Hi Thomas,
Did you build the project before running your command (mvn install
-DskipTests -T1C)?
Which maven version do you use, 3.9?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibuca
+1
Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 18:55, John D. Ament a
écrit :
> +1 LGTM
>
> Though I always question when release notes mention things that are Won't
> Do as being included in them, not a problem for the release.
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:45 AM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
> > Good afternoon!
> >
>
h it
for the project.
Indeed just my 2cts and not a veto or anything close at all.
>
> Am Do., 21. März 2024 um 12:04 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > This is not needed for BatchEE but ultimately I gues
simpler after
IMHO).
Best,
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in
ecall why it was not the
case).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.c
appbut they didnt in 15 years so
no big hope weld become more usable from our point of view.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://git
this?
>
>
> Am Fr., 8. März 2024 um 20:49 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hmm, not sure I got it all but weld uses BDA isolation - no link to
> > classloaders, linked to physical jars/folders even in the same
> classloader.
vendors never agreed upon.
I guess we can just detect it is weld and fallback on multiple captured bm
(jndi, provider one, CDI.current()) but it stays very fragile.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
version is fishy, means we should use the BM only in
extension somehow which is just not compatible with most CDI code so I'm
quite hesitant to modify DS where Weld is likely the culprit, wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibuca
CDI.current to
no more align initial context lookup and CDI.current which looks like a big
bug to me.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
to fix it it seems.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibu
Hmm, this is a big breaking change between v3 and v4 I missed, let's just
do it, thanks for clarifying.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Git
Maybe I get it wrong but if it is a bug in wildfly we should just get it
fixed then integrate the new version IMHO, not sure the point to change
everything on our side - which is valid from a spec standpoint - to hide
other bugs (we test the most used case IIRC).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
Hmm, it stays the default but not the beans.xml we recommend nor provide so
not sure, trim should stay what is recommended in apps IMHO, annotated is a
broken mode by design so not sure it is good to use it in real CDI app.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17715964#comment-17715964
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434:
[~vanta] EE al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17715794#comment-17715794
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434:
> Relea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17715768#comment-17715768
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434:
[~mgrigorov]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17715725#comment-17715725
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434:
The main issu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17715306#comment-17715306
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434:
The harm woul
int to keep it nowdays except backward compatibility we will
not get anyway since we move to jakarta so it is time to clean up the room
IMHO.
If we don't follow that philosophy we should probably reimplement CDI too,
see the point.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> >
converging to the project staff and end users it makes sense to
drop most of what got added to the spec (sometimes thanks to DS :)).
> Am Di., 4. Apr. 2023 um 10:44 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Le mar. 4 avr. 2023 à 10:22, Thomas Andrasch
for a new major).
> >
> > So overall I wouldnt aim at renaming but more pruning what is built in or
> > will be soon and make DS lighter now resources are very low and the need
> of
> > the project really less important than years ago.
> >
> > Hope it makes s
.
Hope it makes sense.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17678135#comment-17678135
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1434:
CDI 4.0 is
+1
Le ven. 8 avr. 2022 à 21:39, Alexander Falb a écrit :
> +1
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 6:27 PM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
> > Hi lords and ladies!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache DeltaSpike-1.9.6
> >
> > The following tickets got resolved:
> >
> >
> > Bug
> > [DELTASPIKE
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
Without feature change I would still prefer the shade/relocation + bom
option instead of 2 branches (recall you didnt maintain your
geronimo-config branches? ;))
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
lenty of great stuff in here still.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 11.09.2021 um 18:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >:
> >
> > Le sam. 11 sept. 2021 à 18:46, Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> true romain
> &
ch cant be easily put into JPA
>
Can go into openjpa but i didnt see a lot of adoption so can stay in 1.x i
guess
> Am Sa., 11. Sept. 2021 um 18:42 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Well transitive dep issue is solved with proper boms.
>
Well transitive dep issue is solved with proper boms.
Think we should ask ourselves the future of DS.
Im not fully convinced of the added value these days in current IT
ecosystem so maybe it should be split in subprojects and some full parts
dropped or given to other asf projects?
Le sam. 11 sept.
+1
Le sam. 6 mars 2021 à 01:08, Daniel Dias Dos Santos <
daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hello ,
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 19:45 Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Lords and Ladies!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache DeltaSpike-1.9.5
> >
> > The following ticke
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17120916#comment-17120916
]
Romain Manni-Bucau edited comment on DELTASPIKE-1402 at 6/1/20, 10:3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17120916#comment-17120916
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1402:
I guess we nee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17111798#comment-17111798
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1366:
[~Sethi] you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17111449#comment-17111449
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1366:
Hi, if it h
+1
Le mar. 28 janv. 2020 à 21:09, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> +1
>
> Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 21:00 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> daniels...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Em ter., 28 de jan. de 2020 às 12:17, Mark Struberg
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > We
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
+1
Le ven. 15 nov. 2019 à 11:14, Thomas Andraschko
a écrit :
> +1
>
> Am Fr., 15. Nov. 2019 um 11:13 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
>
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > What do you think about running a DeltaSpike-1.9.2 release?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16825085#comment-16825085
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-193:
---
Think it is w
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
You pull them locally, merge and then push on asf, once "ok" you can ask
the author to close it on github
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16633615#comment-16633615
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1357:
maybe we shoul
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
+1
Le dim. 9 sept. 2018 18:51, Gerhard Petracek a
écrit :
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> Am Fr., 7. Sep. 2018 um 14:04 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
>
> > Good afternoon!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache DeltaSpike 1.9.0.
> > This is the first version which requires Java8
Welcome!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
e push solution is saner and in this case
doesn't require the polling and lasttimestamp at all, no?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 05.06.2018 um 09:34 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >:
> >
> > Hmm, maybe too early so don't hesitate to shout if studid: why n
ion more or
less) the thread will execute in a safe manner (if fail - log but dont quit
the loop) and it returns a boolean to ask to propagate changes upstream or
not.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/&
users in a portable way
(today a user requires to use impl which is not as clean as we are normally
since it mixes extensible classes by users and internals).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>
Hi Marc
You are right, do you want to submit a PR or patch?
Romain
Le mar. 29 mai 2018 20:43, Marc Schorderet a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> Today I found an issue by adding one more configuration file for my
> application. We are using version 1.8.0.
>
>
>
> It seems that your comparator of Co
Oh I see, +1 then
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in
Hi Mark,
Do we have any new feature compared to 1.8.2 to put in?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16482847#comment-16482847
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1345:
[~gpetracek]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16481990#comment-16481990
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1345:
+1 to have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau updated DELTASPIKE-1345:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Blocker)
> Support JavaEE Security annotat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau updated DELTASPIKE-1345:
---
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> Support JavaEE Security annotat
+1
Le mer. 16 mai 2018 00:11, Daniel Cunha a écrit :
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018, 18:36 Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-05-15 23:26 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> >
> > > Hi lords and ladies!
> > >
> > > I would like to call a VOTE on releasing
user you expect to implement it whereas you never do
it normally
So overall it is more confusing for CDI users than helping and encourages
to bypass CDI for part of the IoC which sounds very nasty.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 27.04.2018 um 09:27 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
Ok so we are back on the compatibility constraint right?
Do we have a clear view on this line? (like the list of impl not supporting
it?)
If yes we can see when dropping it is possible.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.met
plemented by any
> > user
> >
> > So we kind of encourage users to do it wrong.
> >
> > Always thought it was technical workarounds so now we are in 2018 I think
> > we can slowly hide it or even drop it when not relevant (all core
> > interceptor
oki, let's do that.
Thanks Gerhard for the story behind that part of our code.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rman
slowly hide it or even drop it when not relevant (all core
interceptors pby)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
concept initially).
> #2 e.g. TransactionStrategy has benefits beyond that (a public example is
> the usage in the ds-data-module)
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2018-04-25 6:58 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> > I get it but it means we add a layer on top of i
r-strategies you just need to
> open the hierarchy-view for InterceptorStrategy and you have everything you
> need with one step...)
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2018-04-24 22:35 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> > Hmm not sure i get it, annotations are hard to
en't heard about any concern
> (from users).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2018-04-24 19:31 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> > Le 24 avr. 2018 19:18, "Gerhard Petracek" a
> écrit :
> >
> > it was always just a marker-interface to list all in
interface.
regards,
gerhard
2018-04-24 13:47 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko :
> basically +1
> but its still used currently
>
>
> 2018-04-23 11:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Do we still need InterceptorStrategy?
> >
> > I
Hi guys,
Do we still need InterceptorStrategy?
If not, can we deprecate it and remove it from our built-in interceptors?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g
e correct value reader under the hood.
It avoids to have to propagate the snapshot in the whole user codebase
which is a huge breaking change not that justified technically.
It would also mess up all your code if you think about it and reduce the
composability of the modules of an app at scale.
>
&
ork has been done without requiring to recode parts of the
app. In other words
we give spaces to dev, devops and ops ;).
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g
able to support it in the logging automatically to skip
it since ciphered data are by default sensitive data.
Since next release will be 1.9 I think we can clean it up now before it
gets out.
Wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibuc
class)....
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
&l
ct type
but "frozen" no?
Anyway what about making it an internal of ConfigImpl and not a Config
thing, then we don't care much of the name, right?
> But that's not the case, it is really something different.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 05.04.201
n to ConfigSnapshot and
> * Config#createTransation to
> - Config#resolveSnapshot or
> - Config#createSnapshot, or just
> - Config#snapshot ?
>
> Any thoughts? Or even any better ideas?
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 05.04.2018 um 10:39 schri
access directly but we can add an update event for that
(if we dont want a cdi event we can allow sources to implement Updatable {
void afterUpdate(Collection keys) } probably which would do the
relationship without having a real cycle on the code)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <ht
ost of the cases) to stay atomic.
Long story short: there is no real choice if you want to be atomic
transparently (ie without adding a relationship between keys + keep in the
instance this relationship to know what to update when there is a write
which goes to the placeholding replacements).
To al
ue and update it at once
with the lock.
LieGrue,strub
On Wednesday, 4 April 2018, 18:44:13 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau <
rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Since the cache is per instance we should just clear it on eviction at once
IMHO
the issue is: do you want to populate it at once too? tem
"cache"
+1 to do it without any flag
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linke
All work for me and the apps i work on since a few years.
Le 3 avr. 2018 22:17, "Thomas Andraschko" a
écrit :
> +1 for 3)
> the workarounds are really not that big...
>
> i would leave it as it is for now and start with DS 2.0 (= CDI2.0 only) the
> next months.
>
> 2018-04-03 22:06 GMT+02:00 Ger
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16415151#comment-16415151
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1333:
Hi Niels,
Do
2018-03-01 15:50 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :
> IMHO to move to Java 8 we need to drop support for EE6/EE7. So to me that
> says the next version is 2.0 not 1.9.x.
>
It is way too early for cdi 2, almost no users rely on that yet compared to
cdi 1.x.
>
> There are some weld 1.1 versions that supp
+1, even big data libs like apache beam are java 8 based now so if big data
moved to j8, server techno should have moved already IMHO ;)
Le 1 mars 2018 05:48, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> Hi folks!
>
> Our build, etc in theory still runs with Java6.
> As typical with ASF projects we make battle p
Hi Mark
I like interdync and it is a generic fit but invomon is a bit limited in
current flavor and I would be tempted to say we can just inherit from the
related sirona part of code if we want to go this way.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
+1 to fix the license and keep the shade
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.
@Mark: here cause tomee already has ee concurrency utilities which could be
used to impl @Schedule(persistent=false) - just no will/need yet.
Le 5 janv. 2018 20:10, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:00 PM John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM Mark Strube
+100
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16313201#comment-16313201
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1311:
No need of
+1
Le 30 déc. 2017 21:14, "Gerhard Petracek" a écrit :
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2017-12-30 17:39 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg :
>
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I did run the necessary steps for releasing DeltaSpike-1.8.1
> >
> > The following bugs and improvements got implemented:
> >
> > Bug
> >
Sorry Matej, I don't get how Travis would help since you can do the
same with jenkins which is already configured.
Having the default build running on both weld and OWB would be more
beneficial IMHO, but it is just the opinion from my side of the fence
and experience.
Romain Manni-
Hi Matej,
they are all on the ASF jenkins:
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-29 16:47 GMT+01:00 Matej Novotny :
> Hello
>
> I wanted to bring up a topic of CI (Continuous Irritation - eh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved DELTASPIKE-1303.
Resolution: Fixed
> @Configuration proxies should support List with
Romain Manni-Bucau created DELTASPIKE-1303:
--
Summary: @Configuration proxies should support List without
converters
Key: DELTASPIKE-1303
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1303
+1 the config lifecycle enhancement will be great to cite only it
Le 29 nov. 2017 08:48, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> hi folks!
>
> I'd like to release 1.8.1 in my spare cycles over the next days.
> Any objections?
>
> Would be way cool if people could glimpse through their tickets and
> update/r
works for me, thks Mark
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 15:51 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg :
> We can move it from AfterDeploymentValidation to AfterBeanDiscovery.
> My argument was about why we _not_ do it immediately in ProcessAnnotat
would bring a lot of value by itself even if not 100% aligned on CDI
programming model.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16266801#comment-16266801
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1296:
If we register
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau reopened DELTASPIKE-1296:
> PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal ex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16266630#comment-16266630
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1296:
Hi Mark,
issu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau reopened DELTASPIKE-1296:
> PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal ex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16266083#comment-16266083
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1302:
pushed the prop
1 - 100 of 559 matches
Mail list logo
