On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:01:26 +0100
Nino Novak wrote:
> > - thus become unmaintained, outdated or stay incomplete
>
> they do not become unmaintained because of lacking the appropriate
> category - they lack their category because they are unmaintained
Thats about half right: Pages certainly _do
a little bit confused ... what's going wrong here?
All that is going on here is that on Friday I sent the Wiki bot over a
stack of uncategorized Documentation pages, and dumped them all into the
root Documentation Category. This was wrong... I should have put them
elsewhere (either in some I
On Monday 23 November 2009 10:30, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems -
Hamburg Germany wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:24:04 +0100
>
> Nino Novak wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:30, Clayton wrote:
> > > Part of the prob on the Wiki is that thousands of pages have no
> > > Category at a
On Sunday 22 November 2009 23:32, Clayton wrote:
> On 11/22/2009 08:24 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:30, Clayton wrote:
> >> Part of the prob on the Wiki is that thousands of pages have no
> >> Category at all.. :-(
> >
> > (For me, this is not a problem)
>
> Finding somet
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:24:04 +0100
Nino Novak wrote:
> On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:30, Clayton wrote:
>
> > Part of the prob on the Wiki is that thousands of pages have no
> > Category at all.. :-(
>
> (For me, this is not a problem)
> [...]
> (I really don't understand what's better with unu
My personal preference would be to create a Category
/ (where is the localized term)
as subcategory of Documentation
(as I have done for DE/Dokumentation)
To do this we need to enlist the help of people from the various NLC
communities.. I can't spell Documentation in Chinese... or Bulgarian.
12:33 AM
To: dev@documentation.openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [documentation-dev] Wiki: Category:Documentation overloaded
On 11/22/2009 08:24 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:30, Clayton wrote:
>
>> Part of the prob on the Wiki is that thousands of pages have no
&
Hello TJ :-)
On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:09, T. J. Frazier wrote:
> ...
> Personally, I suggest that Cat:Doc should
> not have any pages in it at all, only sub-categories.
Your suggestion is good!
+1
> ... And, we need to
> decide how to categorize the translations.
My personal preferen
On 11/22/2009 08:24 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:30, Clayton wrote:
>
>> Part of the prob on the Wiki is that thousands of pages have no
>> Category at all.. :-(
>
> (For me, this is not a problem)
Finding something and just general navigating in the ever growing pile
of
On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:30, Clayton wrote:
> Part of the prob on the Wiki is that thousands of pages have no
> Category at all.. :-(
(For me, this is not a problem)
> The Calc: pages I moved on Friday were moved to the Doc parent
> category partly as a test to be sure I could successfully
>> My impression is, that overloading a category impairs its
>> functionality. A Category can be a good instrument for getting an
>> overview but if its contents is scattered through several pages, the
>> overview is lost - which is the case with the Documentation Category
>> at the moment.
>> Plea
Hi, Nino,
Nino Novak wrote:
My impression is, that overloading a category impairs its functionality.
A Category can be a good instrument for getting an overview but if its
contents is scattered through several pages, the overview is lost -
which is the case with the Documentation Category at t
12 matches
Mail list logo
