Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Matt Juntunen
Hi all, After reading all of the comments, here is what I propose for moving forward: * Use version number "1.0-beta1" instead of "1.0-B1". (Gary, were you planning on updating the versioning guidelines?) * Create a new release branch named "1.0-beta1-release" from the "1.0-B1-release"

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:55, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 4:51 PM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:30, Gary Gregory a > > écrit : > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > >

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 4:51 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:30, Gary Gregory a > écrit : > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > > > > > > > Why not

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:30, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > > > > > Why not dropping the redundant reference to the component > > > > and project, since

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > [...] > > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > > > Why not dropping the redundant reference to the component > > > and project, since they are in the repo's name? > > > And how about focusing on the tag's purpose

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> > [...] > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > Why not dropping the redundant reference to the component > > and project, since they are in the repo's name? > > And how about focusing on the tag's purpose by mentioning > > it first? > > Thus: > > rc1_v1.0-beta1 > > > >

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 17:24, sebb a écrit : > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 16:04, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a écrit > > : > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary

Re: [releases,dbutils] There are 4 staged copies of dbutils-1.8

2020-03-31 Thread Rob Tompkins
Thank you for the reminder. I will today. -Rob > On Mar 31, 2020, at 11:18 AM, Carl Hall wrote: > > Hey, Rob. Were you able to put some eyes on the release? > >> On Mar 9, 2020, at 1:04 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> Cool. I like the forward progress. Pardon my being remiss on validation. I

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:04 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a > écrit : > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread sebb
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 16:04, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM

Re: [releases,dbutils] There are 4 staged copies of dbutils-1.8

2020-03-31 Thread Carl Hall
Hey, Rob. Were you able to put some eyes on the release? > On Mar 9, 2020, at 1:04 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > Cool. I like the forward progress. Pardon my being remiss on validation. I > can also give it a look tomorrow. > > -Rob > >> On Mar 9, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Carl Hall wrote: >> >>

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a > > écrit : > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11,

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a > écrit : > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > > > a écrit : > > > > > > > > Thanks. I think I have

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > > a écrit : > > > > > > Thanks. I think I have the gpg key sorted now. > > > > > > I can probably start on RC2 tomorrow. It

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread sebb
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > a écrit : > > > > Thanks. I think I have the gpg key sorted now. > > > > I can probably start on RC2 tomorrow. It sounds like we've agreed to go > > with "1.0-beta1" for the release