[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2016-01-16 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2016-01-16 Thread wilderrodrigues
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#issuecomment-172181356 Ping @remibergsma LGTM, please proceed with merge. Cheers, Wilder --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2016-01-12 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#issuecomment-170902066 tested on a two kvm, as in the bubble, setup: ``` # less /tmp/MarvinLogs/test_vpc_vpn_Q1BTHP/results.txt Test Site 2 Site VPN Across redundant VPCs .

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2016-01-12 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#issuecomment-170863132 ping @sanju1010 @wido @terbolous --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2016-01-11 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#issuecomment-170636254 ping @DaanHoogland --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2016-01-11 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#issuecomment-170543474 just ran the test again after adding the validateList method: command: ``` osetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=/data/shared/marvin/mct-zo

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2016-01-11 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r49317967 --- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py --- @@ -494,9 +526,411 @@ def create_natrule(self, vpc, vm, public_port, private_port, public_ip

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2016-01-07 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r49099622 --- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py --- @@ -494,9 +526,411 @@ def create_natrule(self, vpc, vm, public_port, private_port, public_ip

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-27 Thread sanju1010
Github user sanju1010 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r48463624 --- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py --- @@ -494,9 +526,411 @@ def create_natrule(self, vpc, vm, public_port, private_port, public_ip, netw

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-27 Thread sanju1010
Github user sanju1010 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r48463596 --- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py --- @@ -494,9 +526,411 @@ def create_natrule(self, vpc, vm, public_port, private_port, public_ip, netw

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-27 Thread sanju1010
Github user sanju1010 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r48463512 --- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py --- @@ -494,9 +526,411 @@ def create_natrule(self, vpc, vm, public_port, private_port, public_ip, netw

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-23 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r48382355 --- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py --- @@ -468,7 +500,7 @@ def get_ssh_client(self, virtual_machine, services, retries):

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-23 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r48350750 --- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py --- @@ -468,7 +500,7 @@ def get_ssh_client(self, virtual_machine, services, retries):

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-22 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#issuecomment-166714201 As for: > Is there a timing issue possible where both routers would be in the same state? If so, it might be good to > throw an exception before doi

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-22 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r48290122 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java --- @@ -916,6 +916,9 @@ protected void updateSite2SiteVpnCo

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-22 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r48288107 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java --- @@ -916,6 +916,9 @@ protected void updateSite2SiteVpnCo

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-22 Thread michaelandersen
Github user michaelandersen commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r48286045 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java --- @@ -916,6 +916,9 @@ protected void updateSite2SiteVpnCo

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-22 Thread pdube
Github user pdube commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#discussion_r48278591 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java --- @@ -916,6 +916,9 @@ protected void updateSite2SiteVpnConnectionSt

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-22 Thread pdube
Github user pdube commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#issuecomment-166675193 Good to see additional tests created. I would suggest adding a test that turns one of the routers off, and then seeing if the VPN connection works correctly. I quickl

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-22 Thread wilderrodrigues
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#issuecomment-18278 Did a code review on this PR and also talked to @michaelandersen on Slack about switching the MASTER router off. With the changes he applied on the Java fil

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] FIX Site2SiteVPN on redundant VPC

2015-12-22 Thread wilderrodrigues
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1276#issuecomment-17779 Jenkins error is not related: ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/5129209/11960321/6ed3c73e-a8d2-11e5-8b28-b90e81c79914.png) ---