Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3

gt;> >> I believe the official VOTE should last 72 hours minimum >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Piotr Zarzycki >> wrote: >> > Passed. >> > >> > Result 3 +1 binding votes and 1 +1 from community! >> > >> &g

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi Darrin, I am in the process of unsubscribing the email address I have for you. Hopefully this will be the last email you see from this mailing list. Let me know if you continue to get emails after a couple of hours from now. And, of course, you are always welcome to rejoin the lists. Thanks,

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

IMO, we'd be better off having these files donated to Apache so the header does not need to change. There is no need to keep it as third-party since the original author hasn't touched it in years. I'm pretty sure it is ok for me to just say it is owned by Adobe and thus donated. We've done this

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

Hi Darrin, When you send an email to dev-unsubscr...@flex.apache.org, the mailing list robot will send you a confirmation email. If that ends up in spam or blocked somehow then you will remain subscribed. Did you get a response email from the robot? -Alex On 4/19/18, 1:56 PM, "darrin" wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3

+1 Binding Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.3.1/rc3/apache-flex -sdk-installer-3.3.1-src.tar.gz Java 1.8 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.12.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unappro

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi Justin, I've asked Adobe Legal similar questions in the past. Adobe Legal will say it is fine because it is related to Flex and was already out there with a open source license, and even better, an Apache license. It would be bit trickier if it wasn't already ALv2, and much harder/impossible

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

I think the author is an Adobe employee. It isn't clear he would own copyright. I know I wouldn't if I had written it. I think the current situation is acceptable and no changes are required. -Alex On 4/18/18, 5:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >The NOTICE had the wrong year in it so I f

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2

+1 Although I wish we had updated the RELEASE_NOTES. -Alex On 4/17/18, 12:01 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: > Alex, > >I've answered you in discussion thread. > >Thanks, >Piotr > >2018-04-17 20:41 GMT+02:00 Alex Polmans : > >> I tried the installer on Windows 8. A number of dlls were missing >> (

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

It seemed to work for me. My Mac SDK is over 1GB. 8480 items. If you end up doing another RC, please update the RELEASE_NOTES. Otherwise, I think everything is ok for me. -Alex On 4/18/18, 12:12 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Phil, > >I see that also. If you point in your IDE on Mac that SD

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC1

Have you already uninstalled Installer 3.3? Sometimes a newer version can't overwrite the older one. -Alex On 4/16/18, 3:55 PM, "Alex Polmans" wrote: >Sorry, the text was > >"The program can't start because objc.dll is missing from your computer. >Try re-installing the program to fix this prob

Re: Release Apache Flex Installer 3.4

pG5LB4m72Z4B7hYJ01K2cPYFo4klpDs0U44lc >eI%3D&reserved=0 > >Thanks, >Piotr > >2018-04-16 3:12 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> I don't see any way to recover your passphrase. The advice I see is to >> keep trying to remember what it

Re: Release Apache Flex Installer 3.4

straight instruction. > >Can someone sign for me that release or pass some help on that ? > >Thanks, >Piotr > >2018-04-12 17:52 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > >> Hi Alex, >> >> I think it is a good idea to have 3.3.1 instead 3.4. >> >> Thanks, >&g

Re: FlexUnit - FlexUnit4AirCIListener targets player 10.0.0

report target. If I >find time in the next week or so, I can try to get the PR in, else it >really is just making a variable with a default and using it so that it >can be passed in. > >Mike > >-Original Message- >From: Alex Harui >Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018

Re: Release Apache Flex Installer 3.4

Thanks, >Piotr > >2018-04-12 10:25 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> I would skip last call and cut the RC. But yes, use SHA512 with a >>.sha512 >> suffix. >> >> My 2 cents, >> -Alex >> >> On 4/12/18, 12:48 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"

Re: Release Apache Flex Installer 3.4

I would skip last call and cut the RC. But yes, use SHA512 with a .sha512 suffix. My 2 cents, -Alex On 4/12/18, 12:48 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Guys, > >Since I was able to fix issue with OSMF I would like to prepare release >candidate. Should I go through the LAST CALL ? Can I omit it a

Re: FlexUnit - FlexUnit4AirCIListener targets player 10.0.0

I'm pretty sure Apache Flex and Apache Royale (FlexJS) are using FlexUnit without player 10. You can take a look at how that is set up in the flex-sdk and royale-asjs/flex-asjs repos. HTH, -Alex On 4/2/18, 8:07 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Charles, > >Can you make pull request on GitHub wit

Re: Board report time - get involved

I added a few things to the report. On 3/12/18, 4:28 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Right Piotr, > >I expect the activity around Flex continue like this last months, so not >much to report here for now. I think Flex is pretty stable now and only >need to address

Re: Change to SHA1 signatures

Royale made the switch to SHA-512 in this commit: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/commit/56bf90ca100dbdf91b8965b60382ea 9e7a2816fb#diff-2cccd7bf48b7a9cc113ff564acd802a8 Volunteers are welcome to use it as the basis for changing over Flex. HTH, -Alex On 3/6/18, 2:41 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wr

Re: New login to Twitter from Chrome on Windows

I think most of my emails come in as invalid. AIUI, it has to do with some protocol mail servers use to verify authenticity of the other server in order to help flag spam. -Alex On 2/14/18, 5:38 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote: >Look at that hostname... > > >ver...@twitter.com.invalid > > >.invalid >

Re: Retiring Apache FlexJS section from Flex wiki

I agree the FlexJS wiki might be causing confusion, but I'd prefer to not remove any content for a bit longer until Royale has a better web presence. Thanks, -Alex On 1/8/18, 12:59 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Tom, > >I wanted to move Intellij web page to Royale, but just didn't have time >y

Re: Print issue between applications with the same component

Ah, ok, it looked like browser chrome... IIRC, this has to do with the display object that is being printed and its size relative to the print area. If the display object does not have a background or that background does not fully cover the print area then you haven't really specified every pixe

Re: Print issue between applications with the same component

Hugo, To my eyes, I cannot see a difference between the two. What is it that you are seeing? -Alex On 1/4/18, 3:15 AM, "hferreira" wrote: >Hello, > >When I print from my TLF editor component isolated on a Window test >application, I got this beautifull result: >https://na01.safelinks.protecti

Re: ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

On 12/29/17, 2:43 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >It is really not good if we won't move that jobs to the new Azure, cause >we >loose Nightly builds of Apache Flex. :( I don't have cycles in the next >weeks to take a look either. We could copy the last good build somewhere. Unless ch

Re: ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

On 12/29/17, 2:50 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Yep we have FlexJS and Royale [1], but this is Maven build and we need >>to >> have also ANT. > >Jenkins can run ant builds as well. We've used apacheflexbuilds and Erik's CI server for mustella because that way we have control over the ma

ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

Hi, Flex nightly Ant builds have been available on an Azure VM (apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net) I've been paying for over the past few years. Microsoft has generously made some Azure credits available but it requires a separate account and Azure VM. I've set up a new VM for Royale builds and would

[FLEXJS][ROYALE] Please subscribe to Royale Mailing Lists

Hi, Looks like a few folks may have missed that FlexJS discussions are now going on over in the Apache Royale project.. Please subscribe to the d...@royale.apache.org by sending an email to dev-subscr...@royale.apache.org This link might work: mailto:dev-subscr...@royale.apache.org You will r

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: MD5Checker #20294

Fix the flex-ask build first. Get Outlook for Android From: Piotr Zarzycki Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2017 2:31:31 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: MD5Checker #20294 Hi, I would fix that, but I don quite un

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

After some experimenting, it looks like 3.2 was not signed with the correct cert. 3.3 will correctly offer to upgrade 3.1. I guess we'll have to do more testing of the certs in the future to make sure we use the right one. Somehow we missed that for 3.2. Because we didn't force upgrades from 3.1

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

d5324825ea%7Cfa7b1b5a7b >34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636470207809124504&sdata=%2BOBv8dMBnogUtE >QrQo3hmUJmLqs6z3%2BSGJznqV7%2FsZ4%3D&reserved=0 > >Thanks, Piotr > > >2017-11-22 17:30 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> I think you have to get a blog account: >> &

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

R4DPWh8RiaPGAHFMISKUtymN5OCiA%3D&r >>eserved=0 >> 43c0-9049-0A7251630A7D.html >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Alex Harui >> wrote: >> >> > In my experience, SWFs never recompile and match. I think the

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

8504&sdata=q2%2FjMxAzcLeAyja3BwyUKKWbJ >SVczY%2FPZJH2fmF5zxU%3D&reserved=0 > >Thanks, >Om > >On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Alex Harui >wrote: > >> In my experience, SWFs never recompile and match. I think there is a >> time-stamp in the SWF. >> >&

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

In my experience, SWFs never recompile and match. I think there is a time-stamp in the SWF. -Alex On 11/22/17, 10:15 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Nov 22, 2017 9:54 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > >I followed those directions as we

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

cates which you have sent me. I did use >following >variables in build.properties file to locate certs as instruction said in >RELEASE_GUIDE. > >RELEASE_KEYSTORE_FILE= >CERT_PASSWORD_FILE= > >Have you done this differently ? > > >2017-11-22 18:36 GMT+01:00 Alex

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

Are you sure both your 3.2 and 3.3 versions were signed with the certificates we sent you off-list? I don't remember exactly how it works but AIUI, if you install the Installer as built from a source package, that build won't have the official certificates and you'll get that error since the new a

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 Released

Looks fine. You might want to specify using Installer 3.3. Thanks for doing these releases. -Alex On 11/22/17, 1:04 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Folks, > >This is draft for the announcement for 4.16.1 release. I'm waiting for the >mirrors update. I need information how to update our blog an

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

Piotr, I agree with Om that the 3.2 installer may not need to be uninstalled before installing 3.3 on Windows. In fact, I think that the 3.2 Installer will offer an upgrade to 3.3 the next time it is run if we force the upgrade via idk-installer-config-4.0.xml. We did not do that in the past bec

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

om/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.apa >che.org%2Fflex%2Fentry%2Fapache-flex-4-16-0&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1e86bcf80540 >49474b5308d531866001%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63646937 >5562521055&sdata=9rGvaPhDSuh3IABFGf6q%2FqnkjKCu9FWDEcWGx4EMUzg%3D&reserved >=0 > >Thanks

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Yes. On 11/22/17, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Question before I proceed with the push somewhere the release. I see in >the >repository "site\release\flex\4.16.0" Should I create similar folder there >for 4.16.1 ? > >Thanks, Piotr > >2017-11-21 7:58 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean : > >> Hi, >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

there are code page issues in the source >files." ? > >I have so far more +1 than -1 so I can release it, but wondering how to >fix >it for the next release. > >Thanks, Piotr > > >2017-11-21 7:17 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> My suggestion is to vote +1 and ship

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

My suggestion is to vote +1 and ship this release since this is not a new issue. I think there are code page issues in the source files. Volunteers can work it out later for the next release. Let's get our users a release that more of them can use. IMO, releases do not have to be perfect. My 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0. Can you confirm? -Alex On 11/20/17, 8:58 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> diff -w -r >>apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/Sh >>aredResources.properties >>/Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/f

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Peter and others, if you are going to test this release, you will probably need the JCE upgrade. Piotr already mentioned it in the RC1 discussion. Java 8: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jce8-download-21331 66.html Java 7: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/down

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Done. Added Installer 3.4 as well. On 11/19/17, 5:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Alex, > >Could you please add to jira version 4.16.1 for Flex SDK ? > >Thanks, Piotr > > >2017-11-16 18:12 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > >> Hi Peter, >> >> I have setup environment variable JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS to >>-

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC3*

Windows installs were successful with AIR/Flash 24 and later? I didn't think that was possible with the 4.16.0 install script. -Alex On 11/19/17, 2:37 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> It's occurring 100% on Win 7 or Win 10 from your statistics ? > >Hard to tell as we don’t directly log tha

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

Hi Piotr, The draft looks ok to me. There is a "2.2" that should be "3.2". I'd be tempted to remove references to FlexJS from the announcement, but I'm fine if you want to keep it. Thanks, -Alex On 11/17/17, 7:36 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi, > >I will send that announce once we release S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2

+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.16.1/rc2/apache-flex-sdk- 4.16.1-src.tar.gz Java 1.8 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.12.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archiv

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC3*

Hi Piotr, I'm not sure I understand your question, but the pattern of files for repos/dist/release/flex/installer/3.2 looks correct to me. You should have the same set of files for 3.3 and place the in the same kind of folder structure. This is supposed to be done via svn mv dist/dev/fle

Re: [CANCEL][DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

gt; wrote: >> >>> Another RC is coming. Cancel this one. >>> >>> 2017-11-15 9:04 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : >>> >>>> Hi Alex, >>>> >>>> I just tried JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS and that was it! Thank you and I will >>>&

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

y simple workflow; > 1. Get your Source Release in order. > 2. Check it and vote > 3. Release it to /dist > 4. Worry about anything else... > >Point 4 includes things like "Build binary convenience artifacts from the >Source release". > >HTH >Niclas >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

7)", "雨 (U+96E8)", "水 (U+6C34)", "川 (U+5DDD)"]); But when I unpack on my Windows RC2 sources from zip I see in that file this one: [Obraz w treści 1] Can you see screenshot above ? Thanks, Piotr 2017-11-14 8:47 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui mailto:aha...@adobe.com.inva

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

On 11/13/17, 11:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> The binaries are not created by first creating the source package, >> unpacking it and compiling it. You were a Flex SDK RM at least once, >>did >> you not understand what you were signing? > >Every time I made the release I made it from

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

hole repository >having all files unchanged in case of line endings. Now sh scripts are >runnable on Mac. I just run also installer.xml and it's working. I will >wait for Justin's look into the pushed RC2 before I officially cut it. > >Thanks, Piotr > > >2017-11-

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

If the RC build was run on files that weren't utf-8 encoded, the build would have failed, since the build runs checkintests and that's where it first notices the encoding differences. And then I would expect the binaries in the RC would be incorrect, which it appears they aren't. Files are being

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

On 11/13/17, 6:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Is the DateChooser problem from your local build of the sources or from >> the RC binary artifacts? > >A local built from the compiled source bundled I've not tested the binary >yet but given it was made from the source release I would expe

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

I think I just verified that the binary artifacts are ok regarding the non-ascii characters. I think that's because they are correct in the repo, and were compiled into bundles from that repo source. I'm not sure when the files get screwed up. I think it is when Ant copies the files to the temp

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Is the DateChooser problem from your local build of the sources or from the RC binary artifacts? I don't doubt that the locale files are not right, but I would have expected them to be compiled into bundles correctly on the RM's machine. -Alex On 11/13/17, 4:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

I spent some time checking out the release. The line-ending problem is a non-issue. Prior releases are set up this way as well. The "release" target fixes up the line endings when building the binary kit. I think the main build does not so it doesn't inject changes into the sources in a repo.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC3

+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.3/rc3/apache-flex-s dk-installer-3.3.0-src.zip Java 1.8 OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC2*

>> Let me think about it more. I have to admit that I didn't get out of >> memory once I change unzip to PowerShell for Adobe Air. I got different >> errors sometimes. Too bad that there is not so many active folks here we >> would discover something earlier. >> >&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

into that. I hope now it will work with Alex's >suggestion. > >Piotr > >On Fri, Nov 10, 2017, 17:26 Alex Harui wrote: > >> Peter, looks like you are missing the -Drc=1 parameter. >> >> I guess Piotr was unable to use the releasecandidate.xml scripts because

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Peter, looks like you are missing the -Drc=1 parameter. I guess Piotr was unable to use the releasecandidate.xml scripts because they would have put the right command-line in the vote thread emails. IMO, it would be better to get these scripts working so they save everybody time and hassle. -Alex

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC2*

wrote: >Hi Alex, > >Ahh! Yes :) I forgot update those one to lower case!! >If you can update those files, if not I will do this in 1h. > >Thanks, Piotr > >On Fri, Nov 10, 2017, 04:28 Alex Harui wrote: > >> Piotr, did you change how you generated the MD5 files?

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC2*

Piotr, did you change how you generated the MD5 files? It appears to be upper-case now and Ant doesn't like it. I guess I will update the file on dist.a.o. -Alex On 11/9/17, 2:24 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >I really really need more folks who test for me this RC on Windows. The >real issue a

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1

ld work. >Something is wrong when I'm trying to launch it from different file. > >Thanks for your help. >Piotr > >On Thu, Nov 9, 2017, 21:26 Alex Harui wrote: > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> Sounds like the installer code is having trouble with HTTP/HTTPS. I saw >

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1

ed=0 >[2] >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa >che.org%2FuNTu&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9f2870d6d67c4664cdf608d52708e086%7Cfa7b1b >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636457841438035240&sdata=bvtKvPGha%2B >qYZlRjUc5wYvBOkG%2F78zZkFV6Ar4iEIEo%3D&res

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1

56962311776580&sdata=YLSVlWSs1leq >IrC7DP%2F%2FqPz4g7OMVHurkRPKmc7LC6Y%3D&reserved=0 > >Thanks, Piotr > > >2017-11-04 7:41 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> I updated and ran the approval script. It found some tests without >> headers. I added headers and kicked off

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1

+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.3/rc1/apache-flex-s dk-installer-3.3.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.8 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.12.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licens

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

AFAICT, the releasecandidate.xml is not signing the binaries, it is calling build.xml to build and sign the binaries, tag the repo, etc. It is just scripting the steps an RM would otherwise do manually. -Alex On 11/7/17, 8:40 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >Just move our discussion he

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1

hould work. > >I just gave up after that time and make process partially manually. I hope >binaries are ok. > >Thanks for your help! Piotr > >On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, 21:26 Alex Harui wrote: > >> Piotr, >> >> I don’t know if you are still trying to use rele

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1

Piotr, I don’t know if you are still trying to use releasecandidate.xml, but it should have generated templates for these emails with different subjects for you. HTH, -Alex On 11/6/17, 11:40 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >Piotr, sorry for the annoyance, but in

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3

ad it ? Is there any instruction ? > >Piotr > >2017-11-04 7:43 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> I updated and ran the approval script. Things look ok to me. >> >> Thanks, >> -Alex >> >> On 11/3/17, 7:56 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: &g

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3

I updated and ran the approval script. Things look ok to me. Thanks, -Alex On 11/3/17, 7:56 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi, > >I have I think so same Mac version - need to confirm and didn't have such >issue. Could you try Installer 3.3 and let us know whether you experience >same issue. > >P

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1

I updated and ran the approval script. It found some tests without headers. I added headers and kicked off a new nightly build. Looks like it takes a couple of hours to build on my slow Azure VM. Other than that and the license thing Justin found, I think it is ok to release. -Alex On 11/3/17

Re: Trying to commit to royale-asjs repo

Did you do this? https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-personal-access-token-for-the-c ommand-line/ HTH, -Alex On 11/1/17, 5:44 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Hi, > >I thought I was done with all configuration to commit to GitHub for my >apache account,

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

45644&sdata=mj%2FaLkbK9ShbYsCU%2FEY >ErNvOBzV2dGlLnkaCrFh0KiY%3D&reserved=0 > >Thanks for help! Piotr > > > >2017-10-31 22:59 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> The cache value comes from. Http header. It is easier to put in fake >> value then run the app >&

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

mac ? If that > MD5Checker is working on Windows machine if I switch download to Powershell > it should also work for dmg file. > > Piotr > > > 2017-10-31 20:10 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> You put in the md5 for that AIR SDK. What I do is make sure I can run >> M

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

e896 >of sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml file ? > >Piotr > >2017-10-31 18:57 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> I'm not quite sure what you are asking. To add newer AIR SDKs to the >>list >> of choices, add new entries in sdk-installer-config

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

has its own way to make releases, don't know how this fit >> with our releases, but I think you must to do something like "mvn >>prepare >> release" or something like that >> >> 2017-10-30 21:33 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : >> >> > Hi Piotr, >&

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

t;>: >>> > >>> > > Alex, >>> > > >>> > > Exactly. That's why probably my strange questions. I will figure >>>out >>> how >>> > > to do this and try to switch develop to 4.17 today. >>> > > >>>

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

ill create that branch, I believe I can make some >mistakes, even if there is not too much activity maybe someone is using >develop actively and we don't know about that. > >Thank you, >Piotr > > >2017-10-30 3:52 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> Hi Piotr, &g

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

s to 4.17 >in code? > >That was my concerns. >Piotr > >On Fri, Oct 27, 2017, 18:03 Carlos Rovira >wrote: > >> If there's some delta, better to make a 4.16.1 instead a 4.17 >> >> Thanks >> >> Carlos >> >> >> >> 2017-10-27

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

t;I prefer create branch, but question if I do this on this branch I should >make the changes to 4.17 or we are testing still 4.16 by this branch ? > >Om, > >Yes it would be awesome if you could help with tests! > >I will probably start from the installer. > >Thanks, Piotr &

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

IMO, there is so little activity on the develop branch that a release branch is not required. Good luck, -Alex On 10/26/17, 11:08 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >+1 please go ahead. I can help testing. > >I think the process for the Installer release are a bit

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-utilities_installer #1321

That step should launch and AIR app that runs some tests. Did the AIR app launch? If the AIR app launches, the next step is to debug why a test in the AIR app failed. Good luck, -Alex On 10/25/17, 11:09 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >This is the example of Ant on Air build failed [1] > >[1] >ht

Re: git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - Fix path to ant flexTasks.jar

ut that work ? > >Thanks, Piotr > > >2017-10-24 17:22 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> It is failing because MD5Checker and many other utilities expect to be >> built against a repo/working-copy instead of an IDE-compatible Flex SDK. >> Unfortunately, flexTasks is plac

Re: git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - Fix path to ant flexTasks.jar

It is failing because MD5Checker and many other utilities expect to be built against a repo/working-copy instead of an IDE-compatible Flex SDK. Unfortunately, flexTasks is placed in a different place in the repo build vs an IDE-compatible SDK. I guess it should be possible to test for which flexTa

[FLEXJS][ROYALE] Github Issues replacing Apache JIRA

Hi, It looks like GitHub Issues has been enabled on the new Royale repos. The Royale folks will no longer be watching Apache JIRA for issues related to FlexJS and Royale. Existing FlexJS JIRA issues will not be automatically migrated to GitHub Issues. If you have an open FlexJS issue in Apache

[FLEXJS][ROYALE] Royale Mailing Lists

Hi, Looks like the Royale mailing lists are up and being archived by Apache and Nabble. Please subscribe to the d...@royale.apache.org by sending an email to dev-subscr...@royale.apache.org This link might work: mailto:dev-subscr...@royale.apache.org You will receive an email from the mailing

Re: OSMF download fails when running 'ant'

That is a problem, but for Royale, we should stop requiring the flex-sdk repo and just use Apache Flex release bits. My 2 cents, -Alex On 9/28/17, 5:53 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >When I got to sourceforge directly, I see the download link as: > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?u

Re: [FLEXJS] New Royale Repos available

cess-token-for-the-c ommand-line/ On 9/27/17, 9:16 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Hi Folks, > >Looks like the new Royale repos have been created, so I think we need to >switch over to those repos and not make more commits to flex-asjs, >flex-typedefs, and flex-falcon. > >Thanks, >-Alex >

Re: [FLEXJS] New Royale Repos available

The mailing lists appear to be set up, but we may want to get Nabble hooked up to them before moving lots of conversations over there. -Alex On 9/27/17, 9:28 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >How about the mailing lists? > >EdB > > > >On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:16

[FLEXJS] New Royale Repos available

Hi Folks, Looks like the new Royale repos have been created, so I think we need to switch over to those repos and not make more commits to flex-asjs, flex-typedefs, and flex-falcon. Thanks, -Alex

Re: [07/13] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/release0.8.0] - give up on trying to use FlexBox for full-screen 3-pane views. FlexBox seems more happy stretching to content size instead of clipping a

s of errors. It’s >really tedious and hard to find all of them. Basically, unless you’re >really good an find/replace, your app is almost guaranteed to blow up on >some of these and then you need to find the needle in the haystack to fix >it. > >Harbs > >> On Sep 27, 20

Re: [07/13] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/release0.8.0] - give up on trying to use FlexBox for full-screen 3-pane views. FlexBox seems more happy stretching to content size instead of clipping a

m missing the json files and I’m not sure how to >generate them. > >Looks like some binding problem probably due to renaming. The json files >appear to be loading correctly from the web. > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:41 PM, Alex Harui >>wrote: >> >> Feel free to

Re: [07/13] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/release0.8.0] - give up on trying to use FlexBox for full-screen 3-pane views. FlexBox seems more happy stretching to content size instead of clipping a

36420550126149199&sdata=%2BTvYxjGSPD%2FJidjhxawDsc >N4YnE1vPWE%2BarU5wgrolk%3D&reserved=0> > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:02 PM, Alex Harui >>wrote: >> >> Or are you saying ASDoc isn't working for you on some browser? >

Re: [07/13] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/release0.8.0] - give up on trying to use FlexBox for full-screen 3-pane views. FlexBox seems more happy stretching to content size instead of clipping a

>I’d like to use the flexbox layouts and AFAICT, they need browser >sniffing to work across the board. Ideally, the browser sniffing should >be included in the layout itself, but I was not sure the best way to do >that… > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:02 PM, Alex Harui >>wro

Re: [07/13] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/release0.8.0] - give up on trying to use FlexBox for full-screen 3-pane views. FlexBox seems more happy stretching to content size instead of clipping a

o 100%. > >I’m not sure how to generalize this code… > >I have it in three places in my app to make it behave correctly. > >I’ve been meaning to bring up this issue on the dev@ list. Sorry I didn’t >do it sooner… ;-) > >Harbs > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Ale

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

JS version is working again. You'll see that it isn't very pretty. Volunteers are welcome to make it look better. Thanks, -Alex On 9/26/17, 12:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I just fixed the SWF version. Working on the JS version now. > >-Alex > >On 9/26/17,

Re: [07/13] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/release0.8.0] - give up on trying to use FlexBox for full-screen 3-pane views. FlexBox seems more happy stretching to content size instead of clipping a

o "Flex" and "FlexJS" will not be confused with FlexBox and the flex-xxx attributes. -Alex On 7/31/17, 12:57 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >The only example I found was the ASDoc app. > >I switched it and it appears to work. (I pushed my changes.) > >> On

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I just fixed the SWF version. Working on the JS version now. -Alex On 9/26/17, 6:55 AM, "yishayw" wrote: >The address is ok but tags.json isn't found... > > > > > >-- >Sent from: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >x-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >