Out of those, I'd encourage everyone to also take a look at the advisors
which I think if we collectively execute it right, might make a big
difference on how people are perceiving the ASF.
I personally would like that quite a number of people who are active
members will take on the "advisors"
I would like to help in the badging working group but I’m currently on
vacation. I will follow-up in 4 weeks or less. I will join efforts if
someone else takes on some initial work before then.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 11:07 Rich Bowen wrote:
> A month or so ago I started pitching workgroups as a
> On Mar 29, 2024, at 1:17 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Rich,
>
> That's great, thanks !
>
> Quick question about wg-advisors: does this WG include "strong" advice
> to the PMC, like legal/trademark/brand advices to avoid issue ?
>
Yes, we should definitely be giving this advice
Hi Rich,
That's great, thanks !
Quick question about wg-advisors: does this WG include "strong" advice
to the PMC, like legal/trademark/brand advices to avoid issue ?
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 3:06 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> A month or so ago I started pitching workgroups as a way to
Hi Rich
That's a fair comment.
We can also take the example of Livy that we were able to "restart"
thanks to new contributors.
Call For Action can also work (as we did for a few projects),
especially when the project is in use.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 2:35 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
Thanks, folks.
I’ve opened a PR with the feedback from this thread -
https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/174 - and would appreciate a review,
and if you think it passes muster, a merge. Thanks.
> On Mar 29, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> This week, I’ve been approached by
A common mistake for leveraging the power of community is to make
it complicated ”what is suitable for newcomers". Working in many OSS
projects, I practice and encourage other maintainers to practice: Do not
think "community" as an external resource and you need to feed them. We're
part of the
> * Roadmap -
> a sense of new things that they could help build
> a sense the project is still going someplace
+1 This is what I advise the StreamPark podling every time I meet its
"original author". He shares the challenges that he "cannot find many peers
to collaborate with."
I told him,
Rich Bowen wrote on 3/29/24 9:35 AM:
This week, I’ve been approached by someone concerned about one of our projects,
and looking for a “how to get back on track” document, with concrete,
actionable steps that a project can take when it is struggling to find
contributors. This seems like a
This is why we emphasize community over code. And Kvrocks can be a valuable
example that although quite a few of its "original authors" faded away due
to many reasons, we keep invite new members and due to its product value (a
well-known software's alternative, named Redis), so it can be
> On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:21 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Thank you for following up.
>
> How would I signal my interest in or join a working group? Maybe I missed
> that part.
I have several answers to this, but the main one is that we’re not sure yet,
and would love your help in defining
I can share two examples:
* Livy podling. Users take over the community.
* Ambari. Vendors/Individual Devs revived the community.
But both of them don't seem to be quite active (again).
Best,
tison.
Michael Sokolov 于2024年3月29日周五 22:21写道:
> I guess it depends on what the problem with the
On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:20 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> I guess it depends on what the problem with the project is. It seems
> implicit in your ideas that the project has lost momentum; nobody is
> contributing to it or maintaining it actively? But I just want to
> point out there can be other
Thank you for following up.
How would I signal my interest in or join a working group? Maybe I missed
that part.
Gary
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024, 10:06 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
> A month or so ago I started pitching workgroups as a way to organize and
> make progress on the many pain points around the
I guess it depends on what the problem with the project is. It seems
implicit in your ideas that the project has lost momentum; nobody is
contributing to it or maintaining it actively? But I just want to
point out there can be other problems that might need correction with
different solutions (too
A month or so ago I started pitching workgroups as a way to organize and make
progress on the many pain points around the Foundation.
We’ve made a little progress since then, but not a lot of follow-up.
The only way that we’re going to have success here is if we build this thing
together, and
This week, I’ve been approached by someone concerned about one of our projects,
and looking for a “how to get back on track” document, with concrete,
actionable steps that a project can take when it is struggling to find
contributors. This seems like a great doc that we should write. What comes
17 matches
Mail list logo