Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

Yes that is on my plate to fix, but I haven’t gotten time to fix it. I’ve for the first time in a while got some time this weekend away from my standard obligations and will try to put some time in on it. Pardon my being remiss, my personal life has been quite hectic over the past 2 months both

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.16 based on RC1

I’m in with the partent pom right now….can work on getting that sorted…plus I need to to get our release plugin working with the latest version of maven. -Rob > On Jan 22, 2022, at 5:42 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Alright, digging through the parent parent parent pom, it looks like the > Apach

Re: [commons-io] branch master updated: Add CharsetEncoders.

> On Jan 11, 2022, at 8:41 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mar. 11 janv. 2022 à 14:21, > a écrit : >> >> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. >> >> ggregory pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository https://gitbox.apache.or

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

I believe that we already have begun to do this. -Rob > On Dec 30, 2021, at 6:16 PM, sebb wrote: > > Those of you who want to keep the robot, please use the instructions > to reduce the spam. > >> On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 22:51, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> >

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

r > >>> On Dec 30, 2021, at 16:48, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Dec 30, 2021, at 5:37 PM, sebb >>> <mailto:seb...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 21:39, Rob Tompkins >> <mail

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

> On Dec 30, 2021, at 5:37 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 21:39, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> Guys. The fundamental argument underpinng all this is whether it’s better to >> have robot eyes on the code and human eyes on the code. Stop arguing one >&

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

e from at least 9 >> updates which are generally 3 emails per update. >> >> If it does fail, you will have wasted 2 cycles: the original commit of >> 10, and the revert. And only 2 emails. > > +1 and you will get many thanks from those trying to follow commits

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

on version updates some time before > the release. > Days or weeks rather than months or years. > >> >>> Generally all the versions would be updated at the same time, instead >>> of individually. >>> >> >> Not here, if update 10 dependencie

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

> On Dec 29, 2021, at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021, 9:21 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >>> On 29/12/2021 15:04, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:37 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>>> Why not just ru

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

ve been before my time and it seems like a horrible idea: The > software is stable after a few months of activity and it's time to make a > release, so the day before a release, you change all the dependencies, and > cross your fingers? Yikes! > > >> Generally all the ve

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

>>> Please stop pretending that Dependabot does things it does not (and >>> likely cannot) do. >>> >> >> Oh, boy, Sebb, it feels like you are purposely misunderstanding my POV. >> It's as simple as I stated: >> >> If Dependabot detects that a n

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

> Gary > >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021, 08:51 Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 29, 2021, at 8:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> wrote: >>> >>> @Rob: dependabot is mainly about dependencies upgrades and it is also >> why >&g

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

ok > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > >> Le mer. 29 déc. 2021 à 14:39, Rob Tompkins a écrit : >> >> Guys. I think dependabot is our greatest advantage in the work against >> security problems. I know she h

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

Guys. I think dependabot is our greatest advantage in the work against security problems. I know she has her failings and is chatty. But, I think we should open a line of thinking about how best she can help. The reason she’s a pain in the ass is that we don’t have enough hands on the project

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

> On Dec 28, 2021, at 1:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Please no. Dependabot is a key tool for me. Inbox rules should be able to > help you depending on your client. Huge +1 I think we need to help GitHub figure out how to make it better. -Rob > > Someone had suggested creating a new ma

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0

The Apache Commons project announces the release of Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0. Commons CLI requires at least Java 8. The Apache Commons CLI library provides a simple command Line arguments parser. This is a Feature and bug fix release (Java 8) Historical list of changes: https://commons.apac

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0

The Apache Commons project announces the release of Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0. Commons CLI requires at least Java 8. The Apache Commons CLI library provides a simple command Line arguments parser. This is a Feature and bug fix release (Java 8) Historical list of changes: https://commons.apac

[ALL, SITE] Publishing Main Website

Hello all, In going through the CLI release of 1.5.0 (most of which I’ve finished), I needed to publish the main site. In following the standard directions [1], I’ve made the requisite commits to SVN, but I just don’t know how to publish the code out to the site. Note, I used to use the cms app

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0 based on RC1

Hello all, This vote passes with the following votes: Gary Gregory: +1 Bruno Kinoshita: +1 Rob Tompkins: +1 I’ll go ahead work through the promotion process today. Many thanks to those that voted on the RC. Cheers, -Rob > On Oct 23, 2021, at 5:58 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > We h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0 based on RC1

Here’s my +1. -Rob > On Oct 23, 2021, at 5:58 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since > Apache Commons CLI 1.4 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons CLI 1.5.0. > > Apache Commons CLI 1

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0 based on RC1

ecause... Thank you, Rob Tompkins, Release Manager (using key B6E73D84EA4FCC47166087253FAAD2CD5ECBB314) For following is intended as a helper and refresher for reviewers. Validating a release candidate == These guidelines are NOT complete. Requirements: Git, Java, Mave

Re: [CLI] release soon

Gotcha. Thanks for the heads up. Cheers, -Rob > On Oct 19, 2021, at 7:38 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All, > > I intend to create a release candidate for CLI 1.5 soon. This will be the > last Java 7 release IMO and I plan on this being a simple kinde of release, > no big new feature. Feel

Re: Top Contributor in the Commons PMC

+1 for Gary. being in the top 5 overall at Apache is super impressive! Congrats man! -Rob > On Sep 3, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Matt Juntunen wrote: > > I second this congratulations. Thank you for all of your hard work! > > -Matt J > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 8:46 AM Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> If

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.11.1 based on RC1

Validates out succesfully +1 > On Aug 14, 2021, at 10:13 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few regression bugs since Apache Commons Pool 2.11.0 > was released and performed some internal cleanups, so I would like to > release Apache Commons Pool 2.11.1. > > Apache Commons Pool 2.11.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.11.0 based on RC1

+1 signatures good, builds on 8 and 11, rat good reports good. send it :-) > On Aug 11, 2021, at 5:45 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > May I get at least one more PMC review please? > > Gary > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2021, 18:12 Gary Gregory wrote: > >> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhanceme

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.9.0 based on RC1

+1 signatures, reports (ioncluding RAT), and build look good for java8 and java11. Few nits in the SpotBugs, PMD, and CPD reports (nothing of consequence) Send it! -Rob > On Jul 31, 2021, at 11:19 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 based on RC1

Agree….that makes sense to me, particularly because it’s currently live. -Rob > On Jul 19, 2021, at 5:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I'll have to exclude this test fixture, after the release. > TY, > Gary > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021, 17:31 Rob Tompkins wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 based on RC1

+1 All looks good to me (build with 8 and 11, signatures, and reports). (Will let @Gary make the call based on the nit mentioned below). Singular nit (note this file was originally committed in August of 2019, and we have done releases since then. So, it exists on the current live site): https:

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Numbers (full distribution) 1.0 based on RC1

Great work. Keep it up. -Rob > On Jul 15, 2021, at 7:31 AM, Matt Juntunen wrote: > > This vote passes with the following +1s: > - Bruno Kinoshita > - Gilles Sadowski > - Rob Tompkins > - myself > > I'll perform the release tasks within the next

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.11.0 based on RC1

All checks out +1. -Rob > On Jul 9, 2021, at 9:52 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons > IO 2.10.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.11.0. > > Apache Commons IO 2.11.0 RC1 is available for review here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Numbers (full distribution) 1.0 based on RC1

+1 Note. The number of jars for the number of classes available seems a bit extreme. It also makes it quite difficult to validate the release given that to properly validate the release (note, proper validation involves validating all of the signatures of all of the files generated both in nexu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JEXL 3.2.1 based on RC1

+1 builds and tests with 8 and 11 signatures good reports all look reasonable (nit -> can we get japicmp implemented here?) > On Jun 23, 2021, at 5:44 AM, Henri Biestro wrote: > > > I know 3.2 was just (barely) released but it had been a long time (and a long > list of issues) so unfortunat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JEXL 3.2.1 based on RC1

Similarly I will try to review today. -Rob > On Jun 23, 2021, at 6:39 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The vote did not fail yet. The minium vote time window has just gone by. I > will try to review later today. > > Gary > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021, 05:44 Henri Biestro wrote: > >> >> I know 3.2 wa

Re: Welcome back Henri Biestro to the PMC

Cheers! Welcome back. -Rob > On Jun 13, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Welcome back, Henri! Glad to see you again! > >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 08:52 Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> Let's welcome back Henri Biestro to the PMC. >> >> Gary >> -

Re: [REPORT][DRAFT] Apache Commons Board report for June 2021

If I recall correctly, there are actual health metrics that the ASF uses as a standard, but I can’t seem to dig them up. That said, we can say we have healthy PR engagement and disregard project health generally because how people index for that depends on the person. All that said, Commons se

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.10.0 based on RC1

+1 builds/tests successfully with java 8 and java 11. Reports, Site, Signatures all look good to me. > On May 28, 2021, at 5:03 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have added two enhancements since Apache Commons Pool 2.9.0 was > released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Pool 2.10.0. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.9.0 based on RC1

+1 all reports check out. Builds with Java 8 and 11. Keep up the good work Gary! Cheers, -Rob > On May 24, 2021, at 8:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Keeps me on my toes ;-) > > Gary > > >> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:49 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.9.0 based on RC1

Sounds good just wanted to ask the question. -Rob > On May 24, 2021, at 12:47 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The method is already implemented in a super class so nothing is broken. > Recall also that generics are erased by the compiler. > > Gary > > On Mon, May 24,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.9.0 based on RC1

I’m curious….does this change break BC https://github.com/apache/commons-io/commit/6803ac145c274546d0f2e06374a9723a4d4d7ce6 with the removal of: public FileVisitResult visitFile(final Path file, final Ba

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.12.0 based on RC1

I think it’s the 2020*** not the date before hand, regardless, that can be ammended in the site once released. -Rob > On Mar 1, 2021, at 8:12 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I use the RC cut date as the release date since it is part of the tagged > server files. > > Gary > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Net 3.8.0 based on RC1

+1 Vetted correctly: build java 8, build java 11, RAT clirr japicmp signatures (all nexus and dist) nit (If I complain about something then I should fix it ;-) …. ) - low test coverage in jacoco reports. @Gary - thanks as always at keeping the project moving forward. Cheers, -Rob > On Feb 13,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.4 based on RC2

Reviewed. All looks good. +1 Cheers, -Rob > On Jan 20, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 18/01/2021 17:12, Mark Thomas wrote: >> We have fixed a couple of bugs and a regression in 1.2.3, so I would >> like to release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.4. > > > >> Please review the releas

Re: [Daemon] release 1.2.4?

simpler just to use a binary distribution of > CMSC from github. > > Mark > > >> On 22/11/2020 17:15, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> @Mark - are you using VS2008 on windows 10? I’m trying to piece together the >> build environment from this line: >> >> https:/

Re: [Daemon] release 1.2.4?

vironmen that is quite foreign to me. I don’t want to hold up the release of Daemon 1.2.4 with my lack of aptitude in the “C” build departments. Thoughts? -Rob > On Nov 19, 2020, at 11:00 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > I’m going to have to say that building and releasing daemon isn’t v

Re: [Daemon] release 1.2.4?

But, I don’t think that you guys should wait for me to do the build for this 1.2.4 release because I’m going to be too slow. Cheers, -Rob > On Nov 17, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > >> On Nov 16, 2020, at 7:35 AM, Rob Tompkins > <mailto:chtom...@gmail.co

Re: [Daemon] release 1.2.4?

> On Nov 16, 2020, at 7:35 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > >> On Nov 16, 2020, at 2:53 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> On 15/11/2020 22:36, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> So this is my first time in here. You build both unix and windows binaries? >>

Re: [Daemon] release 1.2.4?

> On Nov 16, 2020, at 2:53 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 15/11/2020 22:36, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> So this is my first time in here. You build both unix and windows binaries? >> Do you normally do this using windows linux subsystem as a mechanism to get >> b

Re: [Daemon] release 1.2.4?

So this is my first time in here. You build both unix and windows binaries? Do you normally do this using windows linux subsystem as a mechanism to get both sets of binaries from a single machine or do you perform two builds? -Rob > On Nov 14, 2020, at 3:53 PM, Rob Tompkins wr

Re: [Daemon] release 1.2.4?

> On Nov 14, 2020, at 1:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 13/11/2020 19:19, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> Hm….don’t have a windows machine laying around. Could maybe use AWS to stand >> up something like that for the release. > > I can build and sign the Windows binar

Re: [Daemon] release 1.2.4?

gt; > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 13:28 Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> If I recall correctly, I offered to do the next release when the time came >> in order to set up the release plugin. @MarkT - let me know what you’re >> thinking. >> >> Cheers, >> -Rob >>

Re: [Daemon] release 1.2.4?

If I recall correctly, I offered to do the next release when the time came in order to set up the release plugin. @MarkT - let me know what you’re thinking. Cheers, -Rob > On Nov 13, 2020, at 1:14 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi all & markt, > > Any thoughts on getting the recent fixes out i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC3

+1 Builds successfully with `mvn clean install -DskipTests && mvn -Pjapicmp -Pjacoco site && mvn site:stage` on java8 and java11(without javadoc) Signatures look good Site looks good, reports all look good. -Rob > On Oct 27, 2020, at 12:27 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC1

The build worked for me on a different machine. So I would have been a +1. > On Oct 21, 2020, at 8:20 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > This looks similar to what Bruno is getting out of the build, but here’s what > I’m seeing. It looks like a maven plugin issue. I wonder if th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC1

This looks similar to what Bruno is getting out of the build, but here’s what I’m seeing. It looks like a maven plugin issue. I wonder if there are some updates we could perform in the plugin zone that could potentially sort this out. -Rob ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Net 3.7.2 based on RC1

+1 Signatures Check out Java8 build checks out Java11 build checks out site reports all look good, RAT good > On Oct 14, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons Net 3.7.1 was released, so I > would like to release Apache Commons Net 3.7.2. > > Ap

[all] example of a GitHub generated email. (Was: Fwd: [apache/commons-pool] Bump biz.aQute.bndlib from 5.1.2 to 5.2.0 (#51))

@Sebb - this is the flavour of email that I am referring to. We may have others that get generated, but as a committer on a depository, as the ASF has made us, these emails get sent to you be default from GitHub unless you change your personal email settings. I may be off base here but I thin

Re: Dependabot pr's

indifferent about direction, but wanted to minimally give light to the issue at hand. Cheers, -Rob > On Oct 16, 2020, at 8:35 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > I’m a +0.5 to a notifications (GitHub + Jira) list. This seems reasonable to > me. > > -Rob > >> On Oct 16, 20

Re: Dependabot pr's

> On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:39 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 07:43, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> On 15/10/2020 19:30, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 1:57 PM Bernd Eckenfels >>> wrote: >>> Before we do that, I need help. I am considering to ignore or unsubscribe

Re: Dependabot pr's

I’m a +0.5 to a notifications (GitHub + Jira) list. This seems reasonable to me. -Rob > On Oct 16, 2020, at 2:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 15/10/2020 19:30, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 1:57 PM Bernd Eckenfels >>> wrote: >>> >>> Before we do that, I need help. I am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Net 3.7.1 based on RC2

+1 Builds well with java 8 and java 11 Reports look good. Ran this script for signature validation: https://github.com/chtompki/notes/blob/master/commons-release-validation/mover-downloader-and-validator.sh Note. I think we can likely templatize this script for future release valication. -Ro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.9.0 based on RC1

+1 Build works with java8 and java11 Signatures validate appropriately Site and reports look good Validation scripts: https://github.com/chtompki/notes/blob/master/commons-release-validation/commons-pool-2.9.0-RC1-downloader.sh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.8.0 based on RC1

+1 Built with java8 and java11 “mvn clean test site” Reports look good Signatures check out. For signature validation I used the following scripts in a directory intially containing: -rw-r--r--@ 1 chtompki staff 1874482 Sep 23 09:58 commons-dbcp2-2.8.0-bin.tar.gz -rw-r--r--@ 1 chtompki sta

Re: No more dependabot

> On Sep 16, 2020, at 4:43 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:25 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> >>> Le mer. 16 sept. 2020 à 21:09, Gary Gregory a >>> écrit : >>> >>> I think we really want the PRs, the main benefit is to have the software >>> built and tested WITH the de

Re: [DRAFT] September Commons Board Report

Looks good to me. -Rob > On Sep 8, 2020, at 7:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > Here is what I plan on reporting for the September Commons Board Report > > ## Description: > The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of Java focused > reusable libraries and compone

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.3 RC1

> On Sep 7, 2020, at 2:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 07/09/2020 18:18, sebb wrote: > > > >> Such automation already exists, and is used to generate the VOTE >> emails used by many Commons RMs >> >> $ mvn commons-release:vote-txt > > Thanks for that. > > I tried it out on the 1.2.3-RC

[daemon] validation mechanics (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.3 RC1)

Also, I would think we should be as accommodating as possible to Mark as he is indeed the top maintainer on [daemon]. I doubt we’d be making progress there with out him. I’ve found his [VOTE] threads to be entirely sufficient for validation despite their differences in content. I’m. +1 for con

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.3 RC1

> On Sep 7, 2020, at 6:15 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 04/09/2020 12:30, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> +1 binding. > > Thanks for testing and voting. > >> Builds on java 7 and java 11 works with ‘mvn clean test’ >> >> Build on java 8 works with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.8.0 based on RC1

(undecided) -1 ?? [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 04:00 min [INFO] Finished at: 2020-09-06T02:07:20-04:00 [INFO]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.3 RC1

+1 binding. Builds on java 7 and java 11 works with ‘mvn clean test’ Build on java 8 works with ‘mvn clean test install site’ % mvn -version Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f) Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.3_1/libexec Java version: 1.8.0_242, vendor: Amazon.c

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Crypto 1.1.0 based on RC1

>> This VOTE passes with the following +1s: >>>> >>>> - Alex Remily >>>> - Geoffrey Blake >>>> - Bruno P. Kinoshita, binding >>>> - Rob Tompkins, binding >>>> - Gary Gregory, binding >>>> >>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons Codec 1.15 Released

Nice work Alex! Cheers, -Rob > On Sep 1, 2020, at 12:49 PM, Alex Herbert wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 16:02, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> Thank you for pushing out the release. >> >> In the future, please wait for the jar to propagate to Maven Central and >> mirrors. Maven Centra

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Crypto 1.1.0 based on RC1

+1 Validated java8: mvn clean test install site with: Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f) Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.3_1/libexec Java version: 1.8.0_242, vendor: Amazon.com Inc., runtime: /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/amazon-corretto-8.jdk/Contents/Home/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.15 based on RC1

Will look tomorrow...last few weeks were particularly busy. -Rob > On Aug 30, 2020, at 3:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Ping. > >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, 08:34 Alex Herbert wrote: >> >> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements >> since Apache Commons Codec 1.14

Re: [All] New repo for all proper components as submodules?

> On Aug 30, 2020, at 10:00 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:47 AM Rob Tompkins <mailto:chtom...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >> >>> On Aug 30, 2020, at 9:44 AM, sebb >> <mailto:seb...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>

Re: [All] New repo for all proper components as submodules?

>> Yes yes "girl" -> "git" >> >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020, 09:24 Gary Gregory wrote: >> >>> I'm talking about girl's own submodules: >>> >>> https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Submodules >>> >>&g

Re: [All] New repo for all proper components as submodules?

yes "girl" -> "git" > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020, 09:24 Gary Gregory wrote: > >> I'm talking about girl's own submodules: >> >> https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Submodules >> >> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-submodule &

Re: [All] New repo for all proper components as submodules?

By git submodules, are you talking about a symlink to another git repository inside one of our repositories? -Rob > On Aug 29, 2020, at 6:52 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All, > > Any thoughts for or against creating a new git repository which would > contain all 'proper' Commons components

Re: [ALL] Security tab on GitHub

I don’t see any harm having more documentation. It’s kinda like the apple philosophy of trying to make every thing that someone would think of doing on a computer, actually work like they think it would…right? The more intuitive we can make things the better we will end up being, I would think.

Re: Introducing Maven Wrapper

I’m still a +1 for mvnw….do we have a consensus here? -Rob > On Aug 19, 2020, at 4:27 PM, John Patrick wrote: > > All the suggestions I'm seeing appear to be hard code solutions to > specific implementations, require defining things in multiple places, > or needing developers to select the corr

Re: [ALL] Drop Travis in favor of Apache CI and GitHub Actions

> On Aug 16, 2020, at 1:51 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Travis isn't donated; the ASF pays for a subscription of some sort. > It's likely discounted, but it's still ASF infra in that sense. Wow...great point. I had no idea -Rob > >> On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 16:09, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >>

Re: [LOGGING][DAEMON] Update Java 6 to 7

> On Aug 16, 2020, at 6:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 15/08/2020 19:00, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 1:14 PM Mark Thomas > > wrote: >> >>> On 10/08/2020 17:26, Gary Gregory wrote: As recently done for [EMAIL], I propose we update [LOGGING] and

Re: [LOGGING][DAEMON] Update Java 6 to 7

> On Aug 16, 2020, at 6:13 AM, Xeno Amess wrote: > > I suddenly arise a good idea... > How about > 1. we release a java 7 version of this repo. > 2. we wait for user argue about this. > 3. if no users argue about this, we just go forward to 7. Otherwise, we > re-consider about this. That wo

Re: Github action versioning

> On Aug 16, 2020, at 8:29 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > >  > Sure. That’s why you’ve pulled me from a “no” to a non-blocking dissenting > opinion. I will go with community consensus at this point despite my opinion > (-0) (-; > > -Rob > >>> On Aug 16,

Re: Github action versioning

Sure. That’s why you’ve pulled me from a “no” to a non-blocking dissenting opinion. I will go with community consensus at this point despite my opinion (-0) (-; -Rob > On Aug 16, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Xeno Amess wrote: > >  > @Rob Tompkins > Hi. > Please consider: &g

Re: Github action versioning

> On Aug 16, 2020, at 5:59 AM, Xeno Amess wrote: > > I REALLY suggest we move all dependabot mails to another mailing list. > please create one. Your point has pulled me from a -1 to a -0, where I want the emails as bots should be treated as people in some sense. That said, I’m curious as t

Re: [ALL] Drop Travis in favor of Apache CI and GitHub Actions

I like the use both solution. I personally like the CI system to be closer to the code. Thus, I lean towards GitHub actions. -Rob > On Aug 15, 2020, at 2:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All, > > In order to ease maintenance, I propose that we drop Travis CI in favor of > Apache CI and Git

[all] cicd philosophy (was: Re: Introducing Maven Wrapper)

Hello all, I first want to thank John for bringing these points to light as I think we can have quite a healthy discussion about the CI/CD philosophy employed by the project (Apache Commons) generally. Furthermore, I hope to set precedent with intent and direction with the following comments. N

Re: Github fork issue with dependabot

> On Aug 14, 2020, at 7:56 PM, John Patrick wrote: > > Cheers for that Giles, > I read those emails as PR's raised at say > https://github.com/apache/commons-lang and dependabot, which I > understand. > I'm talking about my fork for commons-lang at > https://github.com/nhojpatrick/commons-lan

[ANNOUNCE] Matt Sicker Joins the Apache Commons Project PMC

Hello folks, I’d like to announce that Matt Sicker has been invited to join the Apache Commons Project, and he’s accepted. Please join me in welcoming Matt Cheers, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.or

[ANNOUNCE] Commons Parent POM 52 released

The Apache Commons Parent team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons Parent 52 The Apache Commons Parent POM provides common settings for all Apache Commons components. Add support for Java 15. Changes in this version include: New features: o Align Javadoc version with java ove

Re: [ALL] Please use ANNOUNCE not ANNOUNCEMENT (or ANNOUCEMENT)

> On Aug 8, 2020, at 7:22 AM, sebb wrote: > > I've just noticed that several recent announcement emails have used the tags > [ANNOUNCEMENT] > or even > [ANNOUCEMENT] > > Such prefixes are non-standard and longer than the default of > [ANNOUNCE] which most other projects use. > Thanks for t

Re: [CRYPTO] Random AEADBadTagException in GcmCipherTest?

the `new Random()` constructor and the tests >> will be deterministic. >> >> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 09:57, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> >>>> This is

Re: [CRYPTO] Random AEADBadTagException in GcmCipherTest?

b > > Gary > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:54 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > >> The ECC stuff I mostly learned about from various Bernstein papers >> like this one: https://cr.yp.to/newelliptic/nistecc-20160106.pdf >> >> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 09:50, Rob Tompkins wro

Re: [CRYPTO] Random AEADBadTagException in GcmCipherTest?

dia.org/wiki/Poincaré_disk_model <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model> -Rob > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 09:50, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >>> Well, for testing RNG

Re: [CRYPTO] Random AEADBadTagException in GcmCipherTest?

of a logician. -Rob > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 09:37, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:33 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >>> Now I hope we don't have unit tests depending on non-static state for >>> its random

Re: [CRYPTO] Random AEADBadTagException in GcmCipherTest?

> On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:33 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Now I hope we don't have unit tests depending on non-static state for > its random number generator! ;) We actually do have a considerable number of those in our projects where we use probabilistic epsilons on the output. See commons-rng.

Re: Your project website

> On Aug 5, 2020, at 12:30 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > The CMS is the transformation system itself from my understanding. I > don't believe svnpubsub is being deprecated here. Our landing page > templates may need to be converted, but that's about it. Thanks Matt for that clarification. -Rob

Fwd: Your project website

Does this apply to Commons as well? If so we have a considerable amount of work to accomplish in a very little amount of time. -Rob > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Ralph Goers > Subject: Re: Your project website > Date: August 5, 2020 at 12:09:49 PM EDT > To: d...@logging.apache.org > Rep

Re: svn commit: r1880586 - /commons/dev/test/date.txt

I see. Thanks, -Rob > On Aug 5, 2020, at 11:38 AM, sebb wrote: > > No, it is used for testing SVN, svnmucc and svnpubsub > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 14:06, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> Just out of curiosity what is the dev/test/date.txt file? Something you use &

Re: svn commit: r1880586 - /commons/dev/test/date.txt

Just out of curiosity what is the dev/test/date.txt file? Something you use for releases? -Rob > On Aug 4, 2020, at 5:15 PM, s...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: sebb > Date: Tue Aug 4 21:15:00 2020 > New Revision: 1880586 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1880586&view=rev > Log: > Dumm

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >