Christoph Gaffga wrote:
The idea is to set JSDK 1.4 as the minimum supported JDK supported for the
next major release 2.2 of Cocoon. Currently we are supporting also 1.3 but
seems like few people is using it.
but what about the maximum support JDK? I tried to compile with 1.5beta, but
it
Reinhard Pötz dijo:
Did you solve your problems with running ant using JDK? I proposed to
run Ant with a JRE 1.5 and use the 1.5 compiler explicitly in the
javac task of Ant. Did you try this?
It would be fine to already include it in the build system. Soon or later
we will need to make the
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Reinhard Pötz dijo:
Did you solve your problems with running ant using JDK? I proposed to
run Ant with a JRE 1.5 and use the 1.5 compiler explicitly in the
javac task of Ant. Did you try this?
It would be fine to already include it in the build system. Soon or
Hello Pier,
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NIO is nice (indeed) for a bunch of things, and as Alan pointed out,
using RegEx in the 2.2 sitemap would be a killer, but IMVHO for this
release we have MUCH BIGGER fishes to fry: blocks and continuations.
does Sun regex offer any
Martin Holz wrote:
does Sun regex offer any significant advantages over ORO or jakarta
regexp ? Just curious.
Probably just the fact that we'd ship one less JAR file.
Ugo
* Ugo Cei [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:15]:
Martin Holz wrote:
does Sun regex offer any significant advantages over ORO or jakarta
regexp ? Just curious.
Probably just the fact that we'd ship one less JAR file.
That was my point.
(Though a change would break sitemaps depending on
Alan wrote:
* Ugo Cei [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:15]:
Probably just the fact that we'd ship one less JAR file.
That was my point.
(Though a change would break sitemaps depending on ORO specific patterns,
if there is such a thing.)
At the cost of breaking some sitemaps, and since
The idea is to set JSDK 1.4 as the minimum supported JDK supported for the
next major release 2.2 of Cocoon. Currently we are supporting also 1.3 but
seems like few people is using it.
but what about the maximum support JDK? I tried to compile with 1.5beta, but
it didn't work. So I compiled
Ugo Cei wrote:
Alan wrote:
* Ugo Cei [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:15]:
Probably just the fact that we'd ship one less JAR file.
That was my point.
(Though a change would break sitemaps depending on ORO specific
patterns,
if there is such a thing.)
At the cost of breaking some
Christoph Gaffga wrote:
The idea is to set JSDK 1.4 as the minimum supported JDK supported for the
next major release 2.2 of Cocoon. Currently we are supporting also 1.3 but
seems like few people is using it.
but what about the maximum support JDK? I tried to compile with 1.5beta, but
it didn't
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
IIRC, ORO is not used by sitemap. Rather, CForms has direct dependecies
on ORO.
Might be worthwile checking if 1.4 regexps are good enough for the task.
PS I heard that 1.4.0 regexp was not good:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-regexp-userm=106588023307749w=2
Oh,
Has anyone else read Bruce Eckel's Thinking in Java ?
quote (chapter 12)
Although the performance of old stream I/O has been improved by
implementing it with nio, mapped file access tends to be dramatically
faster.
/quote
So by switching to 1.4 and *not* using NIO you're likely to get a speed
, 2004 9:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stream vs Mapped IO (was Re: [VOTE] - Entry level
JSDK 1.4 in Cocoon 2.2)
Has anyone else read Bruce Eckel's Thinking in Java ?
quote (chapter 12)
Although the performance of old stream I/O has been
improved by implementing it with nio, mapped
Geoff Howard wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version supported in
Cocoon 2.2?
Here is my +1
-0.5
Even though 1.4 is available for most platforms, and I've been using
it exclusively for quite a long time, I still think there are
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
I think that as a software product that is known for its innovative
nature it is *very* important in the interest of Cocoon to refuse
being impaired by the immobility of bureaucracratic organisations.
We are having a small crisis on
Vadim Gritsenko dijo:
Agreed. But, please, somebody, [POLL] our userbase first.
There is already a pool. See the [POLL] in the user list.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
On 1 Mar 2004, at 08:33, Ugo Cei wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version supported in
Cocoon 2.2?
Here is my +1
-0.5
Even though 1.4 is available for most platforms, and I've been using
it exclusively for quite a long time, I still think there are
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
using RegEx in the 2.2 sitemap would be a killer
I thought we already had regexp in the sitemap.
--
Stefano, puzzled
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version supported in Cocoon 2.2?
Here is my +1
-0.5
Even though 1.4 is available for most platforms, and I've been using it
exclusively for quite a long time, I still think there are many
environments where people are forced
Ugo Cei wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version supported in Cocoon 2.2?
Here is my +1
-0.5
Even though 1.4 is available for most platforms, and I've been using it
exclusively for quite a long time, I still think there are many
Antonio Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version
supported in Cocoon 2.2?
Yes, please: +1
* Hunsberger, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-01 16:57]:
Antonio Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version
supported in Cocoon 2.2?
Yes, please: +1
Does this mean we can use 1.4 regex in the sitemap?
--
Alan / [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
David Crossley wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version supported in Cocoon 2.2?
Here is my +1
-0.5
Even though 1.4 is available for most platforms, and I've been using it
exclusively for quite a long time, I still think
Unico Hommes wrote:
I think that as a software product that is known for its innovative
nature it is *very* important in the interest of Cocoon to refuse being
impaired by the immobility of bureaucracratic organisations. We are
having a small crisis on our hands ATM regarding our persistent
Ugo Cei wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
I think that as a software product that is known for its innovative
nature it is *very* important in the interest of Cocoon to refuse
being impaired by the immobility of bureaucracratic organisations. We
are having a small crisis on our hands ATM regarding
Ugo Cei [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
Unico Hommes wrote:
I think that as a software product that is known for its innovative
nature it is *very* important in the interest of Cocoon to
refuse being
impaired by the immobility of bureaucracratic organisations. We are
having a small crisis
Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
I think that as a software product that is known for its innovative
nature it is *very* important in the interest of Cocoon to refuse
being impaired by the immobility of bureaucracratic
organisations.
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 04:41, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi:
Many was talked about this topic. I think it not need a large explanation:
The idea is to set JSDK 1.4 as the minimum supported JDK supported for the
next major release 2.2 of Cocoon. Currently we are supporting also 1.3 but
seems
On 01.03.2004 19:37, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I think that as a software product that is known for its innovative
nature it is *very* important in the interest of Cocoon to refuse
being impaired by the immobility of bureaucracratic organisations. We
are having a small crisis on our hands ATM
From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But if someone provides a really useful 1.4 thing
like the mentioned NIO-based implementation of the persistent store
I'm for 1.4 of course.
I'm more of a user than a developer of Cocoon, but I'd say that
if someone can provide a reasonable
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Since we don't have a NIO-based implementation of the persistent
store, yet, why upgrade now? When we have it, I'll be more than
willing to vote +1.
Ugo,
this is chicken-egg problem: nobody is going to implement something on
1.4-only API if they
Ugo Cei wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version supported in
Cocoon 2.2?
Here is my +1
-0.5
Even though 1.4 is available for most platforms, and I've been using
it exclusively for quite a long time, I still think there are many
environments
Alan dijo:
* Hunsberger, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-01 16:57]:
Antonio Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version
supported in Cocoon 2.2?
Yes, please: +1
Does this mean we can use 1.4 regex in the sitemap?
Hi Alan:
Yes. This is the
Ugo Cei wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Since we don't have a NIO-based implementation of the persistent
store, yet, why upgrade now? When we have it, I'll be more than
willing to vote +1.
Ugo,
this is chicken-egg problem: nobody is going to implement something on
1.4-only
Hi:
Many was talked about this topic. I think it not need a large explanation:
The idea is to set JSDK 1.4 as the minimum supported JDK supported for the
next major release 2.2 of Cocoon. Currently we are supporting also 1.3 but
seems like few people is using it.
Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi:
Many was talked about this topic. I think it not need a large explanation:
The idea is to set JSDK 1.4 as the minimum supported JDK supported for the
next major release 2.2 of Cocoon. Currently we are supporting also 1.3 but
seems like few people is using it.
Do you
36 matches
Mail list logo
