On 4/29/2010 10:06 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Thanks
I activated it in my gateway and will report back after a day or so.
Question:
a)
Does
it have TXT records that holds additional info that can be returned
in the 5.7.1 message to the sender?
Right now all
...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeil
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:49 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
On 4/29/2010 10:06 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Thanks - I activated it in my gateway and will report back after a day or
so
, April 29, 2010 5:06 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
Hi Declude folks,
We have been testing a blacklist based on real-time GBUdb data
(generated from Message Sniffer).
We have decided to experiment with opening up the blacklist
ticket:
https://www.skywaves.com/content/secure/support_ticket.htm
From: Michael Cummins mich...@i-magery.com
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:36 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
I
?
- Michael Cummins
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 11:00 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
here ya go
IP4R.GBUBD ip4r
://www.skywaves.com/content/secure/support_ticket.htm
From: Michael Cummins mich...@i-magery.com
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 11:20 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
That's odd
Cummins
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:14 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
That's odd. This is what I already configured it for on my first guess:
TRUNCATE-GBUDB IP4Rtruncate.gbudb.net
127.0.0.120
*: Michael Cummins mich...@i-magery.com
*Sent*: Friday, April 30, 2010 11:20 AM
*To*: declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Subject*: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
That's odd. This is what I already configured it for on my first guess:
TRUNCATE-GBUDB IP4R
It is - and I agree with you!
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:53 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
Is the result code really 127.0.0.1
30, 2010 12:53 PM
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
Is the result code really 127.0.0.1? That is totally non-standard.
It should be 127.0.0.2 or higher.
Matt
On 4/30/2010 11:31 AM, Nick Hayer wrote:
you can test the bl
dy Schmidt wrote:
It
is and I agree with you!
From:
supp...@declude.com
[mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:53 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up
truncate
On 4/30/2010 1:17 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
It
is and I agree with you!
From:
supp...@declude.com
[mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:53 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened
There aren't that many RFC hawks around here these days :)
Matt
On 4/30/2010 1:48 PM, Pete McNeil wrote:
So it is by convention that the result code would be 127.0.0.2 -- not
a rule.
I have no problem with this... I will make the change... better to do
it now than later.
Odd that nobody
address.
Andrew 8)
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeil
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:48 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
On 4/30/2010 1:17 PM
;)
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 11:02 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
There aren't that many RFC hawks around here these days
While we're at it what is the difference between the two results below
SNIFIP4R=WARN[5]
SNIFIP4R=IGNORE[5]
Thanks
John
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe
Hi Declude folks,
We have been testing a blacklist based on real-time GBUdb data
(generated from Message Sniffer).
We have decided to experiment with opening up the blacklist for a wider
audience and so as of now you can use truncate.gbudb.net as an ip4r test.
You should get a result of
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
Hi Declude folks,
We have been testing a blacklist based on real-time GBUdb data
(generated from Message Sniffer).
We have decided to experiment with opening up the blacklist for a wider
audience
@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
Hi Declude folks,
We have been testing a blacklist based on real-time GBUdb data
(generated from Message Sniffer).
We have decided to experiment with opening up the blacklist for a wider
audience and so as of now you
On 4/29/2010 5:50 PM, Nick Hayer wrote:
Hi
Pete,
Question - is this blacklist info already contained withing any Sniffer
test? I am wondering about double dipping so to speak - if the info is
within Sniffer which rulebase?
That's not an easy question --
If you are using SNF then your
@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
Hi Declude folks,
We have been testing a blacklist based on real-time GBUdb data
(generated from Message Sniffer).
We have decided to experiment with opening up the blacklist for a wider
audience and so as of now you can use
21 matches
Mail list logo
