times, even though the external test is reporting an
exit code of 0, DecludeJM is treating it as a fail and adding the configured
weight.
This goes for both positive weights
of
defaulting to zero.
Darrell
John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes:
FYI to all running the Beta, I have reviewed and verified a problem
brought
to my attention by Kami.
It appears that some times, even though the external test is reporting
an
exit code of 0, DecludeJM is treating
PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:19 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Major problem with External tests and Beta
3.0.3.4
All tests finished within seconds.
John T
I am running Declude 2.0.14 consistently on my Imail 8.21 server with no
problems that would allow viruses and spam to get through. Granted, my
server only has a volume of about 5K per day.
I am going to being running the betas as soon as I can get to that.
John T
eServices For You
We have been running iMail 7.07 under windows 2000. We had some input
that
there may be some problems in this environment. We are not keen on
upgrading to 8.x since IPSwitch is walking away from iMail the product.
Ipswitch is not walking away from Imail. It is still alive and well, and in
Any comments about this ISP?
It was in my bad mail file and I can not find why it was put in there.
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The
Best thing is to ask on the Sniffer List.
I actually have 17 Sniffer tests based upon exit code, with weights ranging
from 15 to 35. I hold at 25 and delete at 35.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I have responded to each e-mail, including the one you sent 15 minutes ago.
On the phone on Wednesday, I did explain that AutoWhite is not tested in a
SmarterMail configuration.
AutoWhite for Declude does indeed look at the Imail registry for the OHN.
John T
eServices For You
-Original
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 5:19 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Question
John, does that mean sniffer runs 17 times on each mesage, or does it
return
multiple codes?
- Original Message -
From: John
reason until I rebooted it to swap out the decludeproc.exe
later in the day. Looking in my inbox this morning, the problem doesn't
seem to have reoccurred since yesterday afternoon.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, August
BODY filters are generally the LAST test you want to rely on for several
reasons, including problems with encoding (such as you are witnessing) and
resources used.
However, what concerns me is why are any actions being taken on messages
sent from one person in a domain to another person in the
Any one have opinions good/bad on www.linkedin.com?
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Found in 3 held messages: (Spaces inserted in the e-mail address)
Donate a
$1 now or $1,000 - Send donation to donate @ katrinahelpfund . com on
paypal/strong/fontfont size=-2 face=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica,
sans-serifbr
br
every little bit helpsbr
br
Just a paypal account up
Sorry, but can't resist...
Any one have opinions good/bad on www.linkedin.com?
Has a lot of members I know
Barry
Is that good or bad?
;-)
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
It has now been an hour and the decludeproc service has only processed
around 1000 objects, which I believe corresponds to 500 messages. I
created the declude.cfg and put in THREADS 25. I also dl'ed the newer
decludeproc.exe, but when I went to stop the service so I could replace
it, the
Dan, I am at a client right now so I do not have the time to review all, but
could it be an old Imail issue where since the Declude process was having an
issue, the QueueManager did a batch run and grabbed the message before
Declude finished it?
John T
eServices For You
-Original
with Declude 3
Dan,
Restarting IMail's Queue Manager service, or rebooting an IMail server without
stopping the SMTP service can cause spam to be grabbed and delivered by the
Queue Manager without being processed by Declude. You might want to check
for that.
Matt
Dan Horne wrote:
John Tolmachoff
Uh, it is not a Declude issue but rather SmarterMail does not support it.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:18 PM
To:
This is not a Declude issue, but a SmarterMail issue.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:18 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE:
No wonder I like using PowerChute Plus 5.2.1 so much. Plain simple and
easily configurable via the ini file.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Marchette
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005
Also, John - DEBUG mode now lists PID's.
While that is true (and something I know about) leaving the log in DEBUG
mode for several days waiting for it to occur again is not acceptable.
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
And back to my original question.
Is PIDDEBUG still available to use in 2.0.6.x?
Yes, it appears to be still available.
However, I have noticed something interesting. When a postmaster message is
created or processed, including forwards done by Imail, the PID file does
not get deleted when
Title: Message
If you are seeing 100,000 messages
without Declude JunkMail and 200,000 messages with Declude JunkMail, that is a red
flag that something is probably wrong in the Declude JunkMail configuration.
How are you getting the figure 100,000
and 200,000?
John T
eServices
What is your daily total volume?
What server are you using for DNS?
What version of Imail?
What have you tried to tweak? (First thing that comes to my mind is AFTERJM
in the Virus.cfg file.)
Are you using the Default JunkMail configuration, or have you made changes?
John T
eServices For You
Matt beat me to it. I hope you are not
using a nobody alias anywhere. The large amount of GSE files are indicative of
a misconfiguration or improper configuration within Imail.
Also as Matt said, some people are
becoming too quick to point a finger at Declude. I posted some questions
Anybody?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 7:44 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAIN and IPBYPASS
Does SPAMDOMAIN check the PTR of the previous IP if the servers your Imail
server receives from are all configured as IPBYPASS, meaning you have front
end servers doing the receiving for the Imail server?
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
Known problem as posted on the Imail list. I actually sent out a broadcast
earlier informing them of possible problems.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday, July 08,
Correction:
I actually sent out a broadcast to my clients earlier...
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:50 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Network Solutions DNS
Servers
And me not monitoring the imail list. What were the problems (in summary)?
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:49:52
To:Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Network Solutions DNS
Servers
And me not monitoring the imail list. What were the problems (in summary)?
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:49:52
Here is a personal experience that proves the bit about initials on checks
is wrong:
Doing my monthly personal bills, I inadvertently sent my water payment check
to the mortgage company. Guess what, they processed it and applied it to our
account.
So, if a bank does not even check to see who
I am really busy right now, but just a quick thought, restart the Imail
server. Are the text attachments going to all users or just a couple?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Well, I saw not attachment with that
message. The header of it shows that it only failed one test and had a weight
of 8.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Sent: Thursday, July
I am looking for a Web Designer/Programmer to do work for me on a project
basis.
I currently have 2 projects pending with a possible third. The projects I
have pending are fairly small. Both are updating existing sites, the third
one would be a new webmail site. None are e-commerce or have DB
FYI, I will be around off and on Saturday and Monday.
Unless something major happens, it usually gets quite right before a holiday
and through it.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Use SKIPIP
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about load balancers and
balancers and source
IP
SKIPIP = new setting in Declude?
Sorry... Been off the list for a while.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 6:52 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
I think I can safely say that we have all been there done that.
At least it is working now.
Oh, no need to apologize.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
Sent: Monday,
I am successfully relaying for 2 Exchange servers with no problems running
8.20 HF2.
Is there a carriage return after the domain name in the HOSTS file?
Why aren't you using aliases instead of accepting all?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message
There are actually a good number of
Imail/Declude installs that either are pure gateway only or do a significant
amount of their load for gateway service.
IMHO, for a gateway service,
Imail/Declude is and will be a great combination into the foreseeable future.
John
Update: Since installing Imail 8.20 HF2 last Saturday, the problem so far
has not reoccurred.
Any one else still having this problem?
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
I opened a ticket with Ipswitch but they blamed it on Declude, as usual.
I'll bet it was not Eric that said that.
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
In case Declude is not able to respond right now, the 2-3 projects that were
either in development or ready to go to development in the last couple of
years did not get very far AFAIK. At this time, Declude is not working on
one AFAIK.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
AH, User configurable actions is different. I know at one time at least
Sandy had either a Demo or production running for a client.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Kratka
Sent: Friday,
Check your server event log for Error messages Event ID 4 Source SRV.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 5:58 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Did you not see my response to your earlier post?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:53 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
This has been covered for a couple of hours now on the Declude Virus list.
You need to update your F-Prot configuration to include the virus code 8 as
a match.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
A recap:
5 people including me have reported having this problem in the last week or
so.
One of those does not use AVG.
Alex has reported to me that since disabling AVG he has not seen the problem
reoccur in 1 1/2 days.
I have not disabled AVG as I do not think it is the culprit. My server has
Right idea Ralph. We need to all work together to find this, as it happened
again this morning.
What version of Windows are you using?
Windows 2000 server standard
What SP's are installed?
SP4
What version of Declude are you using?
2.0.6 NOTE: I also tried 2.0.6.14 and it occurred as well.
Major problem on my server on 05/22/05 starting at 06:30 AM. I do not think
this is caused by Imail or Declude as nothing has changed in the 3 weeks.
It appears at 6:30 AM I started getting the 2020 event error on the server
and repeating every couple of minutes. Imail services kept working but
of them? I didn't change anything
on the system.
(ok, some new domains, some new accounts, but the system was up since
february).
Alex
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 9:42 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail
run Imail on a Dual Xeon (Intel SR7520JR2 Board), 2 GB RAM, 3*Raid-1
(System/Spool/Mail), 2003 SP1 (since Saturday), Imail 8.15 HF1 (since
Saturday, before 8.14), Declude 1.8
Alex
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 23
.
Robert Whitaker
The Modem Pool
517-789-5689
1-888-377-5689
Be sure to try the New Web Express Internet Accelerator from The Modem
Pool
http://web-express.modempool.com
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail
Lets sign him up for a lot of spam from Korea, Japan, etc and see how he
feels about blocking foreign IPs then...
Sorry to go off on a rant here
The point is a company such as Verizon providing service to a wide and far
reaching ranged of customers can not arbitrarily make such a
Well, since Declude.exe is called from Imail SMPTD.exe and Declude.exe
closes as soon as it is done processing it would be nearly impossible to say
that Declude.exe had a memory leak and was holding memory unless the process
never ended in which case messages processed by Declude.exe never got
Incorrect. The missing line of the SMTPD
log is a missing line, meaning either something interrupted the session or the
lines are missing. Declude knows nothing of the message until after Imail SMTP
service has received it in its entirety.
John T
eServices For You
Yes, I would say the next step is to
review the Message Tracking logs on their Exchange server.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Monday, May 16,
2005 9:26 PM
To:
Title: Message
The incomplete T and associated D files
are a result of stopping the Imail SMTP service.
FYI, any such files will be retried by
the sending client or server as the session was incomplete.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Title: Message
True, there is no way to stop new
connections yet allow existing connections to complete.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005
2:36 PM
To:
Title: Message
Andrew, great idea. Never thought of
disabling inbound connections on the firewall. That would indeed allow existing
to continue but prevent any new.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
That is because COPYALL is an Imail configuration, not a Declude
configuration.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Patterson
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 7:06 AM
To:
Add my name to the list of users asking for this.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:38 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
Outbound scanning is controlled by Global.cfg. So you would need to set
actions there.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:41 PM
To:
them all off. Is there a directive that I am missing?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 6:11 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE
Sorry, was out on Thursday.
Declude 2.0.6 has been working just fine
on Imail 8.20 RC02 for about 2 weeks with no problems.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Thursday, April
1. On the new process counter program, eliminate the popup information
window on start. I have created a short cut to it in the startup folder and
every time I log on I have to click OK.
2. %LOCALFROM% would be similar to %LOCALRECIP% in that in notifications I
could use TO:
there client set to check mail every 5 minutes and throughout the
day they get SMTP connection errors.
I mean I really dont know I am just
searching at this point, but thanks for the info
Kyle
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent
The Content Filter service available from Sonicwall is good. I know there
are a lot of libraries and schools using this.
I have a client that uses Burstek for ISA server and it does a good job.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T files are incomplete Q files, where by
some how the SMTP session was not completed. They along with the associated D
file can be deleted. The reason it looks like they have already been sent is
that the sending server/user upon disconnection of the SMTP session the resent
the message in
files.Kevin
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 10:53 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Odd result on copyfile action.I am seeing something odd/different on using
1 - 100 of 1386 matches
Mail list logo
