Hi Cor,
> My impression is not that people in this discussion think that it will
> be easy per see.
I got a bit different impression, and still see the extensive requirements doc
(also the new one) highly contrasting with what I read as the idea of ‘just
start iterating from
Hi Bjoern,
> That -- and the fact that we have 45.000 accounts on it -- are the reason I
> brought up Askbot. Content and accounts are the things that are hard earned
> on a
> platform, maintainers and moderators are a bit easier, but still hard. The
> pure technical platform is the easiest
Forgot that Bjoern actually mentioned some of the somehows
Technical infrastructure was lacking for contributors:
> [1] Seen e.g. by:
>a/ repeated cries for help on twitter, some examples: (both technical
> issues)
> https://twitter.com/nimbleslides/status/1020899933161848832
>
Hi Bjoern,
> Stating that a classic CMS is by definition better suited for the task at hand
> than something more interactive like discourse is a foregone conclusion. Given
> that the lack of community involvement is the core reason for many limitations
> of the current setup, its not a valid
nde geschreven:
>
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:06:54PM +0200, Maarten Brouwers (murb) wrote:
>> What about adapting Mozilla’s extension-site?
>
> So lets phrase the problem differently: We are not lacking tools or platforms.
> We are lacking v
What about adapting Mozilla’s extension-site? From an and-user’s perspective I
think they’ve well figured out how such site should work, at least from a
consumer’s perspective. Adopting a Q/A site for something that allows for a
structured presentation of an extension looks like turning a bus
