not a requirement we have used when rubbing these tests.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:39 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> The basic tests passed for me.
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 1:51 PM Michael Pearce
> wrote:
>
>> The point was actually i was wanting to make sure the tests pass on
The basic tests passed for me.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 1:51 PM Michael Pearce
wrote:
> The point was actually i was wanting to make sure the tests pass on windows
> as part of validating the release.
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, 16:43 Clebert Suconic,
> wrote:
>
> > You ca
@all. I am not working today. But if everybody could tag my name on any PR
you think it’s safe to merge. Please do so beteeen now and Monday.
@Justin Bertram the Queue refactoring is safe ? Should we delay A day if
you are about to be ready ?
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:42 AM Clebert Suconic
ssues I had few months ago.
> >
> > Krzysztof
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:34 PM Timothy Bish
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 4/9/20 4:25 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > > > I just did
> > > > mvn install -Prelease
> > > >
> &
.
It could be something environmental in your system. I just tried on a
brand new Windows 10 machine I have at home, and everything seems ok.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:37 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> @Michael: Is the problem running the testsuite on windows?
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:2
to
> C:\Users\bruscinodf\.m2\repository\org\apache\activemq\artemis-mqtt-protocol\2.12.0-SNAPSHOT\artemis-mqtt-protocol-2.12.0-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar
> [INFO]
> [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:3.0.0:install (default-install) @
> artemis-mqtt-protocol ---
> [INFO] Installing
> org/apache/activemq/artemis-mqtt-protocol/2.12.0-SNAPSHOT/artemis-mqtt-protocol-2.12.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> [INFO] Writing OBR metadata
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Total time: 44.028 s
> [INFO] Finished at: 2020-04-08T18:15:54+02:00
> [INFO]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
--
Clebert Suconic
pportunity last release to -1 as was late to vote.
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, 04:08 Clebert Suconic,
> wrote:
>
> > So, TL;DR: I had been keeping an eye on the testsuite, and we are
> > clear at this point. You spotted an intermittent failure that would
> > fail 1 in 10 and I j
Or provide some info ?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:36 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Are you able to send a PR?
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:24 AM Michael Pearce
> wrote:
>
>> Another thing to point out as raised in last release building on windows
>> was broken i would
So, TL;DR: I had been keeping an eye on the testsuite, and we are
clear at this point. You spotted an intermittent failure that would
fail 1 in 10 and I just fixed it.
So, we are fine. if you see any other issues please let me know here.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:13 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote
on the encoders for large message I did.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:13 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> The issues reported on ARTEMIS-2659 I fixed last week, as I had an
> encoding issue for Large Messages that I fixed.
>
> The one thing I'm not sure what's happening is on
> testAcc
o -1 any release that still expresses those failures.
>
> On 4/7/20 7:22 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > I asked Justin, and he will try for it... if it's just a day or two
> > delay we should probably wait. if it delays any further that's what I
> > meant for another release in ab
before this release? That
> Justin has worked on. That way we can have a release with the refactor and
> then the test cases could be refactored for the following release.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020, 17:57 Clebert Suconic,
> wrote:
>
> > I am planning a r
.
The testsuite is quite stable on my long running internal jenkins
instance (nothing fancy.. just running the whole testsuite daily).
so, If we could merge / review the PRs we have now.. and if there is
anyone wanting to hold a bit. .this is channel to discuss about it.
Thanks
--
Clebert Suconic
on-binding)-Chris Morgan--Sent from:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
--
Clebert Suconic
ata if not strictly necessary and
> > it already deliver exceptional result: I would like to do the same on
> > paging, given that this really seems a low hanging fruit with an high
> > potential of improvement.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
>
--
Clebert Suconic
awtio-web/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
--
Clebert Suconic
rate plugin repo.My personal is take the risk as will be
> also easier to deliver.But I understand the concerns of others, it might be
> easier to go the new git repo for plugins (i see this alot in other projects)
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> ---- Original messa
nable or use...Sent from my Samsung
> Galaxy smartphone.
> Original message From: Clebert Suconic
> Date: 18/03/2020 00:57 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: [DISCUSSION] New Quorum vote
> pluggable implementation Just like anything else in a
one wants to add
> a plugin we simply allow it. Why should there be any filter.Sent from my
> Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> Original message ----From: Clebert Suconic
> Date: 18/03/2020 00:38 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: [DISCUSSION] New
ve a clear rule of what will be allowed or not and a place to maintain.Sent
> from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> Original message ----From: Clebert Suconic
> Date: 16/03/2020 01:20 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: [DISCUSSION] New Quorum vote
visible in the web
> management console. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> ---- Original message From: Clebert Suconic
> Date: 09/03/2020 14:55 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: [DISCUSSION] New Quorum vote
> pluggable implementati
, 2020 at 8:32 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Ceph is difficult to install I agree. But it has nothing to do with the
> notion of a thing manager instead of a broker.
>
>
> All you need is an option on CLI such as ./artemis node-manager
>
>
>
> You are replacing a
that
> tries to explain it to people who don't know RabbitMQ
> https://www.slideshare.net/Pivotal/implementing-raft-in-rabbitmq. For some
> reason, they wanted to vote up a leader for each queue separately, and then
> they had to make it perform well.
>
> On Mon, Mar
> states
> > >> 3) implement a RI version of such APIs
> > >>
> > >> Post-actions to help people adopt it, but need to be thought upfront:
> > >> 1) a clean upgrade path for current HA replication users
> > >> 2) deprecate or integrate the current HA replication into the new
> > version
> > >>
> > >> I've opened this here because many of the HA replication users are devs
> > too
> > >> and given that this isn't yet implemented: we're stull in the
> > >> design/proposal phase, so anyone that want to express their
> > >> ideas/opinions/POC on this, is invited to talk here ;)
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Franz
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Sent from:
> > >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
> > >>
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
to talk about high levels of
the change, or we can talk through the PR itself if you want to talk
something specific about the changes.
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2986 : ARTEMIS-1975
Real Large Message support into AMQP
--
Clebert Suconic
queue based on
> > > the
> > > > > value specified via FQQN. Currently you cannot attach to the queue if
> > > it
> > > > is
> > > > > not pre-configured.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm working on POC of .NET ActiveMQ client and I am trying to give
> > the
> > > > > potential user as flexible API as possible.
> > > > >
> > > > > The draft API assumes that it should be feasible to specify address,
> > > > > routing type (Multicast, Anycast), queue name, durability, and
> > whether
> > > > the
> > > > > queue should be shared or not.
> > > > >
> > > > > This way user would be able to leverage most of the Artemis Address
> > > Model
> > > > > configuration options directly from the code without
> > pre-configuration
> > > > > anything on the broker side.
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
os/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=commit;h=refs/tags/2.11.0
>
> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.11.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here's my +1
--
Clebert Suconic
gt; > > > I'm working on POC of .NET ActiveMQ client and I am trying to give the
> > > > potential user as flexible API as possible.
> > > >
> > > > The draft API assumes that it should be feasible to specify address,
> > > > routing type (Multicast, Anycast), queue name, durability, and whether
> > > the
> > > > queue should be shared or not.
> > > >
> > > > This way user would be able to leverage most of the Artemis Address
> > Model
> > > > configuration options directly from the code without pre-configuration
> > > > anything on the broker side.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > >
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
ay user would be able to leverage most of the Artemis Address Model
> > configuration options directly from the code without pre-configuration
> > anything on the broker side.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
be back. Happy
> New
> > Year!
> >
> > Krzysztof
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 3:37 AM Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I would need more details on how you're doing it.
> >>
> &
OWN_ERROR message=Journal must be
> in state=LOADED, was [STARTED]
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 1:41 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > It does not work with JDK 13. Use jdk 8 to build.
> >
> > We need to bump the requirement this year.
> >
> > On Sun,
> > >>
> > > >> Most JUnit tests in the project bring up the entire server then
> > connect
> > > to
> > > >> it (which is quite fast, actually.)
> > > >>
> > > >> There is a 'sudo ip route' command in the readme that might be
> > necessary
> > > >> to
> > > >> perform to run some clustering tests/examples.
> > >
> >
> > That path looks interesting, /C:/Users/havre/.m2/repository
> > /com/sun/xml/bind/jaxb-impl/2.2.7/jaxb-core.jar. The leading slash in
> /C:,
> > what is that about? Is this under WSL (the Windows subsystem for Linux, I
> > mean)? You have Java 13 installed and selected as project jdk in
> intellij?
> > The adoptopenjdk jdk version, or something else?
> >
> > I never tried building Artemis on Windows myself, only running it when
> > already built.
> >
> > >
> >
>
--
Clebert Suconic
't been touched for a while.
>
> Krzysztof
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019, 04:58 Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > Question Just to my education:
> >
> > NMs is based on JMS. But it’s not JMS. (Not even java)
> >
> >
> > So why can’t you be based and add i
> By default, queues are created with maxconsumers = 1
> > (createDurableConsumer)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
> >
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Bertram wrote:
>
> I plan on doing an Artemis release in early January. I know lots of people
> will be AFK over the next couple of weeks so I wanted to give an early
> heads up.
>
>
> Justin
--
Clebert Suconic
ly see some of them undo
> themselves.
>
> I dont think its anything to be concerned about, just noting it so
> that if you see unexpected changes later you might know this could be
> why.
>
> Robbie
--
Clebert Suconic
ng PagedMessageImpl
> > for
> > non large messages
> >
> > Any idea to improve it?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
> >
>
--
Clebert Suconic
so, IBM's implementation seems to care about the double definition
while it silently fails on openJDK. I'm not sure which one is correct,
but removing the duplicate definition will ix the issue.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 1:51 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I figured this out.
>
&g
I figured this out.
The issue is that the attribute was already defined on the super type:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2916
it's probably the same issue you had before on queue type.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:41 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:15 PM wrote:
>
> That sucks some what on ibms behalf. I think we hit same issue a while back
> on some queue configs also.
> Is there a way to possibly add an extra jar or something or manage the XML
> parse libs so theyre not dependent on jvm impl version.
There's
urce)
--
Clebert Suconic
ub within the build.
>
> It's what I'm doing for Karaf:
>
> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf/tags
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/12/2019 20:51, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > The "official" image is something you will have to work with Apache
> >
Apache Docker image
> for ActiveMQ
> - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios)
>
> I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Clebert Suconic
.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
>
>
> Regards,
> Michael
--
Clebert Suconic
as this is an
internal component only consumed by ActiveMQ Artemis itself.
--
Clebert Suconic
The vote has passed
Binding
Clebert Suconic
Timothy Bish
Michael Andre Pearce
Christopher Shannon
Non Binding
Howard Gao
Really thanks for the votes and time to review the release.
I will release maven and update the website with the source distribution.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 6:08 AM
Ping @Everybody... I need votes here..
Vote for me!
I intend to put this release on the next artemis release, so I need
this before we can cut a new release.
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:41 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> +1 (Binding)
>
> - wiped out my local maven reposito
just as a reference: https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/18
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 6:21 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Friendly reminder: Please beware of changing only the content of the
> website without changing sources.
>
> next time anyone builds, the .
!
--
Clebert Suconic
/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1199)
- Removed my local maven repository, to make I wouldn't have any local
cached downloads to validate the release.
- Built and ran tests on ActiveMQ Artemis, validating the native bits
are working
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:37 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I woul
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.1 release.
This is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis Native,
Source distribution can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis-native/1.0.1/
Maven repository is here:
I would like to do a ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.1 early next week (Monday)
There are two small commits around META-INF and Dynamic LInked
Libraries (.so) locations. small improvements really, and i would like
to have it included on our next Artemis release.
--
Clebert Suconic
, adding a matching helper script for doing it.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 16:55, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I knew you were going to say that :)
> >
> >
> > I wish there was a way to test the static... I will remove the branch
> > for
> new output on the fly as you update the source, by running:
> jekyll serve -s ./src
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/master/README.md#to-build-the-site
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 15:20, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I actual
remove the branch
> personally. Seems likely to be stale most of the time, and its easily
> created again later if truly needed.
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 20:49, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > There was a PR updating the navbar. It was an include and touched a
>
t you guys think?
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:54 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> There was also a branch from the early days when Michal and Martyn
> were working on the website called "michaelandrepearce-patch-1-1"
> which I rempved and made a copy on my fork.
>
> Now t
:)
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:41 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I have removed it...
>
> (Just in case, I made a copy of it on my fork, just in case, which I
> will remove it some day)
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:40 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> >
I have removed it...
(Just in case, I made a copy of it on my fork, just in case, which I
will remove it some day)
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:40 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I was actually going to ask if we can remove it...
>
> I believe I have authorization to remove the asf
d closing the original infra
> JIRA.
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 16:32, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > everything is on master now!!!
> >
> > I just did one dumb change to make sure the update worked, and it
> > did... everything is on master now.
> >
>
ook to add more of the stuff like staging etc if
> > folks wanted, but I'd say its seperate from this change, and I dont
> > personally see a real need for it right now.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 15:31, Clebert Suconic
> > wrote:
> > >
Everything is on master now!
no more playing with 2 branches.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:35 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I have created the INFRA jira here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19235
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:29 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
; This report is due on 9 Oct, so I will be submitting it by 8 Oct.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > perl -e 'print
> > > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E );'
> > > >
> > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > perl -e 'print
> > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E );'
> > >
> > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > >
>
--
Clebert Suconic
h the change.
Daniel is talking about a yaml file I never heard about, even talking
about staging website (which could be useful as part of our release
processes).
I'm getting confused through the JIRA. and I need help :)
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 13:51, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> &g
I have created the INFRA jira here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19235
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:29 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I am looking to change the activemq-website to use a single branch.
>
> This was after a discussion I was having with Robbie on a
the change.
This should make updating the website an easier process. as moving the
branches is becoming a more expensive process.
Thoughts?
--
Clebert Suconic
be taken as only a few folks have commented on this
> > thread.
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 18:02, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Should we move it then ?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:52 AM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@
s?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>
--
Clebert Suconic
fferent time wise either). Strange that you saw this, and strange
> you now dont, but at least its working now.
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 22:07, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I did not see the error again. I guess it was an effect of working
> > late hours.. I
crazy on indexing files
(don't ask.. I prefer IDE than VIM... I use vim emulation on idea
though ;) )
If more people could double check this is okay.. perhaps we can
replace asf-site by my test branch.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:09 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I copied the folder from the
th certain copy commands, that have dereferenced the link and copied
> the referenced files content. How did you initially populate the
> 'content' dir your subsequent status is showing as being updated?
> Running the build afresh, or copying prior build output?
>
> Robbie
>
>
//dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc1/
> >
> > The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michael
>
--
Clebert Suconic
My intent was to test everything before checkout as asf-site and push -f
I wanted to have other people reviewing before we push.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:53 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I have a branch where I'm using a single branch:
>
> https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq-
t's simpler and documented that sounds like a win to me.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:41 AM Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 16:47, Clebert Suconic
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:44 AM Robbie
thanks a lot. .fixed those.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:54 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 03:13, Timothy Bish wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/1/19 8:29 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > > I have already updated the website and will send the announce tomor
/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.10.1
Many thanks for all the contributors of this release.
--
Clebert Suconic
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:44 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Thats what we do at Qpid and what I've seen other
> projects do, I find it simpler overall.
Tl;DR:
I'm all +1000 on this... what we need to change on infra.
Can we keep the history from master
>
> Messing with the remotes and resetting branches in the build script
> feels a bit icky.
That's the way it is anyway, we always build everything from master.
The reason I did that was because at some point I built, and had to
rebuild because upstream had already moved on. If you really care
I have already updated the website and will send the announce tomorrow.
Meanwhile if you guys could check the website and everything else please?
Just in case I missed anything?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 5:18 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.10.1 release v
Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.10.1 release vote:
Vote passes with 10 +1 votes (6 bindings, 4 non bindings)
Binding:
Clebert Suconic
Timothy Bish
Gary Tully
Cristopher Shannon
Justin Bertram
Michael Andre Pearce
Non Binding:
Francesco Nigro
Howard Gao
Emmanuel Hugonnet
Krzysztof
n't seem the right way to go in my humble
> opinion.
>
>
> Would it be possible to add the official image of Artemis to docker hub? I
> know that there are quite a few images of other products built by Apache
> Foundation out there.
>
>
> I'm willing to help, but I will need a little guidance.
>
> Thanks,
> Krzysztof Porebski
--
Clebert Suconic
disapprove (and reason why)
Here's my +1
--
Clebert Suconic
I would like to do a 2.10.1 (or 2.11.0, depending if we have features
or not on master) early next week.
EOM
Thanks
--
Clebert Suconic
I want to send them batches of 500 msgs each.
> If I need to implement this feature myself, does anyone know which java
> class I need to modify?
>
> Thanks!
> Brian R
>
>
> --
Clebert Suconic
Gemmell
wrote:
>
> The Qpid JMS client will round trip to the server on any receive or
> receiveNoWait calls where it doesnt have a message available locally
> in time (unless it has been configured not to do so).
>
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:21, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
&
on the JMS API.
Users would be complaining to qpid-jms if that was the case.
There's no reason really to do Assert.assertNull(receive(5000));
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:45 AM Jiri Daněk wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:40 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > I
();
some tests taking 2 seconds on a loop for each time the method is
called, being executed several time can amount for a few extra minutes
on the testsuite.
Even though I have seen this pattern in Artemis, this same request is
valid for ActiveMQ.
Thank you!
--
Clebert Suconic
fixed... thanks for bringing it to my attention. I had spent time
looking on the URls but still ended up making a mistake.
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:07 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I see. Sorry about that. I will fix it later tonight.
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:33 AM
the links also arent being inspected
> > afterwards to notice that it wasnt.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 17:25, Clebert Suconic >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Please accept my apologies... I have been on so many channels all at
>
e existing process needed (copy+paste the previous entry in
> > > file, find+replace the version number) is actually fairly easy. Its
> > > just not being followed, and the links also arent being inspected
> > > afterwards to notice that it wasnt.
> > >
> > >
everybody!
--
Clebert Suconic
Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.10.0 release vote.
Vote passes with 6 votes.
The following votes were received:
Binding:
Clebert Suconic
Michael Andre Pearce
Tim Bish
Christopher Shannon
Non Binding:
Howard Gao
Krzystof
Thank you to everyone who contributed and took the time
;
> > > NOTE: I'm preparing a release notes highlights for the website,
> > > especially to mention the updates related to CVE issues.
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > jbono...@apache.org
> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >
> >
>
--
Clebert Suconic
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:33 AM Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> I'm +1 on the 2.10.0 release although below it says 2.4.0
:) thanks.. sorry for the copy & paste error.
after the vote has passed.
[ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Here's my +1
--
Clebert Suconic
it stable at this point.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:41 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I have not done it... I have everything ready to send the vote, I
> don't think we need to stop the train for it.
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:03 PM wrote:
> >
> > Just a quick one have w
t;
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:07 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic"
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It's Tagged and pushedwill send the VOTE Thread in the afternoon
> after I prepare everything.
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:01 AM Clebe
It's Tagged and pushedwill send the VOTE Thread in the afternoon
after I prepare everything.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:01 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Besides qpid-jms to be updated? anything else?
>
>
> I will start a release tomorrow morning, US, EST time.
>
> On S
Besides qpid-jms to be updated? anything else?
I will start a release tomorrow morning, US, EST time.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 4:38 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I’m also on the iPhone :). I didn’t mean now. Just any time between Monday.
>
>
> Have a nice weekend.
>
> On S
phone now so I'll leave the client update for Tim.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, 18:26 Clebert Suconic,
> wrote:
>
> > Cool. Please update proton if there is a new version please.
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 11:24 AM Timothy Bish
> wrote:
&
Cool. Please update proton if there is a new version please.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 11:24 AM Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 8/24/19 10:58 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > Robbie. Should we update qpid JMS ? I think you just had a release ?
>
> The 0.45.0 release just clos
501 - 600 of 1845 matches
Mail list logo
