Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-06 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi Scott, I see the same (with a very small domain and very light usage). The mail server is nowhere near the strongest, but is sometmies stressed with 1.70 (and was the same with 1.69b) but not 1.65. My recommendation for those that are experiencing this is to try adding a line DECODE OFF

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-06 Thread Rick Davidson
I have been experiencing high CPU loads lately as well, I reverted back to the release 1.65 but it is still doing it. I do not believe it is a declude issue. I dont know if this is related, maybe someone can explain here is what I am seeing when i do a netstat at the command prompt

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-06 Thread R. Scott Perry
I dont know if this is related, maybe someone can explain here is what I am seeing when i do a netstat at the command prompt 62.145.51.3:59511 TIME_WAIT That just means that the IP 62.145.51.3 connected to your (from port 59511 on their side). The TIME_WAIT is there because the TCP/IP

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
I see the same (with a very small domain and very light usage). The mail server is nowhere near the strongest, but is sometmies stressed with 1.70 (and was the same with 1.69b) but not 1.65. My recommendation for those that are experiencing this is to try adding a line DECODE OFF to the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-05 Thread Dan Patnode
Patnode Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load We added about 350 users to our 2000+ user dual server configuration in the last week and were doing pretty well until this afternoon. Suddenly the CPU load graph stopped

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-05 Thread Dan Patnode
Scott, The servers in question are not [yet] running Declude Virus so what happened should be a purely Declude JunkMail question. With as lean as Declude is, looks like the only way to test this is in the moment. During yesterdays moment, it was tuff to sit by turning off one test at a time,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-05 Thread Kami Razvan
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load Kami, I'm running ten IP4r tests, referred to in my original email as an external DB query. There seems to be a descrepency between this as a cause and Scott's answer: the Declude process should not show high CPU usage

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-05 Thread Frederick Samarelli
PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load Assuming we're all talking about the same thing, Declude continues to run as a process waiting for replies from IP4r requests but does not consume much CPU time while doing so. That is correct. It should use very, very little

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-05 Thread Jason Newland
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:58 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load I truly wish I could explain it.. May be I am dreaming.. But what I see is Declude does not get to 100% CPU since we moved it to IMail to do IP4r. This morning for example I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-05 Thread Dan Patnode
: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load Assuming we're all talking about the same thing, Declude continues to run as a process waiting for replies from IP4r requests but does not consume much CPU time while doing so. That is correct. It should use very, very little CPU time while

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-05 Thread Kami Razvan
] On Behalf Of Jason Newland Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load Kami, Is your DNS that IMAIL/Declude uses local to you? Or are you using an upstream DNS? That many IPV4 tests may warrant this. We noticed a large

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-04 Thread Dan Patnode
We added about 350 users to our 2000+ user dual server configuration in the last week and were doing pretty well until this afternoon. Suddenly the CPU load graph stopped looking like its normal Donky Kong video game simulation (up and down) and more resembled a 100% highway with a few dips.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-04 Thread Kami Razvan
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Patnode Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load We added about 350 users to our 2000+ user dual server configuration in the last week and were doing pretty well until this afternoon

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes Server Load

2003-06-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
Just before bringing our 3rd server into the fold, things quieted down. While I've already ordered 2 new dual processor 1U's, I want to par down (if not eliminate) the variables invovled: 1) If an external DB query slowed things down, delaying each Declude process, would Declude still show