On Jun 14, 2006, at 2:49 AM, David Wilson wrote:
y University's IT department distributes
OpenOffce for free, but the Academic departments recommend students use
Endnotes for bibliographic management.
Minor correction: Endnote, not Endnotes.
Until recently OpenOffice could claim to at least
Quoting Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jun 14, 2006, at 2:49 AM, David Wilson wrote:
Given this situation I propose that a fifth dot point be added to this
list-
[...]
In terms of the higher Education market bibliographic support is not
'feature', it is a strategic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a scholar in the humanities, I have been hoping for years
that OOo would introduce some kind of decent bibliographic support. For
I'm embarking on a new research project now, and for the first time in 5
years I've kept the windows partition on my new computer; I'm
I'm not an expert on this or anything, but given my experience with
bibliography software, it seems that discoleo is combining two or three
elements of the software I have typically used. The first is the
reference type. For instance, a reference may be to a journal article,
conference
Wow, this series of e-mails is depressing. I am a
professor at the University of Rochester and use
Openoffice daily, so along with Matt Price and Bruce
D'Arcus, there are at least a few people interested in
using Openoffice in academia. I've been following
this issue for some time (I'm the one
Quoting Matthew Yates [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was really hopeful a year or so ago that better
bibliographic support would be built in by now.
As was I, and I should say that one of the reasons the current situation really
bums me out is that there are a number of python-based teaching projects I
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
My opinion for quite awhile has been that Plan B needs to be exactly
what we are doing: starting by implementing the new ODF citation
support, hooking up citeproc to it, and exposing an API.* Without that,
we will make no progress. Or at least, that's my position; I'd
On Jun 14, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's nice, except that unless you will be done (who will implement
new ODF
citation support in OOo?), you will have no useable bibliographic
support
in OpenOffice.org, no users, and no push on Sun to do something about
it.
Right;
Bruce, and others who have been helping, can you give the list an update of where CSL and citeproc are at? I remember seeing some stuff about Python and Ruby code, but didn't have much time to think about it. I am thinking about trying to put together a toolchain using stuff that is available now
On Jun 14, 2006, at 7:33 PM, pt wrote:
Bruce, and others who have been helping, can you give the list an
update of where CSL and citeproc are at? I remember seeing some stuff
about Python and Ruby code, but didn't have much time to think about
it.
Hey, David just pinged me about this
David,
I like the pledge idea. Codeweavers set up something
similar where users can pledge money for a favorite
windows application. The Codeweavers developers can
then prioritize development to get new applications
functioning based on the pledges for it. When they
get it working, they
Thanks Bruce. Got the download. I really don't want to use XSLT 2 if I can avoid it, just too few options for implementing - I need a solution that I can roll into our ICE project which means using Python, simple stand-alone things that work on Windows, Mac and Linux, and/or stuff that comes with
12 matches
Mail list logo
