Hi
> On 17 May 2017, at 12:33, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:15:51PM +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>> I don't share your optimism about gitlab bug tracking, nor do I share
>> in the mentioned frustration with bugzilla.
>
> Me too, I like bugzilla (but not for doing
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 15:31 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any opinions on:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706155
>
> ?
>
> (I use gerrit for some work projects and am quite happy with it in
> general; the interdiff support in particular is incredibly useful)
>
I've als
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 12:32 +0200, Pierre-Yves Luyten wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:32:26 -0500, Erick Pérez Castellanos
> wrote:
> >
> >> Just curious - is there a plan to integrate tasks in future Calendar
> >> app?
> >> https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Calendar [1]
> >
> > Right now I'm
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 11:23 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> > 2012/4/25 Allan Day :
> ...
> > So, IMHO a design driven GNOME needs good desing documents. The
> > "design document is a written contract"[4] between designers and other
> > teams, more
Hi Allan
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 14:27 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies in advance for the long mail - there was no other way.
>
>
> There have been a few design-related threads on the list recently. I’m
> going to try and reboot those discussions in a slightly different and,
> I ho
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 10:31 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 23:43 +0200, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> >
> > > Clocks: The clocks app is designed by the GNOME designers.
> > It is still more
> > > or less a prototype I am working on alongside Emily Gonyer
Hi Federico!
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:55 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> I've been having a terrible time trying to get something tested on top
> of Gnome 3.4, all because I can't get 3.4 built from jhbuild. I'm too
> old to build from tarballs, and my distro doesn't carry 3.4 yet.
>
> I
On vie, 2012-01-20 at 22:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 20.01.12 08:47, Ryan Lortie (de...@desrt.ca) wrote:
>
> >
> > hi Bastien,
> >
> > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 12:36 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > No, the distributions/systems that choose not to use systemd will have
> > > to
On vie, 2012-01-20 at 04:25 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 19.01.12 17:49, Ryan Lortie (de...@desrt.ca) wrote:
>
> >
> > hi Bastien,
> >
> > On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:38 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > commit 27fa171efe4179c0a42ec79e0dc501077f042a08
> > > Author: Bastien Nocera
>
On jue, 2011-10-06 at 14:30 -0400, Ken VanDine wrote:
> Sorry, not trying to sound harsh here but I couldn't find a better way
> to say this.
>
> Basically you are saying that GOA isn't really an open technology to
> help consolidate user's online accounts, it is only to help consolidate
> accou
On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:49 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >>
> >> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
> >>
On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
> about this somewhere I saw recently)
>
> - Why show the "wacom graphics tablet" configuration page in the "System
> Settings" if I don't have one? (perhaps Ubunt
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 07:24 +1200, John Stowers wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 13:42 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> > Dave Neary wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > So, in short, I would like the design team to act like the gnome-utils
> > > team.
> >
> > GNOME design has all the equivalent facilitie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 22:50 +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> I think I can say that I speak for the whole BSD community, GNOME users
> and non-GNOME users, when I say that such steps as enforcing Linux-only
> dependencies even more is a clear sign GNOME does not care about portability
> to
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:00 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Le jeudi 19 mai 2011 à 10:53 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> > > That is perfectly valid advice. You need various things in your
> > > distribution to help GNOME developmen
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 17:51 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 21:50 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > Which is why I've asked Lennart to add a flag to systemd's configure to
> > install only the little servicey bits, for Linux distros, and the docs
> > would serve as ba
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 13:21 -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
>
> And also, does being in git imply that the translation team would
> automatically consider the module?
>
yes, you will start getting translations as soon as it's there. It
happened to me to several modules
__
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 17:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Robert Ancell
> wrote:
> >
> > There have been problems for years and years and years. There is some
> > point where you need to reconsider if that strategy is appropriate.
>
> So here's some actual data
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 22:58 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> > We're not dictating anything; we're just making an awesome OS, the way
> > we envision, period.
> Wait a sec. It was said (here and on IRC) that g-c-c wants to include
> only "polished" panels to g-c-c. Only panels that gnome UI speciali
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:55 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 07:32 +0200, Michael Terry wrote:
> > So as the Deja Dup maintainer, life will go on when you drop support.
> > Worst case, I can just make the panel a dialog.
> >
> > But dropping the existing API feels like a frustr
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 20:51 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > I suspect GNOME might be interested in having a "backup story" so I'm
> > offering this one. And I'd be happy to have increased design advice
> > and developer eyeballs.
>
> I'd really like Deja Dup to be even more integrated into the s
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 07:32 +0200, Michael Terry wrote:
> So as the Deja Dup maintainer, life will go on when you drop support.
> Worst case, I can just make the panel a dialog.
>
> But dropping the existing API feels like a frustrating bait and
> switch. It was not clear (at least to me) that th
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 11:54 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Mi, 2011-04-20 at 10:58 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 17:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > On Di, 2011-04-19 at 16:34 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 1
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 09:43 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 13:48 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:29 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> > > As Frederic pointed out, we shouldn't be brainstorming on the 3.2
> > > feature page
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 17:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Di, 2011-04-19 at 16:34 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:45 +, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > >
> > > Regarding couchdb: how complete is its data model? When it first
> > > showed
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:45 +, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>
> Regarding couchdb: how complete is its data model? When it first
> showed up, SyncEvolution had some problems with it because REV wasn't
> supported, if memory serves me right.
>
IIRC, that was a bug you filed for evolution-couchdb, which
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:14 +0200, daniel g. siegel wrote:
> > what do you mean by 'backends'? Backends of what? As I said,
> > evolution-couchdb already provides an e-d-s backend for accessing
> > contacts in CouchDB databases, so IMO, what we need is:
>
> so my question is basically: why do we n
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:38 +0300, Jens Georg wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 13:21 +0200, daniel g. siegel wrote:
> > and right here i think we shouldn't base on bad formats (vcard) and
> > sucking protocols (syncml). using json is a much better option.
>
> Well as soon as you talk about sync, som
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 13:28 +0200, daniel g. siegel wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 13:21 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:41 +0200, daniel g. siegel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:37 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > > > On 19 April 2011 1
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:29 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> As Frederic pointed out, we shouldn't be brainstorming on the 3.2
> feature pages, so I thought I'd fill in some details/thoughts on the
> Contacts [1] idea here.
>
> The page suggests libfolks and/or libsocialweb for the implementation.
>
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:41 +0200, daniel g. siegel wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:37 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > On 19 April 2011 11:27, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:43 +0200, daniel g. siegel wrote:
> > >> another very important point is synchronisation. together
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 14:04 +0100, Who wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Mirek M. wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > I realize that plans for Gnome 3.2 are being determined, and I just want to
> > put an idea out there.
> > What I'd really love to see in Gnome is command search for every
> > app
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:29 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Metacity is an important component of GNOME 3 as the window manager in
> fallback mode. There's a couple of major things that need doing to make
> it work in the GNOME 3 stack that I wanted to bring up here. Both of
> them already have patches
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:26 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> Plans for testing GNOME 3
> =
> Everybody knows what needs work in their own modules, but there are lot
> of gaps in between modules. How are we going to catch options in the
> control center not doing anything, etc?
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 21:35 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
>
>
> == GNOME Web Platform ==
>
> There is no GNOME web platform. There are no new libraries being
> proposed for use by all GNOME web modules. It feels way too early to
> try to make those sorts of decisions. We need another module o
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:00 +0200, Xavier Claessens wrote:
>
> > - dconf won't be part of that release
>
> Really? So what will happens for apps that are already ported to
> GSettings, like Empathy?
>
well, they should be part of the GNOME 3 beta, not of 2.32.
Again, we can't do a 2.32 release
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 14:26 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:54 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>
> > right, because of this, I think 2.32 should just be 2.30 + some
> > backported changes. If we release 2.32 with some modules using
> > gsettings/gtk3/etc
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 09:56 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 09:24 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > Paolo Borelli wrote:
> >
> > > I still would like to have a definitive description of what 2.32 apps
> > > can and cannot use: for instance will the new glib be part of the
> >
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 09:43 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > libnotify is the only major library that I'm unclear on for GNOME 3.
> > It's a conditional buildrequire in all my GNOME projects (as libnotify
> > still uses gtk2.0) and I'm sure
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 22:36 -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
> On 12 June 2010 11:31, Xavier Claessens wrote:
> > Ubuntu told me that Maverick (the next ubuntu release) is not going to ship
> > GTK3
>
> I don't think that's true. I was at the planning session for "coming
> changes in GNOME" at UDS Ma
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 13:19 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 02.06.2010, 13:11 +0200 schrieb Luca Ferretti:
> > if you want to develop for GNOME, then install a jhbuild
> > sandbox (stable or development) and make your application build and work
> > inside it.
>
> Depends on how you
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:52 -0400, Curtis Hovey wrote:
>
> I think you can:
> * use bzr-git to push your Launchpad trunk to GNOME git
> * setup an import of the git branch and make it trunk
>
launchpad just imports git master, right?
___
desktop-devel-l
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 09:27 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:04 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Xavier Claessens
> >> wrote:
> >> > Nice
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 08:10 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>
> As for VCS and bug tracking it'll be quite a lot more work on our part
> if we should move. I don't think anyone in the team is directly
> opposed to the idea, but it's more the fact that it would be a major
> inconvenience. W
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:04 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Xavier Claessens wrote:
> > Nice. Just a question: where can I find the code for the "Several fully
> > functional backends"? Especially the gconf one.
> >
>
> The gconf backend is included in GConf 2.31
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 13:05 -0800, Dylan McCall wrote:
> > So instead of making this thread bigger, why don't people go to write a
> > 'Interface' capplet, starting with what there was on the Interface tab?
> > If it's done correctly, we can even think about including it in
> > gnome-control-center
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:00 +0200, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
> Google for 'PulseAudio Hate' and then maybe try to understand what
> dangerous road have GNOME project taken last two releases.
>
wow, I just googled, and yeah, you're right! but don't worry, we are
sending Lennart to an empty island wit
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 15:41 +0100, Uros Nedic wrote:
>
> I'm more than ready to help to improve the things and also
> I want to become one of significant contributors, but first
> I do not know how many developers GNOME have and its
> responsibilities, I do not know how whole life-cycle goes,
> e
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:28 +0100, Xavier Claessens wrote:
> Le mardi 10 novembre 2009 à 10:19 +, Thomas Wood a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 10:18 +0100, Xavier Claessens wrote:
> > > So if you agree/disagree with those changes, please tell your opinion!
> > > I would like to know if I'm t
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 11:24 +0100, Ghee Teo wrote:
> Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 23:06 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> >
> >> 2009/10/13 Rodrigo Moya :
> >>
> >>>> Ryan is a bit sad to not get feedback on his proposal,
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 18:24 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 19:17 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > e-d-s stores the data in GConf, so it needs to be migrated indeed. Also,
> > even though the desktop-wide settings might be obsoleted
> > (/desktop/GNOME, for
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 17:39 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> 2009/10/14 Xavier Claessens :
> > Le lundi 12 octobre 2009 à 11:27 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit :
> >> I'd like to propose the inclusion of dconf for GNOME 2.30 in the desktop
> >> release set.
> >
> > This is great news! I'm all in favor of dc
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 23:06 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> 2009/10/13 Rodrigo Moya :
> >> Ryan is a bit sad to not get feedback on his proposal, so a bit more
> >> seriously: I think what we probably need is a migration plan. Should we
> >> move all the code from g
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 17:18 +0200, Pierre Wieser wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just my 10cents piece, as I'm afraid I'm not really involved
> in the decision.
>
> As a new maintainer - about six month on nautilus-actions -
> I've already had to migrate from Gvfs to GIO, from libglade
> to GtkBuilder, and, obvi
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 07:54 -0400, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 13:12 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> >> Le mardi 13 octobre 2009, à 00:16 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo a écrit :
> >> > El lun
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 13:12 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le mardi 13 octobre 2009, à 00:16 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo a écrit :
> > El lun, 12-10-2009 a las 11:33 -0400, Ryan Lortie escribió:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 17:30 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > > Le lundi 12 octo
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 17:02 +0200, Florian Ludwig wrote:
> Hi
>
> i dig a little into couchdb/desktop-couch and am wondering about
> security. Did I understand it right that desktop-couch starts couchdb on
> a random port without any password requirements, bound to 127.0.0.1?
> While not being att
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 20:57 +0100, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
>
> In fact I'm not able to think about 1 application which I'd like to have
> on one workspace
>
the only few I can think of are some that you really want 1 instance of:
* mail application (evolution)
* IM (pidgin, skype, xchat, etc)
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 16:07 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> Is there some (semi) official place to discuss couchdb-glib by the
> way? I have some comments/questions, but I am not sure they are worth
> spamming desktop-devel with :-)
>
use the desktopcouch google group (soon to be moved s
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 11:40 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> >>
> > no, shouldn't be a big task, as confirmed by the CouchDB developers this
> > afternoon. The only thing that I'm not sure about is that they mentioned
> > e4x
> > (http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ec
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 20:03 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> 2009/10/1 Rodrigo Moya :
> > On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:02 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:41 +0100, John Carr wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > > it is not re
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:02 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:41 +0100, John Carr wrote:
> > >>
> > > it is not required for evo-couchdb to work, so I don't think it needs
> > > any mention, apart from saying that if you want to run a lo
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:41 +0100, John Carr wrote:
> >>
> > it is not required for evo-couchdb to work, so I don't think it needs
> > any mention, apart from saying that if you want to run a local CouchDB,
> > you need to install CouchDB and all its dependencies.
>
> I only brought it up because
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 14:24 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 14:12 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > If there is a local couchdb exepected for the common case then maybe
> > > the mozilla js dependency needs a mention.
> > >
> > it is not re
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 12:55 +0100, John Carr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Purpose
> > ===
> > couchdb-glib is a library to implement the protocol to talk to CouchDB
> > servers (http://c
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:52 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Le jeudi 01 octobre 2009 à 13:42 +0200, Rodrigo Moya a écrit :
> > Hi
> >
> > Purpose
> > ===
> > couchdb-glib is a library to implement the protocol to talk to CouchDB
> > servers (http://c
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:48 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Maybe I get this wrong but wouldn't it be easier to access CouchDB from
> libgda database-wrapper that we already have in the external
> dependencies?
>
well, couchdb is not a relational database, in the sense that a CouchDB
Hi
Purpose
===
couchdb-glib is a library to implement the protocol to talk to CouchDB
servers (http://couchdb.apache.org), a schema-free, json-based, database
of documents, which offers synchronization and replication between
several machines.
evolution-couchdb is the 1st module to make use o
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 11:37 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Wolter Hellmund wrote:
> > The project is intended to use a Brainstorm System, which is already
> > provided by
> > IdeaTorrent. It is already implemented in successful projects such as Ubuntu
> > Brains
Hi
During the development of Ubuntu Karmic, I discussed with some people
about having social services accounts (facebook, twitter, etc)
configured in one place, about-me specifically. Since it was a bit late
for GNOME 2.28, I postponed the discussion, but now that 2.28.0 is
almost out, I'd like to
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 21:21 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 18.08.09 21:09, Patryk Zawadzki (pat...@pld-linux.org) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > (I don't want to create the impression that I am opposed to the idea
> > > of a desk
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 00:36 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
>
> We evaluated CouchDB as a primary store over sqlite, but CouchDB lacked
> *very* important features. This makes it undoable. Feel free to get in
> touch with us to discuss which precise features I mean.
>
I talked to some tracker peopl
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:38 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 00:27 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
> > > somewhat bac
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:18 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
>
> CouchDB: I don't really think it is needed. I'm not convinced - how many
> times do I need to change email client. Without proper definition of
> storage (such as FirstName vs. firstName vs ...) it won't help
>
we are defining the stor
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
> somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to talk
> about ontologies and rdf and events and timelines and metadata stores
> and kernel apis before we ans
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:02 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Matthias
> Clasen wrote:
> > I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
> > somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to talk
> > about ontologies and rdf and event
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:16 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
> > developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
> > inclusion for Tra
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 13:31 +0400, Alexey Rusakov wrote:
> В Срд, 29/07/2009 в 11:18 +0200, Rodrigo Moya пишет:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 13:04 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > We have done essentially this (with the extra Preferences menu in
> > > between) for a few
enus could perfectly be replaced by a 'Control
Center' menu item, and then have the control center shell provide an
easy way to search for stuff
--
Rodrigo Moya
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
As $SUBJECT says, we now have a gnome-2-26 branch for 2.26 further
development for gnome-control-center
--
Rodrigo Moya
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
ybe there could be a
button to get new wallpapers from gnome-look.org, or just show new
wallpapers along the other wallpapers directly.
If you want to discuss the details, maybe you want to do it in the
gnomecc-l...@gnome.org mailing list.
--
Rodrigo Moya
___
these things we expect applications developers
> to use directly? What's our message?
>
again, these offer ISDs distro and desktop independence, so it's
something to push a lot also :-)
--
Rodrigo Moya
___
desktop-devel
libcanberra provides a libcanberra-gtk lib which could be
part of GTK. libcanberra itself, I guess, would need to keep as a
separate lib for KDE and others to use it (if they do or plan to, which
I'm not sure about)
--
Rodrigo Moya
___
desktop-devel-lis
an if GConf is still installed.
>
> Ideas are definitely welcome in this direction.
>
there could be a process started by gnome-shell that just migrates the
whole GConf database to dconf? or is this automatic migration not
possible?
--
Rodrigo Moya
___
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 10:55 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>
> > yeah, I agree with you, I think both should be the same (an applet or an
> > icon), so since we already have the applet, I guess it would make sense
>
not
working on their setups. For those users, we really need to offer them a
solution, it's not only about choosing to use it or not, it is that in
some setups it seems to not work as some users want it to.
--
Rodrigo Moya
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 13:22 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 15 janvier 2009 à 12:55 +0100, Rodrigo Moya a écrit :
> > > If the two applets don’t share the basic UI (one panel applet and one
> > > notification icon), that’s a bigger problem. I guess we could
right here, we need some sort of run-time activation of one
applet or the other. I guess gnome-settings-daemon's sound module could
add the applet or the notification icon depending on PA/not PA.
--
Rodrigo Moya
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
rnativeNotificationsUI
it looks nice, but where would immediate-action-required notifications
be shown? Things like 'your battery is about to die'?
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
en more appropriate anyway.
>
wasn't libnotify/notification-daemon created to replace alert boxes? I
tend to find them quite useless, since I miss them most of the time
while typing without looking at the screen, so I don't think they are a
good solution for immediate attenti
; the core of GNOME which is tied to our release cycle and QA
> standards.'
>
that would probably be fixed if we had the Desktop release splitted into
core (panel/applets, nautilus, control center, metacity, ...) and
applications
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
opted as an official module of the GNOME desktop.
>
while I agree about not having all the cool little apps in GNOME, I
think this can be useful to lots of people, so it would be ok IMO if it
were part of gnome-applets.
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 12:40 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 14:16 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > KDE applications are still using XSMP AFAIK, so we'll need to support
> > it in some way
>
> We do? What happens if we decide not to?
>
well, we
I assume from your use of the word "solely" that your
> backwards-compatibility strategy is to leave XSMP support in place for
> legacy applications?
>
yeah, that's the only problem I see with William's suggestion. KDE
applications are still using XSMP AFAIK, so we'
cognition help attract developers.
>
this sounds good to me, if the Foundation has money, we could have every
year a contest for the "coolest GNOME project of the year". GSoC gets us
new developers mainly because of the prizes, so it is a good idea I
think to have something similar
#x27;m misremembering. Or maybe the google
>backend needs something different? Does anybody know?
>
AFAIK, it doesn't handle authentication. It needs to be done (IIRC from
my evolution times) via the e-d-s API, and last time I tested, it stil
didn't handle it
--
Rodrigo Moy
;, which indeed is too much (over 3GB here) if your home
is big
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Both gnome-settings-daemon and gnome-control-center have a new branch
gnome-2-22 for further 2.22.x development.
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/li
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:51 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> ...
also, what about iso-codes? jhbuild seems to be using 0.53, but latest
is 1.8. Is there any reason to use such an old version
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
desktop-d
he "gnome-settings-daemon"
> package, recently added to svn. Note also that gnome-control-center yet
> provides a gnome-settings-daemon program, but I don't know if and how
> those are related.
>
g-c-c will use the settings-daemon used by GDM, in fact, it is a copy
1 - 100 of 311 matches
Mail list logo
