+1.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for both sub-votes.
Matt
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta.
It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP.
IMO Commons would be a good
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Ceki Gülcü c...@qos.ch wrote:
On 10/08/2011 8:02 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
rambling scope=large unabashed-plugin=true
Thank you for posting this summary of the Apache way. Yes, it is damn
hard to track contributions, especially if one wishes to do
Modify manually to fix :)
I don't think we'll need to make a new one, that shows 2.6-3.0 and
after that will be generated.
Hen
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All:
The 2.0 to 3.0 Clirr report here:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ceki Gulcu c...@qos.ch wrote:
* On the ASF model
In a nutshell, while the ASF is a great organization in many ways, it
is not a meritocracy mainly because merit is not measured at all and
at the project level no responsiblity is accrued on merit beyond
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Commons
Lang 3.0.1.
As the version suggests, this is a drop-in replacement for 3.0. A list
of the 9 changes and 6 bug fixes in this release are found in the
release notes:
https://commons.apache.org/lang/changes-report.html#a3.0.1
Absolutely :)
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
+1.
Nits are OK by me.
We have 3.0.2 around the corner anyway, right :)
Gary
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Second try for 3.0.1 :)
Three changes - fixed
Btw (aimed to Greg and anyone else) - never feel that the committers
would be best to put it together. I've gotten Open Source projects out
the door without being a committer simply by listing the things I/they
thought they should work on on a wiki. It's a bit more of a pain
without access to
is that 1000 people pull in 1000 directions, as
opposed to 10 people pulling in 6 directions. ;-)
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw (aimed to Greg and anyone else) - never feel that the committers
would be best to put it together. I've gotten Open Source
Noting that the distribution and maven bundle have been uploaded and
are now awaiting sync. I'll give that a day and then deploy the site
tomorrow night.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks all for voting. 5 +1s, including my implicit +1.
I'll
) Updating from 3.0 to 3.0.1.
The latter would have avoided the 3.0.1-RC1 issue that Gary found.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Noting that the distribution and maven bundle have been uploaded and
are now awaiting sync. I'll give that a day
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Karlsen davidkarl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
org.apache.commons.lang.math.RandomUtils does not exist in lang3 and I could
not find anything in the migration guide.
Are there any alternatives in lang3?
Nope - it was removed as not having enough value.
Which
, and the OSGi attributes are probably incorrect,
too. But I checked that this was also the case for Lang 3.0, so this is
probably not blocking.
So in total I am +1 for the release.
Oliver
Am 06.08.2011 21:16, schrieb Henri Yandell:
Second try for 3.0.1 :)
Three changes - fixed version
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:43 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 August 2011 22:59, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Maven build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. I also tested the
ant build
Second try for 3.0.1 :)
Three changes - fixed version for the archive files, proper fix to
LANG-727 and missing javadoc implemented.
RC2 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0.1-RC2/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_1_RC2/
To quote the Infra team; ENOCARE :)
Now, if you're going to deploy the Maven generated website
automatically, I may care.
Hen
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
We can hold a vote. I would be persuaded to vote no if someone could point to
an ASF or
I think we should move the current trunk off and call it generics-RnD.
Then we should copy 3.2 over to trunk (or maybe 3.3, I seem to recall
that prior to merging the generics in we had a 3.3 ready for release).
We then release 3.3.
Then we start 3.4. We genericize some tiny part of it in a
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
I prefer Apache driven projects when possible. If LOG4J2 takes off,
feature requests would be implemented quicker, I hope.
I like Log4J just
with this. And I think it serves users better, many of whom
have migrated to Google Guava.
1) New bug fix only release, JDK 1.4 compatible
2) New release with some generics, backwards compatible
3) Re-evaluate whether an incompatible release makes sense
Stephen
On 5 August 2011 07:12, Henri Yandell
It's August, which must mean it's time for 3.0.1 :)
RC1 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0.1-RC1/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_1_RC1/
Maven artifacts:
,
Henri Yandell wrote:
It's August, which must mean it's time for 3.0.1 :)
RC1 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0.1-RC1/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_1_RC1/
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Jörg Schaible
joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
It's August, which must mean it's time for 3.0.1 :)
RC1 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0.1-RC1/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should move the current trunk off and call it generics-RnD.
Then we should copy 3.2 over to trunk (or maybe 3.3, I seem to recall
fire up Wireshark and get the same info, but
turning on logging is so much easier... I only wish they had this for the
HttpCore stuff.
Why do you suggest no logging for libraries?
Bill-
On Aug 5, 2011 2:19 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 5, 2011, at 16:27, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/5/11 12:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
HttpComponents would be SFL4j in my structure. They definitely need
debugging.
Lang or Codec don't.
If I
Noting that because this is being worked on by Jörg and Matt (and it
seems close to resolution), I'll hold off on tagging an RC2.
Hen
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Jörg Schaible
joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
Hi Hen
svn list https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases
compare_dirs.pl grab_releases.sh
sign_and_hash.shverify_archive_equivalence.sh
gpg-sign-allmultisign.shsymlinks.sh
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hen,
I am not really comfortable knowing that a SOE can be a normal code
path. It would have to be Javadoc'd to boot.
I can see catching
I'd like to release 3.0.1 of Lang. It would contain the following 11 fixes:
Here's a generated site:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0.1-SNAPSHOT-site/
Review the additions in the clirr report. Note the checkstyle and
findbugs reports have items that need cleanup prior to release.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Henri Yandell flame
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org?
I've been discussing the permissions issue for the old groupIds on Nexus
with the Infra team (i.e components
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/2/11 5:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org
both to 3.0.2.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a generated site:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0.1-SNAPSHOT-site/
Review the additions in the clirr report. Note the checkstyle and
findbugs reports have items that need
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 28/07/2011 22:01, Henri Yandell a écrit :
Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)
Yeah let's use java.util.logging instead :)
Primarily that I don't get the feeling we have a major community of
developers
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hen,
I am not really comfortable knowing that a SOE can be a normal code
path. It would have to be Javadoc'd to boot.
I can see catching IllegalStateException and IllegalArgumentException
in client code,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we require license headers on test fixtures? If not, +1.
Not required.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For
Call a single Commons vote, then point to people as either OGNL or
general Commons. That takes care of two of your votes :)
Hen
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I just signed off all status items on the incubation status page
(needs a while
Mind if I upgrade JCS to Lang 3.0?
Hen
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I finished the updates to JDK 5 generics and concurrent and updated the
maven-2 build. Still some tests fail, others should never have passed. I
would like to ask for
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 28.07.11 08:55, Henri Yandell wrote:
Mind if I upgrade JCS to Lang 3.0?
No problem, go ahead. Only that JCS doesn't use the new features.
Done. I also started a 2.0 side of things in the changes.xml to track
the 2.0
Or:
The Sisyphean task of shoving a large number of bytes up a big hill
while everyone else tries to add, remove and tweak said bytes.
= Step 1: Identify the issues.
Hopefully you are lucky and issues are accumulated in a JIRA, Bugzilla
or other issue tracker (here on JIRA as its our most
I definitely check it from time to time. It's very low maintenance and
many of the open items are wish-list level. I last touched it back in
April
(http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fcommons%2Fproper%2Fdbutils%2Ftrunk%2F),
and Sebb made some tweaks back in 2010.
Neither of
, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Good point. I'll go ahead and update [flatfile]. IIRC the proxy 2
branch already uses [lang] 3; I'll update that to use the release.
Matt
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record
Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on
myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang.
JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and
Proxy need updating.
Hen
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record, and so
Anyone against just letting users get a StackOverflowError?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-686
Hen
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering what people think to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-686
I've improved
Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
I did the proxy 2.0 branch; not sure there's a reason to worry about
the 1.x trunk.
Matt
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Note
and see if I can help.
Thanks...
Bill-
On Jul 28, 2011 6:18 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
I definitely check it from time to time. It's very low maintenance and
many of the open items are wish-list level. I last touched it back in
April (
http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF
That sounds like 'yes we should do that asap' to me :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nearly so, yes. :)
Matt
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch?
On Thu, Jul 28
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/branches/BRANCH_2_0_EXPERIMENTAL/rgoers/
On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I remember I raw
I'm wondering what people think to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-686
I've improved the message of the thrown exception to match the
javadoc, but I'm wondering if a TTL of 2 to protect a
StackOverflowError is really necessary :) I have the urge to throw in
64, or 512, or some
Sigs look good.
Source unpacks happily and builds (OS X, JDK 1.6).
Release notes look good.
+1.
Hen
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/compress/tags/COMPRESS_1.2_RC1/
Site:
For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
following components depend on Lang:
* Chain
* Configuration
* JCS
* Proxy
and in the Sandbox:
* Flatfile
* Pipeline
Hen
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
Yes. The reason the package
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 22.07.11 11:33, Henri Yandell wrote:
Anyone adverse to me svn moving JCS over from Jakarta? It will mean
someone needing to update the site (which they should do while moving
that over).
I'd be willing to help, just
Noting that I've manually modified the Jakarta BCEL site to point to
this on its Maven project-info cvs-usage page.
Hen
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Done.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:55 AM
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 22.07.11 11:33, Henri Yandell wrote:
Anyone adverse to me svn moving
Done.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jörg Schaible
joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
The BCEL code is still under the jakarta SVN tree, which
Anyone adverse to me svn moving JCS over from Jakarta? It will mean
someone needing to update the site (which they should do while moving
that over).
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For
I think the argument is the other way. You should be explaining why
you wouldn't simply just move to Java 5.
+1 to JDK 1.5 minimum.
Hen
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
no, this is not about generics or enums or ...
This time it is methods added
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Vote passes [!]
6 +1s.
Gary Gregory
Matt Benson
Oliver Heger
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Vote passes [!]
6 +1s.
Gary Gregory
Matt Benson
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Stephen Colebourne
and my own implicit +1.
I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
Status
with
it. I just don't want it to be a compile-time dependency for the main
source.
It is specified in the test scope in the POM.
Gary
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Henri Yandell flame
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Vote passes [!]
6 +1s.
Gary Gregory
Matt Benson
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Stephen Colebourne
and my own implicit +1.
I'll start
So you're not saying that we have to escape 0x7f (old behaviour),
but that we have to escape any supplementary characters?
Hen
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Gary Gregory
ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
Hi All:
I am glad to know there is a 3.0 way of doing that, which is:
@Test
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Vote passes [!]
6 +1s
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 July 2011 20:12, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Commons Lang 3.0
Commons Lang is JDK 1.5+ and has updated the API to support Java 5
features, such as generics and varargs. Deprecated parts of the API
have been removed.
This is NOT a backwards compatible release. Because of this, we
, due to an
IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
Hi Stephen,
Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
builds before my commit.
Gary
Stephen
On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Gary.
So 4 +1s.
Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil
Vote passes [!]
6 +1s.
Gary Gregory
Matt Benson
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Stephen Colebourne
and my own implicit +1.
I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
Hen
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Lang is ready
, release often, I remove my
-1 :)
Gary
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.comwrote:
Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
in a non-releasing state. We have a really
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 14.07.2011 21:01, schrieb Matt Benson:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregorygarydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
-1, let's pick up the committed fix for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
I
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
RC4 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
The build runs fine for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts
look good.
I was wondering why the binary distribution does not contain jars for the
sources and javadocs, but this is probably not
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne
scolebou...@joda.org wrote:
On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
1/ FastDateFormat
The date format yyy yy y
Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
RC4 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
Website:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne
scolebou...@joda.org wrote:
On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
1/ FastDateFormat
The date format yyy yy y is formatted with JDK 7 as 2003 2003 03
2003 instead of 2003 03 03 03. So, should FastDateFormat
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
2/ UnicodeUnescaper
Since JDK 1.7 \u+ is a valid Unicode representation. The
UnicodeUnescaper defines the OPTION escapePlus that allows also this plus
character for all runtime versions i.e. currently the OPTION
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
I think we're ready for another release candidate.
Does anyone know of any remaining items? JIRA is clean, and I don't
see anything in the email threads that implies more work needs
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 2:37, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
Hi,
Gary Gregory wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 2:05, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Jörg Schaible
Heads up that I plan to tag and build an RC4 tomorrow.
Commit now, or raise your hand if you need me to delay.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
I'm assuming this is Commons Math. I've added a [math] so it catches
the interest of those involved.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Greg Sterijevski
gsterijev...@gmail.com wrote:
Additionally, I pass all of the Wampler beta estimates.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Greg Sterijevski
From the 3.0 javadoc:
Note that unicode characters greater than 0x7f are as of 3.0, no
longer escaped.
Not that informative on how to fix it I know. Here's the latest,
unpublished javadoc:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Community activity decreased since codebase has been imported
polished; we finally reached Luc Blanchard, the other OGNL original
author, that signed submitted the OGNL SoftwareGrant ICLA - we
also voted him as
There is no planned release date.
We release when the release is ready and there's currently one
blocking API issue regarding the text.translate package.
Once that issue is resolved then another release candidate can be
proposed; currently no one is working on the issue though.
Hen
On Fri, Jul
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
*grumbles that they were ints and a previous RC candidate saw it
change to Range* :)
Change it back! ;)
Tongue in cheek as it might be, I
time back.
Hen
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
We had an RC3 vote so shouldn't remove; but I'm very happy
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
I understand the concern (though s/Thorsten/Torsten/).
I have given up on correcting people.
No idea why so many people believe it needs a h ;-)
As for the matter... I am not keen on the move but - whatever.
Is there a
+1.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely:
1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component
1a. Grant Commons karma to Dave Brosius (dbrosius)
2. Accept JCS [2] as Commons component
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/16/11 8:22 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
(accidentally sent to Jochen personally before, sorry)
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Matt
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
These are the current blocking items in play afaik:
* Email thread - what
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
We had an RC3 vote so shouldn't remove; but I'm very happy if you've
time to do an RC4. I've been managing about enough time to look
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
Not sure what
factors contributed to the stagnation of BCEL development, but I like
to think of Commons as the swiss army knife for Java developers--any
library with a sharply defined surface area and, even better,
+1. No concerns here, the more the merrier.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
+1
I don't see any minimal potential risk, BCEL is well known and widely
adopted and JCS could be kind of commons-cache (dormant) finalization.
Full support from my
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/3/11 7:27 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
wrote:
I think that is also best practice - resolve when fixed in SVN,
close when fix version is released
Seems good. Something other than NULL probably; and probably should
come up with some bizarre negative number to stay out of the way of
any future JDK items.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:06 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 June 2011 03:44, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking more
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
I think that is also best practice - resolve when fixed in SVN,
close when fix version is released.
I couldn't agree more!!! +1!
I just close directly. The resolve then close is a workflow waiting
for a reason :)
Looking more at this one, it looks like the Integer is required as
null is a valid use case. So moving simply to int is out, but
rethinking it seems very doable.
Note that this isn't a public API; FormatCache is for now a
refactoring out of FastDateFormat to allow a later FastDateParser.
I've
FYI.
They had a bunch of Commons libraries listed; generally we did very
well and had 0 issues.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kamani, Sejal Pranlal sejal.kam...@hp.com
Date: Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:33 AM
Subject: Fortify Open Review
To: openau...@fortifysoftware.com
Would have done the same myself if I'd remembered baby had given time :)
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Stephen Colebourne
scolebou...@joda.org wrote:
The discussion threads ended with both th notion that Formattable was
adding no value and final was best added for safety. I checked before
I don't see an issue. Reality is that we generally just couldn't come
up with good logos back in year dot :)
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Joerg,
yes indeed, but looks like there is at least an exception
(commons-math) that is more original.
4.0 isn't looking like it'll be released anytime soon.
Maybe the pre-4.0 branch should be taken and a 3.3 released; this is
the gazillionth (okay, 4th?) time this one has been reported.
Hen
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
That looks like a bug that
201 - 300 of 916 matches
Mail list logo
