I like it but wonder if Upgrade section needs to be added? ..
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 2:25 AM Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We currently have four sources of documentation [1]. Which make managing
> the documentation convoluted, and worse, make navigating and searching the
> documentation real
I think the simplicity of Basic Zone was - you can get away with 1 VLAN for
everything (great for POC setup) where as Advanced Shared with VLAN
isolation requires several VLANs to get going.
How would we cover this use case?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:34 AM Tutkowski, Mike
wrote:
> Also, yes, I
writing re-injestion process of existing running KVM
instances back into new cloudstack - without doing template imports and such.
Has anyone create a tooling for this endevour by any chance? If not - i might
have to create one :(
Thanks
ilya
Daan and Rohit
Come to think about it - you are correct, I looked through and noticed my
install does cloudstack-* against 4.11 repo and Marvin being in the repo -
is being installed.
I will change my process, thanks for the update
-ilya
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:08 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
>
Hi Daan
I've tried installing 4.11 RC1 (i know i'm in the wrong thread) and noticed
it does something funky - like installing marvin and going to pypi to get
dependencies. If its already fixed in RC2 - please ignore this request -
but if not...
Unfortunately some environments dont have a luxury o
Perhaps bring it back into 4.11.1?
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 9:28 AM Suresh Kumar Anaparti <
sureshkumar.anapa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Si / Will,
>
> That is just FYI, if anyone uses VMware with that flag set to false. I'm
> neither against the feature nor telling to rip that out.
>
> You are correc
Ivan
This is already done in 4.11, I’m not next to comp to check but ShapeBlue
has a feature created that would allow for movement between different roles.
Regards
ilya
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:03 AM Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hello, community.
>
> I'm thinking about implementi
x27;static' and 'roundrobin' algorithms, strictly checks for the
order as expected by them, however, the 'shuffle' algorithm just checks
for content and not the order of the comma separate ms host addresses.
Regards
ilya
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Rafael Weingärtn
your thoughts are.
Regards
ilya
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ilya and others,
>
> We have been discussing this idea of graceful/nicely shutdown. Our feeling
> is that we (in CloudStack community) might have been trying
This is great news and cloud monkey is used more than you think :)
I will share the news with my team.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:07 AM Will Stevens wrote:
> +1. It has been a great tool for years. Looking forward to the golang
> version.
>
> On Apr 10, 2018 7:59 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>
> A
/job, meaning if agent noticed a
disconnect or termination request - it will abort the command in flight. We
can also consider restarting this tasks again or what not - but it would
not be part of this enhancement.
Regards
ilya
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hi I
VMware in this case - perhaps
ShapeBlue team can help answer or fill in the blanks for us.
Regards,
ilya
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:48 PM, ilya musayev
wrote:
> Hi Sergey
>
> Glad to see you are doing well,
>
> I was gonna say drop "enterprise virtualization company" and sa
Hi Sergey
Glad to see you are doing well,
I was gonna say drop "enterprise virtualization company" and save a
$fortune$ - but its not for everyone :)
I'll post another proposed solution to bottom of this thread.
Regards
ilya
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Sergey Levitskiy
hread with new proposed solution.
Regards
ilya
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Good point ilya but as stated by Sergey there's more thing to consider
> before being able to do a proper shutdown. I augmented my script I gave you
> origi
e XXX tasks (enumerate tasks) still being
> executed, we will wait for them to finish before shutting down.
>
> * The timeout (60 minutes suggested) could be global settings that we can
> load before executing the graceful-shutdown.
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:15 PM, ilya musaye
te - then it may fail - because you block agent communication on 8250.
Thanks
ilya
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Big +1 for this feature; I only have a few doubts.
>
> * Regarding the tasks/jobs that management servers (
43 -
if you have a single node setup.
There is a chance you may block the access to cloudstack for over an hour -
and that may not be what you intended.
Perhaps we add a parameter in db.properties for
"graceful.shutdown.block.api.server = true/false"
Regards,
ilya
On Wed, A
proposal and not against it, but:
1) Please consider decoupling it from cloudstack-management server - and
release it as server plugin
2) Test coverage must be sufficient enough to validate the functionality
(perhaps mock vault endpoints and response)
Regards,
ilya
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:49 AM
eudoJobDispatcher"
3) job_init_msid=$my_ms_id
Monitor this async_job table for 60 minutes - until all async jobs for MSID
are done, then proceed with shutdown
If failed for any reason or terminated, catch the exit via trap command
and unblock the 8080/8443
Comments are welcome
Regards,
ilya
-10289
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10290
Regards
Ilya
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:58 AM Dag Sonstebo
wrote:
> Hi Lucian,
>
> I’m maybe not the right person to answer this – but my understanding is it
> only kicks in when you have a network offering without a VR, at
Welcome Mike, thank you Wido!
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:59 AM Simon Weller
wrote:
> Thanks for all of your hard work Wido, we really appreciate it.
>
>
> Congratulations Mike!
>
>
> - Si
>
>
> From: Wido den Hollander
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 9:11 AM
> To:
When everything works smooth - the end user does not need to know whats
under the hood.
However, when things begin to swing and your hands are tied to just one CP
- what do you do?
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Khosrow Moossavi
wrote:
> Why would we want to expose this choice to administrat
boost in performance (10x+) and
troubleshooting became much easier. I dont want to assume we will get 10x
boost - but i think we will certainly do much better than what 8 year old
DBCP has to offer.
Regards,
ilya
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.c
Great news!
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:40 PM Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Hi fellow colleagues,
>
> I might be a bit late with this email...
>
> I'd like to introduce Khosrow Moossavi, who recently join our team and his
> focus is currently exclusively on dev for Cloudstack with cloud.ca.
>
> Our 2 c
Thanks for sharing
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:11 AM Nux! wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just stumbled upon this
> https://twitter.com/berrange/status/950209752486817792
>
> "ensure KVM guest CPU model you choose has the "pcid" feature, otherwise
> guests will suffer terrible performance from the Meltdown fix
+1
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:41 PM Boris Stoyanov
wrote:
> 0
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> > On 2 Jan 2018, at 22:13, Khosrow Moossavi
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Khosrow Moossavi
> > CloudOps
> >
I very much agree with Paul, we should consider moving into resilient model
with least dependence I.e ha-proxy..
Send a notification to partner MS to take over the job management would be
ideal.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:28 AM Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi Marc-Aurèle,
>
> Personally, my utopia would
Hi Folks
Apologies for dropping the ball on this initiative. I'm going to be away
for the next week or two dealing with personal issues.
Regards
Ilya
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:21 AM ilya musayev
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We had a great discussion earlier today. I will update the m
call will be held 3 months from now. If you feel we need to
do something sooner or can think of a way to make the communication
better, please let me know.
Thank you everyone for taking the time out of your busy schedule to
attend this call.
Regards,
ilya
binxg9nzlrjxR.bin
Description: application
Great work Sachin, we will review and merge.
On 8/29/17 12:57 PM, sachin patil wrote:
> @wei...yeah I can share some screen shots. I have already attached one in
> my design document.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/
> noVNC+support+for+Cloudstack
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017
Apology - Link for talks below is pointing to "draft" and wont work
Please use this page instead for tomorrows call
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/2017-09-06+Meeting+notes
On 9/5/17 1:59 PM, ilya wrote:
> Acknowledged, will be noted.
>
> I&#x
ther
> information sent during the session to be recorded, which may be discoverable
> in a legal matter. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such
> recordings. If you do not consent to being recorded, discuss your concerns
> with the host or do not join the session.
On 9/
Personal experience with KVM (not cloudstack related) and non-shared
storage migration - works most of the time - but can be very slow - even
with 10G backplane.
On 9/5/17 6:27 AM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote:
> Hi Dimitriy,
>
> I wrote the PR for the live migration in cloudstack (PR 1709). We're
Hi ENA team
Please send updates today before 5pm PST if you'd like to have more
items discussed.
On 8/18/17 5:12 AM, Simon Weller wrote:
> Ilya,
>
>
> I'll be attending with a few other folks from ENA.
>
>
> Here's one for the Dev efforts -
>
>
&g
I assume Raja forgot to CC: dev@cloudstack.apache.org - this is the
email forward
On 9/4/17 10:21 PM, Raja Pullela wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
>
> Here are few requests from us at Accelerite. Request you to
> kindly accommodate these.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Raja
>
&g
: ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
Hi Ilya,
Here are couple of items, I would like to bring up.
Best,
Raja
Engineering, Accelerite
COMMUNITY WORK:
Regression Tests
There are a number of tests in the integration folder
which are not run. Need to group these together and start running
them.
Raja
omise you will have an opportunity to talk.
Sorry
-ilya
On 8/25/17 9:42 AM, Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi Ilya and everyone,
>
>
>
> Please find below our ShapeBlue submission. We shouldn’t have any items
> in our list that we need to bring particular attention to on the call,
> bu
Awesome work - thank you Rohit.
On 8/23/17 12:49 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
>
> No regression is seen in the smoke test run, however, I'll leave the PR open
> for some time to gather further feedback and reviews.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
>
> From: Rohit Yadav
>
ipate - please respond to this
thread and adhere to sample format below:
3) Community Efforts - 10+ minutes
Thanks
Hi Team
Proposed new date for first quarterly call
September 6th 2017, time 9AM PST.
This is a month out and hopefully can work with most folks. If it does
not work with your timing - please consider finding delegates and/or
representatives.
Regards
ilya
On 7/20/17 6:11 AM, Wido den Hollander
Welcome!
On 7/31/17 8:07 AM, Nicolas Vazquez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> My name is Nicolas Vazquez, today is my first day at @ShapeBlue as a Software
> Engineer. I am based in Montevideo, Uruguay and I've been working with
> CloudStack since mid-2015. Looking forward to working with you!
>
>
> T
The date conflict is noted - please provide range of alternative dates.
Thanks,
ilya
On 7/19/17 12:35 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote:
> I thought about that, but sometimes you can barely hear the person next to
> you there let alone on a phone. :-)
>
>> On Jul 19, 2017, at 1:28 P
sentences, identify interested parties and have them do a "post"
discussion on the mailing list.
Looking forward to your comments,
Regards,
ilya
sted in item #1, which is
quarterly meeting. The proposed time is 9am PST, August 17th.
I will help setting up the first few initial calls and be a moderator.
Looking forward to your comments
Regards
ilya
this position can be reached here:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darwinbpoveda/
Regards
ilya
Thanks, please keep us posted.
On 6/6/17 11:49 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Good work Sachin.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
>
> From: sachin patil
> Sent: 06 June 2017 09:58:27
> To: dev
> Subject: Weekly update on GSoC project - Adding new noVNC console
>
> Hello All,
>
>
Cool concept.
Basically - you are trying to do what we do with VmWare and XEN. We have
direct and indirect agent model.
CloudStack talks to VmWare vCenter directly for all of its operations
via indirect agent model.
Look into either VmWare or XEN as point of reference.
On 5/18/17 2:29 PM, Joh
displaytext=VM_TMPL_OL63-88 name=VM_TMPL_OL63-88
url=http://mydomain.com/ovas/ol-6.3-88.ova
Regards,
ilya
On 5/25/17 3:06 AM, Marc Poll Garcia wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> About the Cloudstack version upgrade, we've build it from sources, to
> create new self-compiled package 4
+1
On 4/10/17 9:22 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> In the Apache foundation an experiment has been going on to host
> mirrors of Apache project on github with more write access then just
> to the mirror-bot. For those projects committers can merge on github
> and put labels on PRs.
>
> I move to have
Nux
FYI - i had a simalar issue - the password was not set properly (or at
all). I tracked it down to VR problem on 4.5. with ubuntu images/
If possible, please enable static username password please if password
update via cloudstack fails.
Thanks
ilya
On 3/31/17 1:08 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Hm,
thru due to some intricacy with VMware and Cisco (or perhaps
Juniper) switch upstream. Solution was to console in to vRouter and ping
a host 2 hops aways. That would fix ARP issue (albeit temporary).
Let me know if it helps,
Regards
ilya
On 11/7/16 12:35 PM, Cloud List wrote:
> Hi Chiradeep
Hi Linas
Thank you for posting the solution, i've seen this issue in my lab env
as well.
Much appreciated.
Regards
ilya
On 10/26/16 4:44 AM, Linas Žilinskas wrote:
> So after some investigation I've found out that qemu 2.3.0 is indeed
> broken, at least the way CS uses the qem
John and Team
Thanks for amazing work and contributing back.
Regards,
ilya
On 10/3/16 9:48 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> A quick update on our progress to pass all smoke tests aka super green. We
> have reduced the failures and errors for XenServer from 93 to 9 and for
>
esign (VyOS 2.0), "we
>> are planning a clean rewrite that will solve issues of the current config
>> system".
>> This will include the ability to configure via the API.
>>
>> If we have more questions for VyOS, they are very friendly and responsive,
&
Hi folks, please kindly keep in mind the open source licensing when
choosing the next router. AGPL or GPL v3 are "no go" for many shops.
I could not find the license for Vyatta, i do know Vyatta dev folks were
open to working with ACS few years back, but somehow the initiative was
dropped.
On 9/
Hi Gust
Are you proposing solution "optimized CsAddress.py in VR" or just
analysis on where time is being spent?
Regards
ilya
On 8/18/16 9:34 PM, Gust wrote:
>
> Hi,all
>
> we constructed a advance network in cloudstack , it work fine early , but
> when I added some
g which tests should be ran.
Regards
ilya
On 8/4/16 10:19 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Yes, I agree with this.
>
> CVEs need to be handled in security@ and will be added to the branches
> manually once they have been agreed upon there, so no PRs are needed for
> them.
>
> I also
590)
Error Authentication failed
(lab1-ssl) > set verifysslcert false
(lab1-ssl) > list zones
Connection refused by server: [SSL: SSLV3_ALERT_HANDSHAKE_FAILURE] sslv3
alert handshake failure (_ssl.c:590)
Error Authentication failed
On 8/6/16 1:33 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
Who has the karma?
++ David Nalley
On 8/8/16 6:47 AM, Frank Maximus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to assign a jira issue I created to myself.
> Can my account *fmaximus* be added to the contributors list.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> *Frank Maximus *
>
> Senior Software Development Engineer
>
tication failed
regards
ilya
On 8/5/16 3:32 PM, ilya wrote:
> Has anyone tested Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2 with SSL?
>
> Somehow, in my case tomcat reverted back to SSL v3 on port 8443 - which
> is a big no-no.
>
> Please kindly check, alternatively if i dont hear from anyone i will
&g
Has anyone tested Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2 with SSL?
Somehow, in my case tomcat reverted back to SSL v3 on port 8443 - which
is a big no-no.
Please kindly check, alternatively if i dont hear from anyone i will
raise a blocker.
On 8/3/16 10:39 PM, ilya wrote:
> Hi Will and Team
>
> Ca
Hi Will and Team
Can someone point me to upgrade instructions if such exist.
Would like to avoid learning through trial and error if possible.
I will be testing upgrade and functionality of KVM & VMware Advanced
Shared Zones from ACS4.5.2 to latest.
Thanks
ilya
On 7/29/16 11:06 AM, ilya w
Hi Team
Curious if there are noredist RPM of ACS 4.9 RC2 readily available
somewhere i can use for testing..
Thanks
ilya
Hi Will
What Remi mentioned sounds reasonable..
I'll be spending sometime today and next week to test out the issue
reported in 4.8 with VR not starting in Basic Zone - as well latest 4.9..
i know i'm late to the party - but this is the best i could do :(
Regards,
ilya
On 7/29/
ow it's not totally the Cloudstack Dev team's fault that VM Snapshots
>> are missing from KVM support but I do think this is a list opportunity for
>> a big win if they did something about it.
>>
>> Just my 2 penneth on this subject that has plagued me on a
rewrite.
Regards
ilya
On 7/11/16 8:58 PM, Paul Shadwell wrote:
> This is a feature that has been missing from Cloudstack since the beginning
> when using KVM as the hypervisor.
> It's been asked for many times but still no support.
> This would be a huge plus for Cloudstack if
Just FYI:
You can ask on this list for sponsored feature development if this is
something that needs prompt resolution.
Regards
ilya
On 7/8/16 7:07 PM, 吕海蛟 wrote:
> Hi, Developers
>
>
>
> We deployed ACS+KVM+Ceph in our environment. Everything looks fine
> except the V
Paul,
Thanks for pushing hard on getting Trillian GA.
We've lately became vmware allergic :(
Hoping KVM would be on the roadmap soon.
Thanks
ilya
On 7/8/16 7:38 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
> I can answer this for you. No, it does not support KVM as the base
> hypervisor. This w
meone exploiting the cloud user ssh keys.
This is not a big deal to Cloud Hosting companies - but is a big deal to
enterprise security folks who run cloudstack as private cloud. We don't
want cloud user keys littered everywhere - not very ideal in terms of
security.
Regards
ilya
On 7/3/16 10
PID=$(cat /var/run/cloudstack-management.pid )
> ps -p $CSPID >/dev/null 2>&1 && (kill -9 $CSPID)
> ps -p $CSPID >/dev/null 2>&1 && (echo "ERROR: Count not
> terminame cloudstack service on `hostname` with pid $SCPID&q
VM cross cluster migration for KVM (which
should be much faster than LIVE).
We also would like to contribute the "secure" KVM migration feature.
Marcus has list of other things he has developed as plugins - that we
need to work on - contributing back to cloudstack.
Regards
ilya
On 7/
I agree and support John's comments below.
Regards
ilya
On 6/14/16 2:44 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> Completely agree with Daan. Per semantic versioning, a major revision
> increase must introduce a backwards incompatible change in the public API,
> removal of o
Hi Mikul
Welcome,
You can also convert your system to linux and run Windows as a VM :)
Then you can do nested KVMs and be fine.
Regards,
ilya
On 6/8/16 6:26 AM, Mukul Rajarshi wrote:
> Hello CloudStack team,
>
> My name is Mukul Rajarshi and I have joined Accelerite CloudPlatfor
Sounds like a bug fix to me.. Bug fixes should be allowed in my opinion.
On 6/7/16 4:07 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> Op 28 mei 2016 om 0:34 schreef Will Stevens :
>>
>>
>> Hey All,
>> I think I have done what I can do at this point. I am sorry if you have a
>> PR that you wanted to get in tha
Welcome!
On 5/31/16 7:07 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> welcome Adwait,
>
> Don't forget to try out the bubble:
> https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/bubble-toolkit !
> good luck and have fun
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
>> Welcome Adwait!
>>
>> 2016-05-30 10:54 GMT+0
ce to look for it.
Regards
ilya
On 5/3/16 5:36 AM, Linas Žilinskas wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I implemented a new API call for myself, which returns the VNC url for a VM.
> Currently i'm using some classes from the consoleproxy servlet package as
> well as copied some code ove
thanks Simon and congrats!
On 4/28/16 2:30 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
> Thanks everyone! I look forward to continuing to help out where I can as we
> march towards 4.9.
>
> - Si
>
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 4:20 PM
> To: dev@cl
committer with valid @apache.org email, you can get
access to JetBrains products free of charge (assuming products will be
used to better open source project within ASF umbrella).
Follow this link to request your license:
https://www.jetbrains.com/shop/eform/apache?product=I
Regards
ilya
.
Please do post slides and talk somewhere, load testing would be on my
agenda later this year..
Thanks,
ilya
On 4/19/16 6:20 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I will go to a talk this evening about http://gatling.io/ Is there anybody
> busy testing cloudstack this way? What tools are you
Hi Will
Thanks for the detailed update and effort.
Please keep us posted.
Regards
ilya
On 4/18/16 1:48 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> ACS PRs
>
>- 1452 - master (ready, pending LGTM)
>- 1475 - 4.7 (pending clarification)
>- 1420 - master + svm (CI running)
>- 1
Awesome and long awaited
On 4/14/16 4:40 AM, Jeff Hair wrote:
> Yesterday, we submitted this pull request:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1492
>
> This originally grew out of making the VirtualMachineName class non-static
> (original PR is mentioned in the above link). We're pr
raffic from VR
link local address - we should be ok. I guess i need to double check on
this.
Regards
ilya
On 4/10/16 1:26 PM, Kris Sterckx wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
> Thanks for reviewing the FS. Based on the received comments I clarified
> further in the FS that the Vpc Inline LB
Welcome Rashmi!
On 4/7/16 9:58 PM, Rashmi Dixit wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am Rashmi Dixit and have recently joined the CloudPlatform team in
> Accelerite. I have worked on a hybrid cloud management solution supporting
> hypervisors such as KVM, Xen, VMware, HyperV and public clouds such as EC2.
>
al *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:11 AM, ilya wrote:
>
>> Thanks for explanation Ian and Will.
>>
>> Much appreciated.
>>
>> On 4/5/16 8:33 PM, Ian Rae wrote:
>>> I don't believe t
hould be able to run it against ACS, so you should be able to try it
>> out...
>>
>> It is a pretty useful tool to be honest. Especially if you are
>> troubleshooting an environment you didn't setup.
>>
>> *Will STEVENS*
>> Lead Developer
>>
&g
Saw ACP Doctor in CCP release notes from Accelerite.
Curious what it is, is it integrated into cloudstack or collection of
shell scripts?
Thanks
ilya
from remote repository.
On 3/29/16 4:48 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Ilya, to my knowledge the certificate won't be saved on file. It will be
> loaded from the command coming from the MS in the agent directly. Why are
> you looking to update the ssvm? I thought these are only used in
Hi Boris
Welcome!
On 3/28/16 5:21 AM, Boris Stoyanov wrote:
> Hi CloudStack,
>
> My name is Boris Stoyanov (Bobby) and today is my first day @ShapeBlue. I’m
> based in Sofia, Bulgaria. I will be taking the role of Software Engineer in
> Test, and as you may have guessed I’ll mostly focus on t
icy. It will be impossible for me to get a
wildcard cert.
Regards
ilya
Raja
Would you know if cloud.com domain will be transferred to accelerite?
Regards
ilya
On 3/24/16 5:38 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>> Op 24 maart 2016 om 13:33 schreef Raja Pullela :
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Citrix has been hosting "download.cloud.
only make it talk to CloudStack MS on specific ports.
This approach should preserve the internal compliance and wont raise any
red flags.
Perhaps reach out to a client who requested this feature and ask what
they think, maybe they have not thought this through.
Regards
ilya
PS: If we were to
Welcome back Murali!
On 3/23/16 4:50 AM, Murali Reddy wrote:
> All,
>
> Just wanted to let the community know that I have decided to work on Apache
> CloudStack again. I have taken up a position at ShapeBlue, so you will be
> seeing me around @dev and @users. For the new members of the communit
Hi Folks,
What can we do about PR backlog in GitHub? As we all know, it will be
very difficult to merge the changes - as things will get out of sync.
Feedback is welcome,
Thanks,
ilya
+1 Binding.
I dont see anything wrong with this approach especially if it helps to
solve our backlog issue.
On 3/18/16 3:44 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> We are discussing this proposal in 3 or 4 threads, so I will not try to
> recap everything. Instead I will try to give a brief overview of the
> p
Will, Samir, Koushik and Patrick,
Thanks for your commitment and energy.
Regards
ilya
On 3/2/16 11:43 AM, Samir Agarwal wrote:
> Kudos Will!
>
> I had received many private notes wondering if Accelerite will continue to
> play a strong role in contributions to the community;
I could not get LDAP to work as well in 4.5.x, i could get it to work in 4.3
I also get no stacktrace as to what could be wrong.
On 3/3/16 4:53 AM, Rene Moser wrote:
> We are experiencing authentication issues with LDAP since upgrade to 4.5.1.
>
> After some time (...), users can not authentic
so it would be nice to have a
support for it.
Thanks
ilya
On 3/4/16 6:56 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Yes, I have most of it already built and will be releasing it later today
> or over the weekend. The reason I chose Golang is because it can be cross
> compiled to be run on any system and
one.
It could be as simple as configuration setting for zone or cluster.
thanks
ilya
On 3/4/16 1:20 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>
> ShapeBlue <http://www.shapeblue.com>
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>
> d:* | s: +44 203 603 0540*
> |m:
Bharat,
Hope all is well,
Perhaps you can explain the workflow and extensiveness of your tests.
Thanks
ilya
On 2/24/16 9:23 PM, Bharat Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As all of you know from earlier discussions in the community, we have been
> working on implementing a CI to test gi
There is no good reason i am aware of.
CloudStack was designed under a premise it will be ran by Cloud hosting
and not enterprise. Hence there was not much emphasis on cloudstack
instance name VS display name.
With that said, down the road a feature has been added only to VMware to
enable display
1 - 100 of 594 matches
Mail list logo
