Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

org> From: Kristian Liivak <k...@wavecom.ee> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 4:19:03 PM To: users Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 Hello, I have created issue in jira 2 month ago. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10141 In

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

inal Message - From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> To: "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 1:49:04 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 Krist

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

el: +3726850001 > Gsm: +37256850001 > E-mail: k...@wavecom.ee > Skype: kristian.liivak > http://www.wavecom.ee > http://www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee > > - Original Message - > From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > To: "users" &

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

I suggest you discuss it on the vote thread for RC1 Kristian. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Kristian Liivak wrote: > > This fix is only for smaller part of password management.. > Is´t possible that someone have look VR password distribution with > instance creation ? --

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

​Kristian, ​ On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Kristian Liivak wrote: >> > ​... ​ ​As for this one:​ > Also there is major security hole. When instance is destroyd and expunged >> > and new instance is created with old IP all old data is unaffected in VR >> > New instance

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

m.ee > Skype: kristian.liivak > http://www.wavecom.ee > http://www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee > > - Original Message - > From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > To: "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: "dev" <dev@

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

it.ya...@shapeblue.com> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 8:41:15 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 > > All, > > > To give you update, all feature PRs have been

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

com> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 3:23:40 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 I’m investigating these now. I have found and fixed two of them so far. rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSU

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

- Rohit >> >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > Apache CloudStack: Open Source Cloud Computing<https://cloudstack.apache.org/> > cloudstack.apache.org > CloudStack is open source cloud computing software for creating, managing, > and deploying infrastructure cloud servi

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

rce cloud computing software for creating, managing, and deploying infrastructure cloud services > > > > ________ > From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:17:26 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > S

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

4.11 milestone, however, due to it lacking a JIRA id > and > > no response from the author it was only recently removed from the > milestone. > > > > > > Please advise if I need to revert this, or we can review/lgtm it > > post-merge? I'll also ping on the abov

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

cently removed from the milestone. > > > Please advise if I need to revert this, or we can review/lgtm it > post-merge? I'll also ping on the above PR. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ____ > From: Wido

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

der <w...@widodh.nl> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:17:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 On 01/10/2018 07:26 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I hope we understand each other correctly: No-one running an earlier > version then 4.11 shou

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

On 01/10/2018 07:26 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: I hope we understand each other correctly: No-one running an earlier version then 4.11 should miss out on any functionality they are using now. So if you use ipv6 and multiple cidrs now it must continue to work with no loss of functionality. see my

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

I hope we understand each other correctly: No-one running an earlier version then 4.11 should miss out on any functionality they are using now. So if you use ipv6 and multiple cidrs now it must continue to work with no loss of functionality. see my question below. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:06

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

gt; >>> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:50:22 PM >>> To: dev >>> Cc: Rohit Yadav >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 >>> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

kers, database path, >>> packaging and systemvmtemplate related etc. >>> >>> >>> Thoughts, objections? >>> >>> >>> Awesome! >>> >>> I'm looking for the definition for a blocker, I recently found this one: >>> https://github.com/a

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

t;daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:50:22 PM >> To: dev >> Cc: Rohit Yadav >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 >> >> I think that we agreed in th3 past that a blocker is either something >> that pre

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

dev > Cc: Rohit Yadav > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 > > I think that we agreed in th3 past that a blocker is either something that > prevents ACS to start or upgrade, or something that breaks prior > functionality. > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.s

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com<mailto:kmooss...@cloudops.com>> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 8:59:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 +1 Daan and Rohit Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infras

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

PR I didn't add the 4.11 milestone. > > Looking forward to 4.11! > > > Wido > > >> - Rohit >> >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >> >> >> >> >> From: Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

0 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 +1 Daan and Rohit Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infrastructure Developer t 514.447.3456 <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Yes let’s d

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

> > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > From: Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com> > Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 8:59:30 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezin

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

tps://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 8:59:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 +1 Daan and Rohit Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infrastructure Developer t

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

t; > > Yes, it does! When the first RC comes out we should be able to run > tests, fix what's broken and focus in the release and 4.12 afterwards. > > > > Wido > > > >> - Rohit > >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > >> ___

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

nks. > > Yes, it does! When the first RC comes out we should be able to run tests, fix > what's broken and focus in the release and 4.12 afterwards. > > Wido > >> - Rohit >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >> ____ >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

8 4:21:00 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 slow display of arrogance in reacting this time ; yeeaahhh On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote: You again faster than me ))) 2018-01-08 12:21 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Ig

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

On 01/08/2018 01:30 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Does this look agreeable? Thanks. +1

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

> - We'll re-assess the list again by EOD, Wed 10 Jan 2018. > > > Does this look agreeable? Thanks. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

org> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 4:21:00 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 slow display of arrogance in reacting this time ; yeeaahhh On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < igor.volosha

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

slow display of arrogance in reacting this time ; yeeaahhh On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote: > You again faster than me ))) > > 2018-01-08 12:21 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor >: > > > :D tnx ) > > Updated by my

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

You again faster than me ))) 2018-01-08 12:21 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor : > :D tnx ) > Updated by my colleague already > > 2018-01-08 12:06 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland : > >> yeah, way ahead of you Igor ;) I asked a question about it >> >> On

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

:D tnx ) Updated by my colleague already 2018-01-08 12:06 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland : > yeah, way ahead of you Igor ;) I asked a question about it > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < > igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Updates posted to

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

yeah, way ahead of you Igor ;) I asked a question about it On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote: > Updates posted to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2389 > Can you please review? > > 2018-01-08 11:57 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Updates posted to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2389 Can you please review? 2018-01-08 11:57 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor : > Sure. Got it. > > Will post update soon > > 2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland : > >> Igor, I

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Hi Rohit +1 We will work hard to address recent comments posted to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2097 for generalized Config Drive support and hope to get that into 4.11 ! Kris On 8 January 2018 at 08:47, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > > As per the

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

On 01/08/2018 09:47 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: Rohit, Ivan, I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can still go in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at Ivan's PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively working on it so

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Sure. Got it. Will post update soon 2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland : > Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be argued that > it needs to go in as a security feature. For an RM it is unthinkably late, > but fortunately it is very small. I

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

On 01/08/2018 09:47 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Rohit, Ivan, > > I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can still go > in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at Ivan's > PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively > working on

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be argued that it needs to go in as a security feature. For an RM it is unthinkably late, but fortunately it is very small. I will however -1 it if it leads to a plethora of last minute PRs to include. On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:33 AM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Guys, can we please include https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2389 into 4.11 PR very small and updates will be published in next few hours. As we have this for a while in production for 4.8 branch. 2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov : > +1 Daan > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

+1 Daan boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 8 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > Rohit, Ivan, > > I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can still go

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Rohit, Ivan, I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can still go in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at Ivan's PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively working on it so why not include those in the milestone. A bigger

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Rohit, Devs, just consider adding: CLOUDSTACK-10188 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2362 [resouce accounting blocker bug] CLOUDSTACK-10170 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2350 [security fix, enchancement] They are ready (we think so) for some time, but *no final review*

[DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

All, As per the previously shared schedule [1], by EOD today (8 Jan 2018) we would freeze master after which we'll only accept critical/blocker fixes, stabilize master and start a voting thread on 4.11 RC1 (est. by 15 Jan 2018). I wanted to gather consensus if this is acceptable to everyone