Hi,
CloudStack currently leverages storage overcommit/overprovisioning by
specifying global setting storage.overprovisioning.factor
I would like to extend the granularity of global params to make storage
overprovisioning as a per primary store basis.
Also it would allow admin to make more
Animesh,
It passes in the eclipse junit launcher and looking at the line that
throws the null pointer I can only see objects that have been mocked
in the line above.
a long shot: disk space?
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
I have tried
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18066/#review34463
---
Hi,
The current ACS management server runs only on linux based operating systems.
Though it runs on windows under Cygwin terminal with some effort, I'd like to
introduce this feature to make sure that the management server runs on windows
without any dependencies on Cygwin etc.
The Jira Ticket
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18074/#review34464
---
Commit f3a77c79e8ce5b6c1448737520a5c3e159e5337d in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18067/#review34465
---
Ship it!
commit 042cc69c79a428e17a1952ac172893b0629efdd0
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18072/#review34466
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18074/#review34468
---
Commit aa2831231cb82773dcf4460a9b29985782d90ebe in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18069/#review34469
---
Ship it!
commit 8c5886ee7fadcab11834f9e514cf05925f67fc33
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18068/#review34470
---
Ship it!
commit 7f90fb2a4403b1ec542026f1b30d1b05fcf68f95
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18077/#review34471
---
Ship it!
commit 79c4905fd26d6a867f930db338231f68511fa209
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18074/#review34472
---
Commit 2d93d83b44927e0ede7c0a5440bf5f472cc8d11a in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18079/#review34473
---
Duplicatee from 18077, please close
- Hugo Trippaers
On Feb. 13,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18078/#review34474
---
Duplicate from 18077, please close.
- Hugo Trippaers
On Feb. 13,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18074/#review34475
---
Commit 1eb98e135b0bdd6a00f10c5bbf98e2947334a31d in branch
On Feb. 14, 2014, 8:54 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/contrail/model/ServiceInstanceModel.java,
line 81
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18066/diff/1/?file=484221#file484221line81
Why should this be set to a
Did you upgrade this env? My first thought would be that a component
is left behind. The class cast exception makes me think along that
line.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Mo m...@daoenix.com wrote:
Cloudstack 4.2 (CentOS) , Xen Sever 6.2. Two servers.
On Feb 13, 2014 5:41 PM, Daan Hoogland
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18066/#review34476
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/
---
(Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 10:38 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
On Feb. 12, 2014, 5:23 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
test/integration/component/test_persistent_networks.py, line 1336
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/diff/1/?file=468548#file468548line1336
Is waiting required post disable\lock? or after Account.list?
Yes, because we have to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18113/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18114/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers.
Repository:
Please add more details for upgrade scenario. Also can you give some examples
as to how the capacity computation is done for operations where the volume gets
migrated from one PS to another having different over provisioning factors.
Is there any value add if you give this also at cluster
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18114/
---
(Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 11:46 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18113/
---
(Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 11:48 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
On Feb. 14, 2014, 9:08 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
plugins/event-bus/inmemory/src/org/apache/cloudstack/mom/inmemory/InMemoryEventBus.java,
line 63
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18072/diff/1/?file=484234#file484234line63
Why recreate the map?
After explained how this method could
Below are my findings and suggestions.
Dependencies for mgmt server to run on windows.
1. ssh-keygen tool ( default available on linux. Its required to generate
id_rsa_cloud keys)
2. mount cmd ( this is used by vmware/hyperv to mount sec storage on mgmt
server to copy the
On Feb. 14, 2014, 10:18 a.m., Wilder Rodrigues wrote:
This review will be discarded. The changes for the contrail plugin were
squashed with another commit.
A new patch will be uploaded to the review ID 18072
- Wilder
---
This is an
This is a fresh install of both Xen CentOS. What I am attempting to do
is make the primary IP address 10.x IP and the secondary public 96, or
196 subnet. I VPN'd into the management server proceeded to set it up
database, vdh-util, etc, marked my traffic at Xen, setup mount points,
and then
well this;
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: com.cloud.agent.api.Answer
cannot be cast to com.cloud.agent.api.SetupAnswer
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer.processConnect(XcpServerDiscoverer.java:646)
at
Thoughts on how to proceed past this point? A reload of both XEN Cent?
Or, should I revert to what I know works rather well, Cloudstack KVM? :)
- mo
On 2/14/14, 7:01 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
well this;
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: com.cloud.agent.api.Answer
cannot be cast to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18115/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18116/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers.
Repository:
Thanks Rajesh for the inputs...
My comments inline in RED.
Thanks Regards
Damodar/
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 5:26 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18117/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18117/
---
(Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 1:01 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
Hi,
While creating Virtual router its giving below error,
2014-02-14 18:19:53,948 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Use router's private IP for SSH control. IP :
10.129.151.89
2014-02-14 18:19:54,135 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18114/#review34482
---
Ship it!
commit 14a5751d0f4247efc6a982bf1c7e51408fff3894
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18114/#review34483
---
Ship it!
commit 14a5751d0f4247efc6a982bf1c7e51408fff3894
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18115/#review34484
---
Ship it!
commit 41721391cf296ce327ff3cce735fc7e018721c9e
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18116/#review34486
---
Ian,
Can you upload a single patch file for this change? The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18116/#review34487
---
Ian,
Can you upload a single patch file for this change? The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18116/#review34485
---
Ian,
Can you upload a single patch file for this change? The
easiest is to check the xen installation for cloudstack components. It
looks like something is missing there. I don't want to try and insult
you but did you throw vhd-util in /opt/cloud/bin? This is a long shot
as SetupAnswer is part of the core and is created by the xen agent for
your hypervisor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18072/
---
(Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 1:52 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
On Feb. 14, 2014, 1:49 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Ian,
Can you upload a single patch file for this change? The current patch
consists of several patch files.
Patch has been updated sorry about that, seems my diff went wrong!
- Ian
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18116/
---
(Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 2:10 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18113/
---
(Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 2:38 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18072/
---
(Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 2:43 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18114/
---
(Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 2:48 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
On 14.02.2014 06:24, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
+1 from me, the major issues I reported previously (broken HA fw)
have been fixed. Good job!
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Hello,
In the light of recent UDP based attacks (NTP/DNS/SNMP
reflection/amplification) I was thinking to hack the global default
security group so that at least NTP and SNMP are protected in the whole
cloud. By default the security groups come with everything blocked on
ingress and all
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18113/#review34491
---
Ship it!
commit 9903b44754da7188dd5cb277357c57c83c1b3ebe
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18116/#review34492
---
Ship it!
commit de24d7615099b4a61c65051f505608f9d0ad26db
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18072/#review34493
---
Ship it!
commit 643301e031817cc4495fff5d37bd4970ca578c9c
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18027/#review34495
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marcus Sorensen
On Feb. 12, 2014, 8:44
Too late! It's not super critical, I'm just putting things there for
whatever 4.3.x release can include them.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Marcus
I see your commits in 4.3-forward for CLOUDSTACK-6089. Do you want it to be
picked
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17541/#review34496
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Federle
On Feb. 11, 2014, 8:29 a.m.,
Dan,
No insult taken, I placed the vhd-util not in /opt/cloud/bin -- but, as
the directions say into:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor (on the management
server I did this)
Is this still the common place for this file, or?
- Mo
On 2/14/14, 8:50 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Check this.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.devel/22230
Santhosh
From: Tejas Gadaria [refond.g...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 8:06 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to
On 14/02/14 1:01 AM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi,
Using 4.3 RC4 I can now create an instance on an OVS but if I try to
migrate the instance to another VM it fails with the VM_REQUIRES_NETWORK
error. Attempting to manually using XenCenter says Cannot see required
Network
Hey All,
The last few days developers from Schuberg Philis and ShapeBlue spend a lot of
time on fixing findbugs findings. This started as an idea to onboard some of
the new guys on CloudStack development, but it turned out to be a 5 days long
hackaton. The end goal was the elimination of the
The tomcat/apache configuration is good for dynamic compression. At the
same time, dynamic compression of static content is takes quite significant
CPU-time on the server, and it will have to do it for each client. Also,
since it happens when you download (by then it should have been
compressed),
Thanks Yoshikaza, Marcus and Yitao. I agree with Yoshikazu, that Guest
Network
under Admin is a Shared Networks. It will be good to change UI to avoid
confusion.
Can someone pls. clarify my second question.
I created and Enabled a new Network Offering. But when I
create an Isolated Network,
On Feb 14, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.commailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
The correct answer to that question is that in my opinion we both did and
didn't improve CloudStack. The paradox here is that we improved the code as
written making the code
+1 from me
There is a minor issue which I have logged
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6119 but this is by no means a
show stopper.
Tested upgrading from 4.2.1 then creating a Zone and associated components
based on XenServer 6.2.
Create Domain, Accounts, Users, Gust VMs on
+1
Followed release procedure and tested on DevCloud.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 2/14/14 10:10 AM, Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote:
+1 from me
There is a minor issue which I have logged
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6119 but this is by no
means a show
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.comwrote:
Hi,
Using 4.3 RC4 I can now create an instance on an OVS but if I try to
migrate the instance to another VM it fails with the VM_REQUIRES_NETWORK
error. Attempting to manually using XenCenter says Cannot see
I'm nooit sure for What version the location i mentioned was introduced.i
think it was 4.3 but as you run in startup problems i am shooting at the
bear. Did you build yourself or download a distro?
mobile bilingual spell checker used
Op 14 feb. 2014 16:53 schreef Mo m...@daoenix.com:
Dan,
No
Build myself? vhd-util? or Cloudstack, both downloaded from directions
provided on the cloudstack site.
- Maurice
On 2/14/14, 2:56 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I'm nooit sure for What version the location i mentioned was
introduced.i think it was 4.3 but as you run in startup problems i am
On 13.02.2014 18:04, John Kinsella wrote:
Just posted
http://theresnomon.co/2014/improving-cloudstack-ui-performance/ - open
to any comments.
That's great, some people are already using Apache HTTPD for SSL
termination, this is a great bonus. Thanks for sharing.
Lucian
--
Sent from the
Ok, please file a bug at issues. Apache. Org / jira . My provider decided
i am not an important customer and is leaving me without collectiviteit
over the weekend. So i will be very irresponsive. But ill try and think
about any other vlees you can give.
mobile bilingual spell checker used
Op 14
+1.
Looks pretty straightforward to me.
--Sheng
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
Currently PVLAN support is available in CloudStack deployment over VMware
ESXi hypervisor for VMware dvSwitch only. I would like to extend this to
Hi,
It looks like putting the primary storage in maintenance doesn't
trigger the VM shutdown as described in the docs
Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6121 with some
more details.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
Just a reminder here that primary storage can also be at the zone level as
of 4.2.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Please add more details for upgrade scenario. Also can you give some
examples as to how the capacity computation is done for operations
LXC support was added to CloudStack in 4.2 release was implemented as a
hypervisor. Following operations are currently supported:
- Add an LXC cluster
- Add an LXC host
- Register an LXC template
- Spin up an LXC container (Create/Start/Stop/Destroy)
I would like to add more functionality,
Hi Santosh,
Thanks for replay,
I have followed the given link, and deleted systemvm-4.3.0 from
/secondary/systemvm/
still it's giving same error.
Also I followed below link and varifed public key it's they are same.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3014
[root@hyperv is]# cat
77 matches
Mail list logo
