[Declude.Virus] Mcafee Auto Updates

2006-11-07 Thread Mark Reimer
What most people using to auto update Mcafee command line scanner? Mark Reimer IT System Admin American CareSource 972-308-6887 ---This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe

[Declude.Virus] Mcafee Command Line Scanner

2006-10-31 Thread Mark Reimer
Anyone know where to find this? I assume most people are switching away from F-prot because of their wonderful new licensing structure. It seems Clam and Mcafee are the most popular but what else are users using and liking? Also is there any real difference between Clamwin and Clam-win32?

[Declude.Virus] Mcafee with 5000 engine tested?

2005-12-11 Thread Info Wind
Does somenone already works with the new 5000-er engine? Does someone has experience? Thanks for information, Uwe

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change.

2005-09-12 Thread Matt
I changed the subject so that people can be alerted to this. Announcements of things like this would be useful to the entire Declude customer base. I am afraid that we are a little over a month behind. Those with a single scanner would be screwed. I adjusted my scripts to use the link that

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change.

2005-09-12 Thread David Barker
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:58 PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change. I changed the subject so that people can be alerted to this. Announcements of things like

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change.

2005-09-12 Thread Markus Gufler
I have to check my script because it still works fine up to now. Markus From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Monday, September 12, 2005 9:58 PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change.

2005-09-12 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Declude at all. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Monday, September 12, 2005 12:58 PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change. I changed the subject so that people can be alerted

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change.

2005-09-12 Thread Matt
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change. I changed the subject so that people can be alerted to this. Announcements of things like this would be useful to the entire Declude customer base. I am afraid that we are a little over a month behind. Those with a single scanner

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change.

2005-09-12 Thread William Stillwell
The Proper method to update the dat would be to pull the "ini" file http://download.nai.com/products/datfiles/4.x/nai/update.ini Then Parse this [zip] section

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change.

2005-09-12 Thread Matt
The FTP site doesn't have the beta DAT's listed. It is the beta DAT's that contain the latest updates, and for an E-mail system, they are the best thing to use. Naturally they aren't as well tested as the other things, but they will block things more quickly and you have to weigh that against

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change.

2005-09-12 Thread Gary Steiner
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee DailyDAT download location change. David, Information such as this is best 'pushed' rather than 'pulled'. Declude should have a notification list that sends announcements of important things concerning all products such as new

[Declude.Virus] Mcafee error 8

2005-05-10 Thread John Shacklett
I think I missed something, and I'll admit right up front that I've been swamped and I haven't been paying attention as close as circumstances require, so it's my own fault. That being said, I'm getting a steady stream of Error 8 in virus scanner 1. messages in my virus logs over the last several

[Declude.Virus] McAfee throwing errors

2005-04-25 Thread Matt
I've noted that McAfee will throw errors from time to time when called with Declude, and when it does, they tend to come in droves, otherwise I can go weeks with it being absolutely quiet. I have a feeling that this might be related to the daily dats. Today I have seen over a dozen such

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee throwing errors

2005-04-25 Thread Scott Fisher
I haven't seen anything obvious in a quick glance through today's logs. Do you have an example? Usually, I just force another download of the dats. - Original Message - From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 3:42 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus

[Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash

2005-02-07 Thread Matt
I've never seen this before, but beginning on Saturday morning, I started getting appearances of "Application Error" in my Event Log about McAfee: Faulting application Scan.exe, version 4.3.2.0, faulting module mcscan32.dll, version 4.3.2.0, fault address 0x0001cfd0. Then this morning the

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash

2005-02-07 Thread Bill Landry
updates (version 4400\4426). Bill - Original Message - From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 6:27 AM Subject: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash I've never seen this before, but beginning on Saturday morning, I started getting

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash

2005-02-07 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash Although I cannot explain the cause of the issues you've seen, I would suggest that you upgrade your scan engine: http://www.mcafeesecurity.com/us/downloads/default.asp?wt.mc_n=us_update swt.mc_t=ext_li_concid=10373. Download and run the SuperDat

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash

2005-02-07 Thread Matt
Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 7:04 AM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash Although I cannot explain the cause of the issues you've seen, I

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash

2005-02-07 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
client that changed! Andrew 8) -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:35 AMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crashAndrew,When you say "re

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash

2005-02-07 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
8) -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, AndrewSent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:54 AMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash I don't mean scanning the files

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash

2005-02-07 Thread Matt
Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:54 AM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and POP3 service crash I don't mean scanning the files in the root repetitively. In particular, FileMon was showing me that scan.exe was READing D

[Declude.Virus] McAfee VScan 8

2004-09-03 Thread White, Douglas
Anybody installed VScan 8i on an IMail/Declude setup? We just got our copy of it and I wanted to see if there are any gotchas before going forward with the upgrade from v7.1. Doug --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee VScan 8

2004-09-03 Thread Wolf Tombe
Version 8 has extremely limited user functionality (far less than version 7 had). For example, you cannot exclude directories or applications from being scanned. And, if the virus scanner spots something suspicious even though clearly NOT a virus it stops all process of the application in

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee VScan 8

2004-09-03 Thread Richard Edge
] On Behalf Of Wolf Tombe Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee VScan 8 Version 8 has extremely limited user functionality (far less than version 7 had). For example, you cannot exclude directories or applications from being scanned

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee VScan 8

2004-09-03 Thread Wolf Tombe
Very good Point about the enterprise version! I just say the subject line which indicated McAfee VScan 8 and immediately reacted with a warning since I've had several pretty significant problems with it do to it's limitations. Wolf --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee VScan 8

2004-09-03 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Scott, Looking at the logging in terms of vulnerabilities I noticed that under certain circumstances it does not print out the File(s) are Infected line when the vulnerability is found in the subject or from field. Is this by design? Also, in terms of when it catches the vulnerability in

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee VScan 8

2004-09-03 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 4:04 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee VScan 8 Very good Point about the enterprise version! I just say the subject line which indicated McAfee VScan 8 and immediately reacted with a warning since I've had several pretty significant problems with it do

[Declude.Virus] Mcafee command line scanner

2004-07-08 Thread Alan Walters
Hi, About 3 years ago I ordered McAfee Active Virus Defense (aka NetShield Security Suite) v4.5 from CDW for use with Declude. Their part numbers have changed over the years, but this link to CDW should get you started. http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=343571 If you talk

[Declude.Virus] Mcafee command line scanner

2004-07-07 Thread Adam Hobach
Is this a real price for the Mcafee command line scanner: http://www.macmall.com/macmall/shop/detail.asp?dpno=118250 Has anyone found this software this low?? This is what is needed to work with Declude? Thanks, Adam --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee command line scanner

2004-07-07 Thread Jeff Pereira
It will work, but you will most likely be violating their licensing agreement. - Original Message - From: Adam Hobach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:31 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee command line scanner Is this a real price

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee command line scanner

2004-07-07 Thread Adam Hobach
Which Mcafee product does everyone use then? Thanks, Adam -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Pereira Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee command line scanner It will work

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee command line scanner

2004-07-07 Thread Douglas Cohn
:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee command line scanner Which Mcafee product does everyone use then? Thanks, Adam -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Pereira Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:31 AM To: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee 4160 engine is toooo old

2004-06-18 Thread Greg Little
More info on problems with the old engine. Also sometimes (esp on Win 98) it may take some extra procedures to fully update the engine. http://forums.mcafeehelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=27957 PS For any McAfee question this forum is a GREAT resource. (Focused on Retail customers, but there is a small

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems

2004-04-29 Thread Douglas Cohn
Contact Microsoft. They can analyze the dumps for you. 64K dumps should be fine. DC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Hahn Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems

2004-04-29 Thread Douglas Cohn
, April 28, 2004 5:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems I agree with Scott's response about LDAP. The raid controller firmware I am not concerned with, although I did not know they had a new one. I will have to check on my clients 2650 for that. While

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems

2004-04-28 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
and installing it. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Hahn Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 12:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems

2004-04-28 Thread Scott Hahn
:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems I also opened drwatsn32. It is enabled and noticed a error I N ldap Application exception occurred: Given this App: f:\imail\OpenLDAP\bin\slapd.exe (pid=1940) and: Imail 8.1 latest this, I think

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems

2004-04-28 Thread marc catuogno
: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems How can I tell what hotfixes were applied to my system? I am 8.1, I think I have HF2 (The latest) In the meantime I have disabled LDAP to see if that helps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems

2004-04-28 Thread Scott Hahn
Thanks Scott Hahn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of marc catuogno Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield Problems Start;Programs;Imail;Imail release notes - I'm

[Declude.Virus] McAfee batch updates

2004-03-09 Thread Serge
I am working on the mcafee batch updates linked to on declude.com I am trying to customize the file for a special case, and to rewrite one to download the latest McAfee engine instead of SDAT for that, i need some help understanding the lines below any hints welcomed mainly, how do we get the

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-28 Thread Gene Head
Hickerson Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee Here is some information for a McAfee VirusScan Command Line which works well. From the testing I've done it appears to be a fast, small, lightweight scanner with SCAN.EXE and all the Declude

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
It's Mcafee Virus Scan Ver 8.0 Build 8.0.26 There isn't a scan.exe or scan32.exe on the drive. You'll need to do a Full Install. That should get the scan.exe installed. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-25 Thread Gene Head
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee It's Mcafee Virus Scan Ver 8.0 Build 8.0.26 There isn't a scan.exe or scan32.exe on the drive. You'll need to do a Full Install. That should get

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've re-installed it a couple of times but I haven't seen anywhere that I can tell it to do a full install. You'll need to contact McAfee then to see how to do a Full Install (or at least how to get the scan.exe file installed). -Scott ---

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-25 Thread Darrell LaRock
:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee Scott, I've re-installed it a couple of times but I haven't seen anywhere that I can tell it to do a full install. Does anyone have this version? Gene Head ACCRAM Inc. MCP,Net+,A+,CCNA,CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-25 Thread Gene Head
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gene Head Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee Scott, I've re-installed it a couple of times but I haven't seen anywhere that I can tell it to do a full install. Does anyone have this version? Gene

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-25 Thread Kami Razvan
, 2004 12:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee Do you have a part number/SKU for that? I've called Mcafee and can't seem to get them to understand what I need. They do have a version called VirusScan ASAP but they can't tell me if it has scan.exe. Gene

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-25 Thread Darrell LaRock
version is 7.1. Darrell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gene Head Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee Do you have a part number/SKU for that? I've called Mcafee and can't

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-25 Thread Gene Head
into the installer. Also, the current version is 7.1. Darrell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gene Head Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee Do you have a part number/SKU

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Thanks for the link. I called them to get a price and ran into another brick wall. McAfee is like that. Their normal MO, though, is to oversell, doing everything short of blatant lying to do so. What you may want to do is try asking them I have one computer running Windows XYZ (for example,

Re: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-24 Thread Bill Landry
: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee I just purchased Mcafee to use as a third scanner. I installed it but I can't find the command line scanner. Anyone have the new Virus scan program and can share the process for getting this to work? Gene Head ACCRAM Inc. MCP,Net+,A+,CCNA,CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-24 Thread Gene Head
I just purchased Mcafee to use as a third scanner. I installed it but I can't find the command line scanner. Anyone have the new Virus scan program and can share the process for getting this to work? Gene Head ACCRAM Inc. MCP,Net+,A+,CCNA,CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-24 Thread Gene Head
, February 24, 2004 6:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee Typically the McAfee command line scanned, scan.exe, has been located in c:\program files\common files\Network Associates\VirusScan Engine\4.0.xx, or whatever version number you are running. Here is the McAfee entry

Re: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee

2004-02-24 Thread Bill Landry
Dunno then. You may need to put a call into McAfee. Bill - Original Message - From: Gene Head [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 6:48 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee It's Mcafee Virus Scan Ver 8.0 Build 8.0.26 There isn't a scan.exe

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and /clean

2003-12-04 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Sorry for the denseness I was looking at the McAfee help file, and there were /mime and /mailbox switches. Am I missing something? Also is there an AV product that will function w. Declude AV and clean and pass the messages along? Statistically it would probably be seldom used as most

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and /clean

2003-12-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
I was looking at the McAfee help file, and there were /mime and /mailbox switches. Am I missing something? You can ignore those. McAfee won't see any MIME segments or mailboxes -- Declude Virus handles all that. McAfee will just see an attachment (one that will be deleted immediately after

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and /clean

2003-12-04 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and /clean Hello, Is the /clean switch in McAfee AV (Enterprise Edition 7.1) supported within Declude? In other words is there a problem with adding /clean to the virus.cfg file? Thanks

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and /clean

2003-12-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is the /clean switch in McAfee AV (Enterprise Edition 7.1) supported within Declude? No, it is not. In other words is there a problem with adding /clean to the virus.cfg file? Yes, there would be a problem. Specifically, McAfee will clean the decoded attachment that Declude Virus creates,

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and /clean

2003-12-03 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, I think that virtually all virus infected emails nowadays contain worth preserving, because the only thing attached is the virus itself. Cleaning would not accomplish anything - because after the cleaning there'd be nothing left. (Sorry to disappoint you, but that virus email that claims

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and /clean

2003-12-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Sumariwalla Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.Virus] McAfee and /clean Hello, Is the /clean switch in McAfee AV (Enterprise Edition 7.1) supported within Declude? In other words is there a problem with adding /clean to the virus.cfg file

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Enterprise 7.0 not picking up Sobig.F

2003-08-22 Thread David Sullivan
Hello R., Thursday, August 21, 2003, 2:59:18 PM, you wrote: I did that with eicar and the On-Demand Scanner picked it up. However, when I did it with Sobig.F, there was no attachment. Then I noticed that it was a bounced message from another server (not using SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS). I'm now

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Enterprise 7.0 not picking up Sobig.F

2003-08-21 Thread John Shacklett
Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2003 6:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Enterprise 7.0 not picking up Sobig.F I use two scanners, F-Prot and McAfee Enterprise 7.0. F-Prot is picking up Sobig.F, but McAfee is not. I have the latest definitions, 4288, and the latest engine

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Enterprise 7.0 not picking upSobig.F

2003-08-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
I did that with eicar and the On-Demand Scanner picked it up. However, when I did it with Sobig.F, there was no attachment. Then I noticed that it was a bounced message from another server (not using SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS). I'm now wondering if that is why McAfee On-Demand/Declude is not picking it

[Declude.Virus] McAfee Enterprise 7.0 not picking upSobig.F

2003-08-21 Thread Bill Newberg
Scott, Unfortunately (actually a good thing), all the virus e-mails I have left in the \virus directory are bounces from other servers. I don't have a Sobig.F attachment available to test. Once I receive one, I'll re-test. Thanks, Bill -- Original Message

[Declude.Virus] McAfee Enterprise 7.0 not picking up Sobig.F

2003-08-20 Thread Bill Newberg
I use two scanners, F-Prot and McAfee Enterprise 7.0. F-Prot is picking up Sobig.F, but McAfee is not. I have the latest definitions, 4288, and the latest engine 4.2.60. When I send the test eicar file as a zip, both scanners detect it, so I know both scanners are functioning. Does anyone have any

[Declude.Virus] McAfee 4241 missing w32/SoBig

2003-01-11 Thread Smart Business Lists
f-prot scanner caught 8 messages yesterday with the w32/SoBig.A@mm virus that Mcafee (NAI) passed. Mcafee dat is at 4241 released 1/8. I scanned the smd file with NAV and it also reported soBig. Reviewing NAI for information on w32/soBig.A http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99950.htm indicates

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee 4241 missing w32/SoBig

2003-01-11 Thread Smart Business Lists
NAI just sent me an extra.dat but I had to request it. After installation of the extra.dat the Mcafee scanner is now detecting this virus: Scanner 2: Virus= the W32/Sobig@MM (ED) virus !!! Attachment=Sample.pif [0] I Getting several of these now. Based on what I am seeing the treat

[Declude.Virus] McAfee update

2002-07-08 Thread John Tolmachoff
To those interested in the topic of virus scanner cost a few weeks ago, here is an update on my conversations with McAfee. Not Good. If we got the rate of their best client, we would pay about $2,000 per year. Any we are a small shop. :( John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee

2002-05-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have just installed NetShield, (full install disabled on demand,) but I do not see a scan.exe in the directory. I do see the scan32.exe, but according to the virus manual, that is not the one to use for command line. I even ran a manual scan to see if it would create it. You may need to do a

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Daily DAT Command Line Scanner Update Script

2002-01-29 Thread Jerry Murdock
- Original Message - From: "Jerry Murdock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 6:53 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Daily DAT Command Line Scanner Update Script As requested a few times, attached is a script to update the engine and

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Daily DAT Command Line Scanner Update Script

2002-01-29 Thread Steve Spear
Then on the mcafee site there isn't a link for an update for the command line scanner for the myparty virus. If there is a link, please forward it. Thanks, STeve --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Daily DAT Command Line Scanner Update Script

2002-01-29 Thread Jerry Murdock
I'm not sure what your asking. Update instructions are clearly described in the virus listing on McAfee's site. Jerry - Original Message - From: Steve Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Daily DAT

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Virusscan command-line

2001-12-07 Thread Joachim Baert
Thanks, that little trick helped me out. Is there any chance I could have a peek a that update script of yours? My scripting are rather basic, I doubt it would take me less than a day to get it to work :P Joachim. If you actually managed to find and install the command line only version of

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade

2001-10-12 Thread Mark Chadwick
Tel: +44 (0)1223 326512 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Serge Dergham Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade upgraded to engine 4.1.5, but still getting the timout

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade

2001-10-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
In the declude.cfg look for; SCANNERTIMEOUT 60 I think 60 is the default so if you increase this your scanner is allowed more time to scan big files and thus eliminate your problem. Actually, his problem is with the scanner itself, when it is not being used with Declude. The SCANNERTIMEOUT

MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade

2001-10-12 Thread Ric Stevenson
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 8:30 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade In the declude.cfg look for; SCANNERTIMEOUT 60 I think 60 is the default so if you increase this your scanner is allowed more time to scan big files and thus eliminate your problem

Re: MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShieldUpgrade

2001-10-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
forwarded email from aol (.eml files) have gotten through declude and f-prot. users are returning messages to our users that those emails have a virus. i need to include eml file attachments in scanning. Declude with F-Prot should catch those. When the E-mail is forwarded as an .eml file,

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade

2001-10-11 Thread Serge Dergham
last week ? - Original Message - From: Jerry Murdock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 8:23 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade 1: 4.0.70 must be 2-3 years old now. Run SDAT ASAP, the scanner isn't worthless

RE: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade

2001-10-11 Thread John Shacklett
ftp://ftp.nai.com/pub/antivirus/superdat/intel/sdat4164.exe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Serge Dergham Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade thanks just

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade

2001-10-11 Thread Charles Stanley
At 01:23 PM 10/11/01, you wrote: 1: 4.0.70 must be 2-3 years old now. Run SDAT ASAP, the scanner isn't worthless, but there are plenty of things that require the newer engines. Is there a URL available for the SDAT? I've been searching McAfee's site for way too long, no luck... This E-mail

[Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade

2001-10-11 Thread Charles Stanley
At 03:47 PM 10/11/01, you wrote: At 01:23 PM 10/11/01, you wrote: 1: 4.0.70 must be 2-3 years old now. Run SDAT ASAP, the scanner isn't worthless, but there are plenty of things that require the newer engines. Is there a URL available for the SDAT? I've been searching McAfee's site for way too

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade

2001-10-11 Thread Serge Dergham
- From: Jerry Murdock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:04 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee NetShield Upgrade 4100 is over a year old. Get the latest 4165 from the mcafee site. Jerry - Original Message - From: Serge Dergham [EMAIL PROTECTED