[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1554) IDENTITY_VAL_LOCAL() returned value is modified incorrectly by a multi-row INSERT statement.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1554?page=all ] Yip Ng updated DERBY-1554: -- Attachment: derby1554trunkstat01.txt derby1554trunkdiff01.txt Attaching my initial patch - derby1554trunkdiff01.txt for DERBY-1554. This patch only

[jira] Created: (DERBY-1644) NPE when inserting values to a table that has a column declared as generated by default as identity

NPE when inserting values to a table that has a column declared as generated by default as identity --- Key: DERBY-1644 URL:

Regression Test Failure! - Derby 428459 - Sun DBTG

[Auto-generated mail] *Derby* 428459/2006-08-03 19:46:07 CEST *derbyall* Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform --- *Jvm: 1.6* 5731726 0 106.54% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386 Details in

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1612) As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a constraint should be dropped when a privilege required by the constraint is revoked.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1612?page=all ] Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-1612: - Attachment: grddl_fail.txt With this patch grantRevokeDDL fails for me. diff to the master file is attached as grddl_fail.txt As per the

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1614) Test harness overrides heap size settings when starting Network Server

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1614?page=comments#action_12425754 ] John H. Embretsen commented on DERBY-1614: -- I really appreciate the historical information, Myrna, it is certainly useful in figuring out what the

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1533) ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in DDMReader, on a specific data size

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1533?page=all ] Bryan Pendleton updated DERBY-1533: --- Attachment: notes.html withTests.diff Attached is an updated patch (withTests.diff), with 2 new regression tests added to

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1533) ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in DDMReader, on a specific data size

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1533?page=comments#action_12425760 ] Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-1533: -Dframework=DerbyNetClient jdbcapi/XATest.java fails even after I reverted my change. The diff is: 52a53 (1

Re: Rick Hillegas, now JIRA maven

Hi Craig, Thanks for the encouragement! I've been advised to consult the Administrator pages. Do you know what that means? I'm not finding anything useful at www.apache.org, http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/, or on the Administrator tab of actual DERBY issues. Thanks, -Rick Craig L

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1533) ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in DDMReader, on a specific data size

On 8/4/06, Bryan Pendleton (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1533?page=comments#action_12425760 ] Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-1533: -Dframework=DerbyNetClient jdbcapi/XATest.java fails even

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1544) Address remaining upgrade task(s) to complete full upgrade mechanism for GRANT/REVOKE, specifically with changing database owner name from 'DBA' to authorizationId of us

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1544?page=comments#action_12425767 ] Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1544: - Ran derbyall with 'd1544-patch2-v1.diff' using Sun jdk1.4.2 on Windows XP. No new failures. patch 1 and patch 2 are

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-244) with linux, depending on env setting $LANG and console encoding, some i18n tests fail

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-244?page=comments#action_12425768 ] Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-244: - Hi Myrna, On my linux machine $LANG is en_US.ISO-8859-1 and I see the following diffs in the urlLocale test after

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1612) As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a constraint should be dropped when a privilege required by the constraint is revoked.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1612?page=all ] Mamta A. Satoor updated DERBY-1612: --- Attachment: DERBY1612_V2_diff_DropConstraintOnRevoke.txt My fault. I thought I had updated the master in the patch. Dan, the diff you see are correct

[jira] Assigned: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=all ] Rick Hillegas reassigned DERBY-1639: Assignee: Rick Hillegas Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1639: - Attachment: derby-1639-notice_v01.diff Attaching derby-1639-notice_v01.diff. This adds the following blurb to the NOTICES file: When run on jdk1.6, this

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1639: - Derby Info: [Patch Available, Release Note Needed] (was: [Release Note Needed]) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES,

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1639: - Description: from the license: 3. Distribute applications written to the Specification to third parties for their testing and evaluation use, provided

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425779 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- Don't we have to respect Sun's naming scheme for jdk 1.6 and use Java SE 6?

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425781 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- Sorry, I see the extract that is required by the JCP licence. Still don't understand what that means

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1363) Derby should publish a well defined coding convention per the db project guidlines

I still don't think it is worth it to reformat all the code style, but do think addressing the tab/space issue is worth it. Before we do any reformatting I would like to clearly understand the process and any likelyhood that the automated reformatter will introduce bugs into the code. My main

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1363) Derby should publish a well defined coding convention per the db project guidlines

I agree, we need to be careful about global reformatting; I think the biggest issue is around tabs vs. spaces. If svn diff can ignore white space in diffs, that would be great, and we could go ahead and convert (carefully) all the code. I also wouldn't even mind a filter running on svn

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1640) Instability in XATest

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1640?page=all ] Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1640: -- This is the kind of diff that is usally caused by some change to system catalogs that is reflected in a newly created database (adding/removing system

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1640) Instability in XATest

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1640?page=all ] Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1640: -- Component/s: Regression Test Failure Instability in XATest - Key: DERBY-1640 URL:

Re: Re: Rick Hillegas, now JIRA maven

On 8/4/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Craig, Thanks for the encouragement! I've been advised to consult the Administrator pages. Do you know what that means? I'm not finding anything useful at www.apache.org, http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/, or on the Administrator tab of

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1637) OutBufferedStream.java fails on ibm131/jdk131 jvms.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1637?page=all ] Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1637: --- Attachment: outbuff_ibm131.jar javacore.20060804.101637.3308.txt javacore.20060804.101643.3308.txt This test is

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1640) Instability in XATest

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1640?page=comments#action_12425795 ] Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1640: - If we look at the tinderbox results, this test started failing here:

Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1640) Instability in XATest

Mike Matrigali (JIRA) wrote: This is the kind of diff that is usally caused by some change to system catalogs that is reflected in a newly created database (adding/removing system catalog, changing the number of rows in new db, changing size of a row in a new db). snip I would feel better

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1639: - Attachment: derby-1639-notice_v02.diff Thanks for the quick review, Dan. I'm attaching a second rev of the patch, derby-1639-notice_v02.diff, which changes

Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1640) Instability in XATest

Not sure what happened but when I ran derbyall against DERBY-1579 before the commit (which involves removing an unused system table), I didn't see any XATest diffs. derbyall/derbynetclientmats/derbynetclientmats.pass:jdbcapi/XATest.java On 8/4/06, Mike Matrigali (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1639: - Description: from the license: 3. Distribute applications written to the Specification to third parties for their testing and evaluation use, provided

Faiures in derbynet on JDK 1.6 (was Re: Regression Test Failure! - Derby 428459 - Sun DBTG)

I don't run derbynet in my derbyall suite, so the failures seen here are due to SQLException differences. Perhaps someone who runs derbynet can scratch that itch? David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Auto-generated mail] *Derby* 428459/2006-08-03 19:46:07 CEST *derbyall* Failed TestsOK

Re: Rick Hillegas, now JIRA maven

Thanks, Andrew. The Administrator tab has lots of goodies for me now. This is what I need. Cheers, -Rick Andrew McIntyre wrote: On 8/4/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Craig, Thanks for the encouragement! I've been advised to consult the Administrator pages. Do you know what

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1363) Derby should publish a well defined coding convention per the db project guidlines

Mike Matrigali wrote: I still don't think it is worth it to reformat all the code style, but do think addressing the tab/space issue is worth it. My hope is to address this incrementally. My only goal right now is to do define a long term coding style for the project and for new code. I'd

Re: Faiures in derbynet on JDK 1.6 (was Re: Regression Test Failure! - Derby 428459 - Sun DBTG)

After further thought, I think I should probably fix this, just as I fixed the JDK 1.3 failures earlier -- that's what these regression tests are for, to catch failures on platforms you don't test in your sandbox. David David Van Couvering wrote: I don't run derbynet in my derbyall suite, so

[jira] Created: (DERBY-1645) ALTER TABLE ... SET INCREMENT BY X... Turns off the Generated By Default identity column constraint

ALTER TABLE ... SET INCREMENT BY X... Turns off the Generated By Default identity column constraint - Key: DERBY-1645 URL:

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425797 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- It probably depends on what the made available refers to. I read it as the Derby release itself,, and

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425798 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- The release note should also include J2ME/CDC/Foundation 1.0 when it lists the list of Java

[jira] Created: (DERBY-1646) Documentation to address Grant/Revoke Authorization for views/triggers/constraints/routines(DERBY-1330)

Documentation to address Grant/Revoke Authorization for views/triggers/constraints/routines(DERBY-1330) --- Key: DERBY-1646 URL:

[jira] Assigned: (DERBY-1646) Documentation to address Grant/Revoke Authorization for views/triggers/constraints/routines(DERBY-1330)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=all ] Laura Stewart reassigned DERBY-1646: Assignee: Laura Stewart Documentation to address Grant/Revoke Authorization for views/triggers/constraints/routines(DERBY-1330)

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1612) As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a constraint should be dropped when a privilege required by the constraint is revoked.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1612?page=all ] Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-1612: - Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available]) Patch DERBY1612_V2_diff_DropConstraintOnRevoke.txt committed - revision 428801 - Thanks Mamta As

[jira] Created: (DERBY-1647) JDK 1.6 derbynet is failing due to SQLException.toString() changes

JDK 1.6 derbynet is failing due to SQLException.toString() changes -- Key: DERBY-1647 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1647 Project: Derby Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Assigned: (DERBY-1647) JDK 1.6 derbynet is failing due to SQLException.toString() changes

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1647?page=all ] David Van Couvering reassigned DERBY-1647: -- Assignee: David Van Couvering JDK 1.6 derbynet is failing due to SQLException.toString() changes

[jira] Assigned: (DERBY-1640) Instability in XATest

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1640?page=all ] Yip Ng reassigned DERBY-1640: - Assignee: Yip Ng Instability in XATest - Key: DERBY-1640 URL:

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1057) documentation to address Grant/Revoke (Derby-464)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=comments#action_12425805 ] Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1057: -- Question on information in the file cdevcsecure865818.html, In other topics we refer to user authorizations. Here we

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1315) largeCodeGen fails with embedded and framework DerbyNetClient

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1315?page=all ] Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1315: --- Summary: largeCodeGen fails with embedded and framework DerbyNetClient (was: largeCodeGen fails with framework DerbyNetClient) largeCodeGen

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1640) Instability in XATest

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1640?page=all ] Yip Ng updated DERBY-1640: -- Attachment: derby1640trunkdiff01.txt derby1640trunkstat01.txt I think this is caused by DERBY-1549. I ran the XATest again and I am seeing the diff.

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1640) Instability in XATest

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1640?page=comments#action_12425809 ] Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1640: --- I mean this is caused by DERBY-1579. Instability in XATest - Key: DERBY-1640

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1315) largeCodeGen fails with embedded and framework DerbyNetClient

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1315?page=comments#action_12425810 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1315: -- When running this I saw the out of memory exception was during optimization. largeCodeGen fails with

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1640) Instability in XATest

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1640?page=all ] Yip Ng updated DERBY-1640: -- Derby Info: [Patch Available] Instability in XATest - Key: DERBY-1640 URL:

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1639: - Description: from the license: 3. Distribute applications written to the Specification to third parties for their testing and evaluation use, provided

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425819 ] Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1639: -- Before taking this to legal-discuss, maybe I could sand down the verbiage a bit to make it clear that the

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1548) Document builtin functions - ACOS, ASIN, ATAN, COS, SIN, TAN, PI, DEGREES, RADIANS, EXP, LN, LOG, LOG10, CEIL, CEILING, FLOOR

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1548?page=comments#action_12425833 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1548: -- Thanks Laura, some comments: ACOS,ASIN - If the absolute value of the specified number is greater

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425835 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- -1 on this change until it has been cleared through the legal-discuss and the DB-PMC. Rick, I

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-1647) JDK 1.6 derbynet is failing due to SQLException.toString() changes

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1647?page=all ] David Van Couvering resolved DERBY-1647. Resolution: Fixed Sending java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/master/DerbyNet/jdk16/ieptests.out Sending

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1646) Documentation to address Grant/Revoke Authorization for views/triggers/constraints/routines(DERBY-1330)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425841 ] Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646: -- In Derby-1330 I asked some questions about the properties in the spec

Copyright work

I am looking at the scope of this work, and I do not believe I can accomplish this by the end of next week if it is just me working on it. Luckily, this task is easily chunked up. I have some scripts that I got from the Apache site, and I am fine-tuning these. Once I have them working, I

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1544) Address remaining upgrade task(s) to complete full upgrade mechanism for GRANT/REVOKE, specifically with changing database owner name from 'DBA' to authorizationId of us

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1544?page=comments#action_12425848 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1544: -- Patch d1544-patch1-v1.diff committed revision 428872 - Thanks Deepa Address remaining upgrade

Re: Copyright work

Thanks, David. David Van Couvering wrote: I am looking at the scope of this work, and I do not believe I can accomplish this by the end of next week if it is just me working on it. Luckily, this task is easily chunked up. I have some scripts that I got from the Apache site, and I am

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1643) As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a revoke execute ... restrict should fail if there are dependent objects on the execute privilege

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1643?page=all ] Mamta A. Satoor updated DERBY-1643: --- Attachment: DERBY1643_diff_V1_RevokeExecutePrivilege.txt DERBY1643_stat_V1_RevokeExecutePrivilege.txt Here is the next incremental

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1643) As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a revoke execute ... restrict should fail if there are dependent objects on the execute privilege

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1643?page=all ] Mamta A. Satoor updated DERBY-1643: --- Derby Info: [Patch Available] As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a revoke execute ... restrict should fail if there are dependent

Re: Copyright work

OK, thanks, the Big Slug should be avoided if possible. I've created a Wiki page. I will work on the finishing touches on the scripts and then publish them. Thanks, David Rick Hillegas wrote: Thanks, David. David Van Couvering wrote: I am looking at the scope of this work, and I do not

last week of 10.2 development

We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development. A number of Blocker and Urgent issues are still in motion. Now would be a good time to alert the community if you are working on one of these issues and think that you might need some help to finish by August 10. Thanks to David for blazing

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1057) documentation to address Grant/Revoke (Derby-464)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=comments#action_12425856 ] Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1057: -- I think that we need to add the new derby.database.sqlAuthorization property to the list of properties that are

Re: last week of 10.2 development

Rick Hillegas wrote: We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development. I do not know if our patch mail is working. Andrew said he would check on it on Monday. Right now there are 28 patches outstanding. Of these 16 are marked fix version 10.2 Key Summary DERBY-1643 As per

Regression Test Failure! - TinderBox_Derby 428803 - Sun DBTG

[Auto-generated mail] *TinderBox_Derby* 428803/2006-08-04 20:02:37 CEST *derbyall* Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform --- *Jvm: 1.5* 1687686 2 153.86% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386 Details in

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1629) StandardException.unexpectedUserException() does not correctly catch internally generated exceptions as of JDK 1.6

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1629?page=comments#action_12425860 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1629: Committed Myrna's patch, revision 428887 StandardException.unexpectedUserException() does not correctly

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1629) StandardException.unexpectedUserException() does not correctly catch internally generated exceptions as of JDK 1.6

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1629?page=all ] David Van Couvering updated DERBY-1629: --- Derby Info: [Existing Application Impact, Regression] (was: [Regression, Existing Application Impact, Patch Available])

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1315) largeCodeGen fails with embedded and framework DerbyNetClient

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1315?page=all ] Rajesh Kartha updated DERBY-1315: - Attachment: largeCodeGen.sql Here is 4 line sql script to recreate the issue, hope this will help in debugging and fixing the OOM error. I also plan to bump

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1629) Exceptions thrown by code in procedures or triggers are not handled/thrown correctly by Derby

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1629?page=all ] David Van Couvering updated DERBY-1629: --- Summary: Exceptions thrown by code in procedures or triggers are not handled/thrown correctly by Derby (was:

Re: full stack trace with TestConnectionMethods.java

On 8/3/06, Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, SUMMARY: UNABLE TO REPRODUCE PROBLEM :-( That's a good thing. :-) I applied patch for DERBY-1424 (i.e.) derby-1424-v1.diff. /snip I also ran jdbc40 TestSuite in both the Embedded and the client frameworks. The test always seemed to pass.

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-1424) Build derbyclient.jar from a dependency list generated by classlister

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1424?page=all ] Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1424. Resolution: Fixed Committed to trunk with revision 428891. Build derbyclient.jar from a dependency list generated by classlister

License headers for .sql files

Dan had mentioned that .sql files could safely exist without license headers. But a lot of our .sql files are tests, which I would argue are creative works. Any comments? Thanks, David

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1377) Update copyright headers to comply with new ASF policy

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425870 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377: Dan, I just noticed this patch you added. Is this something for review only, or do you want me to commit

Re: [jira] Resolved: (DERBY-1424) Build derbyclient.jar from a dependency list generated by classlister

Great, thanks! Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1424?page=all ] Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1424. Resolution: Fixed Committed to trunk with revision 428891. Build derbyclient.jar from a dependency

Re: last week of 10.2 development

Gads. Makes one's head spin. David Kathey Marsden wrote: Rick Hillegas wrote: We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development. I do not know if our patch mail is working. Andrew said he would check on it on Monday. Right now there are 28 patches outstanding. Of these 16 are

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1614) Test harness overrides heap size settings when starting Network Server

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1614?page=all ] John H. Embretsen updated DERBY-1614: - Attachment: DERBY-1614_v3.diff Attatching 'DERBY-1614_v3.diff', which is a replacement for all previous patches, provided that the changes are

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1057) documentation to address Grant/Revoke (Derby-464)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=comments#action_12425874 ] Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1057: Laura, here is some info based on what I know. May be someone else can verify it. Also, please feel to

[jira] Created: (DERBY-1648) Create a tool for database recovery

Create a tool for database recovery --- Key: DERBY-1648 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1648 Project: Derby Issue Type: New Feature Components: Tools Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-1319) Need documentation on the toursdb demo database

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1319?page=all ] Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1319. Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0 Resolution: Fixed Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available]) Committed DERBY-1319_20060725_2.diff with revision

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1596) Add demo programs needed for Working With Derby activities to the Derby codeline and build: WwdEmbedded.java, WwdClient.java and WwdUtils.java

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1596?page=comments#action_12425880 ] Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1596: Hi Stan, A few small issues with the current patch: - demo.html and navbar.html conflict with the recent

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1521) Upgrade test needs to be enhanced to test grant revoke

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1521?page=comments#action_12425881 ] Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1521: - Currently, only basic grant/revoke support is tested after upgrade. To run more grant/revoke tests after upgrade, I was

Re: last week of 10.2 development

Andrew McIntyre wrote: * if you know it's not going to pass a vote, call it what it is. :-) And the best way to communicate this I think is to use our new mechanism to escalate issues to Urgency Urgent or Critical. That said, I would like to share that because of other commitments and

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1646) Documentation to address Grant/Revoke Authorization for views/triggers/constraints/routines(DERBY-1330)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425882 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1646: -- 3) In one way there are not really two models, Laura you put it well in some other comment that said

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1431) Typo in link to Simple Example from frameworks/readme.html

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1431?page=all ] Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1431: --- Attachment: derby-1431-alt.diff Noticed this was still in the patch queue. I'm attaching an alternate patch for this issue in order to revive this

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1377) Update copyright headers to comply with new ASF policy

OK. From my perspective it looks good, pretty basic switch. David Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425877 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:

Re: last week of 10.2 development

+1 to daily mail for now. Andrew McIntyre wrote: On 8/4/06, Kathey Marsden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick Hillegas wrote: We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development. I do not know if our patch mail is working. Andrew said he would check on it on Monday. Right now there are 28

Re: last week of 10.2 development

Hi Andrew, This sounds good to me. Can this be done from the Administrator tab? Thanks, -Rick Andrew McIntyre wrote: On 8/4/06, Kathey Marsden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick Hillegas wrote: We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development. I do not know if our patch mail is working.

Re: last week of 10.2 development

On 8/4/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andrew, This sounds good to me. Can this be done from the Administrator tab? No, it has to be done while logged in as user derby-dev, who owns the subscription. I can send you the password if you'd like to do it yourself. andrew

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1057) documentation to address Grant/Revoke (Derby-464)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=comments#action_12425886 ] Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1057: - For information on derby.database.sqlAuthorization property, this mail from Satheesh has some more information:

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1646) Documentation to address Grant/Revoke Authorization for views/triggers/constraints/routines(DERBY-1330)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425887 ] Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646: -- Okay, I see what you mean. I am not sure that we want to use coarse grained and fine grained as descriptions for

Re: last week of 10.2 development

Kathey Marsden wrote: Andrew McIntyre wrote: * if you know it's not going to pass a vote, call it what it is. :-) And the best way to communicate this I think is to use our new mechanism to escalate issues to Urgency Urgent or Critical. That said, I would like to share that because of

Re: last week of 10.2 development

Yes, please! -Rick Andrew McIntyre wrote: On 8/4/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andrew, This sounds good to me. Can this be done from the Administrator tab? No, it has to be done while logged in as user derby-dev, who owns the subscription. I can send you the password if

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1431) Typo in link to Simple Example from frameworks/readme.html

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1431?page=comments#action_12425888 ] Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-1431: Hi Andrew, thanks for looking at this. Your suggestion is fine with me, but I think we also have to take the link

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1614) Test harness overrides heap size settings when starting Network Server

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1614?page=comments#action_12425889 ] Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1614: I agree, I think this approach is better than setting a default, especially one which cannot be overridden. If

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1431) Typo in link to Simple Example from frameworks/readme.html

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1431?page=all ] Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1431: --- Attachment: derby-1431-alt2.diff Attaching updated patch which removes the link from frameworks/readme.html which would be broken in the snapshot but

Re: last week of 10.2 development

Kathey Marsden wrote: Rick Hillegas wrote: We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development. A number of Blocker and Urgent issues are still in motion. Now would be a good time to alert the community if you are working on one of these issues and think that you might need some help to

Legal hiccups for 10.2

I have posed Dan's question to legal-dicuss: Does the AS IS clause of the Apache 2.0 license conflict with the testing and evaluation purposes only clause of JDBC4's early-draft disclaimer. For more context, see the discussion in the comments of DERBY-1639. Geir Magnusson answered yes, this

[jira] Closed: (DERBY-1642) As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a revoke execute ... restrict should fail if there are dependent objects on the execute privilege

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1642?page=all ] Mamta A. Satoor closed DERBY-1642. -- Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0 Resolution: Duplicate This is duplicate of DERBY-1643 As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a revoke execute

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1377) Update copyright headers to comply with new ASF policy

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425893 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377: Does our generated javadoc need to have license headers? My intuition is yes, but looking for others

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1603) ERROR 54038: Maximum depth of nested triggers was exceeded occurs when trigger fires after upating 10.1.2.5 jars to 10.1.3.1

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1603?page=all ] Rajesh Kartha updated DERBY-1603: - Urgency: Urgent (was: Normal) Priority: Critical (was: Major) Bumping the Priority and Urgency. This issue occurs between versions, hence can be

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1377) Update copyright headers to comply with new ASF policy

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425895 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377: -- I would say no to the generated javadoc, they are not source files. Though maybe the copyright

  1   2   >