[GitHub] asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259567401 ## File path:

[GitHub] asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259567401 ## File path:

Nanosecond precision timestamps?

Hello! Beam SQL uses Calcite's codegen for Calc relations. Ideally, we would support nanosecond precision like java.sql.Timestamp and the new Java 8 date/time libraries. it looks like there is an assumption of millisecond precision. Is this nanosecond support possible? I have not grokked the

Re: Ordering table scans

Also, since you are particularly interested in applying filters from one table on another, that is actually a nested loops join rather than a filter. Linq4j implementation has examples of nested loops join in the CorrelateJoinTest class. Thanks, Walaa.

Re: joins and low selectivity optimization

No need to mention it, I also appreciate your contributions/discussions. Block-based nested loops is not implemented but we already have tuple-based nested loop [1] and it is a good starting point. Regarding the particular query that you cited I think that even tuple-based nested loop would work

[GitHub] kgyrtkirk opened a new pull request #1064: [CALCITE-2839] Simplify comparisions against boolean literals

kgyrtkirk opened a new pull request #1064: [CALCITE-2839] Simplify comparisions against boolean literals URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1064 This patch enables to simplify x=true to x and x=false to not(x) It also handles inequalities which are probably less frequent.

[GitHub] kgyrtkirk commented on a change in pull request #1053: [CALCITE-2852] Simplification: traverse calculations and unknown UDFs

kgyrtkirk commented on a change in pull request #1053: [CALCITE-2852] Simplification: traverse calculations and unknown UDFs URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1053#discussion_r259525126 ## File path: core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rex/RexSimplify.java ##

Re: Ordering table scans

Hi Gopal, You may take a look at the FilterableTable API. It allows filtering tables based on a list of RexNodes. Check ScannableTableTest.testFilterableTableCoopertive() for an example test. Thanks, Walaa. On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:37 PM Gopalakrishna Holla wrote: > Hello, > > The problem

[GitHub] julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259516689 ## File path:

[GitHub] kgyrtkirk closed pull request #1047: [CALCITE-2841] Simplification: push negation into Case expression

kgyrtkirk closed pull request #1047: [CALCITE-2841] Simplification: push negation into Case expression URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1047 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.19.0

Yea I don't mind pushing out the RC towards the end of next week (beginning of March). I'm not in a rush to build the RC. I just picked Monday to try to hit the target of February that was arbitrarily picked in the sand. At this point, the release will most likely happen in early March. Kevin

[GitHub] asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259513062 ## File path:

[GitHub] asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259513062 ## File path:

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.19.0

Can you do the RC towards the end of next week? I only just saw this message - 4 days after you sent it - because I’ve been fighting down a backlog of 500 Apache messages. There are some changes I would like to get into the release but I will need a few days. Julian > On Feb 18, 2019, at

[GitHub] julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #1053: [CALCITE-2852] Simplification: traverse calculations and unknown UDFs

julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #1053: [CALCITE-2852] Simplification: traverse calculations and unknown UDFs URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1053#discussion_r259510833 ## File path: core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rex/RexSimplify.java ##

[GitHub] julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #1053: [CALCITE-2852] Simplification: traverse calculations and unknown UDFs

julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #1053: [CALCITE-2852] Simplification: traverse calculations and unknown UDFs URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1053#discussion_r259508694 ## File path: core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rex/RexSimplify.java ##

[GitHub] julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259507731 ## File path:

Ordering table scans

Hello, The problem I'm working on is to order table scans so that one scan can insert filters into the another. It seems like it should be a common problem so I'm sure I'm missing some context. Taking a concrete example, imagine two tables Users and Movies with the following schema User { id:

[GitHub] vineetgarg02 opened a new pull request #1063: CALCITE-1513 : Correlated NOT IN query throws AssertionError(Vineet G…

vineetgarg02 opened a new pull request #1063: CALCITE-1513 : Correlated NOT IN query throws AssertionError(Vineet G… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1063 …arg) This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259476211 ## File path:

Re: Schema constructors and direct dependencies (vs JNDI)

Directory services are usually built-in. And that’s as they should be. There’s nothing stopping you from creating schemas (or trees of schemas) manually. And yes, you can put whatever kinds of objects you like as constructor parameters for your schema. But if you want to use SchemaFactory, or

Re: [calcite] branch master updated: CALCITE-2856-Emulating Cross Join For SparkSqlDialect

Committers, please check the format of the commit comments. Rather than CALCITE-2856-Emulating Cross Join For SparkSqlDialect Should have been [CALCITE-2856] Emulate Cross Join For SparkSqlDialect (Stuti Gupta) > On Feb 21, 2019, at 5:06 PM, mm...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an

[GitHub] julianhyde commented on issue #1025: [CALCITE-2679] Fix a bug that `any_value` can't be used with other ag…

julianhyde commented on issue #1025: [CALCITE-2679] Fix a bug that `any_value` can't be used with other ag… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1025#issuecomment-466500691 Please change the commit comment to not start with 'fix'. Just provide the description of the bug being

Re: support more UDFs

Actually there is a “contributors” group in JIRA and we can add people to it if they ask. But it’s also OK if someone (anyone - they don’t have to be a committer, just have a JIRA account) writes into the JIRA case. “Hi, I’m working on this” and maybe posts a link to their GitHub dev branch if

Re: How to make a TIMESTAMP_ADD call using RelBuilder?

Rather than > relBuilder.getRexBuilder().makeDateLiteral(new DateString(2019, 1, 1)) I think you can use > relBuilder.literal(new DateString(2019, 1, 1)) (Or should be able to.) Same effect, a bit less code. > On Feb 22, 2019, at 8:21 AM, Anton Haidai wrote: > > Stamatis, Hongze - thank

[GitHub] julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

julianhyde commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259454491 ## File path:

[GitHub] zhztheplayer closed pull request #1013: [CALCITE-2791]Add the JSON_TYPE function

zhztheplayer closed pull request #1013: [CALCITE-2791]Add the JSON_TYPE function URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1013 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

Re: "ASF GitHub Bot added a worklog" emails

Yes it’s probably because I am the assignee. I have bulk changed a lot of issues that were assigned to me, and made myself no longer the default assignee for new issues. That will probably help. Still, the JIRA-git integration is far too verbose in my opinion. If someone adds a git comment

[GitHub] asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259446058 ## File path:

[GitHub] asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259446058 ## File path:

Re: "ASF GitHub Bot added a worklog" emails

Julian - It might be because you are the default assignee for tickets? I know I'm assigned tickets or watching them in other projects I get more notifications. Kevin Risden On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:23 AM Francis Chuang wrote: > Would it make sense to have a separate list for Github

[GitHub] zabetak commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis)

zabetak commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259442924 ## File path:

Calcite-Master - Build # 1033 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Calcite-Master (build #1033) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Calcite-Master/1033/ to view the results.

[GitHub] asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259431543 ## File path:

[GitHub] kgyrtkirk commented on a change in pull request #1056: CALCITE-2858

kgyrtkirk commented on a change in pull request #1056: CALCITE-2858 URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1056#discussion_r259429721 ## File path: core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/externalize/RelJson.java ## @@ -391,13 +385,17 @@ RexNode toRex(RelInput

[GitHub] zabetak merged pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez)

zabetak merged pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/898 This is an automated message from the Apache

[GitHub] zhztheplayer commented on issue #1004: [CALCITE-2786][CALCITE-2787] Add order by clause support for JSON_ARRAYAGG; Json aggregate calls with different null clause get in…

zhztheplayer commented on issue #1004: [CALCITE-2786][CALCITE-2787] Add order by clause support for JSON_ARRAYAGG; Json aggregate calls with different null clause get in… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1004#issuecomment-466460271 Thanks @michaelmior! 2 new PRs opened:

[GitHub] zabetak commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis)

zabetak commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259417514 ## File path:

[GitHub] zhztheplayer closed pull request #1004: [CALCITE-2786][CALCITE-2787] Add order by clause support for JSON_ARRAYAGG; Json aggregate calls with different null clause get in…

zhztheplayer closed pull request #1004: [CALCITE-2786][CALCITE-2787] Add order by clause support for JSON_ARRAYAGG; Json aggregate calls with different null clause get in… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1004

Re: How to make a TIMESTAMP_ADD call using RelBuilder?

Stamatis, Hongze - thank you for your help, it works now. On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:05 PM Hongze Zhang wrote: > > >EnumerableCalc( expr#6=[TIMESTAMPADD($t3, $t4, $t5)] ...) > > > >But Calcite (both 1.18 and 1.19-SNAPSHOT) can't execute this plan: > > > >Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException:

Re: How to make a TIMESTAMP_ADD call using RelBuilder?

Mail format is converted to something bad :( The example: final RexNode shiftedDateField = relBuilder.call( SqlStdOperatorTable.DATETIME_PLUS, rexBuilder.makeTimestampLiteral(new TimestampString(2019, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0), 0), rexBuilder.makeCall(SqlStdOperatorTable.MULTIPLY,

[GitHub] asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis

asereda-gs commented on a change in pull request #950: [CALCITE-2703] Reduce code generation and class loading overhead when executing queries in the EnumerableConvention (Stamatis Zampetakis) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/950#discussion_r259409005 ## File path:

Re: How to make a TIMESTAMP_ADD call using RelBuilder?

>EnumerableCalc( expr#6=[TIMESTAMPADD($t3, $t4, $t5)] ...) > >But Calcite (both 1.18 and 1.19-SNAPSHOT) can't execute this plan: > >Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: cannot translate call >TIMESTAMPADD($t3, $t4, $t5)As @Stamatis has said, this is normal. Calcite >doesn't provide an

Re: How to make a TIMESTAMP_ADD call using RelBuilder?

Hi Anton, The TIMESTAMPADD operator never ends up in the logical plan so essentially there is no code for executing it. It is just used as a syntactic sugar in the parser. Have a look below to see how you can obtain the equivalent in relational algebra:

[GitHub] yuqi1129 opened a new pull request #1062: [CALCITE-2861] Exception occurs when do +-*/ between decimal and othe…

yuqi1129 opened a new pull request #1062: [CALCITE-2861] Exception occurs when do +-*/ between decimal and othe… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1062 …r numeric types This is an automated message from the Apache

Re: How to make a TIMESTAMP_ADD call using RelBuilder?

Hongze, thank you for your answer. Your code successfully produces a plan with the following node: EnumerableCalc( expr#6=[TIMESTAMPADD($t3, $t4, $t5)] ...) But Calcite (both 1.18 and 1.19-SNAPSHOT) can't execute this plan: Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: cannot translate call

[GitHub] zhztheplayer opened a new pull request #1061: [CALCITE-2786] Add order by clause support for JSON_ARRAYAGG

zhztheplayer opened a new pull request #1061: [CALCITE-2786] Add order by clause support for JSON_ARRAYAGG URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1061 The JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2786

[GitHub] zhztheplayer opened a new pull request #1060: [CALCITE-2787] Json aggregate calls with different null clause get in…

zhztheplayer opened a new pull request #1060: [CALCITE-2787] Json aggregate calls with different null clause get in… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1060 …correctly merged during converting from SQL to relational algebra The JIRA issue:

Re: Calcite-Master - Build # 1027 - Still Failing

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/JDK+Installation+Matrix That page has details about Jenkins INFRA structure stuff. Kevin Risden On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:14 AM Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > BTW, which version of jdk1.8 we are using on Jenkins? It says latest but I > cannot

[GitHub] zabetak commented on issue #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez)

zabetak commented on issue #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/898#issuecomment-466410857 @rubenada thanks for taking care of all the comments. The PR looks great:) Can you please

Re: Calcite-Master - Build # 1027 - Still Failing

BTW, which version of jdk1.8 we are using on Jenkins? It says latest but I cannot find to which version latest really corresponds. Is it this one jdk-8u201-linux-x64? Στις Παρ, 22 Φεβ 2019 στις 1:59 μ.μ., ο/η Stamatis Zampetakis < zabe...@gmail.com> έγραψε: > Yes, I' ve noticed :( Let's keep

Re:How to make a TIMESTAMP_ADD call using RelBuilder?

Correct the flag: TimeUnitRange.MONTH -> TimeUnit.MONTH Best, Hongze At 2019-02-22 22:07:11, "Hongze Zhang" wrote: Hi Anton, Following code works to me: final RexNode shiftedDateField = relBuilder.call( SqlStdOperatorTable.TIMESTAMP_ADD,

Re:How to make a TIMESTAMP_ADD call using RelBuilder?

Hi Anton, Following code works to me: final RexNode shiftedDateField = relBuilder.call( SqlStdOperatorTable.TIMESTAMP_ADD, relBuilder.getRexBuilder().makeFlag(TimeUnitRange.MONTH), relBuilder.literal(1), relBuilder.getRexBuilder().makeDateLiteral(new

Re: support more UDFs

Issues can also be assigned to contributors and I've added you as a contributor and assigned the issue to you. Thanks! -- Michael Mior mm...@apache.org Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 12:56, Ilia Gorelikhin a écrit : > > Hello! I would like to help with task >

Re: Calcite-Master - Build # 1027 - Still Failing

Yes, I' ve noticed :( Let's keep looking! Στις Πέμ, 21 Φεβ 2019 στις 12:48 μ.μ., ο/η Vladimir Sitnikov < sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> έγραψε: > I've performed multiple builds, and it looks like Java8 is still suffering > from misunderoptimization :( >

[GitHub] michaelmior commented on issue #1004: [CALCITE-2786][CALCITE-2787] Add order by clause support for JSON_ARRAYAGG; Json aggregate calls with different null clause get in…

michaelmior commented on issue #1004: [CALCITE-2786][CALCITE-2787] Add order by clause support for JSON_ARRAYAGG; Json aggregate calls with different null clause get in… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1004#issuecomment-466387868 These seem to be two separate issues. Could you

[GitHub] zabetak commented on a change in pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez)

zabetak commented on a change in pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/898#discussion_r259330299 ## File path:

[GitHub] michaelmior commented on issue #1016: [CALCITE-2803] ProjectTransposeJoinRule messes INDF expressions

michaelmior commented on issue #1016: [CALCITE-2803] ProjectTransposeJoinRule messes INDF expressions URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1016#issuecomment-466386868 @laurentgo Could you fix the import order issue that's causing checkstyle to fail? (See the Travis tests.)

[GitHub] zabetak commented on a change in pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez)

zabetak commented on a change in pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/898#discussion_r259328399 ## File path:

[GitHub] zabetak commented on a change in pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez)

zabetak commented on a change in pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/898#discussion_r259328901 ## File path:

[GitHub] michaelmior commented on a change in pull request #1025: [CALCITE-2679] Fix a bug that `any_value` can't be used with other ag…

michaelmior commented on a change in pull request #1025: [CALCITE-2679] Fix a bug that `any_value` can't be used with other ag… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1025#discussion_r259329347 ## File path:

[GitHub] zabetak commented on a change in pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez)

zabetak commented on a change in pull request #898: [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured types (Ruben Quesada Lopez) URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/898#discussion_r259329627 ## File path:

[GitHub] michaelmior commented on issue #1025: [CALCITE-2679] Fix a bug that `any_value` can't be used with other ag…

michaelmior commented on issue #1025: [CALCITE-2679] Fix a bug that `any_value` can't be used with other ag… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1025#issuecomment-466386448 @asereda-gs Do you mind having a look at this?

[GitHub] yuqi1129 commented on a change in pull request #1057: [CALCITE-2854] code gen error for UNARY_MINUS operator call with deci…

yuqi1129 commented on a change in pull request #1057: [CALCITE-2854] code gen error for UNARY_MINUS operator call with deci… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1057#discussion_r259329092 ## File path: core/src/test/java/org/apache/calcite/test/ReflectiveSchemaTest.java

How to make a TIMESTAMP_ADD call using RelBuilder?

Hello. In SQL, I can execute a query like "SELECT TIMESTAMPADD(month, 1, "date" ) FROM ..." and it works. But my attempts to do the same thing using RelBuilder are not successful, for example, this code does not work: RexNode shiftedDateField = relBuilder.call(

[GitHub] stutigupta028 commented on a change in pull request #1052: CALCITE-2833- Select without from support & CALCITE-2834-Support for values clause for dialects which neither have values clause nor

stutigupta028 commented on a change in pull request #1052: CALCITE-2833- Select without from support & CALCITE-2834-Support for values clause for dialects which neither have values clause nor dual table URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1052#discussion_r259298635 ## File

[GitHub] zabetak opened a new pull request #1059: [CALCITE-2859] Centralize Calcite system properties

zabetak opened a new pull request #1059: [CALCITE-2859] Centralize Calcite system properties URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1059 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: support more UDFs

Hi Ilia, I have the impression that issues can be assigned only to committers of the project. Nevertheless, you can definetely work on this and submit a PR. Tickets are not necessary resolved by the people assigned to them. Best, Stamatis Στις Πέμ, 21 Φεβ 2019 στις 6:56 μ.μ., ο/η Ilia

[GitHub] vlsi commented on a change in pull request #1057: [CALCITE-2854] code gen error for UNARY_MINUS operator call with deci…

vlsi commented on a change in pull request #1057: [CALCITE-2854] code gen error for UNARY_MINUS operator call with deci… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1057#discussion_r259274565 ## File path: core/src/test/java/org/apache/calcite/test/ReflectiveSchemaTest.java

[GitHub] yuqi1129 commented on a change in pull request #1057: [CALCITE-2854] code gen error for UNARY_MINUS operator call with deci…

yuqi1129 commented on a change in pull request #1057: [CALCITE-2854] code gen error for UNARY_MINUS operator call with deci… URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1057#discussion_r259272042 ## File path: core/src/test/java/org/apache/calcite/test/JdbcTest.java ## @@

Re: "ASF GitHub Bot added a worklog" emails

Would it make sense to have a separate list for Github notifications? This would be similar to the commits@ list but would be dedicated to archiving those Github notifications. On 22/02/2019 6:44 pm, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: Julian>I’m getting a dozen or so such emails each day. It seems that

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-2861) Exception occurs when do +-*/ between decimal and other numeric types

yuqi created CALCITE-2861: - Summary: Exception occurs when do +-*/ between decimal and other numeric types Key: CALCITE-2861 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2861 Project: Calcite