Re: Configuration of own roles in external file?

2004-03-10 Thread roy huang
It works,thanks! Roy Huang - Original Message - From: Marco Rolappe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:58 PM Subject: AW: Configuration of own roles in external file? cocoon user-roles=/WEB-INF/myroles.xconf ... is working for me

Re: form framework clean up

2004-03-10 Thread Stephan Michels
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Sylvain Wallez um 16:27: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, à 16:05 Europe/Zurich, Torsten Curdt a écrit : Since we are currently in the middle of cleaning up and focussing on *the* one form framework I like to propose and get rid of

Re: [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Stephan Michels
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37: We should move XSP in a block anyway. +1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard +0.5 (=good idea, won't be able to help) I can offer some help, if nobody on it, then I can try it?! Stephan.

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.2/src/resources/javadoc/avalon package-list

2004-03-10 Thread Stephan Michels
I think here goes something wrong ;-) Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] um 10:48: 1.2 +48 -33cocoon-2.2/src/resources/dev/i18n/simple_dict.xml Index: simple_dict.xml === RCS file:

RE: cvs commit: cocoon-2.2/src/resources/javadoc/avalonpackage-list

2004-03-10 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Ups, yes, will fix that. Thanks! Carsten -Original Message- From: Stephan Michels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:55 AM To: Cocoon Developers Subject: Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.2/src/resources/javadoc/avalonpackage-list I think here goes

Re: [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Stephan Michels wrote: Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37: We should move XSP in a block anyway. +1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard +0.5 (=good idea, won't be able to help) I can offer some help, if nobody on it, then I can try it?! Awsome, I'm

RE: [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Unico Hommes wrote: Awsome, I'm willing to do some stuff as well. I think that besides just moving code around it involves some work regarding quite a few core samples that use XSP. Here's a list: ./common/view-source.xsp ./flow/calc/screens/displayResult.xsp

Re: [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Unico Hommes wrote: Awsome, I'm willing to do some stuff as well. I think that besides just moving code around it involves some work regarding quite a few core samples that use XSP. Here's a list: ./common/view-source.xsp ./flow/calc/screens/displayResult.xsp

Re: [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Unico Hommes wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Unico Hommes wrote: Awsome, I'm willing to do some stuff as well. I think that besides just moving code around it involves some work regarding quite a few core samples that use XSP. Here's a list: ./common/view-source.xsp

Re: form framework clean up

2004-03-10 Thread Torsten Curdt
Stephan Michels wrote: Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Sylvain Wallez um 16:27: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, à 16:05 Europe/Zurich, Torsten Curdt a écrit : Since we are currently in the middle of cleaning up and focussing on *the* one form framework I like to propose and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27564] New: - Generated javascript only works on whole pages

2004-03-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27564. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25114] - Support for multi-page forms

2004-03-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25114. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Troubleshooting problem with Sysdeo Tomcat Eclipse plugin

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Steve Krulewitz wrote: Hey folks -- I just spent some time debugging a problem (which turned out to be a classpath issue, as always) and I just wanted to share my experience. First of all, the way I develop with Cocoon is that I build the cocoon jar, and jars for all the blocks I use, and I

Documentation: How to move from Woody to CocoonForms

2004-03-10 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: 2) we created tools to ease the migration [we need to put some docs on how to do this] Initial docs are in Wiki: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=Woody2CocoonForms -- Reinhard

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/tools/src blocks-build.xsl

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 10.03.2004 10:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified:tools/src blocks-build.xsl ... Using one classpath for all blocks instead of one classpath for each block. Any particular reason for this? I thought this was already in preparation of real blocks. Joerg

Re: [Vote] Removing Woody

2004-03-10 Thread Upayavira
Tim Larson wrote: A few more points: +1 to keep the Woody* wiki pages and any other Woody documentation for as long as we keep the Woody block. Good point. I will leave the Woody* wiki pages as is, and create Forms* pages as well. Upayavira

Re: form framework clean up

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Torsten Curdt wrote: Stephan Michels wrote: Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Sylvain Wallez um 16:27: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, à 16:05 Europe/Zurich, Torsten Curdt a écrit : Since we are currently in the middle of cleaning up and focussing on *the* one form framework I

Re: [Vote] Removing Woody

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Upayavira wrote: Tim Larson wrote: A few more points: +1 to keep the Woody* wiki pages and any other Woody documentation for as long as we keep the Woody block. Good point. I will leave the Woody* wiki pages as is, and create Forms* pages as well. Is it worth to replace their content with

Re: form framework clean up

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 10.03.2004 12:46, Unico Hommes wrote: BTW, what about xmlform and jxforms. Are they still necessary?! Perhaps its time for some clean up. Sounds like a good idea. But I guess we have to deprecate them first like we do with the former-woody block now. xmlform has already been deprecated for

Re: [Vote] Removing Woody

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 10.03.2004 12:49, Unico Hommes wrote: +1 to keep the Woody* wiki pages and any other Woody documentation for as long as we keep the Woody block. Good point. I will leave the Woody* wiki pages as is, and create Forms* pages as well. Is it worth to replace their content with a link to the

SomeClass.getClass() in flow

2004-03-10 Thread Leszek Gawron
Is there possibility to get access to the getClass() method in flow ? I am trying to do some tests with Hibernate and this method is not accessible and while Hibernate makes a heavy use on reflection I have to wrap everything in some faade (getUser( id ), getRole( id ) instead of simple

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/tools/src blocks-build.xsl

2004-03-10 Thread Stephan Michels
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Joerg Heinicke um 12:41: On 10.03.2004 10:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified:tools/src blocks-build.xsl ... Using one classpath for all blocks instead of one classpath for each block. Any particular reason for this? I thought this was already

Wiki move - add version info?

2004-03-10 Thread H . vanderLinden
Hi, now that the Wiki is on the move to a new location, it's a excellent time to not only clean up some pages, but also add information for which version (of Cocoon, Tomcat, Eclipse ) the information is valid. Upayavira already suggested to add tags to the template to add this kind of

Re: First pass at Apache Wiki conversion

2004-03-10 Thread Upayavira
I've now got most if not all links working. It was kinda tough, as Moin is more strict about what it considers a link. And embedding CamelCase into a page automatically makes a link, which is complitated to handle. I know there's more loose ends, including the Woody stuff. Anyway, please check

Re: Wiki move - add version info?

2004-03-10 Thread Upayavira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, now that the Wiki is on the move to a new location, it's a excellent time to not only clean up some pages, but also add information for which version (of Cocoon, Tomcat, Eclipse ) the information is valid. Upayavira already suggested to add tags to the template

Re: [Vote] Removing Woody

2004-03-10 Thread Upayavira
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 10.03.2004 12:49, Unico Hommes wrote: +1 to keep the Woody* wiki pages and any other Woody documentation for as long as we keep the Woody block. Good point. I will leave the Woody* wiki pages as is, and create Forms* pages as well. Is it worth to replace their

Re: form framework clean up

2004-03-10 Thread Torsten Curdt
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 10.03.2004 12:46, Unico Hommes wrote: BTW, what about xmlform and jxforms. Are they still necessary?! Perhaps its time for some clean up. Sounds like a good idea. But I guess we have to deprecate them first like we do with the former-woody block now. xmlform has

Re: First pass at Apache Wiki conversion

2004-03-10 Thread Steven Noels
On 10 Mar 2004, at 13:01, Upayavira wrote: Anyway, please check the site at wiki.apache.org/cocoon and report back anything you find. http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/GeneralizedFlow looks funny the first code block in http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ApacheModProxy has some extra . and before and

Re: [ANN] GUIapplication for Offline Processing

2004-03-10 Thread Upayavira
Simon Mieth wrote: On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:06:17 + Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, Simon, sorry for my delay in replying. Here's my idea of what I'd like to see. Firstly, I'd ___love___ to see a really thin GUI, with no editors (or a really cut down notepad style editor) living

RE: Wiki move - add version info?

2004-03-10 Thread H . vanderLinden
now that the Wiki is on the move to a new location, it's a excellent time to not only clean up some pages, but also add information for which version (of Cocoon, Tomcat, Eclipse ) the information is valid. Upayavira already suggested to add tags to the template to add this kind of

Re: [Summary] [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Stephan Michels
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Reinhard Pötz um 11:03: Stephan Michels wrote: Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37: We should move XSP in a block anyway. +1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard +0.5 (=good idea, won't be able to help) I

Re: [Summary] [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Stephan Michels wrote: Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Reinhard Pötz um 11:03: Stephan Michels wrote: Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37: We should move XSP in a block anyway. +1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard +0.5

RE: [Summary] [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I have following problem, that src/blocks/session-fw/conf/xsp-session-fw.xconf depends on the xsp block, but won't be executed before the patch files of the xsp block :-/ This may require a change to the build system. Hmm. What about moving *all* xsp stuff into the xsp block?

RE: [Summary] [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Stephan Michels
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler um 14:24: I have following problem, that src/blocks/session-fw/conf/xsp-session-fw.xconf depends on the xsp block, but won't be executed before the patch files of the xsp block :-/ This may require a change to the build

Re: [Summary] [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Reinhard Pötz wrote: Stephan Michels wrote: Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37: We should move XSP in a block anyway. +1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard +0.5 (=good idea, won't be able to help) I can offer some help, if nobody on it, then I can try

Re: [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Unico Hommes wrote: Unico Hommes wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: ... Interestingly some of these samples (e.g. flow) are ported in 2.2 from xsp to jx... Yep I already started doing some work in that department :-) BTW. this was done only in the flow samples and regarding me wanting to test

RE: [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Please note that currently jxtransformer/generator is not up to speed in non-flow environment. It has to be extended / completed first in order to be xsp replacement. I hope to come up with a solution in the next weeks Carsten

Re: [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Unico Hommes wrote: Unico Hommes wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: ... Interestingly some of these samples (e.g. flow) are ported in 2.2 from xsp to jx... Yep I already started doing some work in that department :-) BTW. this was done only in the flow samples and

Re: SomeClass.getClass() in flow

2004-03-10 Thread Ugo Cei
Leszek Gawron wrote: Is there possibility to get access to the getClass() method in flow ? I am trying to do some tests with Hibernate and this method is not accessible and while Hibernate makes a heavy use on reflection I have to wrap everything in some faade (getUser( id ), getRole( id ) instead

RE: [Summary] [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Unico Hommes wrote: I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not the other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to accomplish I'd prefer keeping it the way it is now. I will do some research as to what would be involved to change the build system to

[Vote] Change internal redirect handling

2004-03-10 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
As discussed recently, our internal redirects don't work the way one would usually suspect. If you do an internal redirect, like: map:redirect-to uri=cocoon://some-pipeline/ and the called pipeline has an error, then the error handler of the calling pipeline (containing the redirect) is called

Re: Troubleshooting problem with Sysdeo Tomcat Eclipse plugin

2004-03-10 Thread Steve Krulewitz
The code above does not actively ignore the exception, even less silently swallow anything. Errors are uncecked type exceptions in Java. I don't presume you suggest this is the place you want to log any throwable down the execution path? If I were to take a guess, this one will end up in the

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/xsp/java/org/apache/cocoon/generation AbstractServerPage.java ServerPagesGenerator.java

2004-03-10 Thread Stephan Michels
generating, generation, what the . Its all the same ;-) Thanks. Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] um 16:20: unico 2004/03/10 07:20:54 Added: src/blocks/xsp/java/org/apache/cocoon/generation AbstractServerPage.java

RE: [Vote] Change internal redirect handling

2004-03-10 Thread Ralph Goers
Do real forwards have the ability to stay within the same sitemap? I'm assuming this method would call the RequestDispatcher's forward method? If so, would this finally allow constructs such as map:redirect-to uri=cocoon:/../parent-pipeline ? This would seem logical as you'd have to construct

Re: [cforms] selection list binding

2004-03-10 Thread Ugo Cei
Joerg Heinicke wrote: Hello, below you will find the mail I wanted to send first, but after having written it I found the solution myself: I thought about the correct event instead of on-value-changed, I came to on-bind and in the binding docu I found wb:javascript and came to following code that

RE: [Proposal] Document development/maintenance practices

2004-03-10 Thread Hunsberger, Peter
Tim Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At my workplace they are worried that pairing their slow upgrade cycle with the fast pace of open source projects could cause maintenance problems for their custom code. I find the premise a tad strange; you've got the source, what's to prevent you

Re: [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block

2004-03-10 Thread Steve Krulewitz
Please note that currently jxtransformer/generator is not up to speed in non-flow environment. It has to be extended / completed first in order to be xsp replacement. Yes, this is certainly needed to help the jxtransformer/generator conquer XSP. I am currently using the JXTemplateGenerator to

Rhino

2004-03-10 Thread Ralph Goers
After yesterday's message from Brian Behlendorf, and reviewing the mozilla license, it seems pretty clear that Cocoon 2.1.x is covered under the Mozilla license rather than apache's by its inclusion of Rhino. Since I have seen no responses here to his message I have to assume that discussions

wildcard matcher

2004-03-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I use "wildcard" matcher (e.g. */*), a self-developed Transformer doesn't work... I've defined the transformer inthe sitemap: map:transformer name="xyz_components" pool-grow="2" pool-max="16" pool-min="2" src="" parameter name="disable-caching" type="boolean" value="true" / parameter

Re: [cforms] selection list binding

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Ugo Cei u.cei at cbim.it writes: wb:javascript id=filter.object path=objects direction=load wb:load-form var objects = jxpathPointer.getNode(); widget.setSelectionList(objects, id, name) /wb:load-form /wb:javascript The question is just if this could be added with a

XSP block status

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
There remain a few issues that need resolving. - InputModuleAction had to move along with xsp because it has a dependency on some xsp helper class. This is unfortunate and maybe unnecessary. Perhaps someone with more knowledge about this class could take a look and see if they can solve this?

Re: Rhino

2004-03-10 Thread Steven Noels
On 10 Mar 2004, at 17:08, Ralph Goers wrote: After yesterday's message from Brian Behlendorf, and reviewing the mozilla license, it seems pretty clear that Cocoon 2.1.x is covered under the Mozilla license rather than apache's by its inclusion of Rhino. Since I have seen no responses here to

Re: [Vote] Removing Woody

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 10.03.2004 13:20, Upayavira wrote: Why not adding just a prominent warning at the beginning of each page: This documentation is no further maintained. Go to Forms* pages. Gosh. This is getting complicated! I'll add a warning. :) Thanks for your effort. Joerg

Re: form framework clean up

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 10.03.2004 13:35, Torsten Curdt wrote: xmlform has already been deprecated for quite a while now. I think it is safe to remove it. It's only half a year: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=107662678916017w=4. I would deprecate jxforms block now and remove both for 2.2 (which is

Re: First pass at Apache Wiki conversion

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 10.03.2004 13:01, Upayavira wrote: Anyway, please check the site at wiki.apache.org/cocoon and report back anything you find. http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/FAQs: The list at the beginning is broken. The numbering of the sections is also strange in the file: 1. 1. Meta-FAQ instead of 1.

RE: Rhino

2004-03-10 Thread Ralph Goers
Steven, I wasn't looking for panic mode. Just some info. This exact problem, although somewhat less serious, showed up just a few days earlier with Jisp and folks on this list were actively discussing alternatives. Since Brian's post not a single follow-up on Rhino here. Ralph -Original

RE: Rhino

2004-03-10 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks, Joerg. That's just the kind of info I was looking for. Ralph -Original Message- From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Rhino On the other hand there is no need (license POV)

Re: wildcard matcher

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 10.03.2004 17:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I use wildcard matcher (e.g. */*) , a self-developed Transformer doesn't work... I've defined the transformer in the sitemap: map:transformer name=xyz_components pool-grow=2 pool-max=16 pool-min=2

Re: Rhino

2004-03-10 Thread Steven Noels
On 10 Mar 2004, at 20:02, Ralph Goers wrote: Thanks, Joerg. That's just the kind of info I was looking for. Also, the Rhino case triggered a whole lot of related discussions about additional policy requirements laid upon ASL-licensed projects w.r.t. the licenses of their dependencies. And that

Re: Cocoon's Rhino+continuations fork

2004-03-10 Thread Steven Noels
On 09 Mar 2004, at 19:38, Brian Behlendorf wrote: On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Steven Noels wrote: This is troubled partly by the license status of Rhino itself. Upon personal investigation a while ago, I found some source files which where licensed using the NPL1.1

Re: [cforms] selection list binding

2004-03-10 Thread Ugo Cei
Joerg Heinicke wrote: Thanks for your answer, Ugo, I only do not get your point. My problem was about binding and I solved it with the above wb:javascript code and it works for the moment. But I could imagine that I'm not the only one binding selection lists to a collection, so maybe adding an

Re: [Vote] Change internal redirect handling

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 10.03.2004 16:20, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: a) Make an internal redirect a real forward (This is an incompatible change) +1 This is indeed what I expect! Joerg

Re: [cforms] selection list binding

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 10.03.2004 22:01, Ugo Cei wrote: Not it's me that's not getting your point here ;-). Ok, let me clarify. I think I do nothing unusual. Yes, I have a form with a simple dynamic selection list. And I do the binding against a bean. There are two known ways to set the selection list dynamically:

Re: Default ProcessingPipline implementation?

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 04.03.2004 12:45, Unico Hommes wrote: And what happens if I dont specify an element map:pipes/ in the root sitemap? ;-) AFAICT this would generate an error. Doesn't it? Is it possible to express a real error message for map:pipes too? I guess so, just need

Re: [Vote] Change internal redirect handling

2004-03-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: As discussed recently, our internal redirects don't work the way one would usually suspect. If you do an internal redirect, like: map:redirect-to uri=cocoon://some-pipeline/ and the called pipeline has an error, then the error handler of the

Re: Default ProcessingPipline implementation?

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 11.03.2004 00:40, Unico Hommes wrote: For not setting default pipe I get: org.apache.avalon.framework.component.ComponentException: pipes: ComponentSelector Attempted to retrieve component with null hint. For not setting default generator I get:

Re: [CForms] Support for multipe unique-row-id in Repeater

2004-03-10 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 05.03.2004 17:45, Marc Portier wrote: Yes, I only see that wb:unique-row (grouped by type: unique or not unique) is outside of wb:on-bind (grouped by event: on-bind, on-insert, on-delete) though it is executed also at on-bind event. yes, but do you find that surprising? (in fact all of the

JCS Store - new issues

2004-03-10 Thread Corin Moss
Title: JCS Store - new issues Hi Guys, You may or may not have seen my recent posts about performance with JCS store, but I've gotten a little further into diagnosing what looks like a deadlock issue. After about 30mins of load testing I'm seeing everything lock up (iowait of ~ 100%) the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27467] - Upgrade all source files to ASF 2.0 license

2004-03-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27467. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27467] - Upgrade all source files to ASF 2.0 license

2004-03-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27467. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: JCS Store - new issues

2004-03-10 Thread Corin Moss
Hi Guys, I think I've been leading myself up the garden path a bit here. After some more in-depth analysis I've noticed that this is directly related to mem usage and garbage collection. It would seem that the store janitor and GC is kicking in at about the same time (which makes sense.) The

Re: ECM facility

2004-03-10 Thread Stephen McConnell
[repost with correct recipient list] Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi Stephen, I had a quick glance at your finder stuff but are absolutely clueless what I should do with it :) I guess from your description that if this finder is used inside Merlin I can use the ECM configuration files for defining my

Javascript in Woody in Coplets

2004-03-10 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Nacho Jimenez wrote: Jan Hoskens wrote: I'm not sure you mean this, but I'll give it anyway: If you're using woody and thus the woody stylesheet, there are several javascripts that are added (eg the popup window). These javascripts are to be added in your html header and thus the woody

Performance impact of turning on Instrumentation?

2004-03-10 Thread Andrzej Jan Taramina
Anyone have any insight into what the performance impact is of turning on the Instrumentation feature in web.xml (Ver 2.1.4)? Thanks! Andrzej Jan Taramina Chaeron Corporation: Enterprise System Solutions http://www.chaeron.com

Coplets and Excel Generation

2004-03-10 Thread Anna Bikkina
OK. I posted the same question earlier but re-framed it so that someone can me suggestions. I have coplet which accepts some input keys and shoud generate a excel file. When I click on submit it takes to the ill formatted html file but does not generate a excel file. I use the same