michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency
Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456724549
@franz1981 yup agree there are some improvements we could have done, but
have left them out
As right
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456724549
@franz1981 yup agree there are some improvements we could have done, but
have left them out
As
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456724549
@franz1981 yup agree there are some improvements we could have done, but
have left them out.
franz1981 commented on a change in pull request #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#discussion_r250105709
##
File path:
franz1981 commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact caused
by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456725073
@michaelandrepearce
Yep, but consider that providing a lock-free implementation *is* an
improvement that need
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456725467
@franz1981 no indeed, and thats not what im doing.
Im reverting but also removed the need
franz1981 commented on a change in pull request #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#discussion_r250105709
##
File path:
franz1981 commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact caused
by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456725789
> I'm reverting but also removed the need for the sync blocks, and using
atomic updater to the threadTaskDelta
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456725467
@franz1981 no indeed, and thats not what im doing.
Im reverting but also removed the need
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency
Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456725467
@franz1981 no indeed, and thats not what im doing.
Im reverting but also removed the need for the
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456709895
To show this, using a broker with persistance disabled (to remove external
disk perf factors)
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456708382
ARTEMIS-1451 removed synchronization in the class, by adding the overhead of
creating a new
franz1981 commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact caused
by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456711246
Suggestion: i would use something more precise (with an higher spectrum of
latencies) if possible to make things
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456709895
To show this, using a broker with persistance disabled (to remove external
disk perf factors),
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact
caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456711246
Suggestion: i would use something more precise (with an higher spectrum of
latencies) if possible to make
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456712653
@franz1981 we dont even need, that the % change is quite significant.
Also note
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency
Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456713968
@franz1981 we have been running investigations in a REAL environment going
back an forth between
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency
Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456716247
@franz1981 its not down to sizing the thread pool.
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency
Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456716626
@franz1981 This is what the old varient tried to avoid, was creating new
threads...
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456716626
@franz1981 This is what the old varient tried to avoid, was creating new
threads...
The
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456718199
@franz1981 roughly correct
The original one before 1451, tried to re-use an idle thread if
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456718199
@franz1981 roughly correct
The original one before 1451, tried to re-use an idle thread if
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency
Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456719291
correct.
This is an automated message
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact
caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456719095
@michaelandrepearce
Ok and the old thread-pool, assuming max thread count already reached, was
equally
franz1981 commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact caused
by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456719095
@michaelandrepearce
Ok and the old thread-pool, assuming max thread count already reached, was
equally
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact
caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456719988
Ok, if that's the problem I agree with you that need to be addressed: is not
the behaviour of a
franz1981 commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact caused
by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456719988
Ok, if that's the problem I agree with you that need to be addressed: is not
the behaviour of a thread-pool, that
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact
caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456721762
Now that you've helped me to understand the issue I believe that's correct:
let me take a look to the PR
franz1981 commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact caused
by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456721762
Now that you've helped me to understand the issue I believe that's correct:
let me take a look to the current
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency
Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456722769
So all ive done, is revert that change of 1451 to put back semantics.
Streamlined the code a tad,
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456722769
So all ive done, is revert that change of 1451 to put back semantics.
Streamlined the code
franz1981 commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact caused
by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456723336
Yep I see that there are a couple of things that could be addressed due to
this + a possible improvement: I will
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456724549
@franz1981 yup agree there are some improvements we could have done, but
have left them out
As
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address
Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456725981
I can un-squash and make it a two stage commit if it helps? e.g. revert
commit, then remove sync
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency
Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456725981
I can make it a two stage commit if it helps?
ldebello commented on issue #2510: [ARTEMIS-2156] Message Duplication when
using exclusive divert and clustering
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2510#issuecomment-456842951
@clebertsuconic sorry just one question to understand the workflow is common
to see the PR
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer
Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-456881694
@clebertsuconic some of those variables are used but accesed by atomic
updaters. Have commented on your commit
asfgit merged pull request #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact caused by
ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
asfgit closed pull request #2510: [ARTEMIS-2156] Message Duplication when using
exclusive divert and clustering
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2510
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-456877360
I added one change on top of yours during merge... to remove unused
variables..
merged!
you are the man!
asfgit closed pull request #2451: ARTEMIS-2192 LegacyLDAPSecuritySettingPlugin
uses hard-coded RDN types
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2451
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-456656799
@michaelandrepearce I'm pretty sure I will be able to merge this tomorrow.
Testsuite had some unrelated failures. I just want to
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2514: ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact
caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456837511
Oh shoot.. I don't know how I missed this.. I'm the one who merged it..
I wouldn't have merged it if
asfgit closed pull request #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2427: ARTEMIS-2170 Optimized
CoreMessage's checkProperties and cleanupInternalProperties methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2427#issuecomment-456947342
I happy to merge this if you are ready. Have been waiting for your ci
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2427: ARTEMIS-2170 Optimized
CoreMessage's checkProperties and cleanupInternalProperties methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2427#issuecomment-456947342
@franz1981 I happy to merge this if you are ready. Have been
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2199: ARTEMIS-1996
MappedSequentialFileFactory may cause DirectByteBuffer off-heap memory leaks
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2199#issuecomment-456949661
@morefuntang ping. I will close this in a couple days as no response for 3
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2427: ARTEMIS-2170 Optimized
CoreMessage's checkProperties and cleanupInternalProperties methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2427#issuecomment-456947342
@franz1981 I happy to merge this if you are ready. Have been
asfgit closed pull request #2515: ARTEMIS-1867 fix FQQNOpenWireTest
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2515
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
jbertram opened a new pull request #2515: ARTEMIS-1867 fix FQQNOpenWireTest
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2515
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-456913156
@michaelandrepearce duh.. thanks
This is an automated message
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #1293: ARTEMIS-1194: SOCKS proxy support
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1293#issuecomment-456950321
@clebertsuconic whats occuring on this, we ok to merge? And simply mark
feature beta until some decent tests?
tabish121 commented on issue #17: AMQCPP-643: Add an option to time out
connection attempts when blocked in ensureConnectionInfoSent
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-cpp/pull/17#issuecomment-456951888
This is targeted at 3.9.x but would also need to go into master, can you
target
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #1994: ARTEMIS-1787 Openwire message
should not contain internal property
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1994#issuecomment-456950879
As noted effort should go to native openwire message support #1793. Can we
close this.
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2274: ARTEMIS-2059 NettyWritable should
use UTF-8 exact length to encode strings
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2274#issuecomment-456951676
@franz1981 Can we close and reopen later once some more progress or
discussion is done.
clebertsuconic commented on a change in pull request #2480: ARTEMIS-2212 Avoid
using CLQ on ServerConsumerImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2480#discussion_r248709539
##
File path:
clebertsuconic commented on a change in pull request #2480: ARTEMIS-2212 Avoid
using CLQ on ServerConsumerImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2480#discussion_r24870
##
File path:
asfgit closed pull request #2480: ARTEMIS-2212 Avoid using CLQ on
ServerConsumerImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2480
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454709952
@qihongxu
What is worrying me is this
> at most time it obtained a 3k~6k tps
If the same test (same
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2498: ARTEMIS-2228 Large Messages over
Management
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2498#issuecomment-454450983
Just fyi, Re your failed pr build since some recent merges to master ive
been getting more intermittent build failures
franz1981 commented on issue #2250: ARTEMIS-1996 MappedSequentialFileFactory
may cause DirectByteBuffer off-heap memory leaks
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2250#issuecomment-454285382
@CNNJYB in this case it is wanted: compaction was leaking buffers big as as
the
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2250: ARTEMIS-1996
MappedSequentialFileFactory may cause DirectByteBuffer off-heap memory leaks
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2250#issuecomment-454285382
@CNNJYB in this case it is wanted: compaction was leaking buffers big as the
michaelandrepearce commented on a change in pull request #2498: ARTEMIS-2228
Large Messages over Management
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2498#discussion_r247781204
##
File path:
franz1981 commented on a change in pull request #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce
contention on LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#discussion_r248691840
##
File path:
asfgit closed pull request #2500: NO-JIRA Adding test to verify Openwire
consuming from FQQN
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2500
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
qihongxu commented on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454686710
> 900M of page size and very small messages are not such a common use case
TBH
Agreed. Use this case just to make
franz1981 commented on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454709952
@qihongxu
What is worrying me is this
> at most time it obtained a 3k~6k tps
If the same test (same
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454709952
@qihongxu
What is worrying me is this
> at most time it obtained a 3k~6k tps
If the same test (same
franz1981 commented on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454338688
> @franz1981 thx for recommending this tool, much easier to use than jfr!
I was sure you would have like it: is
clebertsuconic commented on a change in pull request #2479: ARTEMIS-2211 Avoid
duplicate code for ByteBuffer pooling and alignment
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2479#discussion_r248716417
##
File path:
asfgit closed pull request #2478: ARTEMIS-2210 Fix PagingStore creation
synchronization issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2478
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
asfgit closed pull request #2474: [ARTEMIS-1536]: Incorrect Journal filesize
calculation where specified size is lest that the block size when using AIO.
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2474
This is an
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2474: [ARTEMIS-1536]: Incorrect Journal
filesize calculation where specified size is lest that the block size when
using AIO.
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2474#issuecomment-455216239
merged & cherry-picked into 2.6.x
clebertsuconic commented on a change in pull request #2473: ARTEMIS-1058 Jars
in web tmp dir locked on Windows
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2473#discussion_r248722829
##
File path:
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2466: ARTEMIS-2206 The MQTT consumer
reconnection caused the queue to not be cle…
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2466#issuecomment-455219150
@jbertram / @onlyMIT what's the status here? I was looking on PRs to merge
but this one
jbertram commented on issue #2466: ARTEMIS-2206 The MQTT consumer reconnection
caused the queue to not be cle…
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2466#issuecomment-455219703
@clebertsuconic, this is still in progress. I haven't had any time to
follow-up yet.
clebertsuconic commented on a change in pull request #2459: ARTEMIS-2200 NPE
while dropping/failing large messages on paging
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2459#discussion_r248724979
##
File path:
franz1981 commented on a change in pull request #2459: ARTEMIS-2200 NPE while
dropping/failing large messages on paging
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2459#discussion_r248726229
##
File path:
franz1981 commented on a change in pull request #2459: ARTEMIS-2200 NPE while
dropping/failing large messages on paging
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2459#discussion_r248726803
##
File path:
clebertsuconic commented on a change in pull request #2459: ARTEMIS-2200 NPE
while dropping/failing large messages on paging
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2459#discussion_r248726923
##
File path:
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2438: ARTEMIS-2178 routing-type
config for core bridge
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2438#issuecomment-455354071
@jbertram thanks for this, like the feature!!, sorry been so long to merge
it for you.
asfgit closed pull request #2438: ARTEMIS-2178 routing-type config for core
bridge
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2438
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2438: ARTEMIS-2178 routing-type config
for core bridge
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2438#issuecomment-455354071
@jbertram thanks for this, sorry been so long to merge it for you.
asfgit closed pull request #2470: Fixes for alerts from lgtm.com
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2470
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
clebertsuconic commented on a change in pull request #2451: ARTEMIS-2192
LegacyLDAPSecuritySettingPlugin uses hard-coded RDN types
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2451#discussion_r248871028
##
File path:
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2434: ARTEMIS-1867 FQQN for producers
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2434#issuecomment-455363730
this is conflicting. it will conflict even worse after we merge Consumers
priority.
Can we work on this after Consumers
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2434: ARTEMIS-1867 FQQN for
producers
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2434#issuecomment-455366517
@clebertsuconic ill hold on merging this, and the work on this with
@jbertram after
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2445: ARTEMIS-2187 remove page from
softcache before consumedpage
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2445#issuecomment-455366535
on this case I think it will be enough if the tests are passing.. will merge
it.
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2434: ARTEMIS-1867 FQQN for producers
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2434#issuecomment-455366517
@clebertsuconic ill hold.
This is an automated message from the
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2445: ARTEMIS-2187 remove page from
softcache before consumedpage
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2445#issuecomment-455370802
@clebertsuconic no worries, this is your area of expertise so will leave for
your better judgement. If
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2444: ARTEMIS-2186 Large message
incomplete when server is crashed
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2444#issuecomment-455373882
@clebertsuconic you happy with this one? I am.
asfgit merged pull request #2501: ARTEMIS-2221 Fix Merge
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2501
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and
franz1981 commented on a change in pull request #2427: ARTEMIS-2170 Optimized
CoreMessage's checkProperties and cleanupInternalProperties methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2427#discussion_r248889763
##
File path:
gaohoward opened a new pull request #2506: ARTEMIS-2230 Exception closing
advisory consumers when supportAdvisory=false
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2506
When broker's advisory is disabled (supportAdvisory=false) any
advisory consumer won't get created at
gaohoward commented on issue #2386: ARTEMIS-2135 Test multiple core consumers
receiving amqp messages
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2386#issuecomment-455419691
closing this as it already merged.
This
gaohoward closed pull request #2386: ARTEMIS-2135 Test multiple core consumers
receiving amqp messages
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2386
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
michaelandrepearce opened a new pull request #2504: NO-JIRA Check data != null
during encode
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2504
Picked up by code analysis checks
This is an automated message from the
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-455388517
Current list of failures:
Test Name | Duration | Age
-- | -- | --
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer
Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-455391365
@clebertsuconic can you recheck this against master, i know things like
testDoubleDelete are failing currently on master
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement
Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-455394066
@clebertsuconic the message group test ones are are genuine, should be fixed
up in last push.
I dont believe
201 - 300 of 1218 matches
Mail list logo
