RE: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-26 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Steven Noels wrote: First, let's make this clear: it's good that people contribute to the new portal framework. So thanks, Friedrich, Gerald and Gernot, for donating this back to the community. Also, I fully trust Carsten in reviewing the code before committing. OTOH, I'm still

RE: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-26 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Steven Noels wrote: Of course, I'm very confident that Carsten has done this with the best possible intentions, but Contributions to the portal is hardly an intuitive commit message, and a quick search for the three people involved didn't bring up much prior

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-26 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Steven Noels wrote: Of course, I'm very confident that Carsten has done this with the best possible intentions, but Contributions to the portal is hardly an intuitive commit message, and a quick search for the three people involved didn't

RE: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-26 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: I noticed that jtidy has been moved out of html block and into lib/optional. What will happen if I to remove jtidy from the lib/optional? Will this break the build? Yepp, you can see it in the gump.xml dependency description. But that means that we are

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-26 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: I noticed that jtidy has been moved out of html block and into lib/optional. What will happen if I to remove jtidy from the lib/optional? Will this break the build? Yepp, you can see it in the gump.xml dependency description.

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-26 Thread Roger I Martin PhD
Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:10 AM Subject: RE: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar Vadim Gritsenko wrote: I noticed that jtidy has been moved out of html block and into lib/optional. What

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-26 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Vadim Gritsenko wrote, On 26/08/2003 14.01: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: ... I also would like to see a bit more descriptive commit message. And may be entry in status.xml too. As long as the portal is alpha this would imho only mess up the status.xml. As soon as it's not

cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-25 Thread cziegeler
cziegeler2003/08/25 00:41:18 Modified:.gump.xml lib jars.xml Added: src/blocks/portal/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/reading ProxyReader.java src/blocks/portal/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/application

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-25 Thread Steven Noels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cziegeler2003/08/25 00:41:18 Modified:.gump.xml lib jars.xml Added: src/blocks/portal/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/reading ProxyReader.java

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-25 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Steven Noels wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Contributions to the portal from Friedrich Klenner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Gerald Kahrer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Gernot Koller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I'm getting increasingly annoyed that, to the best of my knowledge, these contributions have been

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/html/lib .cvsignore jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar

2003-08-25 Thread Steven Noels
Joerg Heinicke wrote: Ui, Steven, hard words. I can understand your irritation, it's not the way I would like to see such stuff goes. But offending somebody in such an aggressive way on the public list ?? Well, it's the classical case of not paying enough attention before pressing the send