Re: 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT - module buile not possible - org.apache.deltaspike:deltaspike:pom:2.0.1-SNAPSHOT was not found

Hi Thomas, Did you build the project before running your command (mvn install -DskipTests -T1C)? Which maven version do you use, 3.9? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-2.0.0

+1 Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 18:55, John D. Ament a écrit : > +1 LGTM > > Though I always question when release notes mention things that are Won't > Do as being included in them, not a problem for the release. > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:45 AM Mark Struberg > wrote: > > > Good afternoon! > >

Re: Release 2.0.0-M1?

. Indeed just my 2cts and not a veto or anything close at all. > > Am Do., 21. März 2024 um 12:04 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > This is not needed for BatchEE but ultimately I guess we can do a 2.0

Re: Release 2.0.0-M1?

simpler after IMHO). Best, Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

Re: DS-2.0.0 - Wildfly - BeanMangerDelegate - subdeployment reverse bean visibilty issue

why it was not the case). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

Re: DS-2.0.0 - PartialBean - Proxy doesn't call delegate?

their appbut they didnt in 15 years so no big hope weld become more usable from our point of view. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://git

Re: DS-2.0.0 - PartialBean - Proxy doesn't call delegate?

this? > > > Am Fr., 8. März 2024 um 20:49 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Hmm, not sure I got it all but weld uses BDA isolation - no link to > > classloaders, linked to physical jars/folders even in the same > classloade

Re: DS-2.0.0 - PartialBean - Proxy doesn't call delegate?

vendors never agreed upon. I guess we can just detect it is weld and fallback on multiple captured bm (jndi, provider one, CDI.current()) but it stays very fragile. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: DS-2.0.0 - PartialBean - Proxy doesn't call delegate?

version is fishy, means we should use the BM only in extension somehow which is just not compatible with most CDI code so I'm quite hesitant to modify DS where Weld is likely the culprit, wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.met

Re: DS-2.0.0 - PartialBean - Proxy doesn't call delegate?

of CDI.current to no more align initial context lookup and CDI.current which looks like a big bug to me. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: DS-2.0.0 - PartialBean - Proxy doesn't call delegate?

cks to fix it it seems. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibu

Re: RFC: ArquillianTests - CDI 4.0 - bean-discovery-mode

Hmm, this is a big breaking change between v3 and v4 I missed, let's just do it, thanks for clarifying. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: RFC: ArquillianTests - CDI 4.0 - bean-discovery-mode

Maybe I get it wrong but if it is a bug in wildfly we should just get it fixed then integrate the new version IMHO, not sure the point to change everything on our side - which is valid from a spec standpoint - to hide other bugs (we test the most used case IIRC). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: RFC: ArquillianTests - CDI 4.0 - bean-discovery-mode

Hmm, it stays the default but not the beans.xml we recommend nor provide so not sure, trim should stay what is recommended in apps IMHO, annotated is a broken mode by design so not sure it is good to use it in real CDI app. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1434) Namespace change javax to jakarta

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17715964#comment-17715964 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434: [~vanta] EE always had been

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1434) Namespace change javax to jakarta

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17715794#comment-17715794 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434: > Releases are ch

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1434) Namespace change javax to jakarta

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17715768#comment-17715768 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434: [~mgrigorov] this can look accurate

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1434) Namespace change javax to jakarta

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17715725#comment-17715725 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434: The main issue is migrating away

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1434) Namespace change javax to jakarta

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17715306#comment-17715306 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434: The harm would be to just deliver

Re: Jakarta EE / DeltaSpike 2.0 Status

ibility we will not get anyway since we move to jakarta so it is time to clean up the room IMHO. If we don't follow that philosophy we should probably reimplement CDI too, see the point. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 04.04.2023 um 10:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: Jakarta EE / DeltaSpike 2.0 Status

e project staff and end users it makes sense to drop most of what got added to the spec (sometimes thanks to DS :)). > Am Di., 4. Apr. 2023 um 10:44 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Le mar. 4 avr. 2023 à 10:22, Thomas Andraschko < > > an

Re: Jakarta EE / DeltaSpike 2.0 Status

a new major). > > > > So overall I wouldnt aim at renaming but more pruning what is built in or > > will be soon and make DS lighter now resources are very low and the need > of > > the project really less important than years ago. > > > > Hope it makes sense.

Re: Jakarta EE / DeltaSpike 2.0 Status

ago. Hope it makes sense. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibu

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1434) Namespace change javax to jakarta

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17678135#comment-17678135 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434: CDI 4.0 is not backward compatible

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.9.6

+1 Le ven. 8 avr. 2022 à 21:39, Alexander Falb a écrit : > +1 > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 6:27 PM Mark Struberg > wrote: > > > Hi lords and ladies! > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache DeltaSpike-1.9.6 > > > > The following tickets got resolved: > > > > > > Bug > >

Re: jira cleanup

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: some draft for DS-2.0

Without feature change I would still prefer the shade/relocation + bom option instead of 2 branches (recall you didnt maintain your geronimo-config branches? ;)) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache DeltaSpike 2.0 targeting Java 17 and Jakarta-9.0

of great stuff in here still. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 11.09.2021 um 18:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Le sam. 11 sept. 2021 à 18:46, Thomas Andraschko < > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > >> true romain >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache DeltaSpike 2.0 targeting Java 17 and Jakarta-9.0

ch cant be easily put into JPA > Can go into openjpa but i didnt see a lot of adoption so can stay in 1.x i guess > Am Sa., 11. Sept. 2021 um 18:42 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Well transitive dep issue is solved with proper boms. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache DeltaSpike 2.0 targeting Java 17 and Jakarta-9.0

Well transitive dep issue is solved with proper boms. Think we should ask ourselves the future of DS. Im not fully convinced of the added value these days in current IT ecosystem so maybe it should be split in subprojects and some full parts dropped or given to other asf projects? Le sam. 11

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.9.5

+1 Le sam. 6 mars 2021 à 01:08, Daniel Dias Dos Santos < daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hello , > > +1 > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 19:45 Mark Struberg > wrote: > > > Hi Lords and Ladies! > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache DeltaSpike-1.9.5 > > > > The following

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.9.4

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DELTASPIKE-1402) ~/.deltaspike/apache-deltaspike.properties doesn't pickup changes during runtime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17120916#comment-17120916 ] Romain Manni-Bucau edited comment on DELTASPIKE-1402 at 6/1/20, 10:38 AM

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1402) ~/.deltaspike/apache-deltaspike.properties doesn't pickup changes during runtime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17120916#comment-17120916 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1402: I guess we need to refine

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1366) Add Junit5 testing support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17111798#comment-17111798 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1366: [~Sethi] you can exclude

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1366) Add Junit5 testing support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17111449#comment-17111449 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1366: Hi, if it helps, openwebbeans

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.9.3

+1 Le mar. 28 janv. 2020 à 21:09, Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit : > +1 > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 21:00 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha < > daniels...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 > > > > Em ter., 28 de jan. de 2020 às 12:17, Mark Struberg > > escreveu: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > >

Re: DeltaSpike 1.9.2?

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: [DISUSS] do a 1.9.2 release?

+1 Le ven. 15 nov. 2019 à 11:14, Thomas Andraschko a écrit : > +1 > > Am Fr., 15. Nov. 2019 um 11:13 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg > : > > > Hi folks! > > > > What do you think about running a DeltaSpike-1.9.2 release? > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.9.1

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-193) Setup SecurityManager enabled CI build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16825085#comment-16825085 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-193: --- Think it is worth doing it since apps

Re: [VOTE] Move our git repo to Apache gitbox

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: Merge PRs

You pull them locally, merge and then push on asf, once "ok" you can ask the author to close it on github Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1357) Update ASM to 6.2.1 for preliminary Java 12 support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16633615#comment-16633615 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1357: maybe we should go straight on asm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.9.0 (take2)

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike 1.9.0

+1 Le dim. 9 sept. 2018 18:51, Gerhard Petracek a écrit : > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > Am Fr., 7. Sep. 2018 um 14:04 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg > : > > > Good afternoon! > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache DeltaSpike 1.9.0. > > This is the first version which requires

Re: Welcome Alex Falb as new Apache DeltaSpike

Welcome! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: where to place a Config-Diff algorigthm

ush solution is saner and in this case doesn't require the polling and lasttimestamp at all, no? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 05.06.2018 um 09:34 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hmm, maybe too early so don't hesitate to shout if studid: why not > having a > >

Re: where to place a Config-Diff algorigthm

ore or less) the thread will execute in a safe manner (if fail - log but dont quit the loop) and it returns a boolean to ask to propagate changes upstream or not. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> |

Re: where to place a Config-Diff algorigthm

in a portable way (today a user requires to use impl which is not as clean as we are normally since it mixes extensible classes by users and internals). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: Next stop 1.9.0 ;)

Oh I see, +1 then Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

Re: Next stop 1.9.0 ;)

Hi Mark, Do we have any new feature compared to 1.8.2 to put in? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1345) Support JavaEE Security annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16482847#comment-16482847 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1345: [~gpetracek] hmm, why can't we use

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1345) Support JavaEE Security annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16481990#comment-16481990 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1345: +1 to have this feature but 1

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-1345) Support JavaEE Security annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau updated DELTASPIKE-1345: --- Priority: Minor (was: Blocker) > Support JavaEE Security annotat

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-1345) Support JavaEE Security annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau updated DELTASPIKE-1345: --- Priority: Blocker (was: Major) > Support JavaEE Security annotat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.2

+1 Le mer. 16 mai 2018 00:11, Daniel Cunha a écrit : > +1 > > On Tue, May 15, 2018, 18:36 Gerhard Petracek wrote: > > > +1 > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2018-05-15 23:26 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > > > >

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

is an API so as an user you expect to implement it whereas you never do it normally So overall it is more confusing for CDI users than helping and encourages to bypass CDI for part of the IoC which sounds very nasty. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 27.04.2018 um 09:27 schr

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

Ok so we are back on the compatibility constraint right? Do we have a clear view on this line? (like the list of impl not supporting it?) If yes we can see when dropping it is possible. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.met

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

would have. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 26.04.2018 um 07:16 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > there are 2 issues: > > > > 1. we reinvent the wheel and do a competitive API compared to CDI > > 2. most of the

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

oki, let's do that. Thanks Gerhard for the story behind that part of our code. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

slowly hide it or even drop it when not relevant (all core interceptors pby) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

> interceptor-strategy concept initially). > #2 e.g. TransactionStrategy has benefits beyond that (a public example is > the usage in the ds-data-module) > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2018-04-25 6:58 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > &

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

verview of all interceptor-strategies you just need to > open the hierarchy-view for InterceptorStrategy and you have everything you > need with one step...) > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2018-04-24 22:35 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

cess) and i haven't heard about any concern > (from users). > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2018-04-24 19:31 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Le 24 avr. 2018 19:18, "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org> a >

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

pi to user where it is actually a dead interface. regards, gerhard 2018-04-24 13:47 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > basically +1 > but its still used currently > > > 2018-04-23 11:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com&g

InterceptorStrategy?

Hi guys, Do we still need InterceptorStrategy? If not, can we deprecate it and remove it from our built-in interceptors? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: atomic access to config values

value reader under the hood. It avoids to have to propagate the snapshot in the whole user codebase which is a huge breaking change not that justified technically. It would also mess up all your code if you think about it and reduce the composability of the modules of an app at scale. > &

Re: atomic access to config values

thout requiring to recode parts of the app. In other words we give spaces to dev, devops and ops ;). wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <http

cipher service rework?

so enable to support it in the logging automatically to skip it since ciphered data are by default sensitive data. Since next release will be 1.9 I think we can clean it up now before it gets out. Wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.me

Re: atomic access to config values

) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <htt

Re: atomic access to config values

hot sounds like it is the same object type but "frozen" no? Anyway what about making it an internal of ConfigImpl and not a Config thing, then we don't care much of the name, right? > But that's not the case, it is really something different. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > >

Re: atomic access to config values

t about > > * renaming ConfigTransaction to ConfigSnapshot and > * Config#createTransation to > - Config#resolveSnapshot or > - Config#createSnapshot, or just > - Config#snapshot ? > > Any thoughts? Or even any better ideas? > > txs and LieGrue, >

Re: atomic access to config values

access directly but we can add an update event for that (if we dont want a cdi event we can allow sources to implement Updatable { void afterUpdate(Collection keys) } probably which would do the relationship without having a real cycle on the code) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

Re: atomic access to config values

ady have use RW for that I don't see it as a perf blocker. What about trying and measure it? > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > Am 04.04.2018 um 23:55 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > Le 4 avr. 2018 19:37, "M

Re: atomic access to config values

ap the cache value and update it at once with the lock. LieGrue,strub On Wednesday, 4 April 2018, 18:44:13 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: Since the cache is per instance we should just clear it on eviction at once IMHO the issue is: do you want to populate

Re: atomic access to config values

such "cache" +1 to do it without any flag Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linke

Re: [DISCUSS] ds for cdi 1.2+ only

All work for me and the apps i work on since a few years. Le 3 avr. 2018 22:17, "Thomas Andraschko" a écrit : > +1 for 3) > the workarounds are really not that big... > > i would leave it as it is for now and start with DS 2.0 (= CDI2.0 only) the > next months. > >

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1333) Support default methods in interface based configuration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16415151#comment-16415151 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1333: Hi Niels, Do you want to do a PR

Re: [DISCUSS] require Java8 and move to Deltaspike-1.9.x version?

2018-03-01 15:50 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > IMHO to move to Java 8 we need to drop support for EE6/EE7. So to me that > says the next version is 2.0 not 1.9.x. > It is way too early for cdi 2, almost no users rely on that yet compared to cdi 1.x. > > There are some

Re: [DISCUSS] require Java8 and move to Deltaspike-1.9.x version?

+1, even big data libs like apache beam are java 8 based now so if big data moved to j8, server techno should have moved already IMHO ;) Le 1 mars 2018 05:48, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > Hi folks! > > Our build, etc in theory still runs with Java6. > As typical with

Re: bringing interdyn and invomon to DeltaSpike?

Hi Mark I like interdync and it is a generic fit but invomon is a bit limited in current flavor and I would be tempted to say we can just inherit from the related sirona part of code if we want to go this way. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: Wrong license on proxy-module impl-asm

+1 to fix the license and keep the shade Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.

Re: provide a default Scheduler which is not using quartz as default?

@Mark: here cause tomee already has ee concurrency utilities which could be used to impl @Schedule(persistent=false) - just no will/need yet. Le 5 janv. 2018 20:10, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:00 PM John D. Ament > wrote: >

Re: provide a default Scheduler which is not using quartz as default?

+100 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> 2

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1311) Allow Excluded Repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16313201#comment-16313201 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1311: No need of veto since

Re: [VOTE] release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.1

+1 Le 30 déc. 2017 21:14, "Gerhard Petracek" a écrit : > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2017-12-30 17:39 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > > > Hi folks! > > > > I did run the necessary steps for releasing DeltaSpike-1.8.1 > > > > The following bugs

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

Sorry Matej, I don't get how Travis would help since you can do the same with jenkins which is already configured. Having the default build running on both weld and OWB would be more beneficial IMHO, but it is just the opinion from my side of the fence and experience. Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

Hi Matej, they are all on the ASF jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/ Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-29 16:47 GMT+01:00 Matej Novotny <manov...@redhat.com>: > Hello > > I wanted to bring up a topic of

[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-1303) @Configuration proxies should support List without converters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau resolved DELTASPIKE-1303. Resolution: Fixed > @Configuration proxies should support List with

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1303) @Configuration proxies should support List without converters

Romain Manni-Bucau created DELTASPIKE-1303: -- Summary: @Configuration proxies should support List without converters Key: DELTASPIKE-1303 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1303

Re: [DISCUSS] releasing 1.8.1?

+1 the config lifecycle enhancement will be great to cite only it Le 29 nov. 2017 08:48, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > hi folks! > > I'd like to release 1.8.1 in my spare cycles over the next days. > Any objections? > > Would be way cool if people could glimpse through

Re: propertyfileconfig and lifecycle

works for me, thks Mark Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-27 15:51 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > We can move it from AfterDeploymentValidation to AfterBeanDiscovery. > My argument was about why we _not_ do it

propertyfileconfig and lifecycle

bring a lot of value by itself even if not 100% aligned on CDI programming model. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1296) PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16266801#comment-16266801 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1296: If we register them

[jira] [Reopened] (DELTASPIKE-1296) PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau reopened DELTASPIKE-1296: > PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensi

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1296) PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16266630#comment-16266630 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1296: Hi Mark, issue is really to have

[jira] [Reopened] (DELTASPIKE-1296) PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau reopened DELTASPIKE-1296: > PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensi

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1302) ThreadPoolManager: ExecutorService map is always empty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16266083#comment-16266083 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1302: pushed the proposed impl, updated

Re: ThreadPoolManager configuration

e can need to really fix it later. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-26 16:55 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org>: > it looks like a strange issue. > here it works with jdk 7 as well as 8 and on jenkins it fails as well.

  1   2   3   4   5   >