Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

Thank you Mike, Wido, Kris, Boris, Daan and Milamber for voting. I will send a results mail and will soon publish the release. ~Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Milamber wrote: > Hello > > +1 (binding) > > - Tested building .deb

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

Hello +1 (binding) - Tested building .deb packages - Tested deployment with advanced network Ubuntu 16.04/KVM/NFS Milamber On 03/07/2017 05:52, Rajani Karuturi wrote: Hi All, I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

we need another binding vote and I know Boris way of working. I don't have time to test myself but given Boris vote I +1 (binding) On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Boris Stoyanov wrote: > +1 > > I’ve did upgrade testing with VMWare 5.5u3, advanced zone running on

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

+1 I’ve did upgrade testing with VMWare 5.5u3, advanced zone running on CentOS 6.8 from: 4.5 -> 4.10 rc7 4.6 -> 4.10 rc7 4.9 -> 4.10 rc7 All went smooth VRs got updated to the latests version and was able to add new VMs to them. Thanks, Boris Stoyanov boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

+1 from Nuage ! Thanks Kris On 5 July 2017 at 15:11, Wido den Hollander wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Tested building DEB packages > - Tested deployment with Basic Networking on Ubuntu 16.04 > - Tested IPv6 integration in Basic Networking > > > Op 3 juli 2017 om 6:52 schreef

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

+1 (binding) - Tested building DEB packages - Tested deployment with Basic Networking on Ubuntu 16.04 - Tested IPv6 integration in Basic Networking > Op 3 juli 2017 om 6:52 schreef Rajani Karuturi : > > > Hi All, > > I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

I will test today > Op 5 jul. 2017 om 07:13 heeft Tutkowski, Mike het > volgende geschreven: > > For the sake of clarity, I should say +1 (binding). > >> On Jul 4, 2017, at 11:07 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: >> >> Thanks Mike. >> >> Is anyone

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

For the sake of clarity, I should say +1 (binding). > On Jul 4, 2017, at 11:07 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > Thanks Mike. > > Is anyone else testing? We need atleast 3 binding votes to create > the Release. > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

Thanks Mike. Is anyone else testing? We need atleast 3 binding votes to create the Release. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On July 3, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: +1 I examined the changes for this RC when compared to the

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

+1 I examined the changes for this RC when compared to the previous one and my positive vote remains. > On Jul 2, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

Yes Mike. Will create new RC an publish in few hours. ~Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > Hi Rajani, > > Just checking: Was it your intention to create a new RC on Monday? > > Thanks! > Mike > > On

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

Hi Rajani, Just checking: Was it your intention to create a new RC on Monday? Thanks! Mike On 6/28/17, 3:28 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: Thanks for confirming. I will keep this RC open for two more days for others to test before next RC. Agree on merging

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

Thanks for confirming. I will keep this RC open for two more days for others to test before next RC. Agree on merging PRs part. That is our release principle in general. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On June 28, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Kris Sterckx (kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

Hi Rajani, Yes we qualified that fix. Can anyone else pls also confirm. To be very clear - this is a generic issue (with native VR based ACS), not tight to Nuage at all. We should not take in new PR's when we move from RC to RC to my view - this way always new issues will pop up. Best, Kris

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

gt; > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com ) > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > -Original Message- > From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org] > Sent: 28 June 2017 07:45 > To: dev@

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

-Original Message- From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org] Sent: 28 June 2017 07:45 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3 Paul, Which shows we are not actively following RCs. That PR was a blocker for RC3 and was well discussed. That PR

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3 I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve discussed in the past is that overall community participation in the RC process has dropped off when such a new branch is created (since the community as

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

@shapeblue -Original Message- From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org] Sent: 28 June 2017 07:45 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3 Paul, Which shows we are not actively following RCs. That PR was a blocker for RC3 and was well discussed

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

and the next >> one can get >> going. If 4.10 had gone out in a timely fashion, then we'd >> probably be on >> 4.11 if not 4.12 by now, with all the new features AND all the >> new fixes in. >> >> People sliding new changes/bug fixes/enhancements in are not

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

[mailto:raj...@apache.org] Sent: 28 June 2017 06:14 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3 We can do a release every month as long as we have enough people actively participating in the release process. We have people who wants to have their code/features checked

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

lue.com > www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com ) > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > -Original Message- > From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com] > Sent: 27 June 2017 01:25 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org &g

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

iginal Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com] Sent: 27 June 2017 01:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3 I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve discussed

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

ski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com] Sent: 27 June 2017 01:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3 I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve discussed in the past is that overall communit

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

Hi Kris, Can you please apply 2162 locally and see if you are OK with the changes? We shouldn't be spending one RC cycle for one issue. Ideally, we should have more CIs running on PRs from different usage perspectives(like managed storage, nuage, basic network, local storage, etc.). That would

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

.shapeblue.com >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >> >> -Original Message----- >> From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com] >> Sent: 27 June 2017 01:25 >> To: dev@cloud

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com] > Sent: 27 June 2017 01:25 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3 > > I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve discussed &

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

Hi all, I 'm sorry for voting -1 again. Issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9980 Caused by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089 Fixed by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2162 Kris - Nuage Networks On 26 June 2017 at 18:58, Tutkowski, Mike

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Cc: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3 I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve discussed in the past is that overall community participation in the RC process has dropped off when such a new branch is created

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve discussed in the past is that overall community participation in the RC process has dropped off when such a new branch is created (since the community as a whole tends to focus more on the new branch rather than on testing the RC

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

+1 (binding) I am not concerned about the code changes that went into this RC since the previous RC, so I am still happy with the amount of automated and manual testing that I performed on a previous RC. On 6/25/17, 11:07 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: Hi All,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

Agree. Will create rc6 soon. ~Rajani Sent from phone. On 23 Jun 2017 3:17 p.m., "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > > > Op 22 juni 2017 om 21:38 schreef Kris Sterckx < > kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net>: > > > > > > Sorry , i meant PR/2084

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

> Op 22 juni 2017 om 21:38 schreef Kris Sterckx > : > > > Sorry , i meant PR/2084 > Ok, so revert and RC6 then? Wido > On 22 June 2017 at 21:25, Kris Sterckx > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

Sorry , i meant PR/2084 On 22 June 2017 at 21:25, Kris Sterckx wrote: > Hi all > > > Thanks to Daan for driving the work at PR/2155 > , but i believe it needs >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

Hi all Thanks to Daan for driving the work at PR/2155 , but i believe it needs more soak time. We found today this PR is breaking VR-provided Guest DNS for SDN providers also. As Daan also suggested, i would recommend taking it out 4.10 and give

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

Hi Wido, Daan, all We have just pushed a workaround https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2155 This works for us. The CsPassword class seems like not needed at all ? The important part for us is that iptables_change = True is set also in case of password handling. That was missing.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

It was an optimization that got merged and if someone is hindered we should back out and proceed, I’d say. On 21/06/17 16:00, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > Op 20 juni 2017 om 21:35 schreef Kris Sterckx : > > > I am sorry,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

> Op 20 juni 2017 om 21:35 schreef Kris Sterckx > : > > > I am sorry, I need to vote -1 :( Anybody else have an idea on how to proceed? We keep having issues popping up with 4.10 This should be fixable right for 4.10? We have so many work piling up for 4.11

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5 I am sorry, I need to vote -1 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2084 is causing password reset issues for us (Nuage) (i know in native tests pass though...). We are trying to provide a fix but the following modified VR script is having severe issues : https

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

I am sorry, I need to vote -1 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2084 is causing password reset issues for us (Nuage) (i know in native tests pass though...). We are trying to provide a fix but the following modified VR script is having severe issues :

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

I should also point out that I performed my tests on a fresh system (I did not upgrade from a prior system). On 6/20/17, 9:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: +1 (binding) I ran all of the managed-storage automated regression tests against the prior RC. The

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

Hello, I've tested this version on Ubuntu 16.04 / KVM with xenial deb packages (generated with docker build). 1/ One (major?) issue : On the management node, the cloudstack-management service don't start correctly. The error message from systemctl/jsvc is: jsvc.exec[9299]: 2017-06-20

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

+1 (binding) I ran all of the managed-storage automated regression tests against the prior RC. The results can be located here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2141. As noted in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2150, I submitted fixes to resolve two issues I had discovered.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

FYI: I located what was going on with VMware + managed storage. It looks like there was a feature that went in (at some point…not sure when) that added the ability to resize a root disk (so it doesn’t have to be the same size as the template it uses) when spinning up a VM. That code triggered

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

this is why i say we should branch on first RC, fix in release branch only and merge forward On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I know it is hard to justify not merging PRs that seem ready but are not > blockers in an RC, but it is a vicious circle

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

I know it is hard to justify not merging PRs that seem ready but are not blockers in an RC, but it is a vicious circle which ultimately results in a longer RC process. It is something i struggled with as a release manager as well. On Jun 13, 2017 1:56 AM, "Rajani Karuturi"

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Thanks Mike, Will hold off next RC until we hear an update from you. Regarding merging non-blockers, unfortunately, its a side-effect of taking more than three months in the RC phase :( Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On June 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Tutkowski, Mike

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Hi everyone, I had a little time this evening and re-ran some VMware-related tests around managed storage. I noticed a problem that I’d like to investigate before we spin up the next RC. Let’s hold off on the next RC until I can find out more (I should know more within 24 hours). Thanks! Mike

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

> Op 10 juni 2017 om 21:18 schreef "Tutkowski, Mike" > : > > > Hi, > > I opened a PR against the most recent RC: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2141 > > I ran all managed-storage regression tests against it and they pass (as noted > in detail in the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Hi, I opened a PR against the most recent RC: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2141 I ran all managed-storage regression tests against it and they pass (as noted in detail in the PR). If someone wants to take this code and create a new RC from it, I’m +1 on the new RC as long as

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Hi everyone, I found a critical issue that was introduced into this RC since the most recent RC, so I am -1 on this RC. The fix for this ticket breaks the support for storing volume snapshots on primary storage (which is a feature managed storage can support):

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Yup. thats right. I dont know how it happened but, it created from the previous RC commit. The script is supposed to do a git pull. I didn't notice any failures. Not sure what went wrong. Thanks for finding it mike. I am creating RC4 now and cancelling this. ~ Rajani

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Hi Rajani, I don’t see the following PR in this RC: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098 I ran all of my managed-storage regression tests. They all passed with the exception of the one that led to PR 2098. As I examine the RC in a bit more detail, it sits on top of ed2f573, but I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

t; >> >> Regards. >> >> >> From: Rajani K <rjnk...@gmail.com> >> Sent: 18 May 2017 15:50:56 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

help over those pending PRs. Regards. From: Rajani K <rjnk...@gmail.com> Sent: 18 May 2017 15:50:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2 These are the pending PRs for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Thanks Rajani, I'll try to help over those pending PRs. Regards. From: Rajani K <rjnk...@gmail.com> Sent: 18 May 2017 15:50:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

blocking the 4.10.0.0 release? Regards. From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: 12 May 2017 01:53:44 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2 Hi Rajani, I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

do den Hollander Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2 Hi Rajani, I opened the following PR (against master) to fix the blocker CLOUDSTACK-9917: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098 Thanks! Mike On 5/10/17, 10:40 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org&

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi Rajani, I opened the following PR (against master) to fix the blocker CLOUDSTACK-9917: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098 Thanks! Mike On 5/10/17, 10:40 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: Thanks for testing Mike. RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR Any

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

11 May 2017 10:10:35 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2 Thanks for testing Mike. RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR Any other additions? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi, I went ahead and opened the following PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2096 Talk to you later! Mike On May 10, 2017, at 9:26 PM, Tutkowski, Mike > wrote: Hi, I analyzed the problematic PR and fixed the issue this

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Today I am working on this PR. Hopefully I will complete it. Yesterday fixed test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true, test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false. Today working on RVR related tests. Thanks, Jayapal On May 11, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Will Stevens

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Is 1866 ready? It looks like CI is failing on a lot of relevant network tests. On May 11, 2017 12:48 AM, "Jayapal Uradi" wrote: Hi Rajani, Also please include the PR#1866. Thanks, Jayapal > On May 11, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Rajani Karuturi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi Rajani, Also please include the PR#1866. Thanks, Jayapal > On May 11, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > Thanks for testing Mike. > > RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR > > Any other additions? > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On May 10, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Thanks for testing Mike. RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR Any other additions? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: I've been running regression tests against the release candidate. So far, all tests but one

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi, I analyzed the problematic PR and fixed the issue this way: https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/cloudstack/commit/c463057c82656a4d7564fc9205bb79517317c629 If a couple people could take a look at this code and see what you think, I can create a PR against the RC and we can make use of this

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

OK, here’s the gist of the problem: In StorageManagerImpl.cleanupStorage(boolean), the following line in 4.9 List vols = _volsDao.listVolumesToBeDestroyed(new Date(System.currentTimeMillis() - ((long) StorageCleanupDelay.value() << 10))); was changed to the following in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

I've been running regression tests against the release candidate. So far, all tests but one have passed. The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before creating RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it. If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections, we can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On May

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

> Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens : > > > Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only with basic > networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes noticeable when > you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement? Well, the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only with basic networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes noticeable when you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement? On May 9, 2017 5:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > +0 > > I don't want to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

+0 I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bug we are facing, but for us 4.10 would be a problem due to the VR performance. A PR is open for this, but I also don't want to delay 4.10 any longer: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089 Technically the VR works, it is just that deployment is

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

; Sent: 20 April 2017 12:27:48 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 I rebased that last one. I don’t think this is still a blocker. On 19/04/17 12:39, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote: CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

> Rajani, >> > >> > >> > Can you please review and merge >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to >> http://download.cloud.com< >> > http://download.cloud.com/>: https://github.com/apache/ >> > cloudstack/p

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

____ > > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> > > Sent: 20 April 2017 12:27:48 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 > > > > I rebased that last one. I don’t think this is s

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

; cloudstack/pull/1582 > > > Regards. > > > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: 20 April 2017 12:27:48 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 > > I rebased that last

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

gt; Sent: 20 April 2017 12:27:48 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 I rebased that last one. I don’t think this is still a blocker. On 19/04/17 12:39, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote: CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove ru

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

I rebased that last one. I don’t think this is still a blocker. On 19/04/17 12:39, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com Thanks, ~Rajani daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

; > > you take a look? >>> > > > >>> > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" >>> > <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > This does seem messed up. >>> > > > &g

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

t;>> > > > >>> > > > It looks like we have a new table: >>> cloud.storage_pool_tags. >>> > > > >>> > > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the >>> >

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

; > > > >> > > > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to >> examine >> > it >> > > a bit more before doing so. >> > > > >> > > > On 3/

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

e? > > > >> > > > >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I seem to hav

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

l our >> > upgrade process >> > > move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to >> > storage_pool_tags? >> > > > >> > > > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to >> examine >

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy < > > > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state? > > > >> > > > >

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and > test > > >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few > more > > >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday) > > &g

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

ruturi ( > raj...@apache.org) > >> wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my > >> previous mail. > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudpl

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy < > > > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state? > > > >> > > > >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, M

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822 > > >> > > >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >> > > >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and > test > > >

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

> >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > >> > >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi ( > raj...@apache.org) > >> wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my > >> previous mail. &g

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my > >> previous mail. > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > >

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

s, and from 4.9 upgrade to 4.10 does no > >> check/enforcement that 4.10 based systemvmtemplate has been > >> seeded/registered, nor the minimum required systemvmtemplate > >> version is changed from 4.6.0 to 4.10.0. > >> > >&g

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

day) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > >> > >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi ( > raj...@apache.org) > >> wrote: > >> > >> I will c

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

> raj...@apache.org) > >> wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my > >> previous mail. > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.acce

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

g) > >> wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my > >> previous mail. > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > >> >

Re: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

lets get to the blockers first. ~Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com> wrote: > Hi, Karuturi > > > These PRs below seems ready to be merged too. > > > #1883, CLOUDSTACK-9723: Enable unique mac address across the zones >

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

1866 - failed BVT results(may not be related. But, needs to be checked. Also, jenkins and travis failed) 1967 - no test results rest merged. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 4, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Haijiao (18602198...@163.com) wrote:

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi ( > raj...@apache.org) > >> wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my > >> previous mail. > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

ers. Waiting for reviews and > test > > >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few > more > > >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday) > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > &g

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

; >> wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my > >> previous mail. > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > >> > >> O

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

; >> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> > wrote: >> >> >> >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and > test >> >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few > more &g

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

t; >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > >> > >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi ( > raj...@apache.org) > >> wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my > >> previous mail. > >> &

  1   2   >