Green build

We have a green build! It only passes with Oracle JDK though. I filed a bug for Arton to look at it: https://github.com/arton/rjb/issues/44 We might have to downgrade RJB back to 1.5.1. Cheers, Antoine

Re: [DISCUSS] Only support official supported Ruby versions

ote: > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: >> I would like to look into dropping all versions of Ruby except for the ones >> officially supported. Looking at MRI, this means 2.1.9, 2.2.5 and 2.3.1. >> For JRuby, that is 1.7.25 and 9.0.50. >&g

[DISCUSS] Scala support

Hi all, an other discussion thread, this time on Scala support. Does it make sense to move to 2.11.8, or should we move to the latest 2.12 milestone? I would like to shoot for the latter. We are still using JDK7 for now but need to think of moving to JDK8 soon. With version 1.5, we can make th

[DISCUSS] Only support official supported Ruby versions

Hi all, I would like to look into dropping all versions of Ruby except for the ones officially supported. Looking at MRI, this means 2.1.9, 2.2.5 and 2.3.1. For JRuby, that is 1.7.25 and 9.0.50. Does that make sense? Cheers, Antoine

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Buildr 1.4.25 released

Apache Buildr is a build system for Java-based applications, including support for Scala, Groovy and a growing number of JVM languages and tools. We wanted something that's simple and intuitive to use, so we only need to tell it what to do, and it takes care of the rest. But also something we can

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.25 release

1 >> >> Thanks for taking the lead. I ran a set of test builds and all seems a-ok. >> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Antoine Toulme >> wrote: >>> We're voting on the source distributions available here: >>> http://home.apache.org/~tou

[VOTE] Buildr 1.4.25 release

We're voting on the source distributions available here: http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.25/dist/ Specifically: http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.25/dist/buildr-1.4.25.tgz http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.25/dist/buildr-1.4.25.zip The documentation generated for t

1.4.25 release

I would like to cut a release at the end of the month, as users have asked for an immediate fix to the JRuby OpenSSL update (BUILDR-712). Does that make sense?

Re: Site publication broken

… and we’re back! The site is now updated as of 1.4.24. Now we need to: -check why mirrors are not populated with downloads. -check the new process for hosting RCs (hosting on home.apache.org is frown upon). > On Mar 29, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Looks like

Site publication broken

Looks like the site publication doesn’t work. I tried to run “rake publish” but the site is not updating. I am looking into the situation and might pull infra in if needed, I’ll let you know when things clear up. Antoine

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Buildr 1.4.24 released

Apache Buildr is a build system for Java-based applications, including support for Scala, Groovy and a growing number of JVM languages and tools. We wanted something that's simple and intuitive to use, so we only need to tell it what to do, and it takes care of the rest. But also something we can

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.24 release

The vote is now closed. We have 2 +1 votes, binding, from Antoine Toulme and Peter Donald. Thanks everybody! I’m pushing the bits and getting ready for 1.4.25 and 1.5. > On Mar 23, 2016, at 3:04 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I will keep the vote open for another 24h. So far we h

Re: Managing versions in Jira

No dice. I get a page that says: You cannot edit the configuration of this project. > On Mar 24, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Peter Donald wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: >> I’d like to manage versions in Jira.

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.24 release

I will keep the vote open for another 24h. So far we have 2 +1s. > On Mar 19, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > OK, here is my +1. > >> On Mar 19, 2016, at 10:29 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> I rebased off your fix and released a new RC. >> &

Managing versions in Jira

I’d like to manage versions in Jira. Some of them need to be marked released. I think I don’t have rights to manage versions. I believe I did in the past. Alex, mind looking into that? Cheers, Antoine

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.24 release

OK, here is my +1. > On Mar 19, 2016, at 10:29 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I rebased off your fix and released a new RC. > > I still need to try a few examples of my own before I vote. > > >> On Mar 19, 2016, at 2:30 AM, Peter Donald wrote: >> >> Hi

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.24 release

bug. Once that fix is in I am +1 on > the release. > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: >> We're voting on the source distributions available here: >> http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.24/dist/ >> >> Specifically: >>

[VOTE] Buildr 1.4.24 release

We're voting on the source distributions available here: http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.24/dist/ Specifically: http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.24/dist/buildr-1.4.24.tgz http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.24/dist/buildr-1.4.24.zip The documentation generated for t

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.24 release

I can move it to next release. > > I will try to run the release through a round of testing tomorrow. > Thanks for getting this going. > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: >> We're voting on the source distributions available here: &

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.24 release

after the release. > On Mar 15, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.24/dist/ > > Specifically: > http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.24/dis

[VOTE] Buildr 1.4.24 release

We're voting on the source distributions available here: http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.24/dist/ Specifically: http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.24/dist/buildr-1.4.24.tgz http://home.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.24/dist/buildr-1.4.24.zip The documentation generated for t

New release

Hey folks, it’s been a while since the last release. There’s about a dozen changes in the CHANGELOG: https://github.com/apache/buildr/blob/master/CHANGELOG I believe it would be a good time to run a release. With your permission, I’ll ge

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.23 release

+1 > On Jun 12, 2015, at 6:26 AM, Peter Donald wrote: > > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.23/dist/ > > Specifically: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.23/dist/buildr-1.4.23.tgz > http://people.apache.org/~donald

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.21 release

+1 for me. Sorry I didn't have time to test things this time around. On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Peter Donald wrote: > Sounds like a plan. I just updated the version of Antwrap and updated the > version at http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.21/dist/ and will > run the tests over t

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.19 release

+1 On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Peter Donald wrote: > And this is a re-send with a correct subject line ;) > > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.19/dist/ > > Specifically: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.19/

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.18 release

+1, no testing as I am vacationing right now. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Peter Donald wrote: > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.18/dist/ > > Specifically: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.18/dist/buildr-1

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.17 release

+1. No testing from me - long week-end here. On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Peter Donald wrote: > A few bugs were reported ... and fixed. A new candidate has been pushed up. > > -- > Cheers, > > Peter Donald >

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.16 release

+1 On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Peter Donald wrote: > Hi, > > It has been a long time since the last release. So I would > like to put out a release with the accumulated fixes. > > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.16/dis

Re: Improved integration between Apache and GitHub

I would be delighted if we move to git and open ourselves to a wider audience of developers. You have my vote of course. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Peter Donald wrote: > Hi, > > The infrastructure team just announced [1] that they now support > improved integration with GitHub. In a nutshe

Re: New PMC member: Peter Donald

Congratulations! On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > It's my pleasure to announce that Peter Donald has joined the Project > Management Committee of the Apache Buildr project. > > As most of you already know, Peter has been very active in the project over > the past 3 years,

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.15 release

+1, with the caveat I cannot do testing at this time - no Buildr projects around. On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > +1 for the release with the caveat that I can't do any testing since I'm in > the woods with no computer access. > On Oct 26, 2013 1:02 AM, "Peter Donald" wr

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.14 release

+1 for the release On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > +1 for the release > > with minimal testing on Ubuntu 13.04 with Ruby 1.8.7 and JRuby 1.7.5. > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Peter Donald > wrote: > > > > We're voting on the source distributions available here:

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.12 release

+1, of course. On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Peter Donald wrote: > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.12/dist/ > > Specifically: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.12/dist/buildr-1.4.12.tgz > http://people.apache

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.10 release

+1 for the release, thanks for the hard work! On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Peter Donald wrote: > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.10/dist/ > > Specifically: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.10/dist/buildr-1.

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.10 release

It looks like the site is missing images ? The zip and tar.gz look good, the PDF looks ok. I haven't had time to play with the gem yet. On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Peter Donald wrote: > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.

Re: ApacheCon / Thoughtworks TechRadar

FWIW the all-in-one bundle was there before and Alex coded most if not all of it :) If I remember correctly, building the all-in-one is supported by a rake task. On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Peter Donald wrote: > Huya, > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Tammo van Lessen > wrote: > > Firs

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.9 release

+1 (binding) as well. On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > Ok, thanks for the info. I haven't been able to reproduce myself. > > Here's my +1 (binding) for the release. > > alex > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Peter Donald >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I actually found it qu

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.8 release

Here is my +1 (binding). Thanks for the hard work Peter! On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Tammo van Lessen wrote: > Hi, > > awesome, this works like a charm. Thanks for fixing! > > I also noticed that > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.8/site/ does not include > the updated changelog.

Re: CI Builds

Great job Donald. Very impressed by how far you've taken this. I remember using the Apache Windows slave to set it up for testing. That involved using the "Remote Desktop Client" to log on to it. No idea how RVM would behave in such an environment. In my recollection, I installed Ruby and JRub

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.7 release

gt; rdoc 3.8 for > >generating documentation > > * Change: Upgrade to require rubygems > 1.8.6 > > * Change: BUILDR-603 Remove install/uninstall actions from :gem packaging > > type > > * Change: BUILDR-602 Fail the build when gem dependencies are missin

Re: Releasing 1.4.7 -- was: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.7 RC1

I'm willing to give an other shot at a release, but I certainly don't want to interrupt if you are on it Alex. Ideally, if I engage myself to do the next release, I'll push a RC in the next 3 days, and if that doesn't happen, the release task is up for grabs again. Does that sound good ? Antoine

Re: JRuby specific system in core/util.rb

I think back then FFI was not supported or completely implemented. On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 05:29, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt wrote: > Does anyone remember why the jruby specific system workaround using FFI > was done in core/util.rb? This has the annoying side effect on windows of > bringing up a new co

Re: Releasing 1.4.7 -- was: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.7 RC1

gt; wrote: > > > Any news on the 1.4.7 release? 1.4.6 with JRuby 1.6.6 is giving me tons > of > > rubygems related deprecation warnings which is rather annoying. > > > > Pepijn > > > > > > On 13/01/2012 20:32, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > > >

Releasing 1.4.7 -- was: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.7 RC1

, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:59, Antoine Toulme wrote: > OK, will do. > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:51, Alex Boisvert wrote: > >> Since we're voting on the source release, here's my +1. >> >> I believe the binary distros need to be re-generated -- at least the &

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.7 RC1

; and "bundle update" on your > system to generate binaries that will install correctly. I've done so on > my system and now all the distros install cleanly (assuming latest rubygems > is installed) > > alex > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Antoine Toul

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.7 RC1

I am in favor of giving this vote one more week to conclude - with Thanksgiving, I didn't have time to run all tests yet. Please let me know if you favor a different solution. Antoine On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 13:35, Alex Boisvert wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Peter Donald >wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.7 RC1

h a larger suite > of tests of Monday. > > Thanks for the good work! > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > > Vote is opened for a week. > > > > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > > http:/people.apache.org

[VOTE] Buildr 1.4.7 RC1

Move to Bundler to manage the project dependencies * Change: BUILDR-548 Remove support for JTestR as it is no longer maintained (Antoine Toulme) * Change: BUILDR-614 Buildr development - Using rvm, bundler and OSX installs the wrong rjb (Russell Teabeault) * Change: Upgrade to RJB 1.3.7 * Fixed: Artifa

Re: Moving to RJB 1.3.7 ?

> > WTF? It's trying to install rjb so it's not picking up the java platform > distribution. > > I don't think that's a buildr issue; just pointing out that we may have to > deal with install hurdles. (BTW, I also tried with jruby-1.6.3 with same > result).

Re: Moving to RJB 1.3.7 ?

Done, and pushing pre2 for both MRI and Java. Please try it out, I'll work on the CI meanwhile. Thanks! Antoine On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:44, Antoine Toulme wrote: > I think I did the wrong thing and tried to yank the prerelease, after > Dominic's reply, to push a new attemp

Re: Moving to RJB 1.3.7 ?

the java platform > distribution. I tried explicitly passing "--platform java" but that > didn't work either. Anybody else seen this? > > (The package installs fine when I download and gem install > buildr-1.4.7.pre.gem directly) > > alex > > > On Thu,

Moving to RJB 1.3.7 ?

Hi folks, it looks like the version of RJB we use is a bit outdated. It would also effectively fix issues on Mac with RVM if we moved to the latest version. What do you think ? Antoine

New release ?

Hi folks, thanks for the hard work and keeping this up. I apologize I can't take as much time as I'd like on Buildr. I looked up the changelog and it looks to me that we are ripe for a new release - and I'm willing to help push it out. WDYT ? Antoine

Re: Jenkins Builds

I believe you need to ask for access to the windows machine that is part of the cluster of build machines Infra has. This is windows1 from what I read on jenkins. Once you get access, you connect via Remote Desktop Client and get access to the file system to install whatever you need. I remember c

Re: Cetralize Requires?

OK with me. We could also centralize a few constants, like the jruby version, in a central file. That's a different work though. On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 19:13, Alex Boisvert wrote: > I think it's an improvement, so +1 from me. > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Peter Donald >wrote: > > > Hi,

Re: Jenkins Documentation?

There isn't much to go on, but then it's not a very complex job. We run rake ci on vesta.apache.org. rvm is used to set up the necessary gems. You need to ask infra for an account on vesta, by contacting them on IRC or more likely open a Jira ticket for it. You can then ssh into vesta and impers

Re: Patch for forcing password auth only in SSH/SFTP

Sorry BUILDR-595. 2011/7/9 Antoine Toulme > OK :) I added a blurb of doc on BUILDR-596, would you please review it ? > > > 2011/7/8 Marc-André Laverdière > >> Hi, >> >> I think I did that previously. BUILDR-592 :D >> >> Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE >

Re: Patch for forcing password auth only in SSH/SFTP

acking anything." -James 1:4 > http://asimplediscipleslife.blogspot.com/ > mlaverd.theunixplace.com > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > > Marc-Andre, in general we cannot take patches attached to email threads > for &

Re: Patch for forcing password auth only in SSH/SFTP

Marc-Andre, in general we cannot take patches attached to email threads for legal reasons. You need to open a bug. You might want to attach your patch to BUILDR-595 to help out. Thanks for your contribution! Antoine 2011/6/3 Marc-André Laverdière > Hello everyone, > > At last, I managed to fi

Marking 1.4.6 released ?

Alex (or maybe someone else with the rights ?), would you please mark 1.4.6 released in jira ? Maybe create 1.4.7 as well ? Thanks, Antoine

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.6 release

happening on > users@buildr.a.o) > > alex > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> OK, buildr all-in-one is released on rubyforge with both tar.gz and zip. >> >> Antoine >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 20:22, Alex

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.6 release

OK, buildr all-in-one is released on rubyforge with both tar.gz and zip. Antoine On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 20:22, Alex Boisvert wrote: > Absolutely, be my guest! :) > > alex > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> I'm moving this w

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.6 release

I'm moving this week-end (and painting walls), but I would nevertheless like to offer to bundle the all-in-one package with jruby if that is still something we want to support ? Antoine On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 17:18, Alex Boisvert wrote: > Vote passed with 3 +1's, no 0's and no -1's. > > I'm goi

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Buildr-ci-build #232

the > rspec-integration. Challenge is to get debugging info on what's not set up > correctly on hudson. > > alex > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> We have 2 failures remaining regarding rspec. >> >> Those 2 tests h

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.6 release

+1. I ran a few integration tests with the release and everything checks out. 2011/6/23 Marc-André Laverdière > I agree. This is not a blocker. > Thanks for looking into it. > > Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE > "Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, > not lacking anyth

Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: Buildr-ci-build #232

We have 2 failures remaining regarding rspec. Those 2 tests have never been reliable in the past. It's pretty much on and off every time. I will look at what it takes to fix them or what we lose if we remove them. Thanks, Antoine -- Forwarded message -- From: Apache Jenkins Ser

Re: Working on CI build again

gt; alex > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> 8 tests not passing: >> https://builds.apache.org/job/Buildr-ci-build/226/testReport/ >> >> It might be a problem with jtestr not being configured or not installed on >> vesta ? >

Re: Working on CI build again

8 tests not passing: https://builds.apache.org/job/Buildr-ci-build/226/testReport/ It might be a problem with jtestr not being configured or not installed on vesta ? On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 07:57, Peter Donald wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrot

Working on CI build again

Hi folks, I finally had time to recover my account on vesta. I was able to sudo su - hudson, and I installed rvm with all the dependencies to run the ci build of buildr. I was able to run successfully the build on the machine - I mean, the build ran to the end, I'm not sure all specs pass. I ma

Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: Buildr-ci-build #221

Apologies, this is just not working. I disabled the build for now. I still haven't been able to log into ssh on vesta, and have requested a nuke of my account there. We should probably start something again from scratch. Antoine -- Forwarded message -- From: Apache Hudson Server

Re: alias :project :define

+1 I can see myself explaining this to a Java dev without seeing eyes rolling. On Nov 20, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > After mulling over this (and writing but not sending a long email about the > finer semantics I was originally thinking about), I think I'll simplify my > proposal do

Re: alias :project :define

How about sticking with Ruby arrays: -unshift prepends at the front of the array -push adds at the end. Antoine On Nov 17, 2010, at 12:14 AM, Peter Donald wrote: >> I was initially thinking about do_first and do_last but though the "do" was >> redundant with Ruby's do ... end notation. Do yo

Re: alias :project :define

k > dependencies and should therefore not be overused) > > Ideally, these last enhancement should go in Rake but we could stage them > in Buildr first. Thoughts? > > alex > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> project is used too -

Re: alias :project :define

project is used too - it's a method returning the current project. define comes from Rake. On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 01:33, redstun wrote: > Why the word 'define' is chosen to create a project? > > The word 'define' makes me thinking I'm creating a ruby method, rather than > a project, because it

Java on Mac OS

>From the RJB forum: http://rubyforge.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=38127 Java update 3 for Snow Leopard removes necessary header files. So installing > rjb gem may fail on OS X. The solution is to install Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 3 Developer Package > from http://connect.apple.com before ge

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #176

_txt.html > > <http://caldersphere.rubyforge.org/ci_reporter/History_txt.html>Happy to > fiddle with it later. Unfortunately, I can't do any SSH work this week due > to restrictive firewall. > > alex > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >

Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #176

We have had that error for little too long. I haven't had time to work on it. Is it fair game to let other committers have access to my vesta account ? If yes, please send your public key if you'd like to take a stab at it. Thanks, Antoine -- Forwarded message -- From: Apache Hu

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #175

Done. Cheers! On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 09:13, Alex Boisvert wrote: > Antoine, when you get a chance could you gem install rspec 2.0.1 in your > hudson account? > > thanks, > alex > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Apache Hudson Server < > hud...@hudson.apache.org> wrote: > > > See

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #172

Looks like I need to add it to PATH myself. Trying that now. On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 22:12, Alex Boisvert wrote: > Antoine, did you uninstall rspec 2.0.0 since our last discussion about > fixing failing tests? We should have the 'rspec' script somewhere on the > PATH. > > alex > > > On Sun, Oct

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #162

It didn't work. We need to take action to fix those two I think. On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:29, Antoine Toulme wrote: > OK trying wiping the workspace. > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:20, Alex Boisvert wrote: > >> Worth a shot. >> >> As far as speculations

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #162

ull support for 2.0.0; lots of breaking changes in > 2.0.0 as far as our integration goes. > > alex > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> I am thinking this is caused by a dirty workspace and tests based on time. >> Should we try w

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #162

I am thinking this is caused by a dirty workspace and tests based on time. Should we try wiping the workspace ? On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:07, Apache Hudson Server < hud...@hudson.apache.org> wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [toulmea

Re: svn commit: r1023279 - /buildr/trunk/buildr.gemspec

Sounds like win32 builds fail at the very end with a weird error. Others seem ok. Which builds in particular were you mentioning ? Feel free to log in and play with them, your login and password are the same as the ones for SVN access. On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 18:14, Antoine Toulme wrote: >

Re: svn commit: r1023279 - /buildr/trunk/buildr.gemspec

Hey Peter, I did the installation of the gem earlier. I don't know about the job status, I'll take a quick look. Maybe it's ci_reporter returning a different value than expected. On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 15:40, Peter Donald wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like this dependency needs to be installed on

Re: New PMC member: Antoine Toulme

e On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:24, lacton wrote: > Welcome Antoine! > > lacton > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Alex Boisvert > wrote: > > Builders, > > > > I'm happy to announce that Antoine Toulme has been elected a PMC member > for > > t

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.3 release

+1 for me after some testing on our projects. Cheers! On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:41, Daniel Spiewak wrote: > +1 Congratulations to all who worked hard on this release! > > Daniel > > On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:25 AM, "Alex Boisvert" > wrote: > > > We're voting on the source distributions available

Re: stackoverflow

Why not do that with the buildr account directly ? I can resend the password if needed. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 09:39, Alex Boisvert wrote: > They do :)I just didn't know about them. > > Thanks for the link I've now created the twitter account and feed: > https://twitter.com/BuildrAtSO > > al

Re: Tycho like support in Buildr

Yes, I'd love to do that. Actually, to try to make that happen, I decoupled buildr4osgi and our OSGi abstraction. By the way, I think Tycho is much nicer than anything I've seen to handle OSGi. It's a good step in the right direction. At most we could do as much as they've done, using the Buildr w

Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #134

Wow, that looks like a nasty bug for RJB ? -- Forwarded message -- From: Apache Hudson Server Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 16:00 Subject: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #134 To: c...@buildr.apache.org See

Maintenance release

Looks like we have one regression on 1.4.2: --trace was enhanced to support trace=all, trace=javac, etc. The regression is that --trace breaks, but you can safely use --trace=all instead. This regression was quickly fixed by Alex, we will do a maintenance release in the next 2 weeks to release t

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.2

OK I updated the website as well. Note we also have a Twitter link from the main page now. Join us in celebrating the release and start following Buildr<http://twitter.com/buildr>! Antoine On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 20:02, Antoine Toulme wrote: > All done! > 1. All gems pushed to r

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.2

19:43, Antoine Toulme wrote: > We have 3 binding +1s, 0 +0s, 0 -1s. > > We have 1 non-binding +1. > > The vote passed and the release is accepted. I'll do the pushing now. > > Antoine > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 06:59, Daniel Spiewak wrote: > >> +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.2

We have 3 binding +1s, 0 +0s, 0 -1s. We have 1 non-binding +1. The vote passed and the release is accepted. I'll do the pushing now. Antoine On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 06:59, Daniel Spiewak wrote: > +1 > > Daniel > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrot

[VOTE] Buildr 1.4.2

We're voting on the source distributions available here: http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.2/dist/ Specifically: http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.2/dist/buildr-1.4.2.tgz http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.2/dist/buildr-1.4.2.zip The documentation generated for

Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build-1.9 #25

Very funny... now that we use snapshots, we have trouble with our own build as it tries to update snapshots. Ah the irony. I'll try to move us to a dot version of that dependency today. -- Forwarded message -- From: Apache Hudson Server Date: Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 06:07 Subject: B

Re: svn commit: r998411 - /buildr/trunk/spec/core/application_spec.rb

Sounds better indeed. On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 05:14, Alex Boisvert wrote: > Antoine, how about: > > Gem.source_index.should_receive(:search).at_least(:once).and_return([]) > > instead of stub? > > alex > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:16 PM, wrote: > > > Author: toulmean > > Date: Sat Sep 18 06:16

Re: Offline next two weeks

Have fun Alex, hope the talk goes well! We need a release soon, we should have done it a few days ago according to the plan. There are still quite a few items pending. On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 16:37, Alex Boisvert wrote: > Quick note to other devs. I'll be offline for most of the coming two > we

javac and the classpath

I am writing specs for the javac command and I am finding out that it resets the classpath of the application, since you pass a classpath to it. At this point, it sounds like the safest option is to shell out instead of running javac in the current JVM, as it has some nasty side effects. I discov

Re: August 2010 Board Report

Looks good to me. Thanks! On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 16:57, Alex Boisvert wrote: > I wrote a first draft of our quarterly board report, > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BUILDR/August+2010+Board+Report > > Feel free to comment/edit.I will submit it tomorrow after 9pm EST. > > thanks,

Buildr examples

Hi Peter, can we take your examples and commit them into our SVN ? We would use them for integration testing. http://github.com/phoet/buildr-examples Thanks, Antoine

<    1   2   3   4   >