Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-29 Thread Joshua Levitsky
All I have to say is things have a way of coming around... That was a comment to you, and nobody here knows the B.S. Comments you've sent me off list because I don't send personal emails to lists. I am leaving the list after this email. I only came back on because I saw your email in the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-29 Thread Bill Landry
Apologies to the list for the noise, my bad! Bill - Original Message - From: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:28 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. All I have to say is things have a way of coming around

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-28 Thread Bill Landry
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 5:53 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. - Original Message - From: Smart Business Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:26 PM Subject: Re

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-28 Thread Matt Robertson
Jason, The mechanism is perhaps there since user-specific ip4r lookups are in place, but this may be a one-way identifier. The implication is they do not, imho, based on their site's overview text. The only way to tell is to individually evaluate email messages, or ask them directly :(

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-28 Thread Matt Robertson
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Newland Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. has anyone been able to auto-send them your held spam? I have tried using the ROUTETO command, but I get an error when I use

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-28 Thread Bill Landry
Hey Matt, thanks for the Trustic update and config info, this is very helpful! Bill - Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:32 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. I do a ROUTETO

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-28 Thread Jason Newland
- Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:32 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. 2. To send Trustic your (confirmed!) spam (typically only that which has received very heavy weighting

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-28 Thread Bill Landry
style RBL.. You know what Bill? Fuck you. I'm off the list. I have no interest in dealing with assholes like you. It's a waste of my time. --- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. From: Bill Landry Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Date: Mon

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Bill B.
I just registered and turned it on, and it seems to have a lot of spam IPs listed. I'll keep an eye out for false positives. Bill -Original Message- From: Joshua Levitsky Sent: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 10:43:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. - Original

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Bill B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 10:50 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. I just registered and turned it on, and it seems to have a lot of spam IPs listed. I'll keep an eye out for false

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Omar K.
general stat. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill B. Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 4:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. I just registered and turned it on, and it seems to have a lot of spam IPs

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Smart Business Lists
Joshua, Sunday, July 27, 2003 you wrote: JL Yes, but it depends on what large is. It seems to me the statement applies to all businesses. JL It was created by the guy that made Yahoo's groups before Yahoo JL owned them. Well, that isn't exactly a confidence builder for me for various

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Bill B.
Hmm... I wonder how effectively that data could be used to generate lists of IPs to block at the firewall level. That'll be interesting to look at. Bill -Original Message- From: Omar K. Sent: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 18:32:53 +0200 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Yes

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Omar K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 12:32 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Yes, same here, I noticed that it is tagging IP's that have not been caught by easynet or osirusoft. Another

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Smart Business Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 11:40 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. The problem I have is that I have no way of knowing the cost of this service

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Bill B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Hmm... I wonder how effectively that data could be used to generate lists of IPs to block at the firewall level

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Bill B.
Message- From: Joshua Levitsky Sent: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 12:13:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. - Original Message - From: Bill B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Matt Robertson
I've just started forwarding spam to them, but only the stuff that comes in from Imail's content filtering, which is basically just sweeping up after Declude (and it STILL bags about 10% of the survivors!). One thing I was REALLY not happy about was their method of adding default positives

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 1:35 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. One thing I was REALLY not happy about was their method of adding default positives (i.e. the originally

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Matt Robertson
: Sunday, July 27, 2003 10:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. - Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 1:35 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. I just verified a piece of spam that originated from a dialup IP. Now its in my list and I see Trustic has

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Matt Robertson
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. - Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 4:08 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Could that have been the idea in the first place? Who knows anything about these guys? While I can only speak

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 4:08 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. I'd leave this service alone for awhile so they can get their act together. They may call this a beta

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Omar K.
: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. - Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 4:08 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Could that have been the idea in the first place? Who knows anything about

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Matt Robertson
Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar K. Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Matt Robertson
I can understand how you'd be defensive since you recommended them to the list, but this has nothing to do with sentiment and everything to do with empirical observation of specific results. I'm sorry you feel the way you do, but don't bandy about words like 'slander' when clearly they don't

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 7:14 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. 63.149.203.45 5 automated positive recommendations and a trusted server. But here they're listed

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Smart Business Lists
Sunday, July 27, 2003 you wrote: JL I'm not trying to make this an argument. That's funny. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Smart Business Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Sunday, July 27, 2003 you wrote: JL I'm not trying to make this an argument. That's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Rifat Levis
get 50 F.P or 150 F.P Lets wait and see :) Regards Rifat Levis - Original Message - From: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:58 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. - Original Message - From: Matt

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread brian
Why don't you guys give it a rest. On 07/27/03 8:53pm you wrote... - Original Message - From: Smart Business Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Sunday, July 27

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Matt Robertson
http://www.trustic.com/ip?ip=63.149.203.45+ You were one of the positives and you didn't bother to submit spam to make it not trusted. Wrong repeatedly. I sent spam to them as I've already said. All of it at one point. As you later note this is becoming a pi$$ing match and that doesn't belong

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread Jason Newland
All tiffs aside :), Can I get some clarity on the operation here? If I personally submit an e-mail that says 10.10.10.10 is a spammer IP, and that same address has 10 positives and 1 negative (Me). I understand that the IP will probably be trusted, but is there something in the background that

[Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-26 Thread Joshua Levitsky
This is kind of cool... I'm using it now as an RBL... http://www.trustic.com/ Trustic is a new solution to the problem of unsolicited email. By aggregating recommendations from its large community of members, Trustic maintains a list of email servers that can't be trusted to prevent spam. This

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-26 Thread Jason Newland
: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. This is kind of cool... I'm using it now as an RBL... http://www.trustic.com/ Trustic is a new solution to the problem of unsolicited email. By aggregating recommendations from its large community of members, Trustic maintains a list of email servers that can't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-26 Thread Omar K.
Sounds interesting, for how long have you been using it ? Do you have any stats? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 4:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-26 Thread Joshua Levitsky
: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Josh, What is the entry you have put in your config file? (If you don't mind sharing) Thanks Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 9

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-26 Thread Joshua Levitsky
that up too... which would be bad. -Josh - Original Message - From: Omar K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 11:48 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Sounds interesting, for how long have you been using it ? Do you have any