Re: [Discuss] Pros and Cons of Using Royale to Build Websites

2017-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
Harbs has to request the repos and mailing lists, and then Infra will hookup GitPubSub and we'll be able to set up royale.apache.org. And when we do, I suggest that we stick in some static pages just for now. I can do it, but will look ugly if I do, so best if someone else can do it. But over ti

Re: FlexJS element setter

2017-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
You aren't the only one, but why did you do it? Is there some subclass of UIBase missing from the component set? ScratchPad? Spacer? On 9/26/17, 10:53 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I’ve used it. > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:41 PM, Alex Harui >>wrote: >> >>

Re: FlexJS element setter

2017-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
quot; wrote: >Huh? Why would the subclass call super.createElement() and assume the >element will not be created? > >FWIW, super.createElement() is barely called, and when it is (from all >the cases I’ve found so far in the whole Basic and MDL), it’s expecting >the default div element

Re: FlexJS element setter

2017-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
called if the element is already created? None >of the subclasses have this null check. > >if (element == null) >element = document.createElement('div') as WrappedHTMLElement; > >Do you think it’s safe to remove the check? > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:42 PM

Re: FlexJS element setter

2017-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
I believe there are components where more than one HTMLElement is created but only one is (and can be) assigned as "element" but all have flexjs_wrapper assigned to the wrapping IUIBase. If in fact no components need a separate positioner, it is fine to remove it. But if we keep it, even as a get

Re: Royale Logo

2017-09-25 Thread Alex Harui
On 9/25/17, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > or >that trick where a line or curve in the artwork is actually composed of >small type, and things like that. FWIW, Here's an example of what I meant above: https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-K5rWzpO9gsc/UAEzmL8Pv4I/AA

Re: Royale Logo

2017-09-25 Thread Alex Harui
ve >it out. > >Justin’s “feather in the hat” idea is an interesting play on things. I’m >not sure if there’s an elegant way to incorporate that. > >I like logos to be as simple as possible. > >Of the examples so far, I like the overlapping lines in the last one. > >I d

Re: Royale Logo

2017-09-24 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Dave, Is having "Apache" in the logo a requirement? I'm not convinced every other Apache project is doing that (or incorporating the feather either). We do need the "TM" in the logo though. Thanks, -Alex On 9/24/17, 2:35 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: >It's pretty cool. I like the path overlays

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-23 Thread Alex Harui
sues. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> >>> >>> Harbs >>> >>>> On Sep 24, 2017, at 8:57 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Let's just use Github Issues, please.

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-23 Thread Alex Harui
a pain that I needed to active 2FA. Oh well… > >I got setup as well. > >Harbs > >> On Sep 22, 2017, at 12:19 AM, Alex Harui >>wrote: >> >> Yes, I had just set up 2FA in GH and also just joined the ASF org. I >>went >> and did both before going to

Re: Royale website and domain registration

2017-09-23 Thread Alex Harui
costs. >> >> If the domain needs to move to somewhere else, I'll remove the locks and >> provide the code, or take care of the move myself. >> >> If needed, I can give other folks karma to manage the domain, but that >> would have to be on a person to perso

Re: Royale website and domain registration

2017-09-22 Thread Alex Harui
ntly there have been problems like that for other projects. Thoughts? -Alex On 9/22/17, 3:04 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I will verify with Trademarks@. At the worst it will have to redirect to >royale.apache.org, so I don't think you have to wait. It would be nice to >have tha

Re: Royale website and domain registration

2017-09-22 Thread Alex Harui
p 22, 2017 2:22 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > >How about I grab 'royalesdk.org' and we take it from there? > >EdB > > >+1 > > > > >On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Alex Harui >wrote: > >> Hi Carlos, >> >> I agree t

Re: Royale website and domain registration

2017-09-22 Thread Alex Harui
ks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdomains. >>google.com%2Fregistrar%3Fs%3Droyalsdk%26hl%3Den&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0702061 >>75b3e4fda913f08d501dec329%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 >>6416978626290869&sdata=ZQF2DIgIJyrixp4i2u5k%2F3ynhGB1JQHd753Wwa0Hy8s%3D&

Re: Royale website and domain registration

2017-09-22 Thread Alex Harui
AIUI, royale.io is owned by a squatter and the price STARTS at $199. I haven't tried to buy a domain from a squatter, but I wouldn't be surprised if the price suddenly goes up. And then beyond that, I think you may have to still pay some other place to register the domain. Yes, royale.as can be

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
rakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Alex Harui >wrote: > >> Thanks Om for that info. It doesn't seem to be working for me. I >>entered >> auth for Apache and Github, but the MFA status is blank. What did you >>get? >&g

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
gL%2FwS0p0ihe6hJq%2FgugJR7pErUZD0%2B7hsNc%3D&reserved=0 > >Thanks, >Om > >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Alex Harui >wrote: > >> Thanks Dave for the info. Especially about the ids. >> >> I've created an Infra ticket for Gi

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
Git box from Infra as it is in a limited case by case >basis since it is still new. > >Regards, >Dave > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Alex Harui >>wrote: >> >> OK, I have asked for >> royale-asjs >> royale-tourj

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
i > >wrote: > >> Om, >> >> Github pages and wiki can coexist and even should in that case. We are >> putting our info into file.md - That file can be displayed on Wiki and >>As >> Gh pages. >> >> Piotr >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
>Thanks, >Om > >On Sep 21, 2017 9:10 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote: > >> 1) royale-asjs just so we can expand later if needed. I like >> royale-compiler. >> 2) Let's get off of SVN! >> ‹peter >> >> On 9/21/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui&qu

Welcome Tom Chiverton as new Apache Flex PMC Chair

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Folks, At yesterday's board meeting, the Apache Software Foundation Board of Directors approved Tom Chiverton as the new PMC Chair for Apache Flex. Tom's new title is VP Apache Flex. Tom is taking over for me. I think it may be a few more days before the transition is complete. The board sec

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
their response. > >Thank you! > >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017, 11:17 Alex Harui wrote: > >> In the sub task I asked if we "must" use JIRA or can use GH Issues. >> >> Thanks, >> -Alex >> >> On 9/21/17, 2:14 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >>

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
oyale? >> > >> >> > >> thanks >> > >> >> > >> El 21 de septiembre de 2017, 11:46, Carlos Rovira < >> > >> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> escribió: >> > >> >> > >> > Congrats to all for getting this step

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
, 11:12 Piotr Zarzycki >wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> Maybe we should have discussion whether we need Jira for new project? >> Maybe we should use Github only? >> >> Piotr >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017, 11:09 Alex Harui wrote: >> >>> T

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
In the sub task I asked if we "must" use JIRA or can use GH Issues. Thanks, -Alex On 9/21/17, 2:14 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> >> Maybe we should have discussion whether we need Jira for new project? >> Maybe we should use Github only? >> > >That sound like a plan. KISS [1] all the way ;-) >

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
Piotr > >2017-09-21 10:08 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I am pleased to announce that the ASF Board approved moving FlexJS >> resources from Apache Flex to a new project called Apache Royale. Harbs >> will be the VP Apache Royale. >> >>

Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Folks, I am pleased to announce that the ASF Board approved moving FlexJS resources from Apache Flex to a new project called Apache Royale. Harbs will be the VP Apache Royale. There are a series of steps to get a new project up and running. Some are described here [1], although we won't have

Re: [DISCUSS] Building the brand for Royale

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
gt;Git >> it can be there and then we can refer to it from the official ask site >> and/or merge the two under standard ASF CMS. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> > On Sep 20, 2017, at 1:36 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >> >> wrote: >> > >&

Re: [DISCUSS] Building the brand for Royale

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
nce >companies, so there's no much interest for me in that regard or at least I >can see a logic relation since we don't sell "flex services" anymore. > >2017-09-20 19:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> True, that's a lot of rules. Part of that is because

Re: [DISCUSS] Building the brand for Royale

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
True, that's a lot of rules. Part of that is because we owe our hosts (the ASF) some "props". But that may be why it is easier for us to approve Carlos to do what we wants outside the project. It will free him most of these rules. AIUI, the only rules would then be: 1) make sure Apache is menti

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
rote: >Alex, > >You are right! I just checked in the email chain and I see Tom's vote, but >he did mistake and send it only to me!! > >Vote was as we see in the summary. > >Piotr > >On Wed, Sep 20, 2017, 19:02 Alex Harui wrote: > >> Thanks Dave for pos

Re: [DISCUSS] Building the brand for Royale

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
tive. Again I'll be waiting for board >approval to start working. I'm assuming here that you guys trust me to >make >this website and branding work, of course. > >So maybe we could make a thread to select from Royale.io and Royale.as, >and >of course if price for .io

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
Thanks Dave for posting the summary. I cannot find record of Tom's vote in my email or on lists.a.o. It is bugging me because that means I wasn't sending out the right totals yesterday. And we should record here where to find his vote in the archives. What day did he send it? Thanks, -Alex

Re: [DISCUSS] Building the brand for Royale

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Carlos, We can go grab some royale. domains. Apache will have some rules about what can go on them. At the worst it will have to be a straight redirect to royale.apache.org, but I think we might be able to have at least a landing page. I think the goal is that Apache wants strong association

Re: FlexJS Customer feedback

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Harbs, Yishay, Congratulation on your migration! I agree, everyone who has contributed to our PAYG philosophy and use of Beads deserves credit. It may not be fair to say that all performance gains are due to the coding patterns we've used. The JS runtimes in the browsers have gotten much fas

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
t;> > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Piotr >> > >> > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : >> > >> >> Justin voted. >> >> >> >> Now we have Royale

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
>I'm not sure if voting is only from PMC members. > >Anyway, Royale is awesome name. Simple, yet rich and powerful just like >Flex. > >On 20 Sep 2017 8:42 am, "Alex Harui" wrote: > >> Royale >> Beads >> Braid >> >> >> On 9/1

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
Royale Beads Braid On 9/17/17, 12:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi, > >In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS >project. > >LIST: > >Royale >Boja >Strand >Bead >Limber >Boinga >Braid >Arise > >HOW DO WE VOTE: >1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them f

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Piotr changed his vote. > >It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13. >Arise is now third at 9 points. Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8. > >Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
;> > >> the >> > >>>> product to anyone who does not already use it. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> *bodja, booya, boha. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < &g

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
aren't concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks. -Alex On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Dave changed his abstention to a vote. > >That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each. Beads now

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
to how I pronounce it. :) >> >>> >> >>> Piotr >> >>> >> >>> 2017-09-19 19:31 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala >>: >> >>> >> >>>> Boja is one name I really dislike. Sorry Piotr😕 >> >>>> >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
otr😕 >>>>> >>>>> Also I dont know how to pronounce it. Is it Bo-ha, or boo-ha or >>>>>bo-ja, >>>> etc? >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 19, 2017 10:09 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>>>> >>>>> wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
Dave changed his abstention to a vote. That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each. Beads now has 11. Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times. -Alex On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Erik changed his vo

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
Renaming subject for those of us who don't use Gmail. On 9/19/17, 10:40 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >I'm changing my vote to: > >1) Limb(e)r >2) Bead(s) >3) Braid > >Sorry for any confusion. > >EdB > > > >On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 P

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail. I >changed it again. > >You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can >move Bend enough to make a difference. You could actual

[DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
re >> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. >> >> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can >>break >> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes, >>right?) >> >> EdB >> >> >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
What a dilemma! I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I wanted to see what the trend was first. If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third, Royale has the lead at 12 points, but barely: Bead, Boja and Limber have 10. Boja has been mentioned more tha

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
We don't have time for another vote thread. We need to close down the vote tonight or early tomorrow morning. So, if you are ok with Limber (still not clear it will win, please state objections to using Limbyr as the spelling. It is true a unique spelling stand out from search results, but first

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
; > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Harbs >> > > > > >> > > > > > On Sep 17, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Piotr Zarzycki < >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > > > > wrote: >> >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-asjs #2567

2017-09-18 Thread Alex Harui
I spent a couple of hours yesterday trying to get it the build to pass. I upgraded FireFox and saw checkintests pass from the command line but the full build still failed. I will look into it some more. -Alex On 9/18/17, 1:03 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: >It fails on propertyName="text" value="

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-16 Thread Alex Harui
01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wiktio >nary.org%2Fwiki%2Fboja&data=02%7C01%7C%7C474ae1cddaf34f798d2408d4fd90895d% >7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636412244619792854&sdata=cr6x >p272SB%2FCmqxvbx%2FXEHnVx03AlQpIzlAA4tUQAaw%3D&reserved=0 > > >On 9/16/17, 10:38 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-16 Thread Alex Harui
exact match but didn't check all. https://github.com/mudroljub/bojanka is "Simple JavaScript application for drawing in HTML5 canvas" -Alex [1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/boja On 9/16/17, 10:38 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > >> On Sep 17, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Alex Harui

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-16 Thread Alex Harui
A quick "suitable name search" on some other candidates: Braid: 260 repos match with Braid on Github. There is a project call BraidApps. Could pose some confusion since we produce apps. Strand: 697 repos match Strand on Github. First match was https://github.com/MediaMath/strand. It is a "c

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-16 Thread Alex Harui
nts, option 2 for 2 and >> option >>> 3 for 1. >>> >>> We could then tally up the points for the winners. >>> >>> At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call >>> another vote to decide between the two with the

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

2017-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
Abstain. Gonna go with the flow... On 9/15/17, 4:22 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: >Alex -you have not voted. Please vote folks. > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Is this a No Binging VOTE? >> >>

Re: [FLEXJS][Marketing] why should a web dev choose FlexJS?

2017-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
I think Piotr started this same thread on users@. You can follow it here [1]. Some interesting thoughts today. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/23de478726b584a9930e14819989cbc66247aa 634bd44ba5b21b46f9@%3Cusers.flex.apache.org%3E -Alex On 9/15/17, 7:23 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com o

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

2017-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Rui, Are you not allowed to consider 'beta' frameworks? That's an interesting data point. The supposed advantage of working with open source at Apache is that you can directly influence the development of the code including stabilizing the parts you need. Thanks, -Alex On 9/15/17, 6:06 AM, "

Re: Renaming Work (Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork)

2017-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
and suchlike fall into the documentation task? >That is a task I have done several times with software companies and would >be glad to help out with, given that it does not require much code >expertise to make sure the sentences are coherent and refer to the current >product name. >

Renaming Work (Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork)

2017-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
In this thread, let's see if we can list out what needs to be done to rename the code. I think for the ActionScript code, the steps are: 1) go through each folder in framework/projects and do: git mv src/main/flex src/main/royale git mv src/main/flex/org/apache/flex src/main/flex/org/apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we might need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second candidate? I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name. If anyone wants to pus

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Carlos, I agree with Piotr. Retaining your ActionScript business logic instead of the risk of porting it to a less structured language is one of the original premises behind FlexJS. I could be wrong, but I think all of the emails I've answered about FlexJS in the past months are from people l

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-15 Thread Alex Harui
It is funny, but actually, as we we've been thinking about adding suffixes for target runtimes like Bend -> BendJS, it did occur to me that we would have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target called "Dover". My 2 cents, -Alex On 9/15/17, 2:59 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-14 Thread Alex Harui
quot;Harbs" wrote: >So same product but marketed with two different names? > >Kind of odd, but an interesting approach. It might have merit. > >I’d like to sit on this idea. I’m not yet sure how I feel about it. > >Harbs > >> On Sep 15, 2017, at 3:04 AM, Alex Harui

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-14 Thread Alex Harui
I agree that for getting new users who don't already know about Flex, that having a name without Flex in it would be best. But I think Justin Hill is saying, and I share his concern, that folks who are sitting on a Flex app and thinking about migrating might be more attracted to a product named Fl

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-14 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Justin, Great to hear from you on this. Do you think it would be a problem if the project name != product name? That we call the project Royale for example and ship a product called FlexJS? Thanks, -Alex On 9/14/17, 1:07 PM, "Justin M. Hill" wrote: > >Hi everyone, > >I am not someone with

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-14 Thread Alex Harui
I just heard back from Adobe Branding. They confirmed they do not own a trademark for Royale and they don't care if we use it. Thanks, -Alex On 9/14/17, 9:47 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Even that is hard to explain on email. I think "Royal" has more emphasis >on

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

2017-09-14 Thread Alex Harui
Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name? I don't want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name. Thanks, -Alex On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote: >No (binding) > >On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > >>VOTE Should the Project Name of the Propos

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-14 Thread Alex Harui
Even that is hard to explain on email. I think "Royal" has more emphasis on the first syllable "ROY-el" and "Royale" is a bit more like "ro-YELL". Dictionary.com: Royale [roi-AL] Royal [[ROI-uh l] http://www.dictionary.com/browse/royale?s=t Click on the pronunciation button.

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-14 Thread Alex Harui
Here's my last thought of the day: -Use Royale for the project name -Use FlexJS for the product name -Call the new JS-only packaging I'm working on "Royale". Thoughts? -Alex On 9/14/17, 2:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >I believe we need to have voting both for whether we should change, and >l

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-13 Thread Alex Harui
Here are the guts of what would I would put in a PODLINGNAMESEARCH for Royale. I don't see anything blocking, but I don't know if there is an issue with using former Macromedia project code names. It doesn't appear that Macromedia registered it. Interestingly the first definition for "Royale" is

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-13 Thread Alex Harui
I think the momentum is shifting and the vote will be about some other name. -Alex On 9/13/17, 2:46 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: >When we start the VOTE I suggest the following ballot: > >VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? > >[ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache F

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-13 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Dave, I prefer not to rush a vote for FlexJS because I feel like Carlos and Om are starting to change some minds. AFAICT, everyone who was in favor of FlexJS as the name was mainly concerned about how migrating Flex customers will find that we have something that can help them. And the answer

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-13 Thread Alex Harui
t;If anything, a new name would bring a fresh perspective on this wonderful >technology. > >I volunteer to help out with the branding as much as I can. > >Thanks, >Om > > > >From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 6:

Re: home.apache.org

2017-09-13 Thread Alex Harui
Should just be: sftp home.apache.org Hope you remember your passphrase. -Alex On 9/13/17, 9:16 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote: >Hi, > >Does anyone have the instructions on how to set up access to your >home.apache.org space? I've looked on the apache.org site and all I can >find are instructions abou

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

2017-09-13 Thread Alex Harui
OK, good to know it works for other people. I've been trying to adjust the build scripts to create this package automatically. The current problem I'm wrestling with is in the Flash Builder launch configs. The launch configs are used by Flash Builder to update a new Flex project with a valid Fle

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-13 Thread Alex Harui
Actually, my question was whether the PROJECT name is more or less important than the PRODUCT name. Mostly, the board/infra doesn't want us to change the PROJECT name. Infra replied that we can create PRODUCTs with names that do not match the PROJECT name. So, could we live with the PROJECT bein

Re: [FLEX JS] How to import mx.managers.PopUpManager?

2017-09-12 Thread Alex Harui
FWIW, the reason there is no PopUpManager in FlexJS is only because nobody has needed it yet. The mx.managers.PopUpManager and related classes is a pretty sophisticated subsystem that allows multiple "top-level" overlapping windows. All of that code is only truly needed if you have more than one

Re: [FlexJS, AMF] Steps to make FlexJS / Java - RemoteObject / AMF sample work

2017-09-12 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Prashant, Are you testing with the example code or your own app. I see MainView in the stack trace and there isn't one in the example. If you have your own code, make sure ClassAliasBead is a bead on the Application and not the View. Thanks, -Alex On 9/12/17, 3:59 AM, "PKumar" wrote: >I d

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
I would like some thoughts on a related question, but first some context: IMO, it would help to continue to develop and ship a product called Apache FlexJS right now to draw in migrating Flex folks. And maybe some day, we'll ship a product that is more targeted to folks writing new JS apps and ma

Re: [FlexJS, AMF] Steps to make FlexJS / Java - RemoteObject / AMF sample work

2017-09-10 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Prashant. It feels like you are somehow using an older version of the compiler. How are you building the app? Is your server on localhost:8080? Thanks, -Alex On 9/10/17, 8:13 AM, "PKumar" wrote: >If i am using "ClassAliasBead" then i am getting following error on >browser >console. Please

Re: [FlexJS, AMF] Steps to make FlexJS / Java - RemoteObject / AMF sample work

2017-09-09 Thread Alex Harui
Did any output show up in the server console? Is some other server running on localhost:8080? Get Outlook for Android From: PKumar Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2017 8:43:40 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [FlexJS, AMF] Steps to ma

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

2017-09-09 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Prashant Try removing that line from flex-config. You probably don't need it for this test. Get Outlook for Android From: PKumar Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2017 8:47:39 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Fut

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Logistics (was: Future packaging of FlexJS releases)

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
>> > >> > 2017-09-07 18:43 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : >> > >> > > This is a big big deal. Thanks for getting this done. >> > > >> > > I would be very interested in the non-installer, simple zip file >> > download. >> >

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Adam, Thanks for your input. Many of us want to make sure SWF output is viable for several reasons 3 of which quickly come to mind: 1) There is a runtime verifier in the Flash Player. When you run your code in Flash/AIR it is literally running 1000's of tests that the browser doesn't run and

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
Small test cases would be helpful in determining solutions. Thanks, -Alex On 9/7/17, 3:15 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >It only worked up to a point. I ran into many cases where the old >compiler blew up on these issues. I spent about a month with Alex on >these issues. They were very difficult to resolv

Re: Trouble with typedefs

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
How did you create the SWC? I think typedefs JS files have to be an externs folder not in js/out. If the typedefs source is AS then make sure @externs is in the ASDoc for the class. HTH, -Alex On 9/7/17, 4:31 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I have an issue with some typedefs and I can’t figure out why a

Re: [FLEXJS] Modules

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
ast, but I suppose that in the >end we would need to clean those duplicates in order to have a more >"production" feature > >Thanks! > > > >2017-09-07 9:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> Hi Carlos, >> >> Peter's work ended up being

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
quick and dirty bullet list?) > >Mike > >On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Alex Harui >wrote: > >> Here's a zip: >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fhome.apache >>.org%2F~aharui%2FFlexJS%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacaad6d80da64f721

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
ppirala : >> >> > This is a big big deal. Thanks for getting this done. >> > >> > I would be very interested in the non-installer, simple zip file >> download. >> > >> > I dont care much for Ant as a requirement, I would rather continue >> &

Re: [FLEXJS] Modules

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
example and seeing how it performs and give some >> feedback. I think it could work for me at least, but I suppose that in >>the >> end we would need to clean those duplicates in order to have a more >> "production" feature >> >> Thanks! >> >>

[FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
Hi folks, Yesterday, I was able to manually create a folder of files that contained no Adobe AIR or Adobe Flash files and still was an acceptable Flex/FlexJS SDK for Adobe Flash Builder and allowed me to compile DataBindingExample for JSFlex output only (it did not build a SWF). This is interesti

Re: [FLEXJS] Modules

2017-09-07 Thread Alex Harui
our repo to check it and play with it? > >3.- About the draw backs you mention, there's some progress on it or do >you >think in left as is for the moment?, those problems of duplicated js files >should be a problem, or only something to clean in some way in the future? > >T

Re: [FlexJS, AMF] Steps to make FlexJS / Java - RemoteObject / AMF sample work

2017-09-06 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Carlos, If you can do the merge, that would be great! And thanks for adding the additional test. Thanks, -Alex On 9/6/17, 6:56 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Carlos, > >+1 for merging this into develop if it is working for you. I see that >Prashant is pretty interested in it, let's make e

Re: FlexJS installation - Installer vs. npm

2017-09-05 Thread Alex Harui
Om, That error implies that js.swc or playerglobal.swc/airglobal.swc isn't being found. See if NPM install is putting them in the right place. Then, those SWCs have to be referenced by whatever -config.xml file in being used, and there are sensitivities in 0.8.0 with dual mode about whether you

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-05 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Carlos, Try switching flex-falcon to the develop branch. I think the RemoteClass handling is in the develop branch and not feature/amf. -Alex On 9/5/17, 10:56 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >thanks, I know start to remember. That two scaffold pr

[RESULT][VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-05 Thread Alex Harui
Results are: +1 - 16 +0 - 1 -1 - 2 I will post our proposal on board@ for their feedback and possible inclusion on the September board meeting agenda. Thanks, -Alex On 8/31/17, 11:28 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Hi folks, > >Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-05 Thread Alex Harui
+1 from me. On 8/31/17, 11:28 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Hi folks, > >Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal >below to the board. Please use +1 for yes, -1 for no, and if you want, >any number in-between per [1]. Only PMC member votes w

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-09-05 Thread Alex Harui
Again, please try to find small test cases that reproduce these bugs. As Harbs showed, details matter. The fact that you were trying to initialize a static variable with a function might matter in these cases. Thanks, -Alex On 9/5/17, 3:20 AM, "lizhi" wrote: >But I feel the spriteflexjs libra

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-09-04 Thread Alex Harui
Are your actual code are you using both in the same file and fully qualifying the call to flash.utils.SetTimeout? Maybe you need more than one file in the test. -Alex On 9/4/17, 7:10 PM, "lizhi" wrote: >no error > >package >{ > import flash.utils.setTimeout; > public class TestBug

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >