? Also when I might see your draft track?
Thanks.
On 02/17/2015 01:13 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
I'll do this as part of my Cloud tracks (see why I chose such a broad
term ;-)
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From
I agree Joe,
We only have a very few immutable rules. Everything else is policy. As long as
policy don't break those immutable rules the they can shift and change as much
as they need to in order to empower individual project communities.
Coincidentally I wrote a presentation on this very
Yep. I've added some such comments, but got frustrated with the only CFP so am
now working in a spreadsheet you can't see (sorry).
If you see my name in a owning comment drop me a mail and we can talk about
which track it fits best.
Sent from my Windows Phone
[mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 9:50 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Way talks
On 16 February 2015 at 16:51, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I think that's exactly it. If we write policy down it becomes a rule.
Huh?
Written
Thanks Joe, if you don't mind I'd like to hold on the container track. I'm
putting together a larger group of cloud tracks and trying to weave a
narrative through the whole thing. This includes containers. The good news is
you and I mostly agree on the valuable container related talks are. I'll
It's probably best we start an online doc somewhere...
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 12:29 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Knowing which
talks
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
There is value in these sessions, some people are completely new and we
probably should still schedule them. However, I think we ought to do
some new stuff along the lines of:
How is the ASF different from other foundations?
Why
Sent: 2/14/2015 9:48 AM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Way talks
On 14-02-2015, at 11:47, Nick Burch n...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
There is value in these sessions, some people are completely new
I don't believe there is (certainly shouldn't be) a restriction on wiki access.
That said as a PMC member I was completely unaware there is a ComDev wiki.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Bertrand Delacretazmailto:bdelacre...@apache.org
Sent: 2/5/2015 1:05 AM
Allowing everyone to rate every session will always result in an average of
accept. I recommend the individual track leads make a judgement call. They can
consult with any experts they feel they should
We want great content, not averaged content.
The model we use in GSoC works well (the
If LF want to do it they can. It's their conference. I totally agree that we
should not be a part of it.
We discussed this when negotiation the contract. Buying sessions is not on the
cards.
However, my point is not about sales pitches or bought slots. Mine is about
taking it too far. People
We should not explore anything. It's an LF responsibility.
(I know I said this about 5 times in quick succession, sorry. I just want to
make sure we don't start becoming ConCom. ApacheCon has been outsourced to LF)
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Pierre
@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: ApacheCon NA CFP closed
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On 02/04/2015 11:21 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Sally is not part of the ACNA process. Nobody in the ASF is. This is an
LF event.
We can
Sally is not part of the ACNA process. Nobody in the ASF is. This is an LF
event.
We can (and should) make recommendations to LF but we are are not to take on
responsibility for these things. That takes us back to where we were with
ConCom.
Sent from my Windows Phone
Dropping board to BCC.
Note that:
If ComDev is going to host this stuff, then ComDev should have the say
in what the actual requirements are.
Absolutely! And right now I'm personally volunteering my cycles to help with
that within the ComDev framework.
Is exactly the kind of
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I never intended to say that we should not take responsibility for
content. I intended to say LF should take responsibility for defining
the theme of the conference they want to market and we *help
@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: ApacheCon NA CFP closed
On Feb 4, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Sally the volunteer can do what she wants
Sally the contractor has no responsibility for ApacheCon
We are *not* responsible (by contract
I attended Nicks sessions in Budapest - they were *excellent*. Using them as a
model for Austin is to be recommended.
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February
).
just my opinion
rgds
jan i.
On Feb 2, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Great job Rich, and those who helped.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Rich Bowenmailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com
Sent: 2/2/2015 12:19
(work which just started today).
All that said, I believe in general we should look for ways to motivate our
projects a lot more to participate (not only with talks, but also getting
people to come).
just my opinion
rgds
jan i.
On Feb 2, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH
See http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html for I fo on GSoC and
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Subham Sonimailto:subham.soni...@gmail.com
Sent: 2/2/2015 12:43 AM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Contributing to Apache
been
announced.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com
Sent: 2/2/2015 7:56 AM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: RE: Contributing to Apache
See http://community.apache.org
) to access
and contribute to ASF mailing lists.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 07:29
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: RE: Mailinglists - a tool from the 90s?
For me any alternative
There are many reasons why the ASF requires projects to use its own servers for
some items. For example, we couldn't use GitHub until we had built a system
that would provide adequate traceability of contributions.
Failure to do that would have meant it was no longer possible to provide the
Where are you seeing discouragement of pilot projects? Any volunteer can step
up and deliver any pilot for the foundation on a voluntary basis. We are set up
to do that.
However, if a service stood up by a volunteer becomes a core part of the ASF
then that must be maintained in an ongoing
edit you do will
generate an email with the new project data and send it to dev@community.a.o,
as a review measure.
I hope this will make it easier for people to jump in and help with
creating the site :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-01-14 18:53, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Daniel
the site :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-01-14 18:53, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
Daniel,
There is no assuming just do it :-)
You have a number of ComDev PMC members saying +1, and you are a PMC member
yourself. Let's have the code where we can start working on it and let's
Having read the while thread, to date, I find I have nothing to add other than
a hearty +1
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Daniel Grunomailto:humbed...@apache.org
Sent: 1/14/2015 3:48 AM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject:
This requires that infra maintain a running instance of OfBiz and that any
ComDev member who wants to help out needs to learn OfBiz. Have you consulted
with infra? Can ComDev members be expected to learn OfBiz in order to make a
small tweak?
It seems to me that whilst the extra functionality
: projects.apache.org overhaul proposal
On 14 Jan 2015, at 10:36, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
As I said when you originally raised this I would recommend focusing on a
committee that tracks other data, data that is not currently well structured.
Trademarks, media
, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
This requires that infra maintain a running instance of OfBiz and that any
ComDev member who wants to help out needs to learn OfBiz. Have you
consulted with infra? Can ComDev members be expected to learn OfBiz
Daniel,
There is no assuming just do it :-)
You have a number of ComDev PMC members saying +1, and you are a PMC member
yourself. Let's have the code where we can start working on it and let's get it
to feature parity with projects.apache.org ASAP. I agree with Rich that there
is value in
I'm changing the recipient list to our infrastructure team who can better
advise on this.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Baruch Burstein [mailto:bmburst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:50 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Dump of entire asf repo
Hi all,
I was
Are you willing to organize this? I've never been much of a fan of poster
sessions at conferences, but others will strongly disagree with me, I'm sure.
It might be a good idea to have these in the hackathon space. Where folks from
the involved projects are present they could locate themselves
You can submit at any level you want. The conference tends to have very
technical folk as well as some more general decision maker folks.
We particularly like sessions that tell the story of how Apache software has
improved things for you and your company in some way. This could be a case
How about Jono Bacon. He's got the open source creds but his new gig at XPrize
is a fascinating demonstration that what we do here in open source is akin to
the processes needed to create huge innovation leaps. If we were to pair that
with some bigwig at a research org then we can do the full
send a few email and gauge the interest. If there's enough (which I
assume to be the case), I'll volunteer.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 12/12/2014 04:53 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
If you arrange it, yes :-)
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
It's absolutely my intention to manage the track I have signed up for
independently of all other tracks.
It is entirely possible that I will want a talk that others have identified for
their tracks. We can resolve those issues when CFP has closed.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: jan i
Moving dev@community.apache.org to BCC so as not to create unnecessary traffic
(I assume it was a mistake having it in the To line)
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday,
Rich,
As per your blog at
https://blogs.apache.org/conferences/entry/apachecon_north_america_returns_to
please sign me up. I don't want to do a project specific track, I'm more
interested in a cloud track. I want to create a coherent track in which each
session, whilst being valuable as a
A couple of years ago I had the same concerns. I got pushback on messing with
the TLD pages (perhaps more accurately there were so many strong opinions it
wasn't worth the argument, plus the task is daunting to say the least). Instead
I started trying to create signposts into our dense TLD
Sorry here's the mail I meant to send...
We are evaluating options around Apache-extras at present. I'd note that its
nit the tools that create communities, its the people within. It could be
argued that GitHub is the default place for folks to search but other than that
the location is mostly
Note, we have recently been discussing how OfBiz can help with management of
the fundraising activities. Melissa (our EA) is in contract with the project.
It seems to me that this would be the simplest starting point (and isn't public
facing, so less of a design overhead).
Other than that, as
and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Note, we have recently been discussing how OfBiz can help with
management of the fundraising activities. Melissa (our EA) is in
contract with the project
As I mentioned to you in private I can reach out to UK government CTO if you
want an eGovernment replacement (would likely result in the same outcome as
going to Wardley)
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: jan imailto:j...@apache.org
Sent: 9/24/2014 8:06 AM
To:
dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org (you need to send it from the subscribed
email address, if that is difficult the help message you get in response will
guide you)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Brodsky [mailto:rktsm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:53 PM
To:
ConCom used to be the home for this kind of thing. It moved to ComDev when
ConCom was disbanded. ComDev are yet to define how this support, this is a good
thing as ConCom became a controlling influence that often stifled the energy
behind local meetups.
On thus list there are plenty of people
I was a lecturer many years ago. I always tried to encourage final year
students to work with open source communities. Those that chose to take in the
challenge always reported learning a great deal, they also felt their work was
of more value.
The kinds of projects that really worked for
Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
Try reading http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
On 9 Jul 2014 22:20, Pierre Smits pierre.sm
Try reading http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
On 9 Jul 2014 22:20, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a bit strange to read that 'Contributor' is not the official role for
anybody who is committed to an Apache project. Equally strange is it to
read that both the
Yes, of course a community member can propose a member. As Rob says, the
nomination and election has to be done by the Members, but not all projects
have existing members acting as the eyes and ears.
Of course, not having members in a project community shouldn't impact the
project since it is
Member?
On 06/07/2014 09:48, Ross Gardler wrote:
[snip]
but not all projects have existing members acting as the eyes and ears.
[/snip]
Don't they?
In addition to the officers of the corporation, the Board of Directors
may, by resolution, establish one or more Project Management Committees
Generally the board likes to see at least one member be part of new PMCs.
It is not a requirement but it is a preference.
On 8 Jul 2014 19:44, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote:
I don't know where you got this, but it definitely is not true that
every PMC chair is
We have foundation giveaways but generally not specific projects (the table
isn't big enough;-)
Usually we just have Melissa staff it and answer general questions about
the ASF. Wherever possible she connects people asking about specific
projects to attendees at the conference.
In theory we
Brett didn't ask about where policy ought to be made, he asked about where
committer support lives.
You narrow a very good point about policy not being made on members list,
and in fact it isn't made there - sometimes debated but never defined. I do
agree that those discussions should be public
I don't imagine many attendees would be interested in a sponsorship keynote
per se. However, as part of a how the foundation works, what it is and its
current status keynote it makes more sense.
If we do a State of the Feather keynote in EU then I'd like to propose that
it not be 40 mins of the
. I'll
come back to it in a month or two when I have the time to actually action
this work.
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 16 May 2014 10:38, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote
It's time to renew the budget so please submit your requests (for those who
have not already done so).
The process is as follows:
a) Submit your budget request to presid...@apache.org (see below for what
is required)
b) I will review requests and, where necessary, ask for
Event branding is handled by trademarks@. Hadoop has a unique history that
means some events are handled differently, although they should still
adhere to the branding policy. I'm not aware of any concerns around these
events but if there are any they can be raised on trademarks@
On 9 Apr 2014
Go Rich!
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 9:41 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: ApacheCon Europe status and ToDo
Now that I'm caught up from ApacheCon US, I wanted to give folks a little
information about the plans
Sally has responded on another thread, all good
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Nick Burch n...@apache.org javascript:;
wrote:
...I believe Sally is the master holder of these, so she's the main
person to
for
other peoples. If you reject one of mine then that's more time I have to
enjoy the conference ;-)
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 13 February 2014 10:10, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote
then work
with the appropriate PMCs to de-dupe more fully (Rich I'm happy to help
with this process)
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 2 February 2014 04:48, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote
a real difference in the developing
world through open source. See
http://mifos.org/community/news/volunteer-mifos-2014
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
for me now works at OKF and a
number of divisions of my employers parent company have engagements with
OKF, but I don't work directly with them.
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 16 January 2014 22:33
If there enough people willing to manage the ASF side of things (e.g.
contract negotiation, talk selection, trademark oversight) we may can
look seriously at getting a suitable producer. However, as Melissa says
there are currently no plans.
Ross
Sent from my Windows Phone From: Melissa Warnkin
. For now lets proceed with the larger list.
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 30 October 2013 10:13, Melissa Warnkin missywarn...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thank you all for your feedback. I have
Adding e...@apache.org to ensure Melissa sees this. She has some stuff.
Sent from my Windows Phone From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
Sent: 10/23/2013 14:04
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: [REQUEST] ASF Related Promo Material
Hi,
I'll be talking about some of my personal Apache interests, projects
in with a helpful
hints section.
Thanks,
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 4 October 2013 02:20, Isabel Drost-Fromm isa...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, October 03, 2013 04:17:33 PM Melissa
to think about providing an Event in a Box to
support activities such as this. It's currently empty so even brainstorming
around this now would be valuable even if you decide not to go ahead with
it.
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc
://community.apache.org/calendars/index.html)
Melissa is also tasked with creating an Event in a Box support package for
event producers. We can make this guidance part of that.
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft
that would be broadly interesting to our
communities as a whole.
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 27 June 2013 07:38, Maurizio Taverna tavernamauri...@gmail.com wrote:
*
Hello,
I'm an Apache
+1 thanks Rich
On 25 Jun 2013 13:42, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
I'd like to do some things to make it easier for our members and committers
to be ambassadors for Apache, and I'd like to propose a concrete step,
inspired by Roy, from a thread on another list.
(Eventually it might be
Friday morning UTC is OK, Friday morning PT (for example) is end of
day for UTC so much of Europe is already into the weekend.
Monday morning PT (for example) is Monday evening UTC so might be too
close to the meeting.
Given your time zone you would probably you could get away with it
Friday AM
On 26th April I posted a mail on behalf of the board to this list with
the subject Future of VP ConCom Role. This mail outlined the action
the board intended to take in the May board meeting with respect to
ConCom. The proposal was to use paid contractors (VP Marketing and
Executive Assistant) to
Adding ComDev list, suggest interest parties should discuss this there.
On 17 May 2013 14:11, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I am forwarding this email on behalf of Leslie Hawthorn,
a co-worker of mine @ RedHat. In the spirit of GSOC,
I wanted to see if there is interest within the ASF
Why not use dev@community (with subject tags?)
I don't object to a new list, just adding another option.
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 7 May 2013 06:20, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We don't seem to have a place for cross-cutting
Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
I just wanted to thank you for the feedback you provided in your last
board report with respect to your experiences with moving to Git. This
kind of information is really useful
them. We also need to get the Git mirrors working
again, as well as our CI implementation.
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
, we certainly don't want Git vs SVN content.
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 26 April 2013 10:41, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard
Great work. Thank you.
On 23 Apr 2013 06:43, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if we could have a better format for the frontpage of the
ComDev website, and worked on a quick prototype available in [1] and would
appreciate any feedback on it.
Thoughts
[1]
Depends on what you mean by communication. We tell people about it when it
comes up. You have a good point though.
Feel free to write a para on the website, perhaps at
http://community.apache.org/contactpoints.html
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 19 Apr 2013
On 17 April 2013 09:19, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Maria,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Maria Ramos mar...@webhostinghub.com wrote:
...I've emailed you a week ago regarding your web page which I found
interesting and wanted to translate it into Spanish
to allow them through.
Do we want to set up some spam control on the wiki? Anyone know how?
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
http://wiki.apache.org/Women/
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 17 April 2013 10:12, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 2013/04/17 16:33, Ross Gardler said:
The main reason I have called for more moderators
On 17 April 2013 14:19, Katherine Marsden kmarsdende...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 4/17/2013 2:34 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/Women/
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
I don't know how useful the content
It looks great. Published. Thanks.
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 17 April 2013 13:03, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:50 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote:
+1. Go ahead!
I
Thanks, that's three new moderators, so I've made the request.
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 17 April 2013 13:52, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Me too.
On 17 April 2013 00:09, Ross Gardler rgard
My apologies, I missed your comment on the commit.I guess you are more
of a perfectionist than I (which is certainly not a bad thing).
I'll not roll back as we know Suresh is looking at it.
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
any.
On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
It seems that we need another moderator or two for this list - any
volunteers?
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
it or reuse it.
Ross
[1] http://community.apache.org/newcomers/index.html
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 16 April 2013 16:29, Maria Ramos mar...@webhostinghub.com wrote:
Dear Sir,
I've emailed you a week ago regarding your
the year.
Granted, this leaves things undone, but that's probably ok, if our focus
is indeed community over code.
No problem if an issue is tagged GSoC but gets closed before GSoC comes
along.
Ross
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
--
Ross Gardler
.
Personally, I wouldn't consider 33 projects low. We only get around 35-40
slots anyway.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
more emails? Ask the board to mandate
a section in board reports
detailing the project's GSoC endeavors? Any ideas?
Uli
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
:07, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
On 11 April 2013 14:23, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On Apr 10, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
+ it's also pretty hard to spin of small
at the computer science institute of Freie
Universität Berlin, Takustr 9, 14195
Berlin. If you know of any local student (computer science, mathematics,
physics, whatever) who
might want to participate in GSoC this year, please send them ;)
Cheers,
Uli
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler
A short mail to committers@ asking people who don't know about the process
to ensure their PMC forwards the request should be enough.
Things won't scale if ComDev start trying to offer more support than we
already do. Let's have the PMCs answer queries from their communities.
Ross
Sent from a
, Ross Gardler wrote:
Thanks for stepping up Ulrich
I intend to mentor this year so don't want to Admin. However, as always I
will be around should things get out of control.
+1 to having an Admin + a mentor at the summit. I'd suggest making the
requirement to be active in representing
provide the mentor(s). finding the money would also need to be done
by the admin, but I'm sure help will be available.
https://live.gnome.org/OutreachProgramForWomen#For_
Organizations_and_Companies
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http
week leave of
absence from $dayjob).
Ideas? Anyone want to help?
- Shane
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
201 - 300 of 477 matches
Mail list logo
