Re: Direct templates/volumes upload don't work in real world

[Rajani Karuturi]

Check the values of secstorage.encrypt.copy, secstorsge.ssl.cert.domain

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Procedure+to+Replace+realhostip.com+with+Your+Own+Domain+Name
has more info

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, 11:57 am Ivan Kudryavtsev, 
wrote:

> Yes, but API returns https:///, not
> https://1-2-3-4.dns.zone/hash.
> That is what I'm talking about, at least it works for my 4.11.1 deployment,
> while CPVM works just fine with https://1-2-3-4.dns.zone/
>
> 2018-08-23 13:24 GMT+07:00 Rajani Karuturi :
>
> > The same CPVM type URL also works for SSVM. You could also add Https
> > exception in browser to test it out.
> >
> > Check FS at
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=39620237
> > for more details.
> >
> > ~Rajani
> >
> > Sent from phone.
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, 10:25 am Ivan Kudryavtsev, <
> kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello, devs.
> > >
> > > Today I investigated how ACS handles file uploads. I thought there is a
> > > Jetty-based implementation, but it looks like they are managed thru
> SSVM
> > by
> > > requesting unique upload URL and so on and so forth.
> > >
> > > By design, it's good, despite that the URL which returned by an API
> > > includes https://IP/ schema, where SSL is related to *.
> realip.com
> > > and as a result, nothing really works in a browser without playing with
> > > certs.
> > >
> > > I know that CPVM uses 1-2-3-4.domain.com URL and works great with
> > > real-life
> > > SSLs, no idea why SSVM doesn't act the same way.
> > >
> > > Personally, I don't use direct uploading, but you know the users. They
> > find
> > > it very attractive and easy rather than managing thru external
> HTTP/HTTPS
> > > servers.
> > >
> > > So, basically, the feature doesn't work for real-life deployments.
> > >
> > > --
> > > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > > Bitworks LLC
> > > Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> > > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks LLC
> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
>

Re: Direct templates/volumes upload don't work in real world

[Rajani Karuturi]

The same CPVM type URL also works for SSVM. You could also add Https
exception in browser to test it out.

Check FS at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=39620237
for more details.

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, 10:25 am Ivan Kudryavtsev, 
wrote:

> Hello, devs.
>
> Today I investigated how ACS handles file uploads. I thought there is a
> Jetty-based implementation, but it looks like they are managed thru SSVM by
> requesting unique upload URL and so on and so forth.
>
> By design, it's good, despite that the URL which returned by an API
> includes https://IP/ schema, where SSL is related to *.realip.com
> and as a result, nothing really works in a browser without playing with
> certs.
>
> I know that CPVM uses 1-2-3-4.domain.com URL and works great with
> real-life
> SSLs, no idea why SSVM doesn't act the same way.
>
> Personally, I don't use direct uploading, but you know the users. They find
> it very attractive and easy rather than managing thru external HTTP/HTTPS
> servers.
>
> So, basically, the feature doesn't work for real-life deployments.
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks LLC
> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 
>

Re: New committers: Nathan Johnson and Marc-Aurèle Brothier

[Rajani Karuturi]

Congratulations guys...

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 25 Sep 2017 9:54 am, "Rohit Yadav"  wrote:

> Congratulations Nathan and Marc-Aurèle.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
> From: Rafael Weingärtner 
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:01:24 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: New committers: Nathan Johnson and Marc-Aurèle Brothier
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited
> Nathan Johnson and Marc-Aurèle Brothier to become committers and we are
> pleased to announce that they have accepted.
>
> They have shown commitment to Apache CloudStack community, contributing
> with PRs in a constant fashion. Moreover, they have proved great abilities
> to interact with the community quite often in our mailing lists and Slack
> channel trying to help people.
>
> Let´s congratulate and welcome Apache CloudStack’s two newest committers.
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: Need to ask for help again (Migration in cloudstack)

[Rajani Karuturi]

You might start with this commit
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/21ce3befc8ea9e1a6de449a21499a50ff141a183

and storage_motion_supported column in hypervisor_capabilities
table.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 31, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Dmitriy Kaluzhniy
(dmitriy.kaluzh...@gmail.com) wrote:

Hello!
I contacted this mail before, but I wasn't subscribed to mailing
list.
The reason I'm contacting you - I need advise.
During last week I was learning cloudstack code to find where is
implemented logic of this statements I found in cloudstack
documentation:
"(KVM) The VM must not be using local disk storage. (On
XenServer and
VMware, VM live migration with local disk is enabled by
CloudStack support
for XenMotion and vMotion.)

(KVM) The destination host must be in the same cluster as the
original
host. (On XenServer and VMware, VM live migration from one
cluster to
another is enabled by CloudStack support for XenMotion and
vMotion.)"

I made up a long road through source code but still can't see
it. If you
can give me any advise - it will be amazing.
Anyway, thank you.

--

*​Best regards,Dmitriy Kaluzhniy+38 (073) 101 14 73*

[ANNOUNCE][CLOUDSTACK] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

# Apache CloudStack Release 4.10.0.0

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release of the
CloudStack 4.10.0.0 This release includes 339 pull requests and fixes more
than 272 bugs since
the CloudStack's previous release.

A few highlights:

- IPV6 support for basic networking
- Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
- Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage backups for
snapshots
- VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NFS
- RBD snapshot backups to secondary are now QCOW2 rather than raw to save
space
- Strongwan VPN Improvements
- Nuage VSP SDN Plugin: Shared networks support, Guest DNS support, Source-
and Static-nat to Underlay and support for Nuage VSP 4.0
- Significant performances improvements related to Virtual Router Deployment
- Force power off/stop support for KVM, VMware and XenServer
- Lots of bug fixes and performance improvements


Apache CloudStack is an integrated Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
software platform that allows users to build feature-rich public and
private cloud environments. CloudStack includes an intuitive user interface
and rich API for managing the compute, networking, software, and storage
resources. The project became an Apache top level project in March, 2013.

More information about Apache CloudStack can be found at:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/

# Documentation

What's new in CloudStack 4.10:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/about.html

The 4.10.0 release notes include a full list of corrected issues, as well
as upgrade instructions from previous versions of Apache CloudStack, and
can be found at:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/

The official installation, administration and API documentation for
each release are available on our Documentation Page:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/

# Downloads

The official source code for the 4.10.0 release can be downloaded from our
downloads page:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html

## Downloads

The official source code release can be downloaded from:

http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html

In addition to the official source code release, individual contributors
have also made convenience binaries available on the Apache CloudStack
download page, and can be found at:

https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu/
https://download.cloudstack.org/centos/7/

http://download.cloudstack.org/centos/6/

http://shapeblue.com/packages/



Thanks,
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: 4.10 release announcement?

[Rajani Karuturi]

I can see the latest rn docs now. I will add apidocs and make the
release announcement in a day.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 30, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

Rajani - I've added you to the list of maintainers, please
tag/push changes, log in and build/publish them once your changes
pass locally (do a local build first).

I've also kicked build to publish 4.10 now.

- Rohit


From: Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 1:53:04 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Rohit Yadav
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

branch is already there and version is set to 4.10.0.0. I
haven't tagged it yet.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/4.10

I created an account RTD. username is rajani. Can you give the
required access?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

On August 30, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>)
wrote:

Rajani,

After you've update the cloudstack-docs-rn, you need to create a
branch 4.10 or tag 4.10.0.0 (see existing branches/tags and other
previous releases for example). Once you're done, I can help with
publishing this on read-the-docs, if you're a member of the
maintainers of release-notes you may log in and kick the
builds/publish yourself.

I don't see you here:
https://readthedocs.org/dashboard/cloudstack-release-notes/users

You may create an account and share with us your username and I
can add you to the cloudstack release-notes project on
read-the-docs.

- Rohit

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com 
( http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com )>
@shapeblue

From: Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org<mailto:raj...@apache.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 7:01:48 AM
To: Rohit Yadav;
dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

readme only talks about how to create a PR, use translations
etc. not about how to push the generated html to RTD website.
There should be some automated jenkins job to do it.

These are the contents of make.sh. It shows me the generated
html locally. But, there is not way to push it.

rm -fr build

mkdir build

sphinx-build -b html source build

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 28, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Will Stevens
(williamstev...@gmail.com<mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>)
wrote:

In this case it is sphinx and not middleman, but I spent a lot
of time on
the README in the past to make sure the contribution details are
clear, so
if anything is not clear please highlight the details.

Cheers,

Will

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Rohit Yadav
<rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
wrote:

Rajani,

Yes middleman is used, kindly see the build/run scripts in the
repository
for details.

- Rohit
--
*From:* Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org<mailto:raj...@apache.org>>
*Sent:* Sunday, August 20, 2017 6:47:14 AM
*To:* Will Stevens
*Cc:* Rohit Yadav; Wido den Hollander;
dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
*Subject:* Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Middleman is used only for website I think. For doc sites it's
different.

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 18 Aug 2017 8:11 pm, "Will Stevens"
<williamstev...@gmail.com<mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>>
wrote:

The HTML is built using a build script in the repo locally by
the person
who suggests a change. The build script actually uses middleman
to

generate

the html. The generated HTML is tracked in the pull requests so
merges
result in updates to the published content.

The readme should be up to date and the details should be clear,
but I
have not looked in a little while.

I am on vacation right now, but I can check the details when I
am back.

Cheers,

Will

On Aug 18, 2017 2:32 AM, "Rajani Karuturi"
<raj...@apache.org<mailto:raj...@apache.org>> wrote:

Hi Wido/Will,

Do you know how the html is generated for readthedocs? Is that
through

any

jenkins job? I think if atleast release notes are ready, we can
make an
annoucement.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 14, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org<mailto:raj...@apache.org>)

wrote:

I updated the downloads section of the website.

The following items are pending:

apidocs needs to be added at
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api.html

install docs needs a 4.10 version at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.
org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/4.10/

admin docs needs a 4.10 version at

Re: 4.10 release announcement?

[Rajani Karuturi]

branch is already there and version is set to 4.10.0.0. I haven't
tagged it yet.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/4.10

I created an account RTD. username is rajani. Can you give the
required access?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 30, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

Rajani,

After you've update the cloudstack-docs-rn, you need to create a
branch 4.10 or tag 4.10.0.0 (see existing branches/tags and other
previous releases for example). Once you're done, I can help with
publishing this on read-the-docs, if you're a member of the
maintainers of release-notes you may log in and kick the
builds/publish yourself.

I don't see you here:
https://readthedocs.org/dashboard/cloudstack-release-notes/users

You may create an account and share with us your username and I
can add you to the cloudstack release-notes project on
read-the-docs.

- Rohit

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com ( rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com )
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
@shapeblue

From: Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org ( raj...@apache.org )>
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 7:01:48 AM
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org (
dev@cloudstack.apache.org )
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

readme only talks about how to create a PR, use translations etc.
not about how to push the generated html to RTD website. There
should be some automated jenkins job to do it.

These are the contents of make.sh. It shows me the generated html
locally. But, there is not way to push it.

rm -fr build

mkdir build

sphinx-build -b html source build

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 28, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Will Stevens
(williamstev...@gmail.com) wrote:

In this case it is sphinx and not middleman, but I spent a lot of
time on
the README in the past to make sure the contribution details are
clear, so
if anything is not clear please highlight the details.

Cheers,

Will

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Rohit Yadav
<rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

Rajani,

Yes middleman is used, kindly see the build/run scripts in the
repository
for details.

- Rohit
--
*From:* Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
*Sent:* Sunday, August 20, 2017 6:47:14 AM
*To:* Will Stevens
*Cc:* Rohit Yadav; Wido den Hollander; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Middleman is used only for website I think. For doc sites it's
different.

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 18 Aug 2017 8:11 pm, "Will Stevens"
<williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote:

The HTML is built using a build script in the repo locally by the
person
who suggests a change. The build script actually uses middleman
to

generate

the html. The generated HTML is tracked in the pull requests so
merges
result in updates to the published content.

The readme should be up to date and the details should be clear,
but I
have not looked in a little while.

I am on vacation right now, but I can check the details when I
am back.

Cheers,

Will

On Aug 18, 2017 2:32 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

Hi Wido/Will,

Do you know how the html is generated for readthedocs? Is that
through

any

jenkins job? I think if atleast release notes are ready, we can
make an
annoucement.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 14, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org)

wrote:

I updated the downloads section of the website.

The following items are pending:

apidocs needs to be added at
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api.html

install docs needs a 4.10 version at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.
org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/4.10/

admin docs needs a 4.10 version at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.
org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.10/

release notes html needs to be updated with already updated
source at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-releas
e-notes/en/4.10/

uff.. we have lots of documentation. We should club them all to
one repo
and one url.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 14, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org)

wrote:

I merged the release notes PR[1]. Do we need to do something
else for the
changes to reflect on the docs site[2]?

Downloads section of the website also needs to be updated.

I am sending out a draft announcement to marketing@

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/4.10

[2] http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-releas
e-notes/en/4.10/

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 12, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com)
wrote:

Thanks Simon,

Overall, LGTM.

- Rohit

*From:* Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID>
*Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 7:56:52 PM
*To:* Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
*Cc:* Wido den Hollander
*Subject:* Re: 4.10 release an

Re: 4.10 release announcement?

[Rajani Karuturi]

readme only talks about how to create a PR, use translations etc.
not about how to push the generated html to RTD website. There
should be some automated jenkins job to do it.

These are the contents of make.sh. It shows me the generated html
locally. But, there is not way to push it.

rm -fr build

mkdir build

sphinx-build -b html source build

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 28, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Will Stevens
(williamstev...@gmail.com) wrote:

In this case it is sphinx and not middleman, but I spent a lot of
time on
the README in the past to make sure the contribution details are
clear, so
if anything is not clear please highlight the details.

Cheers,

Will

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Rohit Yadav
<rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

Rajani,

Yes middleman is used, kindly see the build/run scripts in the
repository
for details.

- Rohit
--
*From:* Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
*Sent:* Sunday, August 20, 2017 6:47:14 AM
*To:* Will Stevens
*Cc:* Rohit Yadav; Wido den Hollander; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Middleman is used only for website I think. For doc sites it's
different.

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 18 Aug 2017 8:11 pm, "Will Stevens"
<williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote:

The HTML is built using a build script in the repo locally by the
person
who suggests a change. The build script actually uses middleman
to

generate

the html. The generated HTML is tracked in the pull requests so
merges
result in updates to the published content.

The readme should be up to date and the details should be clear,
but I
have not looked in a little while.

I am on vacation right now, but I can check the details when I
am back.

Cheers,

Will

On Aug 18, 2017 2:32 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

Hi Wido/Will,

Do you know how the html is generated for readthedocs? Is that
through

any

jenkins job? I think if atleast release notes are ready, we can
make an
annoucement.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 14, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org)

wrote:

I updated the downloads section of the website.

The following items are pending:

apidocs needs to be added at
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api.html

install docs needs a 4.10 version at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.
org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/4.10/

admin docs needs a 4.10 version at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.
org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.10/

release notes html needs to be updated with already updated
source at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-releas
e-notes/en/4.10/

uff.. we have lots of documentation. We should club them all to
one repo
and one url.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 14, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org)

wrote:

I merged the release notes PR[1]. Do we need to do something
else for the
changes to reflect on the docs site[2]?

Downloads section of the website also needs to be updated.

I am sending out a draft announcement to marketing@

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/4.10

[2] http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-releas
e-notes/en/4.10/

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 12, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com)
wrote:

Thanks Simon,

Overall, LGTM.

- Rohit

*From:* Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID>
*Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 7:56:52 PM
*To:* Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
*Cc:* Wido den Hollander
*Subject:* Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Thanks Rohit.

i've modified the list based on that.

- IPV6 support for basic networking
- Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
- Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage
backups for
snapshots
- VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NFS
- RBD snapshot backups to secondary are now QCOW2 rather than
raw to save
space
- Strongwan VPN Improvements
- Nuage VSP SDN Plugin: Shared networks support, Guest DNS
support,
Source- and Static-nat to Underlay and support for Nuage VSP 4.0
- Significant performances improvements related to Virtual
Router
Deployment
- Force power off/stop support for KVM, VMware and XenServer
- Lots of bug fixes and performance improvements


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 12:51 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

The power off operation (or force stop flag in deployVM API) on
VM is
supported for all KVM, VMware and XenServer.

- Rohit


From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 2:31:52 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcem

Re: 4.10 release announcement?

[Rajani Karuturi]

Middleman is used only for website I think. For doc sites it's different.

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 18 Aug 2017 8:11 pm, "Will Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The HTML is built using a build script in the repo locally by the person
> who suggests a change. The build script actually uses middleman to generate
> the html. The generated HTML is tracked in the pull requests so merges
> result in updates to the published content.
>
> The readme should be up to date and the details should be clear, but I
> have not looked in a little while.
>
> I am on vacation right now, but I can check the details when I am back.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>
> On Aug 18, 2017 2:32 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Wido/Will,
>
> Do you know how the html is generated for readthedocs? Is that through any
> jenkins job? I think if atleast release notes are ready, we can make an
> annoucement.
>
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
>
> On August 14, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org) wrote:
>
>
> I updated the downloads section of the website.
>
>
> The following items are pending:
>
> apidocs needs to be added at http://cloudstack.apache.org/api.html
>
> install docs needs a 4.10 version at http://docs.cloudstack.apache.
> org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/4.10/
>
> admin docs needs a 4.10 version at http://docs.cloudstack.apache.
> org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.10/
>
> release notes html needs to be updated with already updated source at
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-releas
> e-notes/en/4.10/
>
>
> uff.. we have lots of documentation. We should club them all to one repo
> and one url.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
>
> On August 14, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org) wrote:
>
>
> I merged the release notes PR[1]. Do we need to do something else for the
> changes to reflect on the docs site[2]?
>
>
> Downloads section of the website also needs to be updated.
>
>
> I am sending out a draft announcement to marketing@
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/4.10
>
> [2] http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-releas
> e-notes/en/4.10/
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
>
> On August 12, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com)
> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Simon,
>
>
> Overall, LGTM.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> *From:* Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 7:56:52 PM
> *To:* Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> *Cc:* Wido den Hollander
> *Subject:* Re: 4.10 release announcement?
>
> Thanks Rohit.
>
>
>
> i've modified the list based on that.
>
>
> - IPV6 support for basic networking
> - Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
> - Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage backups for
> snapshots
> - VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NFS
> - RBD snapshot backups to secondary are now QCOW2 rather than raw to save
> space
> - Strongwan VPN Improvements
> - Nuage VSP SDN Plugin: Shared networks support, Guest DNS support,
> Source- and Static-nat to Underlay and support for Nuage VSP 4.0
> - Significant performances improvements related to Virtual Router
> Deployment
> - Force power off/stop support for KVM, VMware and XenServer
> - Lots of bug fixes and performance improvements
>
>
>
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 12:51 PM
> To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Wido den Hollander
> Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?
>
> The power off operation (or force stop flag in deployVM API) on VM is
> supported for all KVM, VMware and XenServer.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
> From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID>
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 2:31:52 PM
> To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Wido den Hollander
> Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?
>
> Rajani,
>
>
> Great job on this release!
>
>
> Wido,
>
>
> Here are few more items for the feature list. I've combined those already
> mentioned as well.
>
>
> - IPV6 support for basic networking
> - Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
> - Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage backups for
> snapshots
> - VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NF

Re: 4.10 release announcement?

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi Wido/Will,

Do you know how the html is generated for readthedocs? Is that
through any jenkins job? I think if atleast release notes are
ready, we can make an annoucement.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 14, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org) wrote:

I updated the downloads section of the website.

The following items are pending:

apidocs needs to be added at
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api.html

install docs needs a 4.10 version at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/4.10/

admin docs needs a 4.10 version at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.10/

release notes html needs to be updated with already updated
source at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/

uff.. we have lots of documentation. We should club them all to
one repo and one url.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 14, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org) wrote:

I merged the release notes PR[1]. Do we need to do something else
for the changes to reflect on the docs site[2]?

Downloads section of the website also needs to be updated.

I am sending out a draft announcement to marketing@

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/4.10

[2]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 12, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

Thanks Simon,

Overall, LGTM.

- Rohit

From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID (
swel...@ena.com.INVALID )>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:56:52 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org (
dev@cloudstack.apache.org )
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Thanks Rohit.

i've modified the list based on that.

- IPV6 support for basic networking
- Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
- Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage
backups for snapshots
- VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NFS
- RBD snapshot backups to secondary are now QCOW2 rather than
raw to save space
- Strongwan VPN Improvements
- Nuage VSP SDN Plugin: Shared networks support, Guest DNS
support, Source- and Static-nat to Underlay and support for Nuage
VSP 4.0
- Significant performances improvements related to Virtual
Router Deployment
- Force power off/stop support for KVM, VMware and XenServer
- Lots of bug fixes and performance improvements


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 12:51 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

The power off operation (or force stop flag in deployVM API) on
VM is supported for all KVM, VMware and XenServer.

- Rohit


From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 2:31:52 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Rajani,

Great job on this release!

Wido,

Here are few more items for the feature list. I've combined
those already mentioned as well.

- IPV6 support for basic networking
- Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
- Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage
backups for snapshots
- VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NFS
- RBD snapshot backups to secondary are now QCOW2 rather than
raw to save space
- Strongwan VPN Improvements
- Nuage VSP SDN Plugin: Shared networks support, Guest DNS
support, Source- and Static-nat to Underlay and support for Nuage
VSP 4.0
- Significant performances improvements related to Virtual
Router Deployment
- KVM force stop support
- Lots of bug fixes and performance improvements

Can those that submitted other features please continue to add
to this list? This will also help with the release notes.

- Si


From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 5:07 AM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

> Op 11 augustus 2017 om 11:56 schreef Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>:
>
>
> Yes the packages are pushed. Status is still the same as my
> previous update.
>

Ok!

> api changes and fixed issues are available at
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30
[https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400]<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

( 
https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400%5D<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30
 )
>

4.10 api changes and fixed issues by karuturi · Pull Request #30
·
apache/cloudstack-docs-rn<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30>
github.com
copied from list generated by @swill

[https://avata

Re: 4.10 release announcement?

[Rajani Karuturi]

I updated the downloads section of the website.

The following items are pending:

apidocs needs to be added at
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api.html

install docs needs a 4.10 version at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/4.10/

admin docs needs a 4.10 version at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.10/

release notes html needs to be updated with already updated
source at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/

uff.. we have lots of documentation. We should club them all to
one repo and one url.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 14, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org) wrote:

I merged the release notes PR[1]. Do we need to do something else
for the changes to reflect on the docs site[2]?

Downloads section of the website also needs to be updated.

I am sending out a draft announcement to marketing@

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/4.10

[2]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 12, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

Thanks Simon,

Overall, LGTM.

- Rohit

From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID (
swel...@ena.com.INVALID )>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:56:52 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org (
dev@cloudstack.apache.org )
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Thanks Rohit.

i've modified the list based on that.

- IPV6 support for basic networking
- Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
- Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage
backups for snapshots
- VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NFS
- RBD snapshot backups to secondary are now QCOW2 rather than
raw to save space
- Strongwan VPN Improvements
- Nuage VSP SDN Plugin: Shared networks support, Guest DNS
support, Source- and Static-nat to Underlay and support for Nuage
VSP 4.0
- Significant performances improvements related to Virtual
Router Deployment
- Force power off/stop support for KVM, VMware and XenServer
- Lots of bug fixes and performance improvements


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 12:51 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

The power off operation (or force stop flag in deployVM API) on
VM is supported for all KVM, VMware and XenServer.

- Rohit


From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 2:31:52 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Rajani,

Great job on this release!

Wido,

Here are few more items for the feature list. I've combined
those already mentioned as well.

- IPV6 support for basic networking
- Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
- Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage
backups for snapshots
- VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NFS
- RBD snapshot backups to secondary are now QCOW2 rather than
raw to save space
- Strongwan VPN Improvements
- Nuage VSP SDN Plugin: Shared networks support, Guest DNS
support, Source- and Static-nat to Underlay and support for Nuage
VSP 4.0
- Significant performances improvements related to Virtual
Router Deployment
- KVM force stop support
- Lots of bug fixes and performance improvements

Can those that submitted other features please continue to add
to this list? This will also help with the release notes.

- Si


From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 5:07 AM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

> Op 11 augustus 2017 om 11:56 schreef Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>:
>
>
> Yes the packages are pushed. Status is still the same as my
> previous update.
>

Ok!

> api changes and fixed issues are available at
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30
[https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400]<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

( 
https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400%5D<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30
 )
>

4.10 api changes and fixed issues by karuturi · Pull Request #30
·
apache/cloudstack-docs-rn<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30>
github.com
copied from list generated by @swill

[https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400]<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

( 
https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400%5D<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30
 )
>

4.10 api changes and fixed issues by karuturi · Pull Request #30
·

Re: 4.10 release announcement?

[Rajani Karuturi]

I merged the release notes PR[1]. Do we need to do something else
for the changes to reflect on the docs site[2]?

Downloads section of the website also needs to be updated.

I am sending out a draft announcement to marketing@

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/4.10

[2]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 12, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

Thanks Simon,

Overall, LGTM.

- Rohit

From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID (
swel...@ena.com.INVALID )>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:56:52 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org (
dev@cloudstack.apache.org )
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Thanks Rohit.

i've modified the list based on that.

- IPV6 support for basic networking
- Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
- Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage
backups for snapshots
- VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NFS
- RBD snapshot backups to secondary are now QCOW2 rather than
raw to save space
- Strongwan VPN Improvements
- Nuage VSP SDN Plugin: Shared networks support, Guest DNS
support, Source- and Static-nat to Underlay and support for Nuage
VSP 4.0
- Significant performances improvements related to Virtual
Router Deployment
- Force power off/stop support for KVM, VMware and XenServer
- Lots of bug fixes and performance improvements


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 12:51 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

The power off operation (or force stop flag in deployVM API) on
VM is supported for all KVM, VMware and XenServer.

- Rohit


From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 2:31:52 PM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

Rajani,

Great job on this release!

Wido,

Here are few more items for the feature list. I've combined
those already mentioned as well.

- IPV6 support for basic networking
- Virtio-Scsi disk controller support for KVM
- Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage
backups for snapshots
- VMSnapshot (including memory) support for KVM on NFS
- RBD snapshot backups to secondary are now QCOW2 rather than
raw to save space
- Strongwan VPN Improvements
- Nuage VSP SDN Plugin: Shared networks support, Guest DNS
support, Source- and Static-nat to Underlay and support for Nuage
VSP 4.0
- Significant performances improvements related to Virtual
Router Deployment
- KVM force stop support
- Lots of bug fixes and performance improvements

Can those that submitted other features please continue to add
to this list? This will also help with the release notes.

- Si


From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 5:07 AM
To: Rajani Karuturi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 release announcement?

> Op 11 augustus 2017 om 11:56 schreef Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>:
>
>
> Yes the packages are pushed. Status is still the same as my
> previous update.
>

Ok!

> api changes and fixed issues are available at
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30
[https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400]<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

( 
https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400%5D<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30
 )
>

4.10 api changes and fixed issues by karuturi · Pull Request #30
·
apache/cloudstack-docs-rn<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30>
github.com
copied from list generated by @swill

[https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400]<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

( 
https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/186833?v=4=400%5D<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30
 )
>

4.10 api changes and fixed issues by karuturi · Pull Request #30
·
apache/cloudstack-docs-rn<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30>
github.com
copied from list generated by @swill

>
> Pierre-Luc is helping on upgrade docs.
>
> Someone needs to handle the announcement part. I remember
seeing
> a draft from you?
>

Once we have the docs we can send it out + update website.
Anything other people can help with?

I wrote a draft indeed:

"Hi,

How does this look like initially?

# Apache CloudStack Release 4.10

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release
of the
CloudStack 4.10 This release contains many bug-fixes and
improvements since
the CloudStack previous release.

A few highlights:
- IPv6 support in Basic Networking
- More
- More

Apache 

Re: 4.10 release announcement?

[Rajani Karuturi]

Yes the packages are pushed. Status is still the same as my
previous update.

api changes and fixed issues are available at
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

Pierre-Luc is helping on upgrade docs.

Someone needs to handle the announcement part. I remember seeing
a draft from you?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 10, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Wido den Hollander
(w...@widodh.nl) wrote:

Hi Rajani,

Did you need any help with the 4.10 release announcement?

All the packages are out there and so are the sources. We just
need to update the website and send out a announcement.

What needs to be done and do you need help with this?

Wido

Re: 4.10.0.0 release announcement draft

[Rajani Karuturi]

looks good wido. Thank you.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On July 21, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl)
wrote:

Hi,

How does this look like initially?

# Apache CloudStack Release 4.10

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release
of the
CloudStack 4.10 This release contains many bug-fixes and
improvements since
the CloudStack previous release.

A few highlights:
- IPv6 support in Basic Networking
- More
- More

Apache CloudStack is an integrated Infrastructure-as-a-Service
(IaaS)
software platform that allows users to build feature-rich public
and
private cloud environments. CloudStack includes an intuitive
user interface
and rich API for managing the compute, networking, software, and
storage
resources. The project became an Apache top level project in
March, 2013.

More information about Apache CloudStack can be found at:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/

# Documentation

What's new in CloudStack 4.10:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10.0/about.html

The 4.10.0 release notes include a full list of corrected
issues, as well
as upgrade instructions from previous versions of Apache
CloudStack, and
can be found at:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10.0

The official installation, administration and API documentation
for
each release are available on our Documentation Page:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/

# Downloads

The official source code for the 4.10.0 release can be
downloaded from our
downloads page:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html

## Downloads

The official source code release can be downloaded from:

http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html

In addition to the official source code release, individual
contributors
have also made convenience binaries available on the Apache
CloudStack
download page, and can be found at:

https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu/ (packages to be
published soon)
https://download.cloudstack.org/centos/7/ (packages to be
published soon)

Op 20 juli 2017 om 6:39 schreef Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>:

Hi Wido,

We have to create a draft and send it to marketing@ for review.
Once its finalized, we have to announce the release.

If you could take care of both the steps, that would be of great
help.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On July 19, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Wido den Hollander
(w...@widodh.nl)
wrote:

Where do you want info? I could write something about the IPv6
for Basic Networking.

Wido

Op 19 jul. 2017 om 08:11 heeft Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org> het volgende geschreven:

api changes and fixed issues are available at
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

Pierre-Luc is helping on upgrade docs.

Can someone help on release announcement draft please?

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: 4.10.0.0 release announcement draft

[Rajani Karuturi]

That was the plan Daan. But, unfortunately, not getting enough
time to work on that.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On July 19, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

How about using one of the older announcements as draft, Rajani?
That is how I did it in the past.

On 19/07/2017, 08:11, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

api changes and fixed issues are available at
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

Pierre-Luc is helping on upgrade docs.

Can someone help on release announcement draft please?

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Re: 4.10.0.0 release announcement draft

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi Wido,

We have to create a draft and send it to marketing@ for review.
Once its finalized, we have to announce the release.

If you could take care of both the steps, that would be of great
help.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On July 19, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl)
wrote:

Where do you want info? I could write something about the IPv6
for Basic Networking.

Wido

Op 19 jul. 2017 om 08:11 heeft Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org> het volgende geschreven:

api changes and fixed issues are available at
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

Pierre-Luc is helping on upgrade docs.

Can someone help on release announcement draft please?

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

4.10.0.0 release announcement draft

[Rajani Karuturi]

api changes and fixed issues are available at
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30

Pierre-Luc is helping on upgrade docs.

Can someone help on release announcement draft please?

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [4.10] repos

[Rajani Karuturi]

AFAIK, there is no job that automatically pushes templates. I
manually copied the templates from build
https://builds.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-master-systemvm/272/
to http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On July 12, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion
(pdion...@apache.org) wrote:

Hi,

I've created new jenkins jobs [1] to create package for our
release, The
jobs pushed rpm's but for systemvm, look like there is a wget
job somewhere
that download systemvm template from jenkins from build of
master branch,
I've created a set of systemvm templates that I would like to
published on
download.cloudstack.org but they are most likely going to be
overwritten,
could we disable that job ?

[1] https://builds.cloudstack.org/view/release/

PL

Re: next major release

[Rajani Karuturi]

I made the pom changes on master to 4.11.0.0-SNAPSHOT

4.10 branch is created

master and 4.10 can now accept changes once the upgrade paths are
in place.

Release notes and release announcement are the pending items now.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On July 12, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl)
wrote:

I would say 4.11

5.0 should have major changes (like mentioned), API changes or
other big things. It should have 'killer features'. New GUI, New
API, etc. That kind of things.

Wido

Op 10 juli 2017 om 7:09 schreef Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>:

should it be 4.11.0.0 or 5.0.0.0?

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: ACS Release Note Generation

[Rajani Karuturi]

The scripts are very useful. Thanks for all the hardwork Will and
Pierre-Luc.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On July 7, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Will Stevens
(williamstev...@gmail.com) wrote:

Hey All,
I just sent Rajani a more detailed email including the actual
output, but I
figured I might as well send out a more general email to let
everyone know
about this work.

https://github.com/swill/generate_acs_rn

When I was the 4.9 RM, I added the ability to output the API
changes in a
JSON format [1] in addition to the existing TXT format. I did
this so I
could use this output to script the formatting of the respective
release
notes.

Today I finally got around to releasing the code I had written
to produce
the 'API Changes' [2] and 'Fixed Issues' [3] sections of the
release notes,
so I figured I would let people know about it.

Please feel free to offer suggestions or open Pull Requests if
you would
like changes.

Cheers,

Will

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1658
[2]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.9.0/api-changes.html
[3]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.9.0/fixed_issues.html

next major release

[Rajani Karuturi]

should it be 4.11.0.0 or 5.0.0.0?

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi all,

After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.10.0.0 [1] *passes* with
4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
* Mike Tutkowski
* Wido den Hollander
* Daan Hoogland
* Milamber

+1 (non binding)
* Kris Sterckx
* Boris Stoyanov

0
none

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating.

I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to
give the mirrors time to catch up.

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/dafndhtflon4pshf

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

[Rajani Karuturi]

Thank you Mike, Wido, Kris, Boris, Daan and Milamber for voting.
I will send a results mail and will soon publish the release.

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Tested building .deb packages
> - Tested deployment with advanced network Ubuntu 16.04/KVM/NFS
>
> Milamber
>
>
> On 03/07/2017 05:52, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/9d2893d44a3c3a48
>> 29be0964cc991272c1d13e4d
>> Commit:9d2893d44a3c3a4829be0964cc991272c1d13e4d
>> Branch: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.10.0.0-RC2017070
>> 3T1006
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/
>>
>> SystemVm Templates: http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC7/
>>
>> PRs merged since RC4: #2150 and #2089
>> PRs merged since RC5: revert of #2084
>> PRs merged since RC6: #2162
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate
>> "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ~Rajani
>> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

[Rajani Karuturi]

Thanks Mike.

Is anyone else testing? We need atleast 3 binding votes to create
the Release.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On July 3, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

+1

I examined the changes for this RC when compared to the previous
one and my positive vote remains.

On Jul 2, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

Hi All,

I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up
for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/9d2893d44a3c3a4829be0964cc991272c1d13e4d
Commit:9d2893d44a3c3a4829be0964cc991272c1d13e4d
Branch:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.10.0.0-RC20170703T1006

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

SystemVm Templates:
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC7/

PRs merged since RC4: #2150 and #2089
PRs merged since RC5: revert of #2084
PRs merged since RC6: #2162

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi All,

I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/9d2893d44a3c3a4829be0964cc991272c1d13e4d
Commit:9d2893d44a3c3a4829be0964cc991272c1d13e4d
Branch: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.10.0.0-RC20170703T1006

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

SystemVm Templates: http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC7/

PRs merged since RC4: #2150 and #2089
PRs merged since RC5: revert of #2084
PRs merged since RC6: #2162

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

[Rajani Karuturi]

Yes Mike. Will create new RC an publish in few hours.

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
wrote:

> Hi Rajani,
>
> Just checking: Was it your intention to create a new RC on Monday?
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On 6/28/17, 3:28 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for confirming. I will keep this RC open for two more days
> for others to test before next RC.
>
> Agree on merging PRs part. That is our release principle in
> general.
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On June 28, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Kris Sterckx
> (kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net) wrote:
>
> Hi Rajani,
>
> Yes we qualified that fix. Can anyone else pls also confirm.
>
> To be very clear - this is a generic issue (with native VR based
> ACS), not
> tight to Nuage at all.
>
> We should not take in new PR's when we move from RC to RC to my
> view - this
> way always new issues will pop up.
>
> Best,
>
> Kris
>
> On 28 June 2017 at 06:49, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Kris,
>
> Can you please apply 2162 locally and see if you are OK with the
> changes? We shouldn't be spending one RC cycle for one issue.
>
> Ideally, we should have more CIs running on PRs from different
> usage perspectives(like managed storage, nuage, basic network,
> local storage, etc.). That would help uncover issues before they
> are merged.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On June 27, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Kris Sterckx
> (kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net) wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I 'm sorry for voting -1 again.
>
> Issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9980
>
> Caused by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089
>
> Fixed by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2162
>
> Kris
>
> - Nuage Networks
>
> On 26 June 2017 at 18:58, Tutkowski, Mike
> <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I am not concerned about the code changes that went into this RC
> since the
> previous RC, so I am still happy with the amount of automated
> and manual
> testing that I performed on a previous RC.
>
> On 6/25/17, 11:07 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up
> for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/
> 0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff
> Commit:0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff
> Branch: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.10.0.0-
> RC20170626T1011
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
> same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/
>
> SystemVm Templates:
> http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC6/
>
> PRs merged since RC4: #2150 and #2089
> PRs merged since RC5: revert of #2084
>
> PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
> to
> indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> ~Rajani
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
>

Re: Issue 9367

[Rajani Karuturi]

fix for it(PR #1829) is merged and will be available with
4.10.0.0 and the next release of 4.9.*

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 29, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Lotic Lists (li...@lotic.com.br)
wrote:

Hi all

News about issue 9367?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9367

I need a volume with 6TB. If I create an extended volume with 3x
2TB that
issue affect the environment.

Env: XenServer 6.5, ACS 4.9.2, Guest Win2k12 R2 HVM

Thanks

Marcelo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

[Rajani Karuturi]

Thanks for confirming. I will keep this RC open for two more days
for others to test before next RC.

Agree on merging PRs part. That is our release principle in
general.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 28, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Kris Sterckx
(kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net) wrote:

Hi Rajani,

Yes we qualified that fix. Can anyone else pls also confirm.

To be very clear - this is a generic issue (with native VR based
ACS), not
tight to Nuage at all.

We should not take in new PR's when we move from RC to RC to my
view - this
way always new issues will pop up.

Best,

Kris

On 28 June 2017 at 06:49, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

Hi Kris,

Can you please apply 2162 locally and see if you are OK with the
changes? We shouldn't be spending one RC cycle for one issue.

Ideally, we should have more CIs running on PRs from different
usage perspectives(like managed storage, nuage, basic network,
local storage, etc.). That would help uncover issues before they
are merged.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 27, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Kris Sterckx
(kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net) wrote:

Hi all,

I 'm sorry for voting -1 again.

Issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9980

Caused by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089

Fixed by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2162

Kris

- Nuage Networks

On 26 June 2017 at 18:58, Tutkowski, Mike
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:

+1 (binding)

I am not concerned about the code changes that went into this RC
since the
previous RC, so I am still happy with the amount of automated
and manual
testing that I performed on a previous RC.

On 6/25/17, 11:07 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

Hi All,

I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up
for a
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/
0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff
Commit:0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff
Branch: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.10.0.0-
RC20170626T1011

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

SystemVm Templates:
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC6/

PRs merged since RC4: #2150 and #2089
PRs merged since RC5: revert of #2084

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to
indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

[Rajani Karuturi]

Yes, those shouldn't have been merged.  We should have released
faster and then merged.

Lets think of it as ours and us than theirs and those.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 28, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Paul Angus
(paul.an...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

Those new PRs should not have been merged.

Those on the mailing list should respect the process and accept
that they will have to wait until code is unfrozen.

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
Sent: 28 June 2017 07:45
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Paul,

Which shows we are not actively following RCs. That PR was a
blocker for RC3 and was well discussed. That PR is a perfect
example that we are not working as community to release code.
That is a fix for a blocker which stayed open for more than 45
days.

If you see till RC2 it was only blockers that were merged. But,
since it has taken a lot more time to fix blockers, more PRs were
merged on request on the mailing list(and we don't have people
even to object it). you can think of it as a combination of two
releases due to the time it has taken.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 28, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Angus
(paul.an...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

Rajani,

I suspect that fatigue with the 4.10 release testing that we are
seeing is due to the time it has taken to release it. And that is
has been caused by new code going in, which have introduced new
bugs.

This was demonstrated in the last -1 from Kris. This change was
merged 10 days ago.

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com ) 
( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
Sent: 28 June 2017 06:14
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

We can do a release every month as long as we have enough people
actively participating in the release process.

We have people who wants to have their code/features checked in.
We, very clearly do not have enough people working on
releases/blockers. How many of us are testing/voting on releases
or PRs? We have blockers in jira, with no one to fix. We have PRs
open for release blockers for more than a month with no one to
test.

I would ask everyone to start testing releases/PRs and voting on
them actively.

We need people who can do the work. We already know what needs
to be done as outlined in the release principles wiki after long
discussions on this list.

Whether we create a branch off RC or continue on master wont
change the current situation.

We, as community should commit to testing and releasing code.
principles and theory wont help.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 27, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
(rafaelweingart...@gmail.com) wrote:

+1 to what Paul said.
IMHO, as soon as we start a release candidate to close a
version, all merges should stop (period); the only exceptions
should be PRs that address specific problems in the RC.
I always thought that we had a protocol for that [1]; maybe for
this version, we have not followed it?

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+principles+for+Apache+CloudStack+4.6+and+up#ReleaseprinciplesforApacheCloudStack4.6andup-Preparingnewrelease:masterfrozen

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Paul Angus
<paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

Hi All,

>From my view point 'we' have been the architects of our own
downfall. Once a code freeze is in place NO new features, NO
enhancements should be going in. Once we're at an RC stage, NO
new bug fixes other that for the blockers should be going in.
that way the release gets out, and the next one can get going.
If
4.10 had gone out in a timely fashion, then we'd probably be on
4.11 if not 4.12 by now, with all the new features AND all the
new fixes in.

People sliding new changes/bug fixes/enhancements in are not
making the product better, they're stopping progress. As we can
clearly see here.

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com ) 
( http://www.shapeblue.com ) ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
Sent: 27 June 2017 01:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve
discussed in the past is that overall community participation in
the RC process has dropped off when such a new branch is created
(since the community as a whole

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

[Rajani Karuturi]

I don't think creating a branch will help in releasing faster. It
will only make it worse in my opinion.

If we can release faster, features will stay in the PR branch for
a short while and can be merged quickly.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 28, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@gmail.com) wrote:

I'm with Mike on this. fixes go into the rc branch, features
don't and
that's a clearer line then we have now. or we could just keep
rc'ing
untill one passes and keep working on stablising whichever
branch we
choose for that allowing both features and fixes.

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:

Hi,

I personally still like the idea of a new branch being created
right around the time we cut our first RC.

Even if people want to commit changes to the new branch, they
should understand that that code won't be formally released until
the pending RC is validated and released.

That being the case, I would think those who choose to commit to
the new branch will have a vested interest in the RC going out,
as well.

In any event, in addition to the current automated regression
tests that are run, we still have a lot of tests that are not
hooked into the build that are being run ad hoc (managed storage
automated tests are an example). Additionally, we seem to have a
lot of manual tests being run.

Until we can deliver a framework in which we have a very high
percentage of the system covered by automated tests, there is
really no way we should consider monthly releases.

I think we are still shooting for releases every four months,
which seems fair given our current system.

If we enact some deadlines like a code freeze going forward,
that should help. With only blocker PRs going into subsequent
RCs, we should be able to avoid a lot of unnecessary spin.

I definitely want to point out that I appreciate everyone's time
and effort. In particular, I want to be clear that it is not my
intent to be critical of anyone who's been working in release
management. My only goal with this chain of e-mails is to see if
we can continue to improve the process.

Thanks, everyone!
Mike

On Jun 27, 2017, at 11:14 PM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

We can do a release every month as long as we have enough people
actively participating in the release process.

We have people who wants to have their code/features checked in.
We, very clearly do not have enough people working on
releases/blockers. How many of us are testing/voting on releases
or PRs? We have blockers in jira, with no one to fix. We have
PRs
open for release blockers for more than a month with no one to
test.

I would ask everyone to start testing releases/PRs and voting on
them actively.

We need people who can do the work. We already know what needs
to
be done as outlined in the release principles wiki after long
discussions on this list.

Whether we create a branch off RC or continue on master wont
change the current situation.

We, as community should commit to testing and releasing code.
principles and theory wont help.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 27, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
(rafaelweingart...@gmail.com) wrote:

+1 to what Paul said.
IMHO, as soon as we start a release candidate to close a
version, all
merges should stop (period); the only exceptions should be PRs
that address
specific problems in the RC.
I always thought that we had a protocol for that [1]; maybe for
this
version, we have not followed it?

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+principles+for+Apache+CloudStack+4.6+and+up#ReleaseprinciplesforApacheCloudStack4.6andup-Preparingnewrelease:masterfrozen

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Paul Angus
<paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

Hi All,

>From my view point 'we' have been the architects of our own
downfall. Once
a code freeze is in place NO new features, NO enhancements
should be going
in. Once we're at an RC stage, NO new bug fixes other that for
the blockers
should be going in. that way the release gets out, and the next
one can get
going. If 4.10 had gone out in a timely fashion, then we'd
probably be on
4.11 if not 4.12 by now, with all the new features AND all the
new fixes in.

People sliding new changes/bug fixes/enhancements in are not
making the
product better, they're stopping progress. As we can clearly see
here.

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com ) 
( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
Sent: 27 June 2017 01:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve
discussed
in the past is that overall community part

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

[Rajani Karuturi]

Paul,

Which shows we are not actively following RCs. That PR was a
blocker for RC3 and was well discussed. That PR is a perfect
example that we are not working as community to release code.
That is a fix for a blocker which stayed open for more than 45
days.

If you see till RC2 it was only blockers that were merged. But,
since it has taken a lot more time to fix blockers, more PRs were
merged on request on the mailing list(and we don't have people
even to object it). you can think of it as a combination of two
releases due to the time it has taken.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 28, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Angus
(paul.an...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

Rajani,

I suspect that fatigue with the 4.10 release testing that we are
seeing is due to the time it has taken to release it. And that is
has been caused by new code going in, which have introduced new
bugs.

This was demonstrated in the last -1 from Kris. This change was
merged 10 days ago.

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
Sent: 28 June 2017 06:14
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

We can do a release every month as long as we have enough people
actively participating in the release process.

We have people who wants to have their code/features checked in.
We, very clearly do not have enough people working on
releases/blockers. How many of us are testing/voting on releases
or PRs? We have blockers in jira, with no one to fix. We have PRs
open for release blockers for more than a month with no one to
test.

I would ask everyone to start testing releases/PRs and voting on
them actively.

We need people who can do the work. We already know what needs
to be done as outlined in the release principles wiki after long
discussions on this list.

Whether we create a branch off RC or continue on master wont
change the current situation.

We, as community should commit to testing and releasing code.
principles and theory wont help.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 27, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
(rafaelweingart...@gmail.com) wrote:

+1 to what Paul said.
IMHO, as soon as we start a release candidate to close a
version, all merges should stop (period); the only exceptions
should be PRs that address specific problems in the RC.
I always thought that we had a protocol for that [1]; maybe for
this version, we have not followed it?

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+principles+for+Apache+CloudStack+4.6+and+up#ReleaseprinciplesforApacheCloudStack4.6andup-Preparingnewrelease:masterfrozen

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Paul Angus
<paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

Hi All,

>From my view point 'we' have been the architects of our own
downfall. Once a code freeze is in place NO new features, NO
enhancements should be going in. Once we're at an RC stage, NO
new bug fixes other that for the blockers should be going in.
that way the release gets out, and the next one can get going. If
4.10 had gone out in a timely fashion, then we'd probably be on
4.11 if not 4.12 by now, with all the new features AND all the
new fixes in.

People sliding new changes/bug fixes/enhancements in are not
making the product better, they're stopping progress. As we can
clearly see here.

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com ) 
( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
Sent: 27 June 2017 01:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve
discussed in the past is that overall community participation in
the RC process has dropped off when such a new branch is created
(since the community as a whole tends to focus more on the new
branch rather than on testing the RC and releasing it).

I believe we should do the following: As we approach the first
RC, we need to limit the number of PRs going into the branch (in
order to stabilize it). If we had a super duper array of
automated regression tests that ran against the code, then we
might be able to avoid this, but our automated test suite is not
extensive enough for us to do so.

As we approach the first RC, only blockers and trivial (ex. text
changes)
PRs should be permitted in. Once we cut the first RC, create a
new branch for ongoing dev work. In between RCs, we can only
allow in code related to blocker PRs (or trivial text changes, as
discussed before).

What do people think?

On 6/13/17, 4:56 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

thi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

[Rajani Karuturi]

We can do a release every month as long as we have enough people
actively participating in the release process.

We have people who wants to have their code/features checked in.
We, very clearly do not have enough people working on
releases/blockers. How many of us are testing/voting on releases
or PRs? We have blockers in jira, with no one to fix. We have PRs
open for release blockers for more than a month with no one to
test.

I would ask everyone to start testing releases/PRs and voting on
them actively.

We need people who can do the work. We already know what needs to
be done as outlined in the release principles wiki after long
discussions on this list.

Whether we create a branch off RC or continue on master wont
change the current situation.

We, as community should commit to testing and releasing code.
principles and theory wont help.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 27, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
(rafaelweingart...@gmail.com) wrote:

+1 to what Paul said.
IMHO, as soon as we start a release candidate to close a
version, all
merges should stop (period); the only exceptions should be PRs
that address
specific problems in the RC.
I always thought that we had a protocol for that [1]; maybe for
this
version, we have not followed it?

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+principles+for+Apache+CloudStack+4.6+and+up#ReleaseprinciplesforApacheCloudStack4.6andup-Preparingnewrelease:masterfrozen

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Paul Angus
<paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

Hi All,

>From my view point 'we' have been the architects of our own
downfall. Once
a code freeze is in place NO new features, NO enhancements
should be going
in. Once we're at an RC stage, NO new bug fixes other that for
the blockers
should be going in. that way the release gets out, and the next
one can get
going. If 4.10 had gone out in a timely fashion, then we'd
probably be on
4.11 if not 4.12 by now, with all the new features AND all the
new fixes in.

People sliding new changes/bug fixes/enhancements in are not
making the
product better, they're stopping progress. As we can clearly see
here.

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
Sent: 27 June 2017 01:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

I tend to agree with you here, Daan. I know the downside we’ve
discussed
in the past is that overall community participation in the RC
process has
dropped off when such a new branch is created (since the
community as a
whole tends to focus more on the new branch rather than on
testing the RC
and releasing it).

I believe we should do the following: As we approach the first
RC, we need
to limit the number of PRs going into the branch (in order to
stabilize
it). If we had a super duper array of automated regression tests
that ran
against the code, then we might be able to avoid this, but our
automated
test suite is not extensive enough for us to do so.

As we approach the first RC, only blockers and trivial (ex. text
changes)
PRs should be permitted in. Once we cut the first RC, create a
new branch
for ongoing dev work. In between RCs, we can only allow in code
related to
blocker PRs (or trivial text changes, as discussed before).

What do people think?

On 6/13/17, 4:56 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

this is why i say we should branch on first RC, fix in release
branch
only and merge forward

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Will Stevens <
williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote:

I know it is hard to justify not merging PRs that seem ready but
are

not

blockers in an RC, but it is a vicious circle which ultimately

results in a

longer RC process.

It is something i struggled with as a release manager as well.

On Jun 13, 2017 1:56 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>

wrote:

Thanks Mike,

Will hold off next RC until we hear an update from you.

Regarding merging non-blockers, unfortunately, its a side-effect
of taking more than three months in the RC phase :(

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi everyone,

I had a little time this evening and re-ran some VMware-related
tests around managed storage. I noticed a problem that I’d like
to investigate before we spin up the next RC. Let’s hold off on
the next RC until I can find out more (I should know more within
24 hours).

Thanks!
Mike

On 6/12/17, 2:40 AM, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl>
wrote:

Op 10 juni 2017 om 21:18 schreef "Tutkowski, Mike"

<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>:

Hi,

I opened a PR against the most 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi Kris,

Can you please apply 2162 locally and see if you are OK with the
changes? We shouldn't be spending one RC cycle for one issue.

Ideally, we should have more CIs running on PRs from different
usage perspectives(like managed storage, nuage, basic network,
local storage, etc.). That would help uncover issues before they
are merged.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 27, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Kris Sterckx
(kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net) wrote:

Hi all,

I 'm sorry for voting -1 again.

Issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9980

Caused by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089

Fixed by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2162

Kris

- Nuage Networks

On 26 June 2017 at 18:58, Tutkowski, Mike
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:

+1 (binding)

I am not concerned about the code changes that went into this RC
since the
previous RC, so I am still happy with the amount of automated
and manual
testing that I performed on a previous RC.

On 6/25/17, 11:07 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

Hi All,

I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up
for a
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/
0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff
Commit:0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff
Branch: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.10.0.0-
RC20170626T1011

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

SystemVm Templates:
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC6/

PRs merged since RC4: #2150 and #2089
PRs merged since RC5: revert of #2084

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to
indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi All,

I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff
Commit:0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff
Branch: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.10.0.0-RC20170626T1011

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

SystemVm Templates: http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC6/

PRs merged since RC4: #2150 and #2089
PRs merged since RC5: revert of #2084

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

[Rajani Karuturi]

Agree. Will create rc6 soon.

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 23 Jun 2017 3:17 p.m., "Wido den Hollander"  wrote:

>
> > Op 22 juni 2017 om 21:38 schreef Kris Sterckx <
> kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net>:
> >
> >
> > Sorry , i meant  PR/2084  >
> >
>
> Ok, so revert and RC6 then?
>
> Wido
>
> > On 22 June 2017 at 21:25, Kris Sterckx 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks to Daan for driving the work at PR/2155
> > >  , but i believe it
> needs
> > > more soak time.
> > >
> > > We found today this PR is breaking VR-provided Guest DNS for SDN
> providers
> > > also.
> > >
> > > As Daan also suggested, i would recommend taking it out 4.10 and give
> it
> > > some more cycles in 4.11.
> > >
> > > We will support qualifying it.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > Kris
> > >
> > > - Nuage Networks
> > >
> > > On 21 June 2017 at 16:45, Kris Sterckx  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi  Wido, Daan, all
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> We have just pushed a workaround
> > >>
> > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2155
> > >>
> > >> This works for us.
> > >>
> > >> The CsPassword class seems like not needed at all ?  The important
> part
> > >> for us is that  iptables_change = True  is set also in case of
> password
> > >> handling.  That was missing.
> > >>
> > >> Daan, we left a TODO for you to look into deeper though. We worked at
> > >> getting the databag handling fixed inside the class but as we don't
> have
> > >> full background, we kept hitting issues. Until we then saw that
> commenting
> > >> out the lines which we did actually works as well.
> > >>
> > >> I suggest the /2155 is reviewed by the involved stakeholders and
> based on
> > >> that we decide ?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> thanks and toi-toi :-)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Kris
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
>

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi All,

I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/058e34224c0555396c043c6473ac07ab3e8424cd
Commit:058e34224c0555396c043c6473ac07ab3e8424cd
Branch: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.10.0.0-RC20170620T1023

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

SystemVm Templates: http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC5/

New PRs merged since RC4: #2150 and #2089

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Thanks,
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

[Rajani Karuturi]

Thanks Mike,

Will hold off next RC until we hear an update from you.

Regarding merging non-blockers, unfortunately, its a side-effect
of taking more than three months in the RC phase :(

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi everyone,

I had a little time this evening and re-ran some VMware-related
tests around managed storage. I noticed a problem that I’d like
to investigate before we spin up the next RC. Let’s hold off on
the next RC until I can find out more (I should know more within
24 hours).

Thanks!
Mike

On 6/12/17, 2:40 AM, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl>
wrote:

> Op 10 juni 2017 om 21:18 schreef "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I opened a PR against the most recent RC:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2141
>
> I ran all managed-storage regression tests against it and they
pass (as noted in detail in the PR).
>
> If someone wants to take this code and create a new RC from
it, I’m +1 on the new RC as long as this is the only commit added
to it since the current RC.

Thanks Mike!

If this PR is good we should probably merge it asap and go for
RC5.

4.10 should really be released by now.

Wido

>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On 6/9/17, 7:43 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I found a critical issue that was introduced into this RC
since the most recent RC, so I am -1 on this RC.
>
> The fix for this ticket breaks the support for storing volume
snapshots on primary storage (which is a feature managed storage
can support):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9685
>
> Here is the SHA: 336df84f1787de962a67d0a34551f9027303040e
>
> At a high level, what it does is remove a row from the
cloud.snapshot_store_ref table when a volume is deleted that has
one or more volume snapshots.
>
> This is fine for non-managed (traditional) storage; however,
managed storage can store volume snapshots on primary storage, so
removing this row breaks that functionality.
>
> I can fix the problem that this commit introduced by looking
at the primary storage that supports the volume snapshot and
checking the following: 1) Is this managed storage? 2) If yes, is
the snapshot in question stored on that primary storage?
>
> The problem is I will be out of the office for a couple weeks
and will not be able to address this until I return.
>
> We could revert the commit, but I still will not have time to
run the managed-storage regression test suite until I return.
>
> On a side note, it looks like this commit was introduced since
the most recent RC. I would argue that it was not a blocker and
should not have been placed into the new RC. We (as a community)
tend to have a lot of code go in between RCs and that just
increases the chances of introducing critical issues and thus
delaying the release. We’ve gotten better at this over the years,
but we should focus more on only allowing the entry of new code
into a follow-on RC that is critical (or so trivial as to not at
all be likely to introduce any problems…like fixing an error
message).
>
> Thanks for your efforts on this, everyone!
> Mike
>
> On 6/9/17, 8:52 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rajani,
>
> I will see if I can get all of my managed-storage testing
(both automated and manual) done today. If not, we’ll need to see
if someone else can complete it before we OK this RC as I won’t
be back in the office for a couple weeks. I’ll report back later
today.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> On 6/9/17, 2:34 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:
>
> Yup. thats right. I dont know how it happened but, it created
> from the previous RC commit. The script is supposed to do a
git
> pull. I didn't notice any failures. Not sure what went wrong.
>
> Thanks for finding it mike. I am creating RC4 now and
cancelling
> this.
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On June 9, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
> (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
>
> Hi Rajani,
>
> I don’t see the following PR in this RC:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098
>
> I ran all of my managed-storage regression tests. They all
> passed with the exception of the one that led to PR 2098.
>
> As I examine the RC in a bit more detail, it sits on top of
> ed2f573, but I think it should sit on top of ed376fc.
>
> As a result, I am -1 on the RC.
>
> It takes me about a day to run all of the managed-storage
> regression tests and I am out of the office for the next
couple
> weeks, so I’d really like to avoid anot

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC4

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi All,

I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/2d3586b3fca18283e8e2449add2bf1864c4260f1
Commit:2d3586b3fca18283e8e2449add2bf1864c4260f1
Branch:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.10.0.0-RC20170609T1354

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

SystemVm Templates: http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC4/

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

[Rajani Karuturi]

Yup. thats right. I dont know how it happened but, it created
from the previous RC commit. The script is supposed to do a git
pull. I didn't notice any failures. Not sure what went wrong.

Thanks for finding it mike. I am creating RC4 now and cancelling
this.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On June 9, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi Rajani,

I don’t see the following PR in this RC:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098

I ran all of my managed-storage regression tests. They all
passed with the exception of the one that led to PR 2098.

As I examine the RC in a bit more detail, it sits on top of
ed2f573, but I think it should sit on top of ed376fc.

As a result, I am -1 on the RC.

It takes me about a day to run all of the managed-storage
regression tests and I am out of the office for the next couple
weeks, so I’d really like to avoid another RC until I’m back and
able to test the next RC.

Thanks!
Mike

On 6/7/17, 4:36 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote:

Hi All,

I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up
for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=a55738a31d0073f2925c6fb84bf7a6bb32f4ca27
Commit:a55738a31d0073f2925c6fb84bf7a6bb32f4ca27
Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170607T1407

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

SystemVm Templates:
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC3/

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: Templates on http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/

[Rajani Karuturi]

username is ubunutu. Password is returned in the response of
deployVirtualMachine api call. you can also stop the vm and
call resetPasswordForVirtualMachine to generate new password.

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Rashmi Dixit 
wrote:

> Thanks Ivan. I tried ubuntu/ubuntu or centos/centos but that hasn’t worked
> either.
>
> I will just go ahead with it being password enabled.
>
> Rashmi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivan Kudryavtsev [mailto:kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 7:18 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Templates on http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/
>
> Hi. They are password-enabled, just login is not a root but, ubuntu for
> ubuntu, etc...
>
> 7 июн. 2017 г. 20:32 пользователь "Rashmi Dixit" <
> rashmi_di...@accelerite.com> написал:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Can anyone let me know if there is a default root password for the
> > templates created on http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/? I haven't
> > been able to locate any documentation on the same.
> >
> > Rashmi
> >
> > Rashmi Dixit
> > Principal Product Engineer | CloudPlatform | www.accelerite.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > DISCLAIMER
> > ==
> > This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which
> > is the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is
> > intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> > addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not
> > authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this
> > message. If you have received this communication in error, please
> > notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Accelerite, a
> > Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for virus
> infected mails.
> >
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
> the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
> only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain,
> copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any
> liability for virus infected mails.
>

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi All,

I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=a55738a31d0073f2925c6fb84bf7a6bb32f4ca27
Commit:a55738a31d0073f2925c6fb84bf7a6bb32f4ca27
Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170607T1407

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

SystemVm Templates: http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC3/

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

[Rajani Karuturi]

PR 2089 - vRouters fixes & performance improvement is the only
blocker for RC3. If we can resolve it quickly, I will create RC3.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

Thanks Rajani,

I'll try to help over those pending PRs.

Regards.


From: Rajani K <rjnk...@gmail.com>
Sent: 18 May 2017 15:50:56
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

These are the pending PRs for RC3:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/2

Blockers are tagged as such.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

On May 18, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

All,

Other than Mike's blocker fix #2098, do we have any other
outstanding issues blocking the 4.10.0.0 release?

Regards.


From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
Sent: 12 May 2017 01:53:44
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi Rajani,

I opened the following PR (against master) to fix the blocker
CLOUDSTACK-9917:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098

Thanks!
Mike

On 5/10/17, 10:40 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

Thanks for testing Mike.

RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR

Any other additions?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

I've been running regression tests against the release
candidate.

So far, all tests but one have passed.

The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It
looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this
thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for
managed storage in a particular situation.

As a result of this, I was going to vote -1.

I'm guessing the fix will not be complicated, but is important.

I don't yet have the fix, however. Once I do, I can reply to
this thread.

On May 10, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before
creating
RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it.

If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections,
we
can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl)
wrote:

Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens
<williamstev...@gmail.com>:

Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only
with basic
networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes
noticeable when
you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement?

Well, the provisioning is the same between Basic and Advanced.
The VR is utterly slow in doing that.

It happens when you have a lot of VMs in those networks.

In our case we have a couple of thousands VMs.

What I'd like to prevent is that this is merged into 4.9.3, but
is not in 4.10.

However, I don't want to delay 4.10 any longer.

Wido

On May 9, 2017 5:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl>
wrote:

+0

I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bug we are facing, but for us
4.10 would
be a problem due to the VR performance.

A PR is open for this, but I also don't want to delay 4.10 any
longer:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089

Technically the VR works, it is just that deployment is utterly
slow.

Wido

Op 9 mei 2017 om 7:31 schreef Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up
for a

vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=

fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204

Commit:fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170509T1030

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to

indicate

"(binding)" with their vote

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com 
( http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com )> 
( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

[Rajani Karuturi]

Thanks for testing Mike.

RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR

Any other additions?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

I've been running regression tests against the release candidate.

So far, all tests but one have passed.

The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It
looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this
thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for
managed storage in a particular situation.

As a result of this, I was going to vote -1.

I'm guessing the fix will not be complicated, but is important.

I don't yet have the fix, however. Once I do, I can reply to
this thread.

On May 10, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before
creating
RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it.

If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections,
we
can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl)
wrote:

Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens
<williamstev...@gmail.com>:

Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only
with basic
networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes
noticeable when
you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement?

Well, the provisioning is the same between Basic and Advanced.
The VR is utterly slow in doing that.

It happens when you have a lot of VMs in those networks.

In our case we have a couple of thousands VMs.

What I'd like to prevent is that this is merged into 4.9.3, but
is not in 4.10.

However, I don't want to delay 4.10 any longer.

Wido

On May 9, 2017 5:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl>
wrote:

+0

I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bug we are facing, but for us
4.10 would
be a problem due to the VR performance.

A PR is open for this, but I also don't want to delay 4.10 any
longer:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089

Technically the VR works, it is just that deployment is utterly
slow.

Wido

Op 9 mei 2017 om 7:31 schreef Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up
for a

vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=

fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204

Commit:fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170509T1030

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to

indicate

"(binding)" with their vote

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

[Rajani Karuturi]

I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before creating
RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it.

If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections, we
can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl)
wrote:

Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens
<williamstev...@gmail.com>:

Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only
with basic
networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes
noticeable when
you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement?

Well, the provisioning is the same between Basic and Advanced.
The VR is utterly slow in doing that.

It happens when you have a lot of VMs in those networks.

In our case we have a couple of thousands VMs.

What I'd like to prevent is that this is merged into 4.9.3, but
is not in 4.10.

However, I don't want to delay 4.10 any longer.

Wido

On May 9, 2017 5:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl>
wrote:

+0

I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bug we are facing, but for us
4.10 would
be a problem due to the VR performance.

A PR is open for this, but I also don't want to delay 4.10 any
longer:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089

Technically the VR works, it is just that deployment is utterly
slow.

Wido

Op 9 mei 2017 om 7:31 schreef Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up
for a

vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=

fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204

Commit:fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170509T1030

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to

indicate

"(binding)" with their vote

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: GSoC'17

[Rajani Karuturi]

Congratulations Sachin!

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 5, 2017 at 9:19 PM, sachin patil (sachin931...@gmail.com)
wrote:

Hello all,

I have been selected for GSoC'17 and would be working on
CloudStack-9778
(
Adding a new NoVNC console ).

The aim of this feature is to make it possible to connect to VM
consoles
using VNC client called NoVNC in browsers.

NoVNC console is better than our current customized console.
Additional
features that NoVNC provides over the current customized console
include a
copy/paste functionality, scrollback. NoVNC uses websockets that
provides a
more reliable and secure connections.

My proposal can be found here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IqJiZ_sJZktAoPjdQePoinBNZzPboR1jCkUXBpqanjo/edit

I have been selected for this project with my mentors Rohit
Yadav and Syed
Ahmed.

Would like to know about your thoughts/ideas on this project.

Regards,
Sachin Patil

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi All,

I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
Commit:fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170509T1030

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features

[Rajani Karuturi]

Yes. That's the only blocker. Once it's merged, I will create rc2

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 8 May 2017 7:24 p.m., "Simon Weller" <swel...@ena.com> wrote:

> The only PR that is currently showing in blocker status is :
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062
>
> Are there others that should be tagged?
>
>
> - Si
>
>
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 6:43 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features
>
> Rajani,
>
>
> Can we have a list of outstanding blockers/issues?
>
>
> I also saw some enhancement PRs merged, which I think we should be
> avoiding and instead have our resources spent on fixing the release
> blockers, thanks.
>
>
> Regards.
>
> 
> From: Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
> Sent: 08 May 2017 16:20:01
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features
>
> I disagree. The release process is taking long because we dont
> have enough people working on the release. Sometimes, even the
> blockers don't get enough attention. There is no point in adding
> features on already broken/blocked master which is not
> releasable. "un-freezing" master for new features shouldn't be
> the goal in my opinion. We should move towards faster
> releases/release cycles.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On May 8, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland
> (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>
> LS,
>
> In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are
> waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs
> certainly must be solved, users that are not hindered by those
> bugs directly are stopped by them. Therefore, I propose we will
> fork on the first RC branches for future releases, so that
> development is not stopped for it. If the release process takes
> too long and to nice features get merged in between we can always
> decide to re-branch before releasing.
>
> Thoughts..?
> Daan
>
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features

[Rajani Karuturi]

It's waiting on test update from haijiao

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 8 May 2017 8:05 p.m., "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote:

> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062 should be ready to merge, I
> think I had that one ready a couple weeks ago.
>
> *Will Stevens*
> CTO
>
> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:
>
> > The only PR that is currently showing in blocker status is :
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062
> >
> > Are there others that should be tagged?
> >
> >
> > - Si
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> > Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 6:43 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for
> features
> >
> > Rajani,
> >
> >
> > Can we have a list of outstanding blockers/issues?
> >
> >
> > I also saw some enhancement PRs merged, which I think we should be
> > avoiding and instead have our resources spent on fixing the release
> > blockers, thanks.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > 
> > From: Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
> > Sent: 08 May 2017 16:20:01
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for
> features
> >
> > I disagree. The release process is taking long because we dont
> > have enough people working on the release. Sometimes, even the
> > blockers don't get enough attention. There is no point in adding
> > features on already broken/blocked master which is not
> > releasable. "un-freezing" master for new features shouldn't be
> > the goal in my opinion. We should move towards faster
> > releases/release cycles.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > ~ Rajani
> >
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
> > On May 8, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland
> > (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> >
> > LS,
> >
> > In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are
> > waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs
> > certainly must be solved, users that are not hindered by those
> > bugs directly are stopped by them. Therefore, I propose we will
> > fork on the first RC branches for future releases, so that
> > development is not stopped for it. If the release process takes
> > too long and to nice features get merged in between we can always
> > decide to re-branch before releasing.
> >
> > Thoughts..?
> > Daan
> >
> > daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features

[Rajani Karuturi]

All the PRs are tagged with milestone 4.10.0.0 and label Blocker

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 8 May 2017 5:14 p.m., "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Rajani,
>
>
> Can we have a list of outstanding blockers/issues?
>
>
> I also saw some enhancement PRs merged, which I think we should be
> avoiding and instead have our resources spent on fixing the release
> blockers, thanks.
>
>
> Regards.
>
> 
> From: Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
> Sent: 08 May 2017 16:20:01
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features
>
> I disagree. The release process is taking long because we dont
> have enough people working on the release. Sometimes, even the
> blockers don't get enough attention. There is no point in adding
> features on already broken/blocked master which is not
> releasable. "un-freezing" master for new features shouldn't be
> the goal in my opinion. We should move towards faster
> releases/release cycles.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On May 8, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland
> (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>
> LS,
>
> In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are
> waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs
> certainly must be solved, users that are not hindered by those
> bugs directly are stopped by them. Therefore, I propose we will
> fork on the first RC branches for future releases, so that
> development is not stopped for it. If the release process takes
> too long and to nice features get merged in between we can always
> decide to re-branch before releasing.
>
> Thoughts..?
> Daan
>
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features

[Rajani Karuturi]

I disagree. The release process is taking long because we dont
have enough people working on the release. Sometimes, even the
blockers don't get enough attention. There is no point in adding
features on already broken/blocked master which is not
releasable. "un-freezing" master for new features shouldn't be
the goal in my opinion. We should move towards faster
releases/release cycles.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 8, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

LS,

In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are
waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs
certainly must be solved, users that are not hindered by those
bugs directly are stopped by them. Therefore, I propose we will
fork on the first RC branches for future releases, so that
development is not stopped for it. If the release process takes
too long and to nice features get merged in between we can always
decide to re-branch before releasing.

Thoughts..?
Daan

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Re: Reg: Permissions for JIRA and CWIKI

[Rajani Karuturi]

Done

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 27, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Harika Punna
(harika_pu...@persistent.com) wrote:

Hi,

I am Harika, working on the improvement "CLOUDSTACK-9894", need
permissions on Jira(for ticket assignment) and cwiki(for creating
FS for the improvement).

Username for JIRA: HarikaPunna
Username for cwiki: harika.punna

Thanks,
Harika.

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information
which is the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended
only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not
authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this
message. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender and delete all copies of this message.
Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus
infected mails.

Re: Reg : Permission for Jira

[Rajani Karuturi]

done.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 27, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Pavan Kumar Aravapalli
(pavankuma...@accelerite.com) wrote:

Hi,

This is Pavan Aravapalli, I am working for Accelerite. I would
like to contribute for Cloud Stack. Please grant permission for
the Jira, so that I can create and assign ticket to myself.

Jira Username: pavan4smile

Thanks & Regards
Pavan Kumar Aravapalli.

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information
which is the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems
business. It is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print,
distribute or use this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all
copies of this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business
does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

[Rajani Karuturi]

Looks very good. Thanks for open sourcing it :)

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 25, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
(kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com) wrote:

Hello, Cloudstack community.

We are proud to present our last development effort to you.
During the last
5 months we spend some time to develop alternative Cloudstack UI
for basic
zones with KVM hypervisor and security groups. This is basically
the thing
we are using in our clouds. During the design of the software we
tried to
fulfill the expectations of our average cloud users and simplify
operations
as much as possible.

The project is OSS and can be found at GitHub with bunch of
screenshots and
deployment guide. It's under active development so, we will ge
glad if you
join and provide us with additional feedback, UX considerations
and other
interesting information.

Project page at GitHub: https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/
Source code: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui

Have a good day. Looking forward hearing your feedback.

--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bw-sw.com/

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

Thanks Will.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 25, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Will Stevens
(wstev...@cloudops.com) wrote:

Here is a fix for CLOUDSTACK-9878:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062

It doesn't look like Jenkins or Travis are running against PRs
now. Did
that get removed with the change to Gitbox? How are we doing
formal CI now?

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org> wrote:

Quick update:

We have the following blockers and we dont have anyone working
on them.

CLOUDSTACK-9878 Remote Access VPN that losing connection when
new network
configs are introduced
CLOUDSTACK-9868: internal LB for VPC tier is broken

Thanks,

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Rohit Yadav
<rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

Rajani,

Can you please review and merge

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com

<

http://download.cloud.com/>: https://github.com/apache/
cloudstack/pull/1582

Regards.


From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: 20 April 2017 12:27:48
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

I rebased that last one. I don’t think this is still a blocker.

On 19/04/17 12:39, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote:

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com

Thanks,

~Rajani

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com 
( http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com )>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Re: [Github/Gitbox] Setting up your committer account

[Rajani Karuturi]

I raised INFRA ticket few days ago

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13929

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:

>
> > Op 22 april 2017 om 11:50 schreef Sateesh Chodapuneedi <
> sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com>:
> >
> >
> > Hi @Wido
> > Tried subscribing to commits mailing list, but got reply that I am
> already a subscriber.
> >
>
> I honestly don't know then how to fix this after switching to Github. A
> quick search didn't tell me anything either on how this can be fixed or
> done.
>
> Wido
>
> > Here is the reply received
> > Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> > comm...@cloudstack.apache.org mailing list.
> >
> > Acknowledgment: The address
> >
> >sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com
> >
> > was already on the commits mailing list when I received
> > your request, and remains a subscriber.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sateesh
> >
> > On 22/04/17, 4:53 AM, "Wido den Hollander"  wrote:
> >
> > I can't tell where this comes from.
> >
> > I suggest subscribing to comm...@cloudstack.apache.org to get the
> updates.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> > > Op 19 april 2017 om 15:46 schreef Boris Stoyanov <
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > Yup, same here, no GitHub mails recently..
> > >
> > >
> > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:16 AM, Nicolas Vazquez <
> nicovazque...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I noticed the same
> > > >
> > > > 2017-04-18 12:15 GMT-03:00 Syed Ahmed :
> > > >
> > > >> Same thing with me. I don't see any github activity on the ML
> since Friday.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Wido den Hollander <
> w...@widodh.nl>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > >  Op 17 april 2017 om 19:58 schreef Sergey Levitskiy <
> > > >>> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com>:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  I used to receive emails from @dev on every change in git.
> The last
> > > >>> email came on Friday. Is it expected?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I think so? I don't know how that worked previously. There is a
> > > >>> com...@cloudstack.apache.org list though, you mind want to
> subscribe
> > > >>> there.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Wido
> > > >>>
> > >  Example header:
> > > 
> > >  From: serg38 
> > >  To: 
> > >  References: 
> > >  In-Reply-To: 
> > >  Subject: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #2044: CLOUDSTACK-9877
> Cleanup
> > > >>> unlinked templates
> > > 
> > >  Content-type: text/plain;
> > >   charset="UTF-8"
> > >  Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
> > > 
> > >  Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2044
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  On 4/16/17, 10:02 PM, "Rohit Yadav" <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Thanks Wido!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > From: Wido den Hollander 
> > > Sent: 15 April 2017 15:59:33
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: [Github/Gitbox] Setting up your committer account
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Since yesterday we are using the Gitbox [0] services from
> ASF to
> > > >>> have Github our 'primary' source of code.
> > > 
> > > This means that we can now label PRs, merge them, close
> them, all
> > > >> on
> > > >>> Github.
> > > 
> > > If you are a committer you have to be added to the
> 'cloudstack
> > > >>> committers' team on Github and this is done automatically [1]
> once every
> > > >> X
> > > >>> hours.
> > > 
> > > You however need to make sure that your Apache Profile/ID
> [2] has
> > > >>> the right information and that you have 2FA [3] enabled on
> your Github
> > > >>> account.
> > > 
> > > The steps you need to take:
> > > 
> > > - Make sure you are a CloudStack committer
> > > - Make sure you have a Github account
> > > - Enable 2FA [3] on your Github account
> > > - Update your Apache profile [2] and add your Github
> username
> > > 
> > > Now, after a few hours the sync between ASF and Github
> should be
> > > >>> completed and you are added to the right team on Github.
> > > 
> 

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

Quick update:

We have the following blockers and we dont have anyone working on them.

CLOUDSTACK-9878 Remote Access VPN that losing connection when new network
configs are introduced
CLOUDSTACK-9868: internal LB for VPC tier is broken

Thanks,

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Rajani,
>
>
> Can you please review and merge
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com<
> http://download.cloud.com/>: https://github.com/apache/
> cloudstack/pull/1582
>
>
> Regards.
>
> 
> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
> Sent: 20 April 2017 12:27:48
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
>
> I rebased that last one. I don’t think this is still a blocker.
>
> On 19/04/17 12:39, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~Rajani
>
>
>
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

Yes. will do over the weekend.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 19, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Haijiao (18602198...@163.com)
wrote:

Can we merge the rest of PRs already have 2 LGTMs while community
is still dealing with these blokcers ?

在2017年04月19 13时55分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:

A quick update one RC2:

There are the current list of blocker.
CLOUDSTACK-9878 - Remote Access VPN that losing connection when
new network
configs are introduced
CLOUDSTACK-9868 - internal LB for VPC tier is broken
CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com

Thanks,

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org> wrote:

> A quick update on RC2:
>
> These are the current list of blockers.
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
>
> I am planning to close all the PRs by weekend. The blockers
which Mike
> reported is still open and needs a fix.
> If everything is resolved, we can plan for RC2 on Monday.
>
>
> ~Rajani
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for updating RN. Release notes is something which we
haven't
>> looked at till now.
>> Any update on the xen 7.1 PR?
>>
>> ~Rajani
>> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion
<pd...@cloudops.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Look like we need a new systemvm named
"systemvm-xenserver-4.10". t also
>>> seams that older VR ex: 4.7.x are still usable if the
globalsetting
>>> "minreq.sysvmtemplate.version" is changed after the first
boot of
>>> cloudstack-management that upgraded the database. I'll update
the release
>>> note acordingly...
>>>
>>> So this 4.10 is looking promising! :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2017 16:02, "Pierre-Luc Dion" <pd...@cloudops.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm testing upgrade to 4.10 from latest master. I have the
following
>>> error
>>> when upgrading from 4.7.2 in management-server.log:
>>>
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,558 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating System Vm
template IDs
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,561 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating KVM System Vms
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,561 WARN [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) 4.10.0.0KVM SystemVm
template not
>>> found. KVM hypervisor is not used, so not failing upgrade
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,562 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating VMware System
Vms
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,563 WARN [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) 4.10.0.0VMware SystemVm
template
>>> not
>>> found. VMware hypervisor is not used, so not failing upgrade
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,563 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating XenServer
System Vms
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,565 ERROR [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Unable to upgrade the
database
>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
4.10.0.0XenServer
>>> SystemVm
>>> template not found. Cannot upgrade system Vms
>>> at
com.cloud.upgrade.dao.Upgrade4920to41000.updateSystemVmTempl
>>> ates(Upgrade4920to41000.java:195)
>>> at
com.cloud.upgrade.dao.Upgrade4920to41000.performDataMigratio
>>> n(Upgrade4920to41000.java:64)
>>> at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpg
>>> radeChecker.java:426)
>>> at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgra
>>> deChecker.java:507)
>>> at
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLif
>>> eCycle.checkIntegrity(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:65)
>>> at
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLif
>>> eCycle.start(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:55)
>>> at
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>>> r.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:173)
>>> at
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>>> r.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:51)
>>> at
org.s

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

A quick update one RC2:

There are the current list of blocker.
CLOUDSTACK-9878 - Remote Access VPN that losing connection when new network
configs are introduced
CLOUDSTACK-9868 - internal LB for VPC tier is broken
CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com

Thanks,

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> wrote:

> A quick update on RC2:
>
> These are the current list of blockers.
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
>
> I am planning to close all the PRs by weekend. The blockers which Mike
> reported is still open and needs a fix.
> If everything is resolved, we can plan for RC2 on Monday.
>
>
> ~Rajani
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for updating RN. Release notes is something which we haven't
>> looked at till now.
>> Any update on the xen 7.1 PR?
>>
>> ~Rajani
>> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Look like we need a new systemvm named "systemvm-xenserver-4.10". t also
>>> seams that older VR  ex: 4.7.x are still usable if the globalsetting
>>> "minreq.sysvmtemplate.version" is changed after the first boot of
>>> cloudstack-management that upgraded the database. I'll update the release
>>> note acordingly...
>>>
>>> So this 4.10 is looking promising! :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2017 16:02, "Pierre-Luc Dion" <pd...@cloudops.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm testing upgrade to 4.10 from latest master. I have the following
>>> error
>>> when upgrading from 4.7.2 in management-server.log:
>>>
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,558 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating System Vm template IDs
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,561 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating KVM System Vms
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,561 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) 4.10.0.0KVM SystemVm template not
>>> found. KVM hypervisor is not used, so not failing upgrade
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,562 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating VMware System Vms
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,563 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) 4.10.0.0VMware SystemVm template
>>> not
>>> found. VMware hypervisor is not used, so not failing upgrade
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,563 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating XenServer System Vms
>>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,565 ERROR [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
>>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Unable to upgrade the database
>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: 4.10.0.0XenServer
>>> SystemVm
>>> template not found. Cannot upgrade system Vms
>>> at com.cloud.upgrade.dao.Upgrade4920to41000.updateSystemVmTempl
>>> ates(Upgrade4920to41000.java:195)
>>> at com.cloud.upgrade.dao.Upgrade4920to41000.performDataMigratio
>>> n(Upgrade4920to41000.java:64)
>>> at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpg
>>> radeChecker.java:426)
>>> at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgra
>>> deChecker.java:507)
>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLif
>>> eCycle.checkIntegrity(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:65)
>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLif
>>> eCycle.start(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:55)
>>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>>> r.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:173)
>>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>>> r.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:51)
>>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>>> r$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:346)
>>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>>> r.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:149)
>>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
&g

Re: IMPORTANT: Moving to Gitbox/Github

[Rajani Karuturi]

This is great. Finally, I could add labels to PRs.

Did my first merge from UI :) [1]

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 15, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl)
wrote:

Op 14 april 2017 om 21:26 schreef Wido den Hollander
:

Hi,

At the moment the people from Infra [0] are busy with moving the
CloudStack repositories to Gitbox/Github [1].

This means that we will be able to label PRs on Github, but only
people who are in the right group on Github are able to do so.
Any committer should be able to be added to that group.

A requirement is that 2FA [2] is enabled on your account, so if
you don't have that, please do so.

It will take a bit of time before we sort this all out.

I see that my Github account currently has the right
permissions, so I'll start adding some labels to PRs to give it a
try.

Suggestions, help and more are very welcome! Let's make
contributing to CloudStack easier and make our life for testing
it easier as well!

I forgot to add, the Git repo URL changed due to this.

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git

This is how my remote looks like:

wido@wido-laptop:~/repos/cloudstack$ git remote -v
fork g...@github.com:wido/cloudstack.git (fetch)
fork g...@github.com:wido/cloudstack.git (push)
github https://github.com/apache/cloudstack.git (fetch)
github https://github.com/apache/cloudstack.git (push)
origin https://wid...@gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
(fetch)
origin https://wid...@gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
(push)
wido@wido-laptop:~/repos/cloudstack$

Wido

Wido

[0]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13885
[1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf
[2]:
https://help.github.com/articles/about-two-factor-authentication/

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2043: CLOUDSTACK-9876: Removed test test_01_test_vm_volume...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2043
  
@rhtyd @serg38 can you review?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1941: CLOUDSTACK-8663: Fixed various issues to allow VM sn...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
  
Thanks! will take a look.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi Haijiao,

Thanks for testing. Can you log a bug for this please? It can be
a blocker for 4.10.

@Will,

Did you get a chance to take a look at this issue?

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 12, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Will Stevens
(wstev...@cloudops.com) wrote:

Thanks, I will have a look.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>
wrote:

HI, Will
It's a Remote Access VPN that losing connection while new
network configs
introduced.
Thanks !

在2017年04月12 02时26分, "Will Stevens"写道:

Is this a Site-to-Site VPN connection or the Remote Access VPN
that is
losing connection when new network configs are introduced?

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>
wrote:

Hi,

We built and tested the ACS 4.10 from the latest master (Apr.7,
2017)

Our environment is,
- ACS: 4.10.0.0-SNAPSHOT
- Management Server: Centos7.2 1151
- Host: Centos7.2 1151
- System VM: systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
- Network: Isolated Network
- Network Offering: Offering for Isolated networks with Source
Nat

service

enabled

We can successfully setup VPN and it works as expected. However,
once

we

take any network changes below, the VPN connnection will be
immediately
disconnected.

- Update firewall rules (add/change)
- Update port fowarding
- Update LB
- Add one more VPN account

Is there some configuration we missed ? Or it's due to the new
VPN
component (StrongSWAN) introcuced in 4.10 ?

Thanks in advance !

Re: CloudStack related changes in Ansible 2.3

[Rajani Karuturi]

Great work Rene. Thank you.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 12, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Rene Moser (m...@renemoser.net)
wrote:

Hi CloudStack users

Ansible 2.3 is about to be released, I would like to summarize
the
CloudStack related features and changes in this release.

New modules
---

- cs_host
- cs_nic
- cs_region
- cs_role
- cs_vpc

Examples and usage for these modules can be found in the docs,
http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_cloud_modules.html#cloudstack
as
usual.

Docs


The CloudStack guide
http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/guide_cloudstack.html has been
updated,
note the new feature "Environment Variables"
http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/guide_cloudstack.html#environment-variables

VPC
---

The VPC support has been improved in the related modules, but
there is
still some work to do.

Integration tests
-

Soon, CloudStack related new Ansible PRs will be automatically
tested
(~1.000 tasks) on a CI against a CloudStack Simulator running
4.9.x.

Future Module Development
-

Due some other side projects of mine (writing books takes more
time than
one would might think), development of new modules is lagging a
bit. One
module (cs_serviceoffer) is currently WIP
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/19041.

But no worries, new modules are planed:
- cs_diskoffer
- modules for VPN setup

Cloud Role
--

At SWISS TXT, we created a Ansible role for setting up VMs in a
cloudstack cloud with advanced networking for different customer
projects, The role is open source (BSD) and can be found on
GitHub
https://github.com/swisstxt/ansible-role-cloud-infra

Feel free to fork and improve it.

Goal of my Ansible CloudStack Project
-

I often get ask, why I am doing it.

My goal is to not only install and upgrade CloudStack by Ansible
(that
is relatively easy... and can even be done without that much
cloudstack
api interaction) but configure _and_ maintaining a cloud (basic
or
advanced networking) in a reliable way!

It will install the OS and install cloudstack management server,
install
the OS on the hosts, setup hypversisors, create zones, pods,
clusters,
accounts, users, add configured hosts to cloudstack all this by
a single
run and the best of it, you can re-run it safely again and
again,
without fear breaking anything.

Have to add a new host? No problem, put the hardware in the rack
and
connect it to the net, ansible will take care on the next run:
it can be
that simple.

Also note, ansible can manage your network switches, routers and
firewalls too!
http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_network_modules.html

The possibilities are endless...

Thanks
René

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1941: CLOUDSTACK-8663: Fixed various issues to allow VM sn...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
  
@anshul1886 There is a test regression due to this PR. Details are at 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836#issuecomment-293897257
Can you take a look please?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
  
@rhtyd Thanks for running the tests and the report. I might request you 
again once the blockers are fixed :)
@serg38 Thanks for finding the PR. I will try and request the PR author to 
fix this. But, if there is no response, not sure what can be done.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2025: [4.10-blocker] Fix error in restart network in 4.10....

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
  
merging


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack should join the gitbox experiment.

[Rajani Karuturi]

+1

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 10, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@gmail.com) wrote:

In the Apache foundation an experiment has been going on to host
mirrors of Apache project on github with more write access then
just
to the mirror-bot. For those projects committers can merge on
github
and put labels on PRs.

I move to have the project added to the gitbox experiment
please cast your votes

+1 CloudStack should be added to the gitbox experiment
+-0 I don't care
-1 CloudStack shouldn't be added to the gitbox experiment and
give your reasons

thanks,
--
Daan

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2033: [master/4.10+] CLOUDSTACK-9462: Support for Ubuntu 1...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2033
  
@rhtyd Can you add "This closes #1950" to the description of this PR?
can you force push to make jenkins happy? 

@ustcweizhou can you review please?



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1879: CLOUDSTACK-9719: [VMware] VR loses DHCP settings and...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
  
@rhtyd at this stage, I am not looking at more PRs/features for 4.10. I 
need help on fixing the blockers for releasing 4.10 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: [dvswitch blocker] CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemp...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
ok. merging


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: [dvswitch blocker] CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemp...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@rhtyd can you check on the failures? I think there are more failures on 
this PR. I usually see three failures.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: PRs ready for merging into 4.10

[Rajani Karuturi]

@Nicolas and @Haijiao

Noted the PRs. I will see what all can be merged and do the
needful.

@All

Any takers for the VMware blocker (CLOUDSTACK-9849)?

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On April 10, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Nicolas Vazquez
(nicovazque...@gmail.com) wrote:

Hi,

I would like to include PR 1935: CLOUDSTACK-9764: Delete domain
failure due
to Account Cleanup task, it has 2 LGTM.

Thanks

2017-04-08 1:32 GMT-03:00 Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>:

Update the PR list ready for merging.

--
#1886, CLOUDSTACK-9728: Fixed traffic sentinel HTTP 414 error
response
#1901, CLOUDSTACK-9405: add details parameter in listDomains API
to reduce
the execution time
#1903, CLOUDSTACK-9356: FIX Cannot add users in VPC VPN
#1955, CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM hosts
#1956, CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in
VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java
#1957, CLOUDSTACK-9748:VPN Users search functionality broken
#1980, CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network details
#1993, CLOUDSTACK-8931: Fail to deploy VM instance when
use.system.public.ips�lse
#1970, CLOUDSTACK-9725 Failed to update VPC Network during N/w
offering
Upgrade which doesnt have ACL service Enabled.
#1978, CLOUDSTACK-9779 : Releasing secondary guest IP fails with
error VM
nic Ip x.x.x.x is mapped to load balancing rule
#2018, CLOUDSTACK-9848: Added exit status checking for the
iptables
commands
#2022, CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include
network details
#2024, CLOUDSTACK-9857: With this change if agent dies the
systemd will
catch it properly and show process as exited
#2025, Fix error in restart network in 4.10.0.0

Regards,

在2017年04月06 13时23分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:

A quick update on RC2:

These are the current list of blockers.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582

I am planning to close all the PRs by weekend. The blockers
which Mike
reported is still open and needs a fix.
If everything is resolved, we can plan for RC2 on Monday.

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Rajani Karuturi
<raj...@apache.org>
wrote:

Thanks for updating RN. Release notes is something which we
haven't

looked

at till now.
Any update on the xen 7.1 PR?

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion
<pd...@cloudops.com>
wrote:

Look like we need a new systemvm named "systemvm-xenserver-4.10".
t also
seams that older VR ex: 4.7.x are still usable if the
globalsetting
"minreq.sysvmtemplate.version" is changed after the first boot
of
cloudstack-management that upgraded the database. I'll update
the

release

note acordingly...

So this 4.10 is looking promising! :-)

On Apr 1, 2017 16:02, "Pierre-Luc Dion" <pd...@cloudops.com>
wrote:

I'm testing upgrade to 4.10 from latest master. I have the
following

error

when upgrading from 4.7.2 in management-server.log:

2017-04-01 15:58:12,558 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating System Vm
template IDs
2017-04-01 15:58:12,561 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating KVM System Vms
2017-04-01 15:58:12,561 WARN [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) 4.10.0.0KVM SystemVm
template not
found. KVM hypervisor is not used, so not failing upgrade
2017-04-01 15:58:12,562 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating VMware System Vms
2017-04-01 15:58:12,563 WARN [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) 4.10.0.0VMware SystemVm
template

not

found. VMware hypervisor is not used, so not failing upgrade
2017-04-01 15:58:12,563 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating XenServer System
Vms
2017-04-01 15:58:12,565 ERROR [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Unable to upgrade the
database
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
4.10.0.0XenServer
SystemVm
template not found. Cannot upgrade system Vms
at com.cloud.upgrade.dao.Upgrade4920to41000.updateSystemVmTempl
ates(Upgrade4920to41000.java:195)
at com.cloud.upgrade.dao.Upgrade4920to41000.performDataMigratio
n(Upgrade4920to41000.java:64)
at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpg
radeChecker.java:426)
at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgra
deChecker.java:507)
at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLif
eCycle.checkIntegrity(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:65)
at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLif
eCycle.start(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:55)
at 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2032: CLOUDSTACK-9783: corrected the version number...

[karuturi]

GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2032

CLOUDSTACK-9783: corrected the version number in metrics pom

master is broken after fwd-merging metrics PR #1944 from 4.9
This is due to the incorrect parent version number in the metrics pom.
Corrected the same to reflect master version number.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack master-fix-after-1944

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2032.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2032


commit e1c76dcc235fd350f87725adaf359619331db278
Author: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karut...@accelerite.com>
Date:   2017-04-07T04:22:27Z

CLOUDSTACK-9783: corrected the version number in metrics pom

master is broken after fwd-merging metrics PR #1944 from 4.9
This is due to the incorrect parent version number in the metrics pom.
Corrected the same to reflect master version number.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1944: CLOUDSTACK-9783: Improve metrics view performance

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1944
  
master is broken after the merge. Pom version changes


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1282: CLOUDSTACK-9200: Fixed failed to delete snapshot if ...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1282
  
@swill @rhtyd can you review?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1944: CLOUDSTACK-9783: Improve metrics view performance

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1944
  
merging now


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@rhtyd can you check on the failures if they are related?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1889: CLOUDSTACK-9718: Revamp the dropdown showing lists o...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1889
  
@rashmidixit  travis is failing. Can you rebase with master and force push?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

A quick update on RC2:

These are the current list of blockers.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582

I am planning to close all the PRs by weekend. The blockers which Mike
reported is still open and needs a fix.
If everything is resolved, we can plan for RC2 on Monday.


~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for updating RN. Release notes is something which we haven't looked
> at till now.
> Any update on the xen 7.1 PR?
>
> ~Rajani
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Look like we need a new systemvm named "systemvm-xenserver-4.10". t also
>> seams that older VR  ex: 4.7.x are still usable if the globalsetting
>> "minreq.sysvmtemplate.version" is changed after the first boot of
>> cloudstack-management that upgraded the database. I'll update the release
>> note acordingly...
>>
>> So this 4.10 is looking promising! :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2017 16:02, "Pierre-Luc Dion" <pd...@cloudops.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm testing upgrade to 4.10 from latest master. I have the following error
>> when upgrading from 4.7.2 in management-server.log:
>>
>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,558 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating System Vm template IDs
>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,561 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating KVM System Vms
>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,561 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) 4.10.0.0KVM SystemVm template not
>> found. KVM hypervisor is not used, so not failing upgrade
>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,562 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating VMware System Vms
>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,563 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) 4.10.0.0VMware SystemVm template not
>> found. VMware hypervisor is not used, so not failing upgrade
>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,563 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade4920to41000]
>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Updating XenServer System Vms
>> 2017-04-01 15:58:12,565 ERROR [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
>> (localhost-startStop-1:null) (logid:) Unable to upgrade the database
>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: 4.10.0.0XenServer
>> SystemVm
>> template not found. Cannot upgrade system Vms
>> at com.cloud.upgrade.dao.Upgrade4920to41000.updateSystemVmTempl
>> ates(Upgrade4920to41000.java:195)
>> at com.cloud.upgrade.dao.Upgrade4920to41000.performDataMigratio
>> n(Upgrade4920to41000.java:64)
>> at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpg
>> radeChecker.java:426)
>> at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgra
>> deChecker.java:507)
>> at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLif
>> eCycle.checkIntegrity(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:65)
>> at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLif
>> eCycle.start(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:55)
>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>> r.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:173)
>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>> r.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:51)
>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>> r$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:346)
>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>> r.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:149)
>> at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcesso
>> r.onRefresh(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:112)
>> at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationConte
>> xt.finishRefresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:879)
>> at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationConte
>> xt.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:545)
>> at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModule
>> DefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:145)
>> at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModule
>> DefinitionSet$2.with(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:122)
>> at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModule
>> DefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:245)
>> at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

ck.spring.module.factory.CloudStackSpring
> Context.(CloudStackSpringContext.java:62)
> at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.web.CloudStackContextLoaderListene
> r.
> contextInitialized(CloudStackContextLoaderListener.java:52)
> at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(Stand
> ardContext.java:5068)
> at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.startInternal(Stand
> ardContext.java:5584)
> at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase.start(LifecycleBase.java:147)
> at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(Cont
> ainerBase.java:899)
> at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:875)
> at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:652)
> at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDirectory(HostC
> onfig.java:1260)
> at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig$DeployDirectory.run(
> HostConfig.java:2002)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPool
> Executor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoo
> lExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>
>
> Is it now mendatory to upgrade systemvm-template for this upgrade? how does
> the template should be named because I've tried with template
> name systemvm-xenserver-4.10.0.0 and systemvm-xenserver-4.10.0 and not
> success to start the management server :-S
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> *Pierre-Luc DION*
> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
> t 855.652.5683
>
> *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I have this on my to-do list. It might take me a while, though. At the
> > time being, I’m busy with a customer project that is making use of the
> two
> > CloudStack environments that I have in my lab. Then, toward the end of
> next
> > week, I’m heading to Europe for about 10 days or so (customer meetings
> and
> > to present at the CloudStack Meetup in Prague hosted by Interoute).
> >
> > On 3/30/17, 4:28 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Mike, can you confirm that this is not also an issue in 4.9?
> >
> > On 30/03/17 08:21, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > This one may be a blocker (it’s currently marked as such):
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849
> >
> > It would be nice if one of our VMware gurus could take a look at
> > it and see what’s going on there.
> >
> > The gist is you can’t live migrate a VM from one cluster to
> > another in the same datacenter (using either NFS or iSCSI as shared
> > storage) (which I think you should be able to do with VMware in
> CloudStack).
> >
> > On 3/30/17, 12:06 AM, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> > Seems only one blocker left.   Are we close to release the
> RC2
> > ?
> >
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:
> >
> > We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC
> once
> > they are fixed.
> >
> > ~ Rajani
> >
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
> > On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (
> > raj...@apache.org)
> > wrote:
> >
> > We currently have the below list of blockers:
> >
> > BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
> > Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure
> eth3
> > while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8
> > physical
> > host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoog

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
Wonderful. Seeing green travis after a long time :) 👍  
Thanks @nvazquez and @SudharmaJain 
merging now


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

We can wait. When do you expect the pr to be out?

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 30 Mar 2017 6:50 p.m., "Pierre-Luc Dion" <pd...@cloudops.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late?
> We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
> > master and it's working fine on master.
> > This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
> > checked why they cannot co exist.
> >
> > ~Rajani
> >
> > Sent from phone.
> >
> >
> > On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?
> >
> > On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
> > if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)
> >
> > If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > ~ Rajani
> >
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
> > On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
> > (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> >
> > To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
> > removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
> > VMs isn’t working properly.
> >
> > On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> > Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
> >
> > 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:
> >
> > We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
> > they are fixed.
> >
> > ~ Rajani
> >
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
> > On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
> > (raj...@apache.org)
> > wrote:
> >
> > We currently have the below list of blockers:
> >
> > BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
> > Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
> > while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
> > host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
> >
> > Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?
> >
> > ~ Rajani
> >
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
> > On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
> > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sure, I can pull that code and test.
> >
> > I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
> > middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
> > done,
> > I can move on to your PR.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Mike
> >
> > On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" <nicovazque...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
> > created this
> > PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
> > testing it
> > and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
> > repeat your
> > tests on it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nicolas
> >
> > 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
> > <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>:
> >
> > > Here’s the ticket:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
> > >
> > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> > <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, I can open a ticket.
> > >
> > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> > > sergey.lev

Re:Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

We do that until rc1 is created. After that it's mostly blockers. If there
is less gap between RC and release, that would solve it. But unfortunately,
we have very few people who test/vote on a release and taking more and more
fixes after RC delays it even more if the merged fixes uncover more
blockers.

Also, we don't backport. We forward merge(there can be exceptions).

~Rajani

Sent from phone.


On 30 Mar 2017 7:18 p.m., "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

There are still 2-3 blockers reported I think according to this mail thread.


Personally I would suggest 'leap frogging tactics' that we put bug fix and
features as many as possible in 4.10.x as long as they meet criterias. It
would give commutity who would like to embrace and try the 'new things'  a
chance to help test widely and then backport important bug fixs, even
features back to 4.9.x (LTS branch) .


Similar approach we see on Ubuntu roadmap,  16.04 (LTS) and 17.04 (non-LTS).




在2017年03月30 21时20分, "Pierre-Luc Dion"<pd...@cloudops.com>写道:

Hello,

Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late?
We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ?

Thanks,



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> wrote:

> Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
> master and it's working fine on master.
> This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
> checked why they cannot co exist.
>
> ~Rajani
>
> Sent from phone.
>
>
> On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
> Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?
>
> On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
> if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)
>
> If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
> (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>
> To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
> removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
> VMs isn’t working properly.
>
> On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
>
> Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:
>
> We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
> they are fixed.
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
> (raj...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
> We currently have the below list of blockers:
>
> BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
> Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
> while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
> host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
> (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sure, I can pull that code and test.
>
> I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
> middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
> done,
> I can move on to your PR.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" <nicovazque...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
> created this
> PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
> testing it
> and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
> repeat your
> tests on it?
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
>
> 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
> <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>:
>
> > Here’s the ticket:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, &

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2023: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023
  
code LGTM. Need to check why xenserver and KVM still have wrong urls on PR 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582#issuecomment-288310796 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
I requested @sateesh-chodapuneedi for a review


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
master and it's working fine on master.
This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
checked why they cannot co exist.

~Rajani

Sent from phone.


On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?

On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote:

Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)

If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
VMs isn’t working properly.

On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:

We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org)
wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" <nicovazque...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM,

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
@nvazquez PR #2019 is merged. Can you force push and kick travis again?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2019: CLOUDSTACK-9851 travis CI build failure after merge ...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2019
  
merging now


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)

If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
VMs isn’t working properly.

On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:

We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org)
wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" <nicovazque...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:
> >>
> >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and
test
> >> results. Once they are ready,

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1994: CLOUDSTACK-9827: Storage tags stored in multiple pla...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
  
Thank you all. I will merge #1961 and #1994 now


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2003: CLOUDSTACK-9811: fixed an issue if the dev is not in...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
  
ok. Thanks everyone. I am merging this.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2011: CLOUDSTACK-9811: fix duplicated nics on VR caused by...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2011
  
ok. Thanks everyone. I am merging this.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1994: CLOUDSTACK-9827: Storage tags stored in multiple pla...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
  
@mike-tutkowski can you do a final review please?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1582: CLOUDSTACK-9408 for the move away from download.clou...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
  
@DaanHoogland ok. This is not mergeable yet. I will see what are the 
conflicts with #1982. It  might require new changes.
@borisstoyanov do you see the same template values as I posted. Just want 
to confirm if its my environment issue. As per the above template data, if you 
run KVM tests, it should fail as it doesnt have the system vm template url for 
kvm.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2003: CLOUDSTACK-9811: fixed an issue if the dev is not in...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
  
@ustcweizhou can you also review this fix? Is pr #2011 still required?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1582: CLOUDSTACK-9408 for the move away from download.clou...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
  
@borisstoyanov can you post the results?
@DaanHoogland After deploying from this PR, I am seeing the below values in 
vm_template table. I think LXC, KVM and Xen values below aren't right.

$ > select id,unique_name,name,type,url,updated,created from vm_template 
where type='SYSTEM';

| id | unique_name | name  | type   | url   

   | updated | created 
|-|-||-|-|
| 1 | routing-1   | SystemVM Template (XenServer) | SYSTEM | 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-master-4.6.0-xen.vhd.bz2
 | NULL| 2017-03-21 07:11:27
|  3 | routing-3   | SystemVM Template (KVM)   | SYSTEM |   

   | NULL| 
2017-03-21 07:11:27 |
|  8 | routing-8   | SystemVM Template (vSphere)   | SYSTEM | 
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-vmware.ova
| NULL| 
2017-03-21 07:11:27 |
|  9 | routing-9   | SystemVM Template (HyperV)| SYSTEM | 
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-hyperv.vhd.zip
| NULL| 
2017-03-21 07:11:27 |
| 10 | routing-10  | SystemVM Template (LXC)   | SYSTEM | 
http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 
 | NULL 
   | 2017-03-21 07:11:48 |
| 12 | routing-12  | SystemVM Template (Ovm3)  | SYSTEM | 
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.6/systemvm64template-4.6.0-ovm.raw.bz2
 | NULL 
   | 2017-03-21 07:12:26 |



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1859: CLOUDSTACK-8672 : NCC Integration with CloudStack

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1859
  
I was one of the RM for 4.6. We never made such a decision nor did we 
follow. There were multiple discussions on ML already about squashing vs 
merging and we never concluded to do squashing.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1859: CLOUDSTACK-8672 : NCC Integration with CloudStack

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1859
  
When debugging, I have seen issues with humongous commits with little or no 
history. They are very difficult to understand.
This is a feature and it need not be backported. so, backporting to 
previous releases is out of question. up-porting automatically happens.
If we want to revert the feature, we revert the merge which is very easy to 
do.
Also, reverting (for feature stability reasons) is just temporary. 
I agree that the number of commits is high. But, the amount of code is also 
high and from different authors who wants to keep it this way.
I am +1 with keeping it as is. 
I prefer merges with proper history and small logical units.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2009: CLOUDSTACK-9369 Fixed Ldap regression

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2009
  
I am seeing the same Travis timeout on all the PRs. Will force push again


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2009: CLOUDSTACK-9369 Fixed Ldap regression

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2009#discussion_r106854397
  
--- Diff: 
server/src/com/cloud/api/auth/DefaultLoginAPIAuthenticatorCmd.java ---
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ public String authenticate(String command, Map<String, 
Object[]> params, HttpSes
 throw new CloudAuthenticationException("Unable to find 
the domain from the path " + domain);
 }
 final UserAccount userAccount = 
_accountService.getActiveUserAccount(username[0], domainId);
-if (userAccount == null || 
!(User.Source.UNKNOWN.equals(userAccount.getSource()) || 
User.Source.LDAP.equals(userAccount.getSource( {
+if (userAccount != null && User.Source.SAML2 == 
userAccount.getSource()) {
--- End diff --

in case of LDAP, account will be created if it doesnt already exist.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LDAP%3A+Trust+AD+and+Auto+Import


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---