ction and play.
>
Speaking personally, I think it would be good if photos was able to handle
video as well as images. We haven't really discussed that, since we're
still busy filling out basic image processing features, but it's certainly
interesting.
Allan
_
Hi, using that thread I have a doubt related with the 751212 bug and which
can be resolved from the perspective of design. How handles gnome-photos
importing videos from cameras?
I mean that other similar software as Gthumb, import all content (photos
and video) and even allows display on the coll
On 10/18/2016 10:44 AM, Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
Not sure how can this pan out - I guess that stable release is in
bugfixes-only mode, so the widgets could land only in Gtk4. GNOME
modules probably won't quickly switch to it, right?
GNOME modules will likely be the first projects to move to 4.x.
On Oct 18, 2016 13:55, "Allan Day" wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> Below is a list of UX features that would be great to have from a design
point of view. I thought I'd share it, in case it helps with 3.24 planning.
It's not a complete list and I think that some of
Hi everyone!
Below is a list of UX features that would be great to have from a design
point of view. I thought I'd share it, in case it helps with 3.24 planning.
It's not a complete list and I think that some of them are already being
worked on.
It would be really great to have a bunc
Ok thanks for the info, then I guess its the promo text for the
campaign that still apply.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:41:32PM +0100, Stef Walter wrote:
>> Andreas or Tobias would know definitively ... but I don't think that any
>> im
Hi,
I'm active in the GNOME engagement team and are currently working on a
article about the 2012-2013 privacy campaign for the GNOME annual
report. To complete the article I need know what privacy features have
been implemented as a result of the campaign. Information about this
are very
Hi.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:41:32PM +0100, Stef Walter wrote:
> Andreas or Tobias would know definitively ... but I don't think that any
> implementation has been undertaken by GNOME as of yet.
that is correct.
Cheers,
Tobi
___
desktop-devel-list m
e 2012-2013 privacy campaign for the GNOME annual
> report. To complete the article I need know what privacy features have
> been implemented as a result of the campaign. Information about this
> are very much appreciated, thanks.
>
___
desktop-
Hi, fr33domlover
El jue, 10 de oct 2013 a las 11:29 , fr33domlover
escribió:
Then what about MediaGoblin?
Anyway, there's a chance Diaspora develops a public API if you talk to
them and explain they're going to have a desktop plugin in GNOME. I'm
sure they'll be happy.
Well, I'm not invol
Then what about MediaGoblin?
Anyway, there's a chance Diaspora develops a public API if you talk to
them and explain they're going to have a desktop plugin in GNOME. I'm
sure they'll be happy. So the only question is whether someone wants to
develop a plugin once Diaspora has the API.
On ה', 2013
El 10/10/2013 03:02, escribió:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there any plan to add support for MediaGoblin and Diaspora
Diaspora doesn't have a public API yet.
Andrés Fernandez
Software Peronista
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
htt
Hello,
Is there any plan to add support for MediaGoblin and Diaspora, to help
promote them as free (libre) decentralized replacements for their
proprietary centralized parallels? (They could have plugins in Totem,
Photos and Documents at least)
(Personally I upload my photos/video to a Media
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:22 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> In short, you would be able to see your Facebook photos in Photos, and
> use your Windows Live (outlook.com, live.com, hotmail.com) email from
> Evolution.
Just following up - the Windows Live email feature is done already and
turned out to
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> All evidence I've seen suggests only paid Office 365 accounts support
> Exchange Web Services, not free Outlook.com accounts.
Ah, right. I was probably thinking of Office 365 then, which I've
occasionally had to deal with.
Thanks.
--
dw
A warning about Outlook.com's IMAP support. It's a bare-boned
implementation of IMAP 4 with no support for IDLE or UIDPLUS. In
addition, I discovered (and reported) that the EXPUNGE command will
freeze all connections for that account 10s - 15s. It's not pretty at
the moment.
-- Jim
On Mo
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 14:41 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Those are the protocols they've *added* to support mobile access,
> AFAICT. But they *already* supported EWS natively, and that is the
> protocol they support best.
All evidence I've seen suggests only paid Office 365 accounts support
Exc
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 13:02 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>
> If you look at
> http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-outlook/archive/2013/09/12/outlook-com-now-with-imap.aspx
> (which is linked from the feature page), then the other alternative is
> EAS or Exchange ActiveSync [1] not EWS.
Those are th
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:46:27PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:22 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>>
>> - https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/WindowLiveMail
>>
>> In short, you would be able to ... use your Windows Live (outlook.co
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:22 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>
> - https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/WindowLiveMail
>
> In short, you would be able to ... use your Windows Live (outlook.com,
> live.com, hotmail.com) email from Evolution.
Shouldn't we be using EWS
Hello everybody,
I would like to propose these two features for GNOME 3.12:
- https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/FacebookPhotos
- https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/WindowLiveMail
In short, you would be able to see your Facebook photos in Photos, and
use your Windows
Fixing old bugs :)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hey,
when I announced the 3.8.0 release last week, I forgot to mention one thing:
With 3.8 out, we're now opening the floodgates for another development cycle.
The feature proposal period for 3.10 will be open from now to late
April. Let us know what features you have in the pip
Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 20:15 +0100, Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas wrote:
> Luckily, there's a W3C standard to do exactly this:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/its/
>
> And version 2.0 is due to be a recommendation later this year:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/
>
> And we already
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 20:15 +0100, Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas wrote:
> OTOH, and in my very humble opinion, I think that generic XML parsing in
> intltool is not the right way. Internationalize an xml file must not
> modify its structure:
> 1- There is an standard attribute 'xml:lang' that could be
Hi Javier and everyone,
I also send this message to desktop-devel-list, because from my point of
view this mailing list is where this conversation belongs. If this is
not the place for this topic I would thank any pointing. I should have
notify this to GNOME people some time ago, although never is
Allan Day wrote on 02/07/12 09:38:
>...
>
> Jon has been doing some fantastic work on Nautilus recently. It was
> getting very little - if any - developer attention and he has stepped
> up to make dramatic improvements, including addressing long-standing
> complaints. I'm really excited about the
m the two cases I've seen
(bgo#676842, bgo#676897), where the only thing Jon said on a bug was, in
effect, "this doesn't work to my liking", and then proceeded to remove a
bunch of code for very concrete features.
> compact view is problematic, and I don't see any wh
- Mensaje original -
> De: Allan Day
> Para: Federico Mena Quintero
> CC: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> Enviado: Lunes 2 de julio de 2012 17:03
> Asunto: Re: taking features away (compact view removed from Nautilus)
>
> Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> ...
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Allan Day wrote:
Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
..
> The anti-pattern for both removals is like, "there's some peeling paint
> in this house - let's bulldoze the neighborhood".
..
How do you know that was the reason for the decision, if the
background hasn't
out the next release of Nautilus
> thanks to his work; instead of having no movement whatsoever, we are
> going to have lots of great improvements to talk about.
>
Are you sure? Many basic and long standing nautilus features was removed in
the last weeks. I wonder what people inside and outsi
Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
...
> The anti-pattern for both removals is like, "there's some peeling paint
> in this house - let's bulldoze the neighborhood".
...
How do you know that was the reason for the decision, if the
background hasn't been explained? The anti-pattern for that statement
is
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:38:36AM +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Adam, if you wanted to discuss this change, you could have done so on
> the bug or on the Nautilus mailing list, or by asking on
> #gnome-design. I would have been happy to have given you some
> background on why the decision was made.
F
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 16:20 -0007, Adam Dingle wrote:
> The features in core GNOME apps are the result of years of hard work
> and consensus building by our community. All I ask is to be informed
> before these features vanish and to be given the chance to say why I
> like them s
agree with that suggestion. I don't think it would be
> workable, and I don't think it would make GNOME a better place to
> work. There is still time to discuss changes that have been made; we
> don't need to wrap ourselves up in policies.
>
>> The features in core G
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> Adam Dingle wrote:
> > I realized recently to my surprise and dismay that the compact view has
> been
> > removed from Nautilus:
>
> Adam, if you wanted to discuss this change, you could have done so on
> the bug or on the Nautilus mailing list,
s a problem here beyond just Nautilus. In my opinion, useful
features are vanishing from core GNOME apps without adequate notice to
the community and opportunity for discussion by people who use those
features regularly."
> No one objects when you add a feature, yet features can ruin a d
don't need to wrap ourselves up in policies.
> The features in core GNOME apps are the result of years of hard work and
> consensus building by our community.
...
There is no consensus. There are features that some people have gotten
used to, and there has been a long period of addin
> As just one more example, last December the bookmark toolbar was suddenly
> removed from Epiphany:
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2012-January/msg5.html
>
> I was startled to see it removed. I used the bookmark toolbar all the time
> and still miss it every day.
>
> adam
ere because I think
there's a problem here beyond just Nautilus. In my opinion, useful
features are vanishing from core GNOME apps without adequate notice to the
community and opportunity for discussion by people who use those features
regularly. As just one more example, last December the bookm
On So, 01.07.2012 16:11, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>> I'd like to end on a constructive note. I propose that GNOME adopt
>> the following policy. No major feature will be removed from a core
>> GNOME application before a discussion has occurred on a public mailing
>> list such as this one
>You
On 06/30/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Dingle wrote:
I'd like to end on a constructive note. I propose that GNOME adopt
the following policy. No major feature will be removed from a core
GNOME application before a discussion has occurred on a public mailing
list such as this one
You probably want naut
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:44 PM, John Stowers
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
> wrote:
> > It seems like the broken "labels beside icons" behavior should be
> > treated as a bug in GtkIconView that should just be fixed.
>
> Don't worry about it, the text beside icons b
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
> It seems like the broken "labels beside icons" behavior should be
> treated as a bug in GtkIconView that should just be fixed.
Don't worry about it, the text beside icons bug was fixed by removing
the offending feature too.
http://git.g
om a core GNOME
> application before a discussion has occurred on a public mailing list such
> as this one (or on a Bugzilla bug, with a prominent mailing list
> announcement pointing to the bug in question). I also propose that all such
> feature removals that have occurred in the 3
ion). I also propose that all such
> feature removals that have occurred in the 3.6 development cycle be reverted
> until such discussion has occured .
>
> The features in core GNOME apps are the result of years of hard work and
> c
blic mailing list such
> as this one (or on a Bugzilla bug, with a prominent mailing list
> announcement pointing to the bug in question). I also propose that all such
> feature removals that have occurred in the 3.6 development cycle be reverted
> until such discussion has occured .
&g
with a prominent mailing list announcement
pointing to the bug in question). I also propose that all such feature
removals that have occurred in the 3.6 development cycle be reverted until such
discussion has occured.
The features in core GNOME apps are the result of years of hard work
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:34:38PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> We will tell more about Boxes during its first release. At which point
> I hope more people could try it thanks to jhbuild and some early
> adopters.
Any guess as when you'd have tarballs?
/me is a Mageia packager (hint hint :P)
Hey Vincent,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011, à 17:06 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit :
>> + Boxes
>> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Boxes
>> → many commits, mclasen will push the developers to b
Hi
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> While Boxes look interesting, to me, it feels like it's "just" an
> application, and not a feature per se. And I'm not saying that in a
> negative way :-)
The new feature would be "easily manage virtual and remote machines".
Some GNOME des
On 2011-11-08 08:57, Frederic Peters wrote:
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011, à 17:06 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit :
>> + Boxes
>> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Boxes
>
Le lundi 07 novembre 2011, à 20:21 +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011, à 17:06 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> >> + Boxes
> >> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/F
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011, à 17:06 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> >> + Boxes
> >> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Boxes
> >> → many commits, mcla
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011, à 17:06 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit :
>> + Boxes
>> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Boxes
>> → many commits, mclasen will push the developers to blog a progress report
On So, 2011-11-06 at 17:06 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> It's about time to decide on the major features we'll track for 3.4.
> Actually the release team already met yesterday and did a quick round
> up of the proposed features, here's a summary (ti
Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011, à 17:06 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> + Boxes
> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Boxes
> → many commits, mclasen will push the developers to blog a progress report
> once they have something to show
While Boxes look interestin
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Florian Müllner wrote:
> On lun, 2011-11-07 at 00:23 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Florian Müllner
> >
> > To me it means that the application is in control of what
> > appears in the
> > jumplist, not ne
On lun, 2011-11-07 at 00:23 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Florian Müllner
>
> To me it means that the application is in control of what
> appears in the
> jumplist, not necessarily that it is responsible for
> specifying the
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Florian Müllner
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On dom, 2011-11-06 at 22:52 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> >> > "What you see" for me doesnt necessarily mean th
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Seif Lotfy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Florian Müllner
> wrote:
>>
>> On dom, 2011-11-06 at 22:52 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote:
>> > "What you see" for me doesnt necessarily mean that the program
>> > populates the jumplist alone. It means the items in t
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Florian Müllner wrote:
> On dom, 2011-11-06 at 22:52 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> > "What you see" for me doesnt necessarily mean that the program
> > populates the jumplist alone. It means the items in the jumplist are
> > prgram specific.
>
> To me it means that th
On dom, 2011-11-06 at 22:52 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> "What you see" for me doesnt necessarily mean that the program
> populates the jumplist alone. It means the items in the jumplist are
> prgram specific.
To me it means that the application is in control of what appears in the
jumplist, not nec
m/en-US/windows7/products/features/jump-lists
> > They distinguish between recently and frequently used too
>
> I am not able to see the embedded silverlight movie(?), but the quote
>
> "What you see in a Jump List depends entirely on the program."
>
> would support M
On dom, 2011-11-06 at 21:52 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> Lets avoid the fact that this is by MS, it is still useful to look at.
> http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/products/features/jump-lists
> They distinguish between recently and frequently used too
I am not able to see the
12:00 PM, Matthias Clasen <
> matthias.cla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Frederic Peters
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Frederic Peters
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> + Jumplists
Lets avoid the fact that this is by MS, it is still useful to look at.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/products/features/jump-lists
They distinguish between recently and frequently used too
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> Let me elaborate,
> One of the main
> >>
>> >> Hello all,
>> >>
>> >> + Jumplists
>> >> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Jumplists
>> >> → didn't heard much opinion of it from designers
>> >>
>> >
>> > Jumplists is predica
>>
> >> + Jumplists
> >> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Jumplists
> >> → didn't heard much opinion of it from designers
> >>
> >
> > Jumplists is predicated on choosing an engine like zeitgeist. So there
> is a
> > bigger
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> + Jumplists
>> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Jumplists
>> → didn't heard muc
re proposal but somehow
> nobody even gave it a chance or replied to it...
> Cheers
> Seif
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
l but somehow
nobody even gave it a chance or replied to it...
Cheers
Seif
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> + Jumplists
>> https://li
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> + Jumplists
> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Jumplists
> → didn't heard much opinion of it from designers
>
>
Jumplists is predicated on choosing an engine like zeitgeist. So the
Hello all,
It's about time to decide on the major features we'll track for 3.4.
Actually the release team already met yesterday and did a quick round
up of the proposed features, here's a summary (title/url) of them as
well a a quick release team note.
If you feel that something i
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 16:45 -0400, komputes wrote:
> A few more nautilus features.
Please write to the nautilus mailing list instead.
This is no content for desktop-devel-list, plus wishlists are mostly
uninteresting if you don't offer manpower to work on it.
Thanks,
andre
--
m
idea)
> http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/15427/ (Other implementation ideas
> here)
A few more nautilus features. They all revolve around copy mechanism
improvements:
• Allocate space before copying.
• Checks files to be copied before action is taken.
• Resistant to hidden files, long name, naming confl
an't be the only one itching to get cool things into GNOME 3.4.
>>
>> Where are your ideas ? It would be great to get them onto that wiki
>> page, in particular since next weekend a bunch of us will get together
>> in Montreal to, among other things, spend time to talk abo
would be great to get them onto that wiki
>> page, in particular since next weekend a bunch of us will get together
>> in Montreal to, among other things, spend time to talk about 3.4
>> features.
>
> Was wondering if we could take-up this forgotten feature planned for
>
o, among other things, spend time to talk about 3.4
>> features.
>
> Was wondering if we could take-up this forgotten feature planned for
> 3.1: https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointOne/Features/Sharing
>
> AFAIK, the issue was that designers were way too busy with more
>
> Features !
>
> From: Matthias Clasen
> To: desktop-devel-list
> Subject: Features !
> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:17:00 -0400
> so according to the draft schedule that Andre posted a while ago, we
> are in the middle of the 'feature proposal' period right
On sáb, 2011-10-08 at 11:48 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> GNOME's implementation is very young; I have a hard time finding apps
> on my computer using this feature even in GNOME 3.2;
There are no jumplists in GNOME 3.2, which explains your troubles
finding apps making use of this feature ;-)
Flor
On 6 October 2011 08:13, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> The Jump-list stuff has been on my list for a while:
> What we are facing here is:
> Adding actions to the appmenus: new tab (browser), new note (for tomboy
> or gnote) or pause (for the media players)
> Adding document shortcuts in the appmenus
d a bunch of us will get together
> in Montreal to, among other things, spend time to talk about 3.4
> features.
Was wondering if we could take-up this forgotten feature planned for
3.1: https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointOne/Features/Sharing
AFAIK, the issue was that designers were way too bus
On 6 Oct 2011, at 10:31, Martyn Russell wrote:
> - Is the "universal access" configuration page meant to be in a larger font
> and look completely different to the other page fonts?
Yes -- you'll notice it's only the "Seeing" tab that has the bigger font, for
(hopefully) somewhat obvious reason
Le jeudi 06 octobre 2011 à 10:34 +0200, Joaquim Rocha a écrit :
> Still on the bottom area, I wish that when my status is available,
> notifications would stick in a visible area. It often happens that I'm
> far from the keyboard for 5 minutes, meanwhile a notification came (say
> someone is tryin
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 09:08 -0700, Michael Knepher wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Joaquim Rocha
> wrote:
>
> > Why not have a switch in the Universal Access settings that
> shows/hides
>
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
>
> > Why not have a switch in the Universal Access settings that shows/hides
> > the icon/menu?
>
> That's a trick question, right ? I would love to see you use the
> switch to bring the
Changing subject. As Matthias said, this is somewhat off-topic, as the
original thread was about start to propose features.
On 10/06/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Someone said, "well, if it is my house, I should be able to chose", the
>> reason that rationale doesn'
On 6 October 2011 15:55, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>> yes, that makes sense indeed. But apart from that, it should really
>> support all kind of tablets, not only Wacom ones :)
>
> Of course. That's sort of orthogonal though. As far as I know,
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 16:54 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:49 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> yes, that makes sense indeed. But apart from that, it should really
> support all kind of tablets, not only Wacom ones :)
Of course. That's sort of orthogonal though. As far as I know, the
realistic problem is that we currently only have a go
On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:49 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >>
> >> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
> >> about this somewhere I saw recently)
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
> about this somewhere I saw recently)
Also see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660720
> - Why show the "wacom graphics tablet" configuration page in the "
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
>>
>> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
>> about this somewhere I saw recently)
>>
>> - Why show the "wacom graphics tablet" configuration page in th
uration page is a dialog and not
> integrated like the others.
>
again also ubuntu specific, and hopefully will go away if we get the
region panel in g-c-c to have the 2 missing features (installing langs
and input method config) for 3.4
>
> - I think the "default actions" is hid
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
>>
>> It should be easy to do because the purpose of the desktop is to make
>> things easy. I agree you don't want it off automatically because you need
>> to be sure that a user can find the accessibility fea
I don't think it should easily
> > switched off, and by no means automatically switched off.
>
> It should be easy to do because the purpose of the desktop is to make
> things easy. I agree you don't want it off automatically because you need
> to be sure that a user
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 08:58 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > The worst part of the shell for me is the bottom tray area (sorry if
> > this is not the official name for it).
>
> The message tray.
Thanks.
> [...]
> >
> > I think that a good way to fix this is to remove the expanding
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 08:37 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> I love the shell generally though, this is really just where I think we
>> could improve things.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I second Martyn's proposals and I'd like to name a few thin
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
