Hi Brian,
I agree with Edison on usage of grunt using maven-exec to call grunt.
Will wait for your repository that has your experiments.
I believe setting up the Maven tasks will be a one-time setting should
work without issues.
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
On
Please validate and close the following as release is getting closed now
Reporter Total
Abhinandan Prateek 2
Ahmad Emneina 2
Alena Prokharchyk 12
angeline shen5
Anthony Xu4
Ashutosk Kelkar 1
Bharat Kumar12
Brian Angus1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14197/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4696
Daan,
The info you provided is useful.
We are verifying the steps, once done will update the systemvm scripts.
On 17/09/13 6:03 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Abhinandan,
What we have seen so far is that two files in the xe-guest-utilities
package are missing, where CS
We can provide a way to disable the api.log ?
On 18/09/13 11:27 am, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
If anybody got access to the api.log using the session details we can do
execute api's and cause harm.
But the api.log is present in the mgmt server and if anybody got access
to
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:18 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!
If it is fine with community I am willing to take up 4.2.1 maintenance
Community,
And especially our friends at Citrix, i am willing but am kind of a
dictator in this role. Im an experienced developper but not in such a big
oss project. I know i havey style and obsessions that some of you might not
like. A fixation on automated tests os one that i know is likely to
Hi all,
Is there a way to hibernate a running VM in CloudStack with the REST API? I
know I can deploy/start/stop/destroy it but I couldn't find a way of
hibernating it.
By hibernate I mean - releasing the resources that the VM uses while
preserving it's state (like SLEEP in Windows). In other
Thanks to my colleague Joris,
I can update the scripts in the sytemvm.iso but the real question is
about copy rights. Xenserver is gpl these days isn't it. Can we
redistribute them? any legal advice. The alternative is maintaining a
nonoss systemvm.iso and maybe template.
regards,
Daan
On Wed,
There is no api to suspend/hibernate the VM.
I think the reason it's not implemented is some Hypervisors might support
suspend and some might not. Some hypervisors execute suspend/pause/hibernate
only if the guest tools are installed.
You can create jira ticket for it and please feel free to
Disabling api log might not be a good idea, instead while logging the request
remove the sensitive details (session details, passwords etc ) and dump it.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September
So, there are no guest tools or plugins I can take advantage of. It seems
that I'll need to implementing from scratch.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Rajesh Battala
rajesh.batt...@citrix.comwrote:
There is no api to suspend/hibernate the VM.
I think the reason it's not implemented is some
h Nguyen,
It looks allright but I cannot judge this code without seeing it work. I
hope Hugo or Sebastien can approve it.
regards,
Daan
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, I made an update patch, which aim to remove commented code and
old files.
Thanks Dave,
I still had the google docs in the proxy and it has the same id, now
both the new and the old are in our cache.
regards,
Daan
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Daan,
Yes, that's the right location. For example, the client jar file is at:
Good to hear!
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Dave,
I still had the google docs in the proxy and it has the same id, now
both the new and the old are in our cache.
regards,
Daan
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Dave Cahill
Sudha,
No one has picked up CLOUDSTACK-4624
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4624) which is a blocker for
anyone using security groups in advanced zones.
Regards,
Paul Angus
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14199/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
sounds great Darren,
By component, you mean maven project or some larger chunk like
distribution package? (did i miss this definition somewhere or do we
define the components now?)
regards,
Daan
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently ACS
Thanks for reminding about this one. I have changed priority and target version
so it would show up in proper queries to be picked up by community members
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 3:45 AM
Darren,
I had a quick look at your four submissions, Is there no dependency
between them? if so, can you add those to the review requests?
thanks,
Daan
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
sounds great Darren,
By component, you mean maven project or
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14200/
---
Review request for cloudstack and sailaja mada.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4686
Hey all,
Sorry for the threadomancy, but the discussion have become relevant again with
the current issues with the libvirt library. Of course this could also be
solved by updating the libvirt library with a jdk6 version. Still it might be
good to revisit this topic.
It appears not to be
I would like to raise for discussion the idea of adding a couple methods to the
Storage Subsystem API interface. Currently, takeSnapshot() and revertSnapshot()
only support single VM volumes. We have a use case for snapshotting multiple VM
volumes at the same time. For us, it is more efficient
I remember seeing/hearing some discussion about removing the
cloud-plugin-netapp component since it is not used or really managed any more.
Is this still in the works? One of the dependencies (manageontap.jar) will
conflict with one of the dependencies of our (in development) plugin. The
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:53:18AM +0530, Amit Das wrote:
Hi Brian,
I agree with Edison on usage of grunt using maven-exec to call grunt.
Will wait for your repository that has your experiments.
I believe setting up the Maven tasks will be a one-time setting should
work without issues.
H,
I kept 19:00 cet-daylight saving time open for the meeting discussed
in some threads. Are we going on with it and if so on what medium. For
now I am assuming #cloudstack-meeting but I remember Sebastien writing
about a teleconference.
Who calls it?
regards.
Daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13934/
---
(Updated Sept. 18, 2013, 1:45 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
On Sept. 9, 2013, 2:34 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote:
please ignore the r2 version for issue CLOUDSTACK-3565
CLOUDSTACK-3565 is fixed, so I will commit r2 version if nobody objects.
- Wei
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
please go ahead, I will change BridgeVifDriver as per
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13934. i see no conflicts
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Wei Zhou w.z...@leaseweb.com wrote:
On Sept. 9, 2013, 2:34 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote:
please ignore the r2 version for issue CLOUDSTACK-3565
Agent needs debug enabled, all lines are INFO.
On Sep 18, 2013 3:36 AM, Wei Zhou (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13770615#comment-13770615]
Wei Zhou
/me know your pain, I am feeling it on a long standing change right
now. The pain needs to be felt and should lead to better
modularization of the code. Having some regression tests in place that
will force other committers to take into account the code you depend
on is one thing. This won't help
2013/9/18 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
It looks allright but I cannot judge this code without seeing it work. I
hope Hugo or Sebastien can approve it.
Yah. About rebase code, I tried to rebase my sdnextensions with 4.1 branch,
but there are so many conflict need to fix manually. Do
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14058/
---
(Updated Sept. 18, 2013, 2:28 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14075/
---
(Updated Sept. 18, 2013, 2:28 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13841/
---
(Updated Sept. 18, 2013, 2:28 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14076/
---
(Updated Sept. 18, 2013, 2:29 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
H,
In november in Amterdam there are going to be hackathons and other
workshops held. Last time David (N.) started a page on this so I
think it would be a good idea to do this again.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CCC+Europe
please comment and add to it
I want to apply this now, any objections?
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13934/
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Hugo Trippaers, and
there is a devops meetup with clouds as subject in Amsterdam during
this time, so if no reactions I am cancelling my attendance
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
I kept 19:00 cet-daylight saving time open for the meeting discussed
in some
I checked the vm migration when their host is set to a maintenance mode and
found that even if the orchestration layer fires the each vm migration at
the same time using a ha_worker thread, the actual migration seems to be
executed serially.
Is this what we expect? And if so, any chance to make
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14190/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang and Kelven Yang.
Repository:
Here's my general concern about multiple volume snapshots at once. Giving
such a feature leads the user to believe that snapshotting multiple volumes
at once will give them consistency across the volumes in the snapshot.
This is not true, and difficult to do with many hypervisors, and typically
Yeah, I'm definitely thinking the newer spec, which is better for us anyway
since it is backwards-compatible with existing CSS.
What I'll do is setup a dummy branch, which basically renames cloudstack3.css
to cloudstack.scss or something like that, without much modification right now,
and then
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14143/#review26219
---
Commit d4dc4f7e70159609f51cf66a032073e31b23eb97 in branch
Perhaps he needs to elaborate on the use case and what he means by
more efficient. He may be referring to multiple volumes in the sense
of snapshotting the ROOT disks for 10 different VMs.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my general
That's my read on the proposal also but, Chris, please clarify. I don't think
the end user will see the change. It's an optimization for interfacing with
the storage backend.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September
I don't have much problem with switching to jdk1.7. My eclipse is running with
jdk1.7 as the builder and it can't find any problems in cs code. The main
question I think will come from the Linux variants. Are all of them shipping
with jdk1.7 now?
--Alex
-Original Message-
From:
Another positive side of using grunt would be to minimize and package
javascript. Currently, we load a huge number of javascript files
separately. It'd be great if we can minimize them into a single file during
build. Also, if we were to add any UI tests using libraries like jasmine,
grunt makes
I really question why the current netapp plugin exists in ACS at all to
begin with at all. It basically just manages LUNs and such in really has
nothing to do with ACS or cloud functionality (that I can see). I'd be all
for trashing it.
Is there any chance whatever you're working on will have
+1(binding) followed release procedure and tested on devCloud.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:13 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
I've
I think it should be removed.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:26 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp
I remember seeing/hearing some discussion about
I'd be relatively opposed to switching everything to jdk7. Java 6 is the
current lowest common denominator and using java 7 at the moment will just
alienate somebody I don't know the back story. Is libvirt compiled for
jdk7? I'd be perfectly fine with compiling just the KVM driver with jdk7
as
On Sept. 18, 2013, 5:37 a.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
In client/tomcatconf/applicationContext.xml.in we are referring passing
name properties to the authentication adapters e.g.:
bean id=LdapAuthenticator
class=org.apache.cloudstack.ldap.LdapAuthenticator
property
Good question. The gson dependency in Whirr is coming from jclouds, and
jclouds is very particular about its gson dependencies. Any possibility of
using isolated classloaders in some way?
A.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Han,Meng meng...@ufl.edu wrote:
Dear all,
I am adding an API to
Are you referring to what I have on review board? Any requests I have on
review board at the moment have no interdependencies. They are just a
bunch of random things I found while doing analysis and work for this
proposal.
Darren
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Daan Hoogland
It could enable a volume service for baremetal, but currently it is too
tied to NetApp.
On 9/18/13 11:35 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
I think it should be removed.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Right, component isn't a thing. I probably shouldn't use that term. I
want to standarize on the naming convention of plugin, module, and
extension. It is explained a bit on the wiki [1] but I'll try to do a
little better job here. So a plugin is basically a jar. A jar contains
multiple
You know what would be really swell is to just switch to jackson. The gson
we use is antiquated. I have no idea what the impact of moving to a modern
version would be. Jackson, IMO, is a far better framework that has a lot
of momentum. Additionally it allows you to use JAXB annotations so that
Lets just not log the session info. You can't expect somebody to protect
the box, it sort of defeats the purpose of the log. The whole idea of the
log is to know what is going on and troubleshoot things. So you would be
inclined to give a level 1 support tech person access to that log to see
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14187/
---
(Updated Sept. 18, 2013, 5:51 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang
Darren,
The integration we are working on will be closed source. The NetApp OpenStack
integrations are GPL due to the nature of OpenStack. They may be simply doing
xml/http request because that is the lowest level of communicating with our
storage controllers. Our work uses an internal library
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14211/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kelven Yang.
Repository: cloudstack-git
First, let me apologize for the confusing terms, because some words here are
overloaded:
A volume…
In CloudStack terms is a disk attached to a VM.
In NetApp terms is an NFS volume, analogous to CloudStack primary storage,
where all the CloudStack volumes are stored.
A snapshot…
In CloudStack
What's the point in using separate spring context per plugin?
Separate class loader is the thing I hate most in OSGI, I am afraid we are on
the same way.
Frankly speaking, I never see benefits of this *separate* model, our
project(or most projects) is not like Chrome which has to create sandbox
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14209/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
Given this explanation. Would the following not work?
1) Enhance UI to allow multi select. There is no API change, UI will just
call snapshot a bunch of time
2) Enhance storage framework or driver to detect that 20 requests just came
in within a window of X seconds and send them to the driver
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14210/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
I'm not for OSGi either, but contexts are quite useful and will lead to
better things. First off, we don't want one gigantic spring XML config
file like we have today. I think we can all agree on that. So each plugin
will have to supply its own XML. So the obstacles you mention, will
largely
That certainly would work, but I don't see how it is a better design. Can you
elaborate on how sending multiple volumeIds is hackish? Look at the existing
API framework. We have several APIs that accept lists as parameters. Normally,
they're used for things like querying or deleting. Take a
I am not against boundary, I am just against making things unnecessary complex
to enable boundary.
If we are going this way, I hope we can make it as much as transparent to
developers. That means, as
a developer, all a plugin I need to do is 1) provide my separate spring xml 2)
inject beans I
Hey everybody, I think I saw something about hotels not being decided for
CCC in Amsterdam this November. Has that been squared out?
I know this is not a dev question per seŠ but hey, what better group to
ask that question but this one? :-)
Thanks!
--
David La Motta
Technical Marketing
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14217/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huang.
Repository: cloudstack-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14218/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang and Kelven Yang.
Repository:
Well. The codes explain more than words.
It seems the only extra work is adding a property file that specifies parent
context and current context name, it's not much complex.
BTW: any reason for working on repo outside ACS?
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd
I'm not a committer
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote:
Well. The codes explain more than words.
It seems the only extra work is adding a property file that specifies
parent context and current context name, it's not much complex.
BTW: any reason for
Nah, I guess its not so bad to have a volumeIds param. Just as long as its
really clear that means nothing about consistency.
I would be a little concerned about how this will be implemented by other
storage providers though. Currently if you do 5 snapshot API calls that
will launch 5 threads
On 09/18/2013 06:51 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
I'd be relatively opposed to switching everything to jdk7. Java 6 is the
current lowest common denominator and using java 7 at the moment will just
alienate somebody I don't know the back story. Is libvirt compiled for
jdk7? I'd be perfectly
I actually did a quick try to update cloudstack to use newest gson version
about 3 months back. Had to roll it back but I didn't try very hard though.
Part of the reason why I decided to rollback is due to gson is used differently
by various components in CloudStack and I didn't have time to
On 09/18/2013 04:40 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
H,
In november in Amterdam there are going to be hackathons and other
workshops held. Last time David (N.) started a page on this so I
think it would be a good idea to do this again.
In JuniperSrxResource.java, someone to look at it?
Kelven
Looking
From: Kelven Yang kelven.y...@citrix.commailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:14 PM
To:
The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated
with a * next to their name:
+1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, Wido*, Sebastien,
Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon
Weller,
I'm going to proceed
I almost faced that there is no choice but to go for it for VMware
recently, we found that VMware vSphere 5.1 SDK we are currently using has
some backwards compatibility issue with VMware vSphere 4.x systems.
Therefore it makes a valid business case that CloudStack may have to
support different
Thanks Alena.
Kelven
On 9/18/13 4:38 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
Thank you Darren, just fixed with
3ab8d8d8f20c453fdc684f177a612922eae5f415
-Alena.
From: Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.commailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
Reply-To:
I can do some analysis on this. I'm always up for a terribly painful
refactor :)
Darren
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
I actually did a quick try to update cloudstack to use newest gson version
about 3 months back. Had to roll it back but I didn't
That's a good point and I'm not sure. Maybe we can have the drivers indicate
whether they support batched/multiple volume snapshotting. If not, then we can
spin up a thread per volume to snapshot. I completely agree that simply calling
them in sequence could end up badly.
You're right though,
I've been following this conversation somewhat and would like to throw in some
background as a plugin writer.
One thing that concerns me in the current plugin model is the number of
XML/text files that need to be edited to deploy my plugin.
-applicationContext must be edited to add our
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14186/#review26249
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kelven Yang
On Sept. 17, 2013, 11:08 p.m.,
s/PluginManagerImpl/PluggableService/
Along with a storage provider plug in, we are also creating a generic API
plugin to support the UI plugin we are developing (too many plugins….).
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14189/#review26250
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kelven Yang
On Sept. 18, 2013, midnight,
Yes this is one of the many things this is trying to address. Adding a
plugin should be plopping your jar in a directory and restarting. You
pointed out two things I didn't think about though, command.properties and
log4j xml. Let me think about those twos as they should be address also.
I know rhel6 has jdk6 as the default and jdk7 is also available. Seems
silly to target 1.7 for a redhat project. If libvirt can just target 1.6 I
think that would be ideal and then we can just not change anything on our
side. Somebody can correct me if I'm wrong, but I see the vast majority of
Here is the list of Xenserver products and related licenses
http://www.xenserver.org/about-xenserver-open-source/gplv2-license.html.
On 18/09/13 2:06 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to my colleague Joris,
I can update the scripts in the sytemvm.iso but the real question
Kishan, I was testing VPC on upgraded 4.2 system (the upgrade is done from 4.1
build), and found Critical DB upgrade bug caused by your commit 836ce6c1. This
is MUST fix for 4.2 as a result of it, all existing VPCs will stop functioning
after restart/router destroy.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14148/#review26261
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On Sept. 18, 2013, 5:39
On Sept. 19, 2013, 4:20 a.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
Ship It!
when i try to apply the patch git am says Patch format detection failed..
- Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
We might want to bring John Burwell into this discussion as he has
documented ideas on how storage drivers might be able to advertise to the
outside CloudStack world their capabilities.
For example, my SolidFire driver could advertise that the volumes it
creates support min, max, and burst IOPS.
On 9/18/13 9:10 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my general concern about multiple volume snapshots at once. Giving
such a feature leads the user to believe that snapshotting multiple
volumes
at once will give them consistency across the volumes in the snapshot.
Daan,
The xen tools are listed under GPL. Now are you planning to change the
scripts ? Do file a big to track.
Regards,
-abhi
On 19/09/13 8:01 am, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com
wrote:
Here is the list of Xenserver products and related licenses
99 matches
Mail list logo
