On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Norman Barker norman.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to combine query_servers and os_daemons, currently I have
No.
[query_servers]
lang = path/to/interpreter args
and I would like
[os_daemons]
lang_daemon = path/to/interpreter args
to moving wholly over to this new strategy?
I object, my lord. Also, I fancy your scarf.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aE3gMN97TKw
B.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
... and the crowd goes wild!
I thought I told you to leave the illicit substances at home this time...
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Norman Barker norman.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul,
understand the answer is no (currently), then why?
As Randall says, the protocol between the two types of OS processes is
quite different. Each protocol is generally a request/response type of
protocol, except
os_daemons have limited ability to request information from couch and
they initiate.
Restart me if configuration section section changes is one (the
only?) example.
There are three types of requests an os_daemon can make: get config
variable, register to be restarted on config change, or log
Yep. Looks like a bug. I'll get to it eventually if no one beats me to
it. Hint hint.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Martin Hilbig blueo...@gmx.net wrote:
On 24.01.2011 22:30, Paul Davis wrote:
I think more likely its that 12-12345 fails to parse as a correct
revision and the error gets
dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 16:06, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Martin Hilbig blueo...@gmx.net wrote:
hi,
is this a known bug or even my fault?
create db:
curl -X PUT http://localhost:5984/fail
{ok:true}
create doc:
curl -vX PUT http://localhost:5984/fail/doc -d '{}'
This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
Changes since the last round:
* Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
Futon.
* Spell javascript correctly in loadScript(uri).
* Preserve purge metadata during compaction to avoid spurious
view regeneration.
I would like to see, before getting started on any of this, an RFC-style
document / wiki page that defines what a CouchDB plugins system looks like
that we agree on implementing.
If this were any/most other languages I would totally agree. Except
Erlang is kinda laissez-faire when it comes
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
PLUS ONE
I'm sorry but as outlined clearly in the bylaws of voting [1] your
vote must be formatted specifically as a signed numeral. Otherwise I
might get confused and think you're referring to a medical journal
[2].
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
Release engineers are such hard asses.
+1
:P
I haven't even gotten to that chapter in the release engineering
handbook. I must be a natural.
Have you got an instance of CouchDB running on the machine you're
testing with? That's usually what causes errors like that.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 16:06, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
We encourage
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 trillion.
Does that mean the motion passes? I could see nay-votes having a hard
time coming back from down 1 trillion.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 Jan 2011, at 17:45, Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 trillion.
Does that mean the motion passes? I could see nay-votes having a hard
time
Vote is recalled due to Robert Newson's veto.
Expect round three after the bug fix.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the second release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
Changes since the last round:
* Fix share/www/image/spinner.gif
Most odd. Your response looks good to me, but judging from the email
you're responding to, they've already specifically said that reasoning
is no longer considered. Perhaps you should ask which modern security
protocols they're talking about and some pointers on where we might
look for an
Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that
COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers.
Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm
inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Bram Neijt bne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thank you all for your replies. I've had a great lot of
fun working my way though Erlang, and I'm glad this patch may help in
clearing up the question on whether this is something that should be
on the
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Paul Davis
paul.joseph.da
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Bram Neijt bne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After getting to know erlang the hard way, I've found a place to put
in a patch and hook up validate_doc_read code.
I've got a patch which implements a validate_doc_read in the same
manner as validate_doc_update is
at 4:46 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Bram Neijt bne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After getting to know erlang the hard way, I've found a place to put
in a patch and hook up validate_doc_read code.
I've got a patch which implements
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, December 4, 2010, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Heya,
I've just finished getting the refactoring of the source tree to be
more compliant with OTP source code layout. This is a pretty big
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday, December 4, 2010, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 26, 2010 6:02 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Paul Davis
paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Paul Davis
paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Dec 26, 2010 6:02 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Paul Davis
paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Its not being done in trunk. The change is being prepared as a script
and set of patches that people can test independently which people
failed: %s % cmd)
RuntimeError: Command failed: git am
/Users/basti/Documents/src/sandbox/couchdb-srcmv/couchdb.patches/*.patch
here is the full output: http://friendpaste.com/73PhLSNcRH64dQVDg7B9fr
On 04.12.2010, at 23:43, Paul Davis wrote:
Heya,
I've just finished getting the refactoring
sealing of arrays' failed: expected '2', got '3'
Otherwise, all tests passed.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
Gabriel,
Thanks for the report. Does that attachments test fail on trunk or with FF?
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Gabriel Farrell gsf
:
righto.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
I vote for just deleting the eunit bits in our packaged version. Its
not like we use them. And I'd rather delete the eunit code rather than
grab it as a dependency (and then deal with figuring out what to do
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not sure if bumping to R13B04 is appropriate, since many Linux
distributions (Ubuntu for e.g.) ship with older R13 releases.
Therefore
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Nikolai Teofilov kol...@me.com wrote:
I found this nice post today about the Server-Send Event:
http://www.html5rocks.com/tutorials/eventsource/basics/
and was wondering is there any thoughts on implementation of this technique
for monitoring the _changes
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for R12B05, so
we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do we have a
compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04? That release
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for R12B05,
so we should revisit
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, the mochiweb
Newson robert.new...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 for R13B04.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org
wrote:
On Dec
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Dec 5, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Jason Smith j...@couchone.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:06 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
+ case catch Fun(Doc, Req
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Dec 5, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Jason Smith j
sure everything still
passes.
Ideally I'd like to get this into trunk fairly shortly so that it has
as long as possible to sit in trunk before we cut 1.2.x. Let me know
if there are any comments or complaints on it.
Paul Davis
[1] https://github.com/davisp/couchdb-srcmv
I'm a fan of deleting it, but I think Adam expressed interest in
keeping it at one point.
Also, we don't have tests that even exercise this code trivially so
I'm not even sure anyone knows if it works.
Paul
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Filipe David Manana fdman...@apache.org wrote:
Hello
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Kristina Schneider
krie...@couchone.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am the creative head at CouchOne, and Jan asked me to help out with the
redesign of the Apache CouchDB Website.
He pointed me to Klaus Trainer’s fork, and I took it from there.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Following some kind of discussion on IRC, I would like to propose that
we had plugin handling to our build system. By plugin, I mean :
- custom daemons
- handlers
- auth plugin,
...
It implys that we are abble to
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Following some kind of discussion on IRC, I would like
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
I'd like to note that Jan discovered an issue with the release. I was waiting
for Paul to abort the vote, but I guess he's been busy. It's a busy season!
Anyway, the NEWS and CHANGES files need to be updated to indicate
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 13:55, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
Should we hold 1.0.2 for this?
If releases are a whole bunch of work, then yes.
However, since this doesn't seem to be a (recent) regression, it would
on the following release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/
Happy voting,
Paul Davis
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 25 Nov 2010, at 18:43, Paul Davis wrote:
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 release, round 1.
Good job, Paul.
This release gets the official Noah Slater Seal of Approval.
+1
When can I expect
,
Paul Davis
Davis
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
This email is to request that the CouchDB developer community provide
comments on moving forward with the 1.0.2 release. I am instructed to
specifically ask that developers check the NEWS and CHANGES files
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Paul Davis
paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
This email is to request that the CouchDB developer community provide
comments on moving forward with the 1.0.2 release. I am instructed to
specifically ask that developers check the NEWS and CHANGES files
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Damien Katz damien_k...@yahoo.com wrote:
Apache CouchDB is a distributed JSON document database with HTTP API.
About to release maintenance version 1.0.2 as well as a new feature release
1.1.0. New features include:
- native SSL support,
- many fixes to
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
Without going into very deep analysis yet (no time this weekend):
- I would prefer _doc_ids instead of _docids for the filter name =
besides being more readable, it will match the query parameter (named
doc_ids)
then we most likely just forgot about it. In the
case of 348, no one ever presented a complete patch, so it's just sat
there. In other words, doing exactly what you're doing here is how to
get things moving. :D
HTH,
Paul Davis
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. Hit send too early, but I think I got everything in there that
I wanted to say.
As for the ref counter bottleneck, I just pushed to
https://github.com/tilgovi/couchdb/tree/ets_ref_count
This branch uses a
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
Turns out we just need to add -DNOTEST to the erlc calls when building
mochiweb or define -define(NOTEST, 1). early enough
(http://svn.process-one.net/contribs/trunk/eunit/doc/overview-summary.html#Disabling_testing).
Filipe,
Fixing now.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Filipe David Manana fdman...@apache.org wrote:
Paul,
Here:
+stream_chunked_response(Req, ReqId, Resp) -
+ receive
+ {ibrowse_async_response, ReqId, Chunk} -
+ couch_httpd:send_chunk(Resp, Chunk),
+
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
7. Removing dependencies from the source tree is not going to happen
any time soon. I wish we didn't have to vendor so many projects, but
we have to remember that a
. I'll be watching your repo as you hack there and
if you don't mind I plan on using you as a sounding board while I
puzzle through these different parts.
Paul Davis
is to have better error reporting so users know what's
broken.
HTH,
Paul Davis
anyone. This
move definitely needs to happen and right now its mostly about making
sure we have our bases covered.
Paul Davis
[1] http://github.com/davisp/couchdb-srcmv
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 4 Nov 2010, at 03:27, Paul Davis wrote:
1. We have constraints. Noah's pointed out a few, but I don't even
think that list is exhaustive. A project like CouchDB needs to pay
attention to a lot of different details
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 4 Nov 2010, at 04:41, Paul Davis wrote:
The issue with configure.ac is that it is a pre-distribution method
for configuring a build system. As in, if we claim some functionality
for Erlang builds via configure.ac
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Mikeal Rogers mikeal.rog...@gmail.com wrote:
I just setup a new laptop and used homebrew to install the CouchDB deps
(spidermonkey erlang).
Not only was it super fast and painless but I got a newer spidermonkey
(1.8.3) which is something like 30x faster for
ordering,
that'd be better than just an opaque type. Though, I'm also not sure
how that'd work in relation to string comparison operators in most
languages.
I'm +1 on the switch, I'm just wondering if we can do it without
making them completely opaque.
Paul Davis
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't see any way to avoid this and we've been talking about it for a
while.
+1
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:59, Adam Kocoloski
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Paul, nice work. A few small points regarding couch_os_daemons:
1) couch_os_daemons:stop
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Sam Bisbee s...@sbisbee.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:11:37PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Sam Bisbee s...@sbisbee.com wrote:
Greetings all,
Having wanted to bring the CouchDB community in Boston together for a while
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Oct 14, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
In an attempt to start some merging with cloudant I would like to
start by using rebar in our
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just a quick note. I started actual (minimal) work on this last night.
After a bit of poking I'm starting to think that rebar isn't going
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Oct 14, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com
wrote:
In an attempt
mean as simple as exporting something like conifg_notify/2 and
then passing
fun config_notify/2 to couch_config:register? If so that's simple
enough I can make the change this evening.
Thanks for the feedback.
Paul Davis
I haven't quite finished reviewing the code, but I think this stuff should
, but there is room to make
something similar to what you're describing even a bit more
transparent than changing the _temp_view.
HTH,
Paul Davis
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 Oct 2010, at 20:22, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Mikeal Rogers mikeal.rog...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm working on the new Futon code and I've started working through the view
builder.
One goal I
this is definitely a good idea. So much so that I think we
should consider replacing the entire Futon test suite with something
like this. Tests in Futon that are asserting core functionality should
be part of the build system test suite.
Paul Davis
to be deleting things
like the AUTHORS/THANKS/NOTICE files.
Paul Davis
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 13 Oct 2010, at 23:19, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks to the awesome work of fdmanana we have now _replicator in
trunk and obviously in 1.1. But we still have _replicate handler in
the code that works
, on a last note, seeing as this is a major change to the source
tree (and ideally 0 change to source code) it might be a good idea to
start this work just after we release 1.1.0.
What do you guys think?
Paul Davis
List of files by per app:
couch_core:
./src/couchdb/couch.erl
./src/couchdb
,
Brilliant writeup and proposal. I'd like to see all those things
happen pretty much as you said. Cleaning the cycles out will be much
easier once things are broken out in that style.
+1
B.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010
:54 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com
wrote:
In an attempt to start some merging with cloudant I would like to
start by using rebar in our install process.
Like i see it, we could continue to use autotools
by doc IDs.
Anyone against?
Not only would allow for the continuous replication but also would
imply removing ugly code from the replicator
My +1
+1
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
For a matter of consistency with the replicator, I would name the
field as doc_ids instead of docids.
All the rest seems fine to me.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
/
The commit message has a description here:
http://github.com/davisp/couchdb/commit/653ed6dd3dea87357a90c66b612568a5a9cb6f00
The commit is not stable. I'm forcibly pushing so it'll change. But
it'll be the second most recent on the new_externals branch as long as
that branch is alive.
Paul Davis
to read to be able to
fix the issue. I went through pretty quick, and some of the various
areas I don't know as well as others, so if you find something you
disagree with feel more than merry to update it.
Once again, apologies for the volume of email.
Paul Davis
I'll be going through tickets for awhile. Consider this a preemptive
apology for the ensuing flood of ticket spam.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
Most odd. Individual tests are run in independent processes so the
scope of interaction should be confined to a single *.t file. 170
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not entirely sure about rewriting headers. For the most part I
wanted to make sure that I wasn't modifying headers in anyway
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da
to make this particular file
path specifiable at ./configure time. I think you can still provide
good defaults by distributing packages with modified configuration
files.
HTH,
Paul Davis
of things like being able to cache GET's and such
forth.
HTH,
Paul Davis
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Sebastian Cohnen
sebastiancoh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if I like the idea of having two ways accessing one
functionality. One that will always work and one, that might or might
and stuff.
Paul Davis
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201009.mbox/%3caanlktinv+-eqqracjajvxzxa=soyco_pk1cs8mmcv...@mail.gmail.com%3e
[2] http://github.com/davisp/couchdb/tree/new_externals
[3] http://davispj.com/2010/09/26/new-couchdb-externals-api.html
, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:43, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
I've gone and implemented the two features discussed in [1] with the
goal of using them to replace the current _externals API. The code is
up at [2]. I'd like to get a couple people to build and run the tests
server, cluster, mobile, desktop,
and ISS computers. Now we just need to define constraints for each
one.
Or something...
Paul Davis
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
My answer was more about the csv etc :) what ip i choose to listen and why ?
This is indeed another issue.
I think we're starting
two
entries in this file. Right now, its not even possible to have more
than two.
HTH,
Paul Davis
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
What if the client doesn't have access to the arbitrarily chosen
address? There's no way that CouchDB can guess at all the possible
much coding on something. If you've already have patches or find
obvious things, the best place to report them is in JIRA and not here.
All patches from non-committers must go through JIRA and JIRA
automatically sends this list an email.
HTH,
Paul Davis
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting tired of typing couch_util:get_value(..). It also
consumes too much horizontal space. It's probably the most used
function from couch_util.
I'm thinking of adding a new macro in couch_db.hrl,
701 - 800 of 1210 matches
Mail list logo
