Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1.. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW:

Re: [IMPORTANT] Huge Github PR Backlog

If we ask for each PR to be rebased with master, we need to commit as a team to actually working through them rapidly, as obviously rebasing is significant work in a lot of cases. Just my 2 cents. - Si From: ilya Sent:

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297: delete snapshot without ...

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#issuecomment-197375867 Ideally, at some point in the future, we should rename XenserverSnapshotStrategy to something more generic (maybe DefaultSnapshotStrategy or something).

Re: Issue: CLOUDSTACK-9255 Unable to start VM DomainRouter due to error in finalizeStart

Hi Martin, Thanks for the fix, didn’t catch you attachment first time. Would it be possible for you to send a Pull Request? Is this patch against master or a release branch? Generally speaking it’s best to make a PR against a release branch, 4.7 would be fine I guess in this case. Once it’s a

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

> > What would you be able to do if the git-dual experiment were expanded to > CloudStack that you couldn't do with the proposal above? I suggest that you > take full advantage of the fact that people are now listening. > Thanks for chiming in Sam, Could you give us a summary of the Whimsy

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...

Github user rgardler commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1442#issuecomment-197522417 private@ is not the right place for a discussion about community in an Apache project (though the PR approach is somewhat unusual) --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9305: Cloudstack Usage Breaks ...

Github user kishankavala commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1433#issuecomment-197768091 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: L10n update master 20160127

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1376#issuecomment-197977522 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 107 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=103 Failed=15 Skipped=4

Re: github organisation cloudstack

If we use this I think it's main purpose should be to facilitate CI and integration testing of the apache/cloudstack repo. The first hurdle in using this repo for CI work is the fact that none of the open PRs from apache/cloudstack are available in the cloudstack/cloudstack repo. If we are only

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 for 4.7.x

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1430#issuecomment-197556331 @kiwiflyer 3683dff LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

Re: Issue: CLOUDSTACK-9255 Unable to start VM DomainRouter due to error in finalizeStart

Boris closed it, @Boris why? On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi, > > This issue has been resolved some time ago but unfortunately the PR hasn’t > been merged nor tested yet. > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1400 > > This PR

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: OSPF: adding dynamically routing capabili...

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#issuecomment-198458014 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 111 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=105 Failed=13 Skipped=4

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

We can see if we can get the 'apache-cloudstack' org on github if that is preferred. No reason not to try... What is currently at 'cloudstack/cloudstack' is NOT what we are proposing going forward. This is currently an actual fork which was put in place simply for the purpose of testing. We

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3488

See Changes: [sowmya.neeladhuri] Add nuagevsp userdata testcase (Cloudstack-9095) & Refactor existing [sowmya.neeladhuri] deleted:test_vpcnetwork_nuage.pynew file: [sowmya.neeladhuri] CLOUDSTACK-9304 -

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed unused parameters and variable fr...

GitHub user pedro-martins opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1447 Removed unused parameters and variable from NetworkHelper hierarchy - Was removed the unused params User & Account in the

Re: github organisation cloudstack

Will, I think you are putting the carriage before the horse, sort of speak. I would suggest you make a dummy PR to cloudstack/cloudstack (just one, let’s not talk about migration or anything like that). then you can use this as a playground to see how you could improve our CI… The main idea

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 for 4.7.x

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1430#issuecomment-198239218 stop the management server, and restart cloudstack-agent during the stopping. 1. without the commit 3683dff : ``` 2016-03-17 21:25:26,359 ERROR

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Changed Void Methods to void

Github user rodrigo93 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1439#issuecomment-197832134 Sorry for the delay to answer. Hi @rafaelweingartner , thanks for the suggestion. I will revise my PR and do the proper changes. @syed I am not sure

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...

Github user chrismattmann commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1442#issuecomment-197894977 closed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fixed issues with test_vpc_vpn script

Github user sanju1010 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1156 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#issuecomment-198515978 @swill Please do proceed with revert, I totally agree. `git revert -m 1 dc0ba6bd1a774d3ff4bc4a4dcc00e1434ab1f6e3` will do. Let me know if you need help.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297: delete snapshot without ...

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#issuecomment-197376318 Perhaps I'll rename it in 4.9 (probably not a good idea to do so in 4.7 and then move the name change up to 4.8 and 4.9). --- If your project is set up for

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297 - Reworked logic in Stora...

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#issuecomment-197952462 Maybe we're looking at different code? I see the canHandle method being used from StorageStrategyFactoryImpl.getSnapshotStrategy. It has a

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:39 PM, sebgoa wrote: > >> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> I'm more concerned that the page is indistinguishable from a fork, and >> gives no indication of official status. That may be OK for a work in >>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9313: Remove unused code from ...

Github user cristofolini commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1446#issuecomment-198804084 @eriweb @GabrielBrascher Thanks for the suggestion! I've gone ahead and opened a ticket and updated the title of this PR. --- If your project is set up for

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:15 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > >> As to forks being against Apache >> policy, forks are not, however forks that use the Apache e.g., >> namespace, that have the

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fixes regarding VOLUME_DELETE events resu...

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1373#issuecomment-198312562 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 110 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=104 Failed=15 Skipped=4

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3368

Hi Will, I will retest with the changes. Best, Raja -Original Message- From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Will Stevens Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:19 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins:

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Hi Sebastien, [..] >> >> Hi Sebastien, >> >> Thanks for your reply and yes, I am a member of the ASF board. >> >> The thing is, there was already some discussion of this at the >> ASF board meeting that happened yesterday. I can tell you that >> there were more than a few board members that

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 - Agent throws an excepti...

Github user kiwiflyer closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1429 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

I already created a vote thread in the dev@ mailing list. I wanted to try to get consensus in the community as well. Please feel free to comment and such in that thread. Having ASF board members participating in that thread will be valuable. Thanks. :) On Mar 18, 2016 6:54 PM, "Chris Mattmann"

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed unused code from CloudZoneStartup...

Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1446#issuecomment-198803008 @eriweb, I didn't considered JIRA looking to this point of view (track changes in the release note). With that in mind it seems an interesting approach.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Worked around some possible runtime excep...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1444#issuecomment-198797607 @eriweb sure I can. I will just wait for @swill and @remibergsma feedback. If we decide to revert #780, then I will close this PR; otherwise, we

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed unused code from CloudZoneStartup...

Github user eriweb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1446#issuecomment-198795359 Jira is used for more than you might think. It is used to build release notes as well as a metric in board reports for community activity. There is no

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed unused code from CloudZoneStartup...

Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1446#issuecomment-198794064 @eriweb, as far as I know, JIRA is used for bug/issue tracking. JIRA is a way that users have to report bugs. Based on JIRA, developers can track and fix

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Worked around some possible runtime excep...

Github user eriweb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1444#issuecomment-198791923 Thanks for your PR @rafaelweingartner, for tracking purposes, would you mind creating a jira ticket and including the ticket id in the PR title? --- If your

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed unused code from CloudZoneStartup...

Github user eriweb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1446#issuecomment-198789993 For tracking purposes, would you mind creating a Jira ticket for this, and add the jira ID to the title? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: OSPF: adding dynamically routing capabili...

Github user agneya2001 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#issuecomment-197830412 Marvin test log for testing ospf: nosetests --with-xunit --xunit-file=/tmp/simulator/smoke/test_quota.xml --with-marvin

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Removed unused code from CloudZoneStartup...

GitHub user cristofolini opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1446 Removed unused code from CloudZoneStartupProcessor Upon analyzing the CloudZoneStartupProcessor class, we noticed most of its content consisted of either commented out or unused code. To

[POLL] Interest for EU based event/collab

[Cross posted to users@ and dev@] As you may be aware, a conference has been announced in Brazil later this year. I guess there are more than me having a hard time travelling that far and long, so I would like to check the interest for an EU based event. Unless someone comes up with a big money

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#issuecomment-197904412 @swill you can create a PR if you want. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Update L10N resource files with 4.7 strin...

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1374#issuecomment-198212042 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 109 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=106 Failed=12 Skipped=4

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Ok Jim, it seems we are on one line here. Sorry to bother but I wanted to make sure. In my understanding the moving was only about the part already on github. I'll hold my peace for a while unless we are actually talking about the technical implementation of a convenient developer workflow again

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fixed issues with test_vpc_vpn script

Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1156#issuecomment-197537506 Is this PR still relevant or did the changes in the other mentioned PRs make this PR outdated? If it is still active, please rebase the PR to get rid of merge

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

All, +1 to Will’s proposal/approach. All we are really talking about is rehoming the apache/cloudstack repository mirror to cloudstack/cloudstack. The canonical repository would remain the official Apache git repository hosted on Apache owned hardware. Therefore, we would maintain our current

RE: [POLL] Interest for EU based event/collab

Erik I've responded to your survey (don’t know how useful my response will be, I've said "yes" to everything) One idea: we have a quarterly meeting of the Cloudstack EU UG. We got 50 along to the last one. It’s a different audience to the usual CCC attendees (more users than devs) For the

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Worked around some possible runtime excep...

GitHub user rafaelweingartner opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1444 Worked around some possible runtime exceptions introduced in PR 780. @Remi, @remibergsma I have created this PR to work out those possible problems introduce by PR #780 that may

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fixed Profiler's unit tests bugs.

GitHub user alexandrelimassantana opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1445 Fixed Profiler's unit tests bugs. Problem: The TestProfiler class was using Java Thread methods to test the Profiler's functionality. That was causing the tests to fail

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

As Sam indicated, there was a lot of hush-and-rush about all this, with little communicated and much assumed. It appears that now things are more well known and the matters are being addressed. But for the record, yes, there was the impression and (mis)understanding that "moving" to GH was indeed

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...

Github user chrismattmann commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1442#issuecomment-197590972 Hi, I will go ahead and jump on the dev list and discuss it. I tried to open up an issue in the forked project, but it took me here, sorry. --- If your

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Mar 19, 2016, at 2:12 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > > > > > Personally I have always thought that this is a very serious issue and > trend in open source projects and that ASF (and the board in

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Remove unused code from XenServerStorageP...

GitHub user GabrielBrascher opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1443 Remove unused code from XenServerStorageProcessor and change methods access level Remove unused code from "com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServerStorageProcessor" class and

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 19, 2016, at 2:12 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > > Personally I have always thought that this is a very serious issue and trend > in open source projects and that ASF (and the board in particular) should try > to proactively address. What is the future of ASF in a GitHub

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8324: config drive data set/ge...

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1379#issuecomment-197600578 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 104 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=104 Failed=14 Skipped=4

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

I'm away at the moment but I do believe that signed commits was acknowledged. board: r62882 - /foundation/board/github-discussion/explorations/signed-commits.txt Feel free to share anonimized content from that file. On Mar 19, 2016 2:12 PM, "sebgoa" wrote: > > > On Mar 19,

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

We have two other threads going on this. One is in the private@ mailing list, which we then moved into the dev@ list to get general community input on this. We are actively discussing the role the cloudstack org will play and nothing has been decided. My understanding is that we have no

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: L10n update 4.8 20160127

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1375#issuecomment-198122730 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 108 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=105 Failed=13 Skipped=4

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3368

@Raja. Actually, maybe test this one since it includes the same change as Daan's, but also includes a couple more changes. I think only one of these should be merged. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1438 *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

I may be thinking too far outside the box, but hear me out as this is likely the best way to satisfy everyone's requirements. Recap: The community needs additional github permissions in order to integrate CI in order to maintain code quality. The ASF does not have enough granular control via

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3480

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9298: Improve performance of r...

Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-198518585 Hi @rafaelweingartner, I also ran test/integration/smoke/test_templates.py, I post its results: [root@ussarlabcsmgt41 cloudstack]# cat

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 19, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > The initial action (creating the fork) was not clearly done by the PMC > as a whole, that is now being rectified by a retroactive vote being > taken. Even that I wouldn't suggest be done any differently: many > parts of

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9267: String is not localized ...

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1390#issuecomment-197355085 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 102 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=104 Failed=13 Skipped=4

RE: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 Good plan -Original Message- From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com] Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 7:03 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack' +1 I'd second that. Move to

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297: delete snapshot without ...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#discussion_r56507303 --- Diff: engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java --- @@ -279,7 +282,52 @@ public

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > > >> The other thing is - is the new Cloudstack GitHub organization the > >> result of a subset of the PMC going off and doing this - > > > >I am not sure why you say subset. Let’s try to avoid polemics. > > I’m not

Re: ./certs/realhostip.keystore in SSVN

Sadhu, thank you for your feedback. unfortunately, my problem is not using own certificates on the SSVM/CPVM. This is already done. We're missing some newer Root-CA certificates in the keystore, so therefor some https-download-URL are not working since SSVM doesn't know about that (even valid)

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 Note: ——— To be honest I never contemplated this move. Somehow it never occurred to me as a possibility. But if the board and infra would let use move the mirror of the apache canonical repo to apache-cloudstack/cloudstack then I think we would be all set. > On Mar 19, 2016, at 5:14 PM,

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Good to know that we have the right people talking with the right people. For the reasons I outlined, I'm confident we will sort this out because everyone's interests should be aligned on this and I'm sure ASF understands that in the age of infrastructure-as-code the ability to test myriad

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Pull Request - ignore -

GitHub user chrismattmann opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1442 Pull Request - ignore - Why in the world is Apache Cloudstack creating an organization externally on Github? At a minimum, you can't use the Apache Cloudstack logo? You can merge this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9142 Migrate VM changes xmlDes...

Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1348#discussion_r56420155 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtMigrateCommandWrapperTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,306 @@ +//

Re: ./certs/realhostip.keystore in SSVN

We had the similar issue when downloaded the template/iso from fedorapeople.org. The issue was fixed in our internal version. If you are interested, please create a jira ticket, I will upload it in github. -Wei 2016-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Stephan Seitz : >

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#discussion_r56508756 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java --- @@ -3026,11 +3031,16 @@ public

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > +1 (binding as I saw others mention that. I doubt this is of any concern in > such a technical decision) > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Stevens > wrote: > > > Thank you for

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Top posting because keeping track is going to be hard. Remi and I have talked several times with David about GitHub access and so far the answer has been no. There are several issues in my understanding: - apache on github is one single org, so if you get some write permission in the org

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3491

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...

Github user eriweb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1442#issuecomment-197510472 You could close it by pushing a dummy commit. But yes, I have to agree that sending a PR is some weird communication form! --- If your project is set up for it,

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9289:Automation for feature de...

Github user nitt10prashant commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1417#issuecomment-198314365 @GabrielBrascher @sanju1010 i have removed redundant code --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Thank you. What you describe effectively below is going to > implicitly switch the “canonical” repo in my opinion of the > > repository to cloudstack/cloudstack. Merges that

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Ian Rae wrote: > Sam, > > Thanks for this context, I found it very helpful. We have an > interesting situation where no large companies are involved, and > really this is all about the needs of open source users. As you know > Apache CloudStack

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Thanks for the explanation Sam, I have to ask for your patience with me as > there is one remark in there that leaves me confused; Don't feel obligated > to answer in length but please confirm or negate my suspicion

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

+1 (maybe put/fork upr in there to prevent any cleaning from happening? ;) On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Yes exactly. I don't think we should delete the org, just the repo. I think > the usage of that org is out of scope for this conversation

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Please board and everybody at dev, Until the vote thread initiated by Will no action has been taken or sactioned by the PMC, only discussions were started. It has never been the intention of the PMC to move away from any repository but only to add a fork to facilitate work. The misunderstanding

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

Yes exactly. I don't think we should delete the org, just the repo. I think the usage of that org is out of scope for this conversation and will likely change based on this outcome. I think we should put that org on ice for the time being. On Mar 19, 2016 9:59 AM, "Daan Hoogland"

Re: github organisation cloudstack

I mentioned it here since that was the thread that Sam and Chris were most engaged in, so I wanted the people who were watching these other threads be aware of that thread as we were getting good traction there. On Mar 19, 2016 9:57 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > Will, > >

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Sam, Thanks for this context, I found it very helpful. We have an interesting situation where no large companies are involved, and really this is all about the needs of open source users. As you know Apache CloudStack is highly user driven, and is perhaps thankfully off the radar of the large

Re: github organisation cloudstack

I agree that your title better describes what we are trying to achieve. On Mar 19, 2016 9:57 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > Will, > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Will Stevens > wrote: > > > Please be advised this conversation is continuing in a

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Thanks for the explanation Sam, I have to ask for your patience with me as there is one remark in there that leaves me confused; Don't feel obligated to answer in length but please confirm or negate my suspicion On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: ​...​ >

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > > Hi Sebastien, > > Thanks for your reply and yes, I am a member of the ASF board. > > The thing is, there was already some discussion of this at the > ASF board meeting that happened yesterday. I can tell you that >

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#issuecomment-197890163 I see this was merged into master this morning. Hmmm... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Emit event UUIDs on template deletion

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1378#issuecomment-197705664 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 105 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=104 Failed=14 Skipped=4

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

OK, last comment for a bit, sorry for the top post, going to try and mix 2 replies in 1 email. To Sebastien: It’s more than just permissions - it’s where people *go to* and *believe* that the community making the code is at. In all of your statements, that community will be cloudstack/cloudstack

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

As far as I understand, cloudstack/cloudstack is only being proposed to help with developer workflow and CI. To my understanding, all code that goes in there will end up back in the canonical ASF CloudStack repo (and, as such, be mirrored to apache/cloudstack). This is simply a workaround to

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#discussion_r56509710 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java --- @@ -3332,7 +3332,14 @@ public

Re: [POLL] Interest for EU based event/collab

Hi guys, we've been quiet lately, but we want to organize a collab event in Canada, our target dates are June 2 and 3. We just cleared some questionning regarding the planning and now ready to go forward. Could an european one be postpone? Il start a new thread in the mailing list... On Mar 16,

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> That sounds like a cop-out to me related to what's really going >> on. > > Jim, I am not a native english speaker and this remark has no

Re: github organisation cloudstack

Will, On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Please be advised this conversation is continuing in a thread titled: Re: > External fork of Cloudstack > > Mailing list link: > >

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I see you found the vote thread. Thanks for voting. :) > > For now I think it is best that we try to avoid using the cloudstack org > for anything in order to mitigate confusion and try to get everyone on the > same

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

I see you found the vote thread. Thanks for voting. :) For now I think it is best that we try to avoid using the cloudstack org for anything in order to mitigate confusion and try to get everyone on the same page. We are charting new territory here, so removing as many unnecessary distractions

  1   2   >